6 Nov
2009
6 Nov
'09
11:15 p.m.
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Robert Ramey
Emil Dotchevski wrote:
Either way, why does it matter if we're dealing with a pointer-to-const? It doesn't.
The error/warning or whatever for using a "const" is unrelated to this. It's being considered what it means to load a pointer to a const object and whether or not this should be trapped. This is the subject of a Track Item.
This is not a pointer to a const object. It is a const pointer to a mutable object. Emil Dotchevski Reverge Studios, Inc. http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode