El 20/12/2010 19:41, Daniel Neuberger escribió:
Is there a reason for not finishing the implementation of XSI (System V) shared memory? It seems like most of the work is already done. If there is no reason not to, I might be able to finish the implementation so that it can be included in the next release.
XSI was supposed to be available to have a posix-like portable shared memory semantics for systems with only system v shared memory. However lack of time and portability issues froze the development. Maybe some class (xsi_shared_memory) is ready to be public, just like we have windows_shared_memory. It shouldn't be hard to implement managed_xsi_shared_memory. If there is interest in them I could add them and try posix emulation on top of XSI later. Best, Ion