25 Mar
2010
25 Mar
'10
5:30 p.m.
AMDG Robert Jones wrote:
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Steven Watanabe
wrote: Peter Dimov wrote:
No, but you should be able to use bind( &A::f, *_1 ) for that.
This should work unless A is an abstract type.
I don't understand this; if this passes by reference as Peter states in this thread, why can A not be an abstract type?
Because of a long standing bug in the return type deduction mechanism. In Christ, Steven Watanabe