"William E. Kempf" wrote:
Alexander Terekhov said:
"William E. Kempf" wrote: [...]
means short blocks, even if artificial. Short code blocks combined with the need to carefully analyze synchronization leads to little chance of making the mistake you illustrate.
But explicit unlocking (also "RAII" based) sometimes IS "needed".
No one claimed otherwise.
Yeah. The intent was to show the usage if "release_guard"... and to give you just one more hint with respect to currently missing functionality (sync) in boost::~condition(). Well, it didn't seem to work. OK, <http://tinyurl.com/btdd> -- please read the message 5213... starting at <quote>We later "adjusted"...</quote>. Thank you. regards, alexander. -- Pro-"pthread_null/compare/hash" lobbying association.