24 Feb
2007
24 Feb
'07
5:15 p.m.
On Saturday 24 February 2007 11:59 am, Peter Dimov wrote:
Frank Mori Hess wrote:
I wasn't planning on dropping support for automatic tracking of signals, I don't see that dropping it would make things any less confusing for the user.
Automatic tracking is nice, but is it workable, if the goal is for the 'new' signals to become part of the C++ standard library one day? It requires cooperation from the function objects, and this is hard to achieve in practice.
Hmm, well I suppose it wouldn't be too bad if we just provided an overloaded version slot::track that accepted a signal as an argument. -- Frank