15 Sep
2011
15 Sep
'11
7:36 a.m.
hi,
awesome. thanks. so will it be in the next release of boost?
Not likely as it depends on Boost.Atomic which has yet to be reviewed.
However, I believe the review found the interface to be mostly ok, though the class names may change, so if you can use outside code, it's probably safe to use Tim's library as-is.
the deadline for 1.48 has already passed, so my goal is to merge it for 1.49. iac, you can use the version from my git repository for the time, but make sure to use the addressing_reviews branch, which has some interface changes that have been suggested during the review. cheers, tim