On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 17:07:14 +0200, Mojmir Svoboda
[...]The first version used boost::iostreams and not very smart locking mechanism in mt environment (in terms of performance mainly), but served more as a verification 'it can be done and it is not that ugly as i thought' than a real library candidate. Now i'd like to focus on performance and code size, so I made a sketch of the next version. It is really small and is rather a model than anything usable, but before I start implementation, I'd like to know opinion of library writers and users - what do you think about the concept? is it worth continuing, or i'd better go doing something better? :)
there is another candidate of what might become an official Boost logging library one day: http://torjo.com/log2/doc/html/index.html You might want to check the logging requirements and also have a look at Windows Event Tracing and Event Logging for some more ideas (as ideally the logging library provides some support for whatever logging standard is used on a platform). Boris