Re: [Boost-users] [assign] Default list_of() behavior

Ryan McConnehey skrev:

None of the examples, for list_of, show the use of the default list_of constructor. When I tried to use list_of() for a vector I expected a blank vector without any elements. What I found was a vector that had one element of the vector type. This element had a default value. Is this the correct behavior?

Yes, the upcomming revision will fix this somehow without breaking exisiting code. -Thorsten