Re: [Boost-Users] boost::function and template member functions

On Thursday 05 December 2002 04:21 am, Markus Werle wrote:

With the help of ConcreteEvoker I was able to get an (indirect) address for Test::Apply<double>.

This address is obtained via automatic template instantiation, so I feel like there must be a way to achiev the same thing without ConcreteEvoker.

Any comments?

You could explicitly instantiate the function: boost::function test = &Test::Apply<double>; Doug