19 May
2008
19 May
'08
9:38 a.m.
Part of the reason this isn't in the library is that there's a number of safety issues when converting back to > time_t
Please, note that all the issues you mentioned are relevant to the to_tm() function as well (except it has 1900-based year, while time_t is 1970-based). _________________________________________________________________ News, entertainment and everything you care about at Live.com. Get it now! http://www.live.com/getstarted.aspx