Hello All....
On 25/11/05, Jeff Garland wrote:
-------------- original message snipped -----------------
Hi Johan -
Not sure if these warnings are normal or not -- it's entirely possible
they are because we can't see warnings in the regression system (I
normally don't test vc locally). The good news is that VC7.1 passes all
the date-time regressions so the library should work. I'll put it on
our todo list to try and track down these warnings...
Jeff
Jeff,
it might just be the way i'm using the boost classes that's causing
all the problems. the posix_time is a member of a class which is a
member of another class which is stored in a
vectorboost::shared_ptr. see below:
class mydata {
boost::posix_time::ptime m_timedata;
/// other members...
}
class myobject {
mydata m_data;
/// other members...
}
int main(void)
{
std::vectormyvector;
for(int i = 0; i < 30; ++i) {
boost::shared_ptr<myobject> p(new myobject());
myvector.push_back(p);
}
// use vector myvector
return 0;
}
consequently althought the compiler is complaining a lot about the
date_time lib it may come some other libs. i'm not sure. the programs
run fine but i'm concerned i may miss some of the more crucial
warnings as per project i get around 200++ warnings from the boost
libs and i have about 6 projects in the vc solution.
then again i might just be the vc71 compiler. all boost #includes need
to be at the top of the file or else the compiler with give up with
"Internal Compiler Error. Please call tech support...."
just to make myself happy i tried doing a test program in a seperate project
int main(void)
{
boost::posix_time::ptime
mytime(boost::posix_time::second_clock::local_time);
std::cout << mytime << std::endl;
return 0;
}
this compiled clean without any warnings at all.
all projects were compiled with warning level set to 4.
cheers again
A. Johan
