-----Original Message----- From: Boost-users [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of John Phillips Sent: 23 May 2016 04:06 To: boost-users@lists.boost.org Cc: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Rebooting Boost: Call for Lightning Talks @ CppCon
On 05/22/2016 07:18 AM, Niall Douglas wrote:
At C++ Now a number of informal meetings showed there to be frustrations with the current ecosystem around the Boost C++ Libraries (to paraphrase a founder of Boost, "Boost is supposed to serve *the entire C++ community; it isn't Boost's goal to serve Boost's community*".
... <snip> ...
I have been a (minor, but long running) contributor to Boost for quite a while, and while I don't have the time to comment individually on all the various discussions happening on different ways to evolve Boost, I do want to make one general comment.
I agree that Boost should serve the entire C++ community. In fact, I would like to see all capable members of the C++ community find ways to serve the community. However, my experience in the last nearly 20 years of service to that community is that almost no two people agree on what is and is not a service to the community. I have, in that time, found no value in arguing with people that my idea of service is better than theirs.
As such, I root for all attempts at service to succeed. To find at least some segment of the community for which that service honestly improves the language and the quality of code being produced in the language.
So, if you want to serve by trying something new and different - I wish you well. If you want to serve by doing something tried and true, I again have nothing but respect for your desire to serve, and hope for you to succeed. If you want to try to work within existing projects to try and tweek them toward some direction you find more likely to succeed, once again you have my support for your desire to make a difference.
I will make my own choices of what to lead or follow, based on my own (admitedly limited) understanding of the needs of the community, and of my own skills and interests. I expect all others to do the same. I will only object if I feel people are somehow being forced to work against their desires and understanding.
I see no reason for strained tempers and acrimony in any part of this.
Agreed. Paul PS I agree with the original and current strategy of Gradual Evolution, and do not believe that a Big Bang C++XX only is a better idea. If anything, a much better language without the disastrous baggage of C, would be a much better Bold Adventure for those who feel an urge for the new. --- Paul A. Bristow Prizet Farmhouse Kendal UK LA8 8AB +44 (0) 1539 561830