6 Feb
2007
6 Feb
'07
6:33 p.m.
On 2/6/2007 7:31 AM, John Maddock wrote:
Is there any reason why you can't simplify your expression to just "^[^\\s]+( ([^\\s]+)*)?$" which does the same thing much more efficiently?
No reason at all. I have no idea why we didn't see that when were looking at this originally, unless it was just way too late in the afternoon that day. :-) Thanks, John (and Peter, who also suggested the same simplification), and sorry for the wasted bandwidth. Bob