Re: [Boost-users] [function] equivalent of std::binary_function

On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 1:03 PM, alfC wrote:

Does Boost have the technology to define the equivalent of std::binary_function eg something like

 boost::nary_function

Note that I am not interested in storing any function pointer, so using

boost::function would be a waste.

But I want to use the nice syntax "" that boost::function uses, instead of "".

The objective is to inherit from this class

and instead of class op : std::binary_function{ ... }

to have class op: nary_function{  ... } if possible.

The Boost.Function_Types (Function_Traits?) library lets you handle syntax like double(double, double) easily.