I think you should look into xml_?archive to see how std::string is serialized and work from that. Robert Ramey Robert Bielik wrote:
Robert Ramey skrev:
Or maybe you >> operator isn't checking for the so it doesn't know when to stop.?
I'm definitely not looking for the in the >> operator. Is it guaranteed that the
In the case of the xml archive I'd rather have some other kind of operator that passes the value itself, not leaving the >> operator of each class to have to check for the
template<class char_type> void operator () (const char_type* start, const char_type* end) { }
I don't think making the item "primitive" is the way to go here.
which hides the archive implementation, and only passes on the correct value when loading the archive. For saving, the << operator is just fine.
/R