Re: [Boost-users] Re: boost function ==

15 Dec 2004


      On Dec 15, 2004, at 12:47 PM, gast128 wrote:
...
Ok thank you. We use boost function also as a client defined callback. 
Because
there is no operator==, it is very hard to unregister. So we came up 
with a
solution probably comparable to the signals unregister solution.
Are you sure that the provided operator== doesn't work? The motivation 
for this formulation of operator== (other than the unimplementability 
of the general case) was that it solved Herb Sutter's "delegate" 
problem. For instance, you can write this:

template<typename Signature>
class delegate
{
   typedef boost::function<Signature> callback_type;
   std::list callbacks;

public:
   template<typename F> void register(const F& f) { 
callbacks.push_back(f); }

   template<typename F> void unregister(const F& f)
   {
     typename std::list::iterator pos =  
std::find(callbacks.begin(), callbacks.end(), f);
     if (pos != callbacks.end()) callbacks.erase(pos);
   }
};

	Doug

Re: [Boost-users] Re: boost function ==

Doug Gregor