Re: [Boost-users] [type_traits] ice_or / ice_and not documented but recommended in coding guidelines

2013/10/10 Adam Romanek

Hi,

I have a concern about the usage of boost::type_traits::ice_or and boost::type_traits::ice_and. I've seen it used in many places and it's even recommented in Coding Guidelines for Integral Constant Expressions [1].

The question is: why isn't it documented? Is there any reason for it? Is there any "public" (documented) equivalent?

WBR, Adam Romanek

[1] - http://www.boost.org/**development/int_const_**guidelines.htmlhttp://www.boost.org/development/int_const_guidelines.html

Hi, I use Boost.Mpl for this. Please try boost::mpl::and, etc. I'm curious about those boost::type_traits::ice_* things too, though. Regards, Kris