Re: [Boost-users] [Test] minimal test

"Robert Ramey" wrote in message news:e1pqm7$g16$1@sea.gmane.org...

Gennadiy Rozental wrote:

...

"Robert Ramey" wrote in message news:e1ndd8$ebp$1@sea.gmane.org...

...

I attempted to use the minimal verision of boost test. In order to do this I replaced occurencs of

#include with #include

Is there any particular reasons why you want to do this? My general recommendation: unless there is a reason stick with UTF.

My understanding is that UTF will no longer support all the platforms I want to run tests on. It seemed that the minimal testing environment would be sufficient for my purposes so I had hoped that it would support a wider variety of platforms.

UTF will work on all compilers boost runnig regresssion testing on. Do you want to run test for any other configurations?

...

...

This generates a few problems.

a) In the tests which use the serialization DLL, It seems that references are being made to symbols in the library. Here is the output from the link. I can't figure out why this is.

I don't think you could do this. My guess is that you define BOOST_DYN_LINK that will cause dynamic version of execution monitor sumbols to be compiled.

I do define BOOST_DYN_LINK. But I don't think that should trigger auto-linking from exec_monitor or utf library. I had a similar problem in

I don't think it has anything to do with autolinking. It just adds dllexport/dllimport grist to the function definition/declaration. Gennadiy