data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94d88/94d8842350773c87641d932686beeb60010c20e6" alt=""
16 May
2008
16 May
'08
7:37 p.m.
On 16 May 2008, at 18:50, Noah Roberts wrote:
Kevin Martin wrote:
Is encapsulating the sqlite pointer in an object and having the destructor do that not a better alternative?
Why would it be? What's gained?
A layer of abstraction between the library calls and your user code. Whether this is a gain or not depends on your opinion I suppose. Thanks, Kevin Martin