6 Mar
2003
6 Mar
'03
8:34 a.m.
Hi, [snip]
If the constructor also would accept a row I could use it as a parameter type for function calls when I want to express, that only 'data' types are expected and 'expressions' are not wanted. (Sorry for the sloppy formulation, I am not sure how to express this more concise.)
I hope, we'll be able to solve this, too.
I am not sure about your last statement. Do you mean a kind of 'vector_proxy' that can act as a placeholder to a row/column or another vector?
No, I basically meant, I hope that you'll find appropriate signatures for your functions. I still believe you'll either have to use 'expressions' or have to enumerate all overloads for your 'data' types (and that could be many ;-). Sorry for the confusion, Joerg