Re: [Boost-users] Distance/size of boost ranges for std::set.

On 11/10/10 10:32, Matthew Gwynne wrote:

Should we simply be extending the boost::size function with additional overloaded versions specific to std::set if we wish to use it in this way (is this reasonable?)?

There was an idea of making boost::size(c) call c.size(), boost::sort(c) use c.sort() etc. if those were available. I don't know what exactly happened to that idea, or why it was scrapped.