10 Feb
2006
10 Feb
'06
4:35 p.m.
RIVASSEAU Jean Noel wrote:
I already pointed this out to Robert, the correct use is on the cpp file, not the documentation.
I am also using no RTTI, for me it works fine
Well, I'm quite gratified that it works well. I wrote the test but I never felt that was a complete test of the concept of using one's own custom type id system (extended_type_info_no_rtti in this case).
except that I have to do all sort of strange things to get the thing to link correctly without multiple definitions.
Hmmm - I wouldn't think that this type of problem is related to the extended_type_info system. You should track this down and find the real cause. You might take a look at demo pimpl which might (or not) shed some light on this. Robert Ramey