8 Jun
2013
8 Jun
'13
4:48 p.m.
Looks like I could have wrote: void add( std::shared<Bar> bar ) { m_work_queue.push( [this, bar]{ m_bars.emplace_back( bar ); m_content->bar_id_list.emplace_back( bar->id() ); // simplified }); } void rename( std::string new_name ) { m_work_queue.push( [this, new_name]{ m_info->name = new_name; // simplified }); } Which is even better. Now I have a question: Should the current (1.54.0 beta) version of synchronized_value work with multiple-readers-single-writer mutexes? Joel Lamotte