Joel Falcou wrote:
Eric Niebler a écrit :
joel falcou wrote:
OK.
Last question. I changed my make_expr to use domain_of and it worked nice for the base case.
I'm confused. You *were* using domain_of and I told you not to. ??? No, I wasn't and you did ;)
Still confused. <snip>
Here is a small test case :
Hey, that codepad thing is pretty cool. OK, I see the following in your simd_context class: template<class This,class X> struct result<This(bp::tag::terminal,X)> { // NOTE! I added the following assertion: BOOST_MPL_ASSERT_NOT((boost::is_reference<X>)); typedef typename SimdDesc::type type; }; template<class This,class X> struct result<This(bp::tag::terminal,simd_value<X>)> { typedef typename X::type type; }; The MPL assertion I added fired, and the type of X was "const simd_value<simd_info<int,4>> &". You probably mean for terminals of that type to be handled by the following specialization, but its not because of the cv qualifier and the reference. -- Eric Niebler BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com