2down votefavoritehttp://stackoverflow.com/questions/13628685/boost-1-49-0-compilation-issue
I tried to compile this boost dependent class with VS2008 and VS2010 (error lines are in bold)
#include
#include
#include
#include
struct SafeShardQueue
{
typedef boost::interprocess::scoped_lockboost::interprocess::named_mutex scoped_mutex;
SafeShardQueue()//:
{
}
~SafeShardQueue()
{
remove();
}
void wait_msg()
{
scoped_mutex locker(*mu);
data_avail_condition->wait(locker);
}
void wait_space()
{
scoped_mutex locker(*mu);
queue_empty_condition->wait(locker);
}
boost::shared_ptrboost::interprocess::message_queue msgs;
boost::shared_ptrboost::interprocess::named_condition data_avail_condition;
boost::shared_ptrboost::interprocess::named_mutex mu;
boost::shared_ptrboost::interprocess::named_condition queue_empty_condition;
static SafeShardQueue* open()
{
SafeShardQueue* tmp = new SafeShardQueue();
boost::interprocess::open_only_t open_create_type;
tmp->msgs.reset(new boost::interprocess::message_queue (open_create_type, "message_queue"));
tmp->mu.reset(new boost::interprocess::named_mutex(open_create_type, "shared_queue_mutex"));
tmp->data_avail_condition .reset(new boost::interprocess::named_condition(open_create_type, "data_avail_condition"));
tmp->queue_empty_condition .reset(new boost::interprocess::named_condition(open_create_type, "queue_empty_condition"));
return tmp;
}
static SafeShardQueue* create()
{
remove();
SafeShardQueue* tmp = new SafeShardQueue();
boost::interprocess::create_only_t open_create_type;
std::stringstream ss;
try
{
tmp->msgs.reset(new boost::interprocess::message_queue(open_create_type, "message_queue", 256, 1024));
tmp->mu.reset(new boost::interprocess::named_mutex(open_create_type, "shared_queue_mutex"));
tmp->data_avail_condition .reset(new boost::interprocess::named_condition(open_create_type, "data_avail_condition"));
tmp->queue_empty_condition .reset(new boost::interprocess::named_condition(open_create_type, "queue_empty_condition"));
}
catch (const boost::interprocess::interprocess_exception& e)
{
ss << e.what();
}
return tmp;
}
static void remove()
{
boost::interprocess::message_queue::remove("message_queue");
boost::interprocess::named_mutex::remove("shared_queue_mutex");
boost::interprocess::named_condition::remove("data_avail_condition");
boost::interprocess::named_condition::remove("queue_empty_condition");
}
};
I got the following error message:
1>\boost\boost\interprocess\ipc\message_queue.hpp(254) : error C2039: 'priority_functor' : is not a member of 'boost::interprocess::ipcdetail::ipcdetail'
1>\boost\boost\interprocess\ipc\message_queue.hpp(425) : see reference to class template instantiation 'boost::interprocess::ipcdetail::mq_hdr_t<VoidPointer>' being compiled
1> with
1> [
1> VoidPointer=boost::interprocess::offset_ptr<void>
1> ]
1>\boost\boost\interprocess\ipc\message_queue.hpp(425) : while compiling class template member function 'unsigned int boost::interprocess::message_queue_t<VoidPointer>::get_mem_size(unsigned int,unsigned int)'
1> with
1> [
1> VoidPointer=boost::interprocess::offset_ptr<void>
1> ]
1>\boost\boost\interprocess\ipc\message_queue.hpp(465) : while compiling class template member function 'boost::interprocess::message_queue_t<VoidPointer>::message_queue_t(boost::interprocess::open_only_t,const char *)'
1> with
1> [
1> VoidPointer=boost::interprocess::offset_ptr<void>
1> ]
1>\**sharedqueue.h(42)** : see reference to class template instantiation 'boost::interprocess::message_queue_t<VoidPointer>' being compiled
1> with
1> [
1> VoidPointer=boost::interprocess::offset_ptr<void>
1> ]
1>\boost\boost\interprocess\ipc\message_queue.hpp(254) : error C2955: 'boost::interprocess::ipcdetail::priority_functor' : use of class template requires template argument list
1>\boost\boost\interprocess\ipc\message_queue.hpp(209) : see declaration of 'boost::interprocess::ipcdetail::priority_functor'
1>\boost\boost\interprocess\ipc\message_queue.hpp(254) : error C2143: syntax error : missing ',' before '<'
It seems that you cannot use both interprocess::message_queue and interprocess:named_condition in the same class.
Any ideas? I would greatly appreciate your help in this issue.
Best Regards,
Vladimir
The information in this e-mail transmission contains proprietary and business
sensitive information. Unauthorized interception of this e-mail may constitute
a violation of law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this
communication is strictly prohibited. You are also asked to contact the sender
by reply email and immediately destroy all copies of the original message.
