17 Nov
2011
17 Nov
'11
5:31 a.m.
Richard
Boost.Test already support three "symbols":
BOOST_REQUIRE_* BOOST_CHECK_* BOOST_WARN_*
What you're seems to be implying is that BOOST_WARN_* is a bad idea.
Not just BOOST_WARN_*, but also BOOST_CHECK_* since they keep executing a failed test case.
Why so radical view? This is TDD purist position and is not necessarily the only one.
If you keep executing a test case that's already failed, it is highly likely in C++ that the test runner will simply crash.
This is simply not true. Gennadiy