Re: [Boost-users] [asio] Why are the strands in the "HTTP Server 3" example necessary?

Jose writes:

Hi,

The strands are not required in the example but would be if the example was improved to include timeouts (which I recall Chris was planning to)

regards

That seems to be convenient. When there is more then one handler is active at a given time, the strand makes sense to me. So may be the example should be revamped eventually. Or it shouldn't be declared as a strand example, at least.