On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:41:26 -0500, Doug Gregor
Very simple explanation here: my comments were about libsigc++ 1.2. I've glanced briefly at libstdc++ 2 and was pleasantly surprised. I'd like to look into it further, but do not have the time now. I've been saying for a while that the Signals interface is not ready for standardization because we only had the one implementation (in Boost) and that it was not solid enough for standardization. However, with libstdc++ 2 adopting a similar interface, we might be able to converge on a single, solid interface for Signals & Slots within the C++ Standard Library. Library Technical Report 2 is open for submissions, and signals & slots have been on the wish list since the beginning...
Do you mean "libsigc++ 2" for "libstdc++ 2"? -- Caleb Epstein caleb dot epstein at gmail dot com