27 Nov
2010
27 Nov
'10
12:12 p.m.
On 27 Nov 2010, at 12:48, Cedric Laczny wrote:
Thank you very much for that information.
You're welcome. :)
This is not intended to be picky. I simply want to clarify this for me. Because AFAIK, using "external" classes or structs to represent properties of vertices or edges is the concept of bundled properties (just as you do in the examples). Using e.g. vertex_index_t or such (e.g. as defined in properties.hpp) follows the concept of internal properties?! Nevertheless, I agree with you absolutely that using structs or classes to represent the properties is far more flexible and increases the maintainability of the code.
Oh, I'm so sorry… I mis[understood/named] bundled for internals, and structs for bundled… My fault; we agree.