Vladimir Prus skrev:
Boosters,
the formal review of the Boost.Log library, written by Andrey Semashev, will start in a week from now, on March 8, 2010 and will run through March 17, 2010.
The documentation for the current version is available at:
Hi Andrey, I looked at the documentation, and couldn't find any comparison with other libraries besides a small log4j comparison. Therefore I wonder if such a comparison has been made, and if so, how it guided the design decisions. In particular, I would like to see a quite detailed comparison with Pantheios: http://www.pantheios.org/ It would also be good if you could use this library as one to benchmark against. I would also like to know how your library differs from the one that was rejected by John Torjo, and how your library adresses the issue that was found with that library? Thanks for your work so far -Thorsten