At Wed, 25 Aug 2010 22:48:57 -0700, Ryan McConnehey wrote:
I'm new to the parameter library and started with a simple example to get my feet wet. The first problem I'm having is with type restriction. The "name" variable is being restricted to a boolean type. This doesn't seem to be enforced since I can pass this variable a value of 15 and get this same value out. Currently my output has "name = 15" and I expected the output to be "name = 1". Did I not correctly enforce the type?
Looks like a bug to me. Daniel?
The second problem is with the default value of my variable. I thought if the variable wasn't used then the third parameter, in the declaration, is used for instantiation of that variable. I thought that meant I could do this "m_name(args[_name])". The compiler gives an error saying the operator[] can't deduce the arguments. What did I not do that would allow this behavior.
Ditto, looks like a bug. If we don't already have tests for these cases, we should.
Thank you for your time in helping me out.
Ryan
BOOST_PARAMETER_NAME(name)
struct myclass_impl { template <class ArgumentPack> myclass_impl(ArgumentPack const& args) : m_name(args[_name | false]) //: m_name(args[_name]) //gives a compile error { std::cout << "name = " << m_name << std::endl; }
private: int m_name; };
struct myclass : public myclass_impl { BOOST_PARAMETER_CONSTRUCTOR( myclass, (myclass_impl), tag , (optional (name, (bool), bool(false)))) // no semicolon };
int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { myclass x(_name = 15);
return 0; }
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com