AMDG On 04/07/2012 12:05 PM, Robert Ramey wrote:
That's interesting and useful. So I guess my problem is with the usage of the term "equivalent". I had interpreted this as "can be substituted for".
So I'm now thinking that my original concern is justified - that the document doesn't accurately convey what "less
" really is.
Yes. I agree that the documentation needs some work here.
This has always been confusing to me - and still is. I totally get what "less
::type" is supposed to mean but the meaning and intended usage of "less " is still lost on me.
Okay, I'll try to explain more clearly.
mpl::less