- Boost-users - lists.preview.boost.org

Re: [Boost-users] [interprocess] Interprocess mutex not working / throwing exception when trying to write lock
by nav999 19 Oct '15

19 Oct '15

Dear Admin, It's ok if this does not reach the mailing list. I'm putting it up here as the answer, so that anyone browsing this Nabble forum will find it. The answer is here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/33197889/boost-interprocess-mutex-crashe… -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/interprocess-Interprocess-mutex-not-work… Sent from the Boost - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

1 0

[intrusive] accessing the hook type?
by Oliver Kowalke 18 Oct '15

18 Oct '15

I'd like to determine the hook type of an intrusive container (intrusive::list): template< typename List > void do_link( List & lst) { static_assert(std::is_same< typename List::???, my_hook_type >::value); lst.push_back( * this); }

2 2

boost spirit qi/karma char parsing/generating
by Ernest Zaslavsky 18 Oct '15

18 Oct '15

The question why does it treated as string character when my intention is to work with 8bit integral type? int8_t/uint8_t does not help either on most platforms it is just a define for signed/unsigned char. So, the broader question, how do you work with “byte” type when it is always treated as character? And the main question how do I force qi/karma to treat “char” as a number? P.S. cast to short is an obvious solution but it is not elegant [Read More]<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/sizmek-blog/~6/1> [http://www.sizmek.com/Sizmek.png]<http://www.sizmek.com/>

1 0

Boost.Python extension
by Jeff Archer 16 Oct '15

16 Oct '15

I am trying to use Boost.python to create a python extension. I have created the hello_ext example but find that I cannot import it. I am always getting the error "ImportError: No module named 'hello_ext'". Boost 1.59.0 Python 3.5 Visual Studio 2015

2 1

Re: [Boost-users] [interprocess] Interprocess mutex not working / throwing exception when trying to write lock
by Malko 16 Oct '15

16 Oct '15

Copying over here my initial reply: Hi, 1. Your lockWithWriteLock and lockWithReadLock create a lock, which locks on construction and unlocks on destruction, hence when the function returns no lock is held on the mutex. 2. The fact that you put a scope here makes me think that your intention is for the lock to be unlocked at the end of this scope (which it won't, as it is unlocked way before, as per #1). { std::cout<<"Program 1: Before first locking -------------------------- 1 v\n"; temp.sharedMutex->lockWithWriteLock(); const unsigned int SLEEP_TIME_IN_SECOND = 60; std::cout<<"Program 1: sleep for "<< SLEEP_TIME_IN_SECOND << "\n"; sleep(SLEEP_TIME_IN_SECOND); std::cout<<"Program 1: Finished sleeping\n"; } In this case though, you would perform the wait in bold while still holding the lock, and hence preventing the 2nd program from locking it. Once out of the scope you destroy the object right away. NOTE: both the issue in #1 and #2 lead to your first program possibly deleting the mutex before the 2nd program is done with it. Which leads to the issue you are experiencing. 3. If you need to have the 1st program wait for the 2nd program to be done, then do not use sleeps, use a condition_variable. -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/interprocess-Interprocess-mutex-not-work… Sent from the Boost - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

1 1

[Thread] Problems compiling an example from the docs
by Malko 16 Oct '15

16 Oct '15

Hi, I am trying to compile the following example: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_59_0/doc/html/thread/synchronization.html#t… #include <boost/thread.hpp> #include <boost/thread/future.hpp> int parallel_sum(int* data, int size) { int sum = 0; if ( size < 1000 ) for ( int i = 0; i < size; ++i ) sum += data[i]; else { boost::future<int> handle = boost::async(parallel_sum, data+size/2, size-size/2); sum += parallel_sum(data, size/2); sum += handle.get(); } return sum; } int main() { int data[] = {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10}; int a(parallel_sum, data, 10); return 0; } It does not compile because future is not a type in boost and async has the wrong signature. The future error goes away by defining BOOST_THREAD_PROVIDES_FUTURE, but I can not find this mentioned anywhere in the docs, I found out only looking on stack overflow. The async signature seems to require a function of arity 0. This is clang 3.4 output using Boost.1.59 and C++03: XXX/src/futtest.cpp:12:33: error: no matching function for call to 'async' boost::future<int> handle = boost::async(parallel_sum, data+size/2, size-size/2); ^~~~~~~~~~~~ /home/dev/build/third_party/64-rhel5/boost_1_59_0/include/boost/thread/future.hpp:3545:3: note: candidate function template not viable: requires 2 arguments, but 3 were provided async(launch policy, R(*f)()) { ^ /home/dev/build/third_party/64-rhel5/boost_1_59_0/include/boost/thread/future.hpp:3609:3: note: candidate function template not viable: requires 2 arguments, but 3 were provided async(launch policy, BOOST_THREAD_FWD_REF(F) f) { ^ /home/dev/build/third_party/64-rhel5/boost_1_59_0/include/boost/thread/future.hpp:3961:3: note: candidate function template not viable: requires single argument 'f', but 3 arguments were provided async(R(*f)()) { ^ /home/dev/build/third_party/64-rhel5/boost_1_59_0/include/boost/thread/future.hpp:3978:3: note: candidate function template not viable: requires single argument 'f', but 3 arguments were provided async(BOOST_THREAD_FWD_REF(F) f) { ^ XXX/src/futtest.cpp:22:7: error: excess elements in scalar initializer Is there more macro to be used to enable this to compile? Thanks P.S. It would be nice to have all the info about macro configuration for future (and async, if it has any) in the docs. -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Thread-Problems-compiling-an-example-fro… Sent from the Boost - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

2 3

Xpressive regex superscript 2 and 3 parsed as plain digits
by Mia 15 Oct '15

15 Oct '15

Help pleaseI am using xpressive for text processing with regexes.Microsoft Visual C++ 13.0 on a windows 10 laptop, boost version 1_59_0 (and lib64-msvc-12.0 downloaded from sourceforge) , locale is en_US.UTF-8 .my regular expressions for catching any and all digits :wsregex any_number_regex = wsregex::compile(L"^(.*\\D)?(\\d+)(\\D.*)?$");Looks like it recognizes the superscript 2 and superscript 3 as plain “digits”all other superscript digits are not caught by this regex.examples:πr² 234³is this intentional?is this a bug?(I know I can change the regex to catch [0-9]+, this regex just one of many I use in my software!)thank youMia -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Xpressive-regex-superscript-2-and-3-pars… Sent from the Boost - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

1 0

Use of uninitialized value in any_range
by Auer, Jens 15 Oct '15

15 Oct '15

Hi, Valgrind reports multiple problems in our project which seem to come from boost::range::any_range. I was able to produce a small example which reproduces the problem: #include <iostream> #include <boost/range.hpp> #include <boost/range/any_range.hpp> #include <boost/range/adaptors.hpp> struct Int { Int(int i): x(i) {} int x; }; int main( int argc, char* argv[] ) { typedef boost::any_range<Int*, boost::forward_traversal_tag, Int*, std::ptrdiff_t> R; std::vector<std::unique_ptr<Int>> v; v.push_back( std::make_unique<Int>(42) ); auto f = [](std::unique_ptr<Int> const& p) {return p.get();}; R r = v | boost::adaptors::transformed(f); auto x = (*boost::begin(r))->x; std::cout << x << std::endl; return 0; } Running this, valgrind reports a "Use of uninitialized value of size 8": # g++ --version g++ (GCC) 5.2.0 # g++ -std=c++1y -o test test.cpp # valgrind --version valgrind-3.11.0 # valgrind --track-origins=yes ./test ==8119== Memcheck, a memory error detector ==8119== Copyright (C) 2002-2015, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. ==8119== Using Valgrind-3.11.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info ==8119== Command: ./test ==8119== ==8119== Use of uninitialised value of size 8 ==8119== at 0x4010B8: main (in /tmp/test) ==8119== Uninitialised value was created by a stack allocation ==8119== at 0x40315D: boost::range_detail::any_iterator<Int*, boost::iterators::forward_traversal_tag, Int*, long, boost::any_iterator_buffer<64ul> >::dereference() const (in /tmp/test) ==8119== 42 ==8119== ==8119== HEAP SUMMARY: ==8119== in use at exit: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks ==8119== total heap usage: 3 allocs, 2 frees, 72,716 bytes allocated ==8119== ==8119== LEAK SUMMARY: ==8119== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==8119== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==8119== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==8119== still reachable: 72,704 bytes in 1 blocks ==8119== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks ==8119== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory ==8119== ==8119== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v ==8119== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 1 from 1) Best wishes, Jens -- Jens Auer | CGI | Software-Engineer CGI (Germany) GmbH & Co. KG Rheinstraße 95 | 64295 Darmstadt | Germany T: +49 6151 36860 154 jens.auer(a)cgi.com<mailto:jens.auer@cgi.com> Unsere Pflichtangaben gemäß § 35a GmbHG / §§ 161, 125a HGB finden Sie unter de.cgi.com/pflichtangaben<http://de.cgi.com/pflichtangaben>. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: Proprietary/Confidential information belonging to CGI Group Inc. and its affiliates may be contained in this message. If you are not a recipient indicated or intended in this message (or responsible for delivery of this message to such person), or you think for any reason that this message may have been addressed to you in error, you may not use or copy or deliver this message to anyone else. In such case, you should destroy this message and are asked to notify the sender by reply e-mail. -- Jens Auer | CGI | Software-Engineer CGI (Germany) GmbH & Co. KG Rheinstraße 95 | 64295 Darmstadt | Germany T: +49 6151 36860 154 jens.auer(a)cgi.com<mailto:jens.auer@cgi.com> Unsere Pflichtangaben gemäß § 35a GmbHG / §§ 161, 125a HGB finden Sie unter de.cgi.com/pflichtangaben<http://de.cgi.com/pflichtangaben>. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: Proprietary/Confidential information belonging to CGI Group Inc. and its affiliates may be contained in this message. If you are not a recipient indicated or intended in this message (or responsible for delivery of this message to such person), or you think for any reason that this message may have been addressed to you in error, you may not use or copy or deliver this message to anyone else. In such case, you should destroy this message and are asked to notify the sender by reply e-mail.

1 0

Boost Python having trouble with C++ int return results
by Bradley Neuberg 15 Oct '15

15 Oct '15

I'm fairly new to using Boost Python and running into some funkiness. When I try to pass back a simple int from C++ to Python, I get a Segmentation Fault. Here's the C++: #include <iostream> #include <boost/python.hpp> int helloworld() { return 10; } BOOST_PYTHON_MODULE(test_boost) { boost::python::def("helloworld", helloworld); } and here's the Python: import test_boost print(test_boost.helloworld()) The strange thing is it works fine with char const* types. Does anyone know what could cause this? Compiled on Mac OS X 10.10.5 with Anaconda Python with the following: g++ -g -shared -fPIC -I/Users/bradneuberg/anaconda/include/python2.7 test_boost.cpp -lpython2.7 -lboost_python -o test_boost.so Best, Brad Neuberg

1 0

Boost Intrusive compiler error
by Davies, John 14 Oct '15

14 Oct '15

I've been using Boost 1.55.0 that I built myself for about a year. Our team decide that we would prefer to use the pre-built files located on SourceForge as a standard (http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost-binaries/1.55.0-build2/ ) I downloaded and installed and changed my Visual Studio 2013 project to point to the new root folder. I'm getting this error: Error 2 error C2228: left of '.select_on_container_copy_construction' must have class/struct/union c:\boostlib\boost\intrusive\detail\has_member_function_callable_with.hpp 200 1 BoostCommunication Googling hasn't helped. This code compiled on the libraries I built. I'd appreciate any help in tracking this down. ________________________________ The information contained in this message may be confidential and legally protected under applicable law. The message is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, forwarding, dissemination, or reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by return e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

2 1

Escaping boost.regex literal string fragments
by Dominique Devienne 13 Oct '15

13 Oct '15

Is there no equivalent to http://doc.qt.io/qt-4.8/qregexp.html#escape in Boost.Regex, i.e. a way to escape all special characters so they match "literally"? There are manual solutions, like http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1252992/how-to-escape-a-string-for-use-i…, but shouldn't that be part of the API? Does C++11's std::regex, based on boost::regex, include this API? Thanks, --DD

2 3

how to install boost-devel 1.59 in CentOS7
by 俊赵 13 Oct '15

13 Oct '15

Hello everyone. I want to install boost-devel 1.59 in centos7, but the default repo has only 1.53, so I have to compile it from the source code. I have download 1.59 from web page, and use ./bootstrap.sh and ./b2 install to install the boost 1.59. But when I want install other packages such as CGAL-devel, it tells me that I donnot install boost-devel 1.59, so I wonder how to install boost-devel? Thanks. Zhao Jun

3 2

boost interval container in shared memory
by Asna Ishrat 13 Oct '15

13 Oct '15

I have been trying to store boost interval map in shared memory, but my code below does not compile when I pass allocator while constructing map. After seeing template definition of boost interval_map I assume that boost icl only supports std::allocator. Is there any way to store this container in shared memory. int main () { static bip::managed_shared_memory global_mm(boost::interprocess::open_or_create, "MySharedMemory",65536 //segment name ); static bip::allocator<void, bip::managed_shared_memory::segment_manager> global_alloc(global_mm.get_segment_manager()); boost::icl::interval_map<int, int> *party = global_mm.find_or_construct<boost::icl::interval_map<int, int>>("Store")(global_alloc); party->add(make_pair(boost::icl::interval<int>::right_open(4,5),1)); std::cout << "adding result: " << *party << "\n"; }

1 0

owns_lock on lock not on mutex
by gast128 13 Oct '15

13 Oct '15

Hello all, there is an owns_lock on the lock type but not on the mutex. This is quite unhandy. Any reason why? Use case is in base-derived idiom: class Foo { public: void Process() { boost::unique_lock<boost::mutex> lck(m_mtx); Update(); } protected: void Update() { ++m_n; } boost::mutex m_mtx; int m_n; }; class Bla : public Foo { public: void Process() { boost::unique_lock<boost::mutex> lck(m_mtx); Update(); } private: void Update() { assert(m_mtx.owns_lock()); ++m_n2; Foo::Update(); } int m_n2; };

4 9

Log: [Bug] Setting attribute makes log entry disappear
by Florian Lindner 12 Oct '15

12 Oct '15

Hello, I have a tracer, that should log going in and out of a function: class Tracer { public: Tracer(Logger logger, std::string function, std::string file) : _logger(logger), _function(function), _file(file) {} ~Tracer() { using namespace boost::log; // attribute_cast<attributes::mutable_constant<int>>(core::get()->get_global_attributes()["Line"]).set(1); attribute_cast<attributes::mutable_constant<std::string>>(core::get()->get_global_attributes()["File"]).set(_file); attribute_cast<attributes::mutable_constant<std::string>>(core::get()->get_global_attributes()["Function"]).set(_function); BOOST_LOG_SEV(_logger, trivial::severity_level::trace) << "Leaving " << _function; } private: Logger _logger; std::string _function; std::string _file; }; This works fine, but as soon as I uncomment the line that sets the Line attribut I don't get any Leaving messages anymore. The attributes are added beforehand like that: using namespace boost::log; add_common_attributes(); core::get()->add_global_attribute("Scope", attributes::named_scope()); core::get()->add_global_attribute("Rank", attributes::constant<int>(5)); core::get()->add_global_attribute("Line", attributes::mutable_constant<int>(5)); core::get()->add_global_attribute("File", attributes::mutable_constant<std::string>("")); core::get()->add_global_attribute("Function", attributes::mutable_constant<std::string>("")); Setting all other attributes, similiar to Line works fine. I'm puzzled because Line does not seem to be a reserved name, it works somewhere else and the boost::log sources reveal no relevant usages of that name. What could be the problem here? I'm happy to send anyone the complate code (approx. 150 lines in total) Thanks! Florian

1 1

Boost.Fiber mini-review report
by Nat Goodspeed 10 Oct '15

10 Oct '15

The mini-review of Boost.Fiber by Oliver Kowalke ran from Friday September 4th through Sunday September 13th. There was lively discussion, but only two actual reviews: Agustín K-ballo Bergé: not yet (list of issues below) Niall Douglas: yes, plus suggestions (below)[0] In addition I received two "review withheld" notes: Vicente J. Botet Escriba wanted me to address the previous review point by point. That seems like a reasonable request, and I apologize, but I too have time pressures. Giovanni Piero Deretta made suggestions (synopsized below) with the statement that he will make a recommendation when he sees the library author's progress along those lines. While in theory these results might seem like a hung jury, the very paucity of formal reviews supports a cautious approach. The verdict is: not yet, with specific points as noted below. No reviewer explicitly designated specific points as being essential. (Niall Douglas explicitly designated his suggestions as post-adoption enhancements.) I have made an attempt to rank the recommendations received in descending order of importance to the community. My criteria are: Robustness: does lack of this request pose significant risk to a consuming program? API stability: could this request be considered an implementation detail, or would the change break early adopters? Demand: how many people requested the same thing? If you feel that I have misrepresented the importance of one of your points (or omitted something entirely), please respond. Ultimately, of course, the importance of any given point to the community at large will be reflected in the next mini-review. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Requests: Cross-thread fiber migration: Evidently the community strongly desires the ability to transfer a suspended fiber from one thread to another.[1] Of course there must be controls. Migration might be explicit; but if implicit, there must be a way to designate which fibers may and may not be migrated. An RAII class that temporarily disables migration would also be desirable -- for instance, to guarantee TLS consistency for some specific period. Cross-thread migration support implies a requirement to document the thread safety requirements of the customization API. Standard required timing specifications: meet (30.2.4 Timing specifications [thread.req.timing]). Adapt one or more existing test suites for thread facilities to validate the correctness of the Fiber library's synchronization constructs: e.g. from libc++, libstdc++, Boost.Thread, HPX. std::chrono support: ensure that wait_until() can accept any supported time_point specialization. (The library author asserts that this has already been fixed on the 'develop' branch.) C++11 compatibility: Agustín K-ballo Bergé volunteered to help with this point post-adoption. Paul Fultz offered fit::capture to emulate C++14 move capture. Document that this_fiber::yield() (et al.) are valid from main(), or in general from a thread function, as well as from explicitly-launched fibers. Make shared_state lock requirements explicit: for example, make mark_ready_and_notify_() accept a std::unique_lock<>& (or &&) to force its caller to provide one. Avoid holding mutex during condition_variable::notify_*() calls. (The library author asserts that this has already been fixed on the 'develop' branch.) packaged_task must not decay-copy its task arguments. Align fibers::async() signature, result description and invoke_helper implementation with std::async(). Avoid returning std::move(...). Wait list implementation: try an intrusive linked list of fiber_context objects. Avoid sleeping thread when no fibers are ready -- block on external event. Better handling of waiting tasks (decentralized wait queues?). Optimization to resume awakened fiber on the thread that awakens it. Template redundancy: eliminate duplication between specializations for T, T& and void. The future, shared_future, shared_state, promise and task_object templates were specifically cited. Leverage predicate-based condition::wait() overload internally. Nested schedulers: make schedulers be schedulable entities themselves. Improve robustness of `promise' handling in Asynchronous Callbacks documentation. Avoid overconfident remarks about it. Fix Note overstating the requirements on condition_variable::wait(). The discussion also surfaced the desirability of Grand Unified Future Theory, but it was generally agreed that this is out of scope. Put differently, it would be unreasonable to put the onus on Fiber to solve that very broad cross-library problem. Many thanks to all participants, and thanks especially to Oliver Kowalke for all his work on this library! Nat Goodspeed Boost.Fiber Review Manager ________________________________ [0] Niall Douglas snuck his review recommendation into the following mail message: http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2015/09/225228.php (second to final paragraph). His suggestions were in private mail. [1] Giovanni Deretta suggests that it might be possible to allocate -- without actually running -- an actual kernel thread per fiber, simply to give each fiber its own TLS area.

2 1

boost::serialization bindings for PHP5 somewhere?
by Mauro Condarelli 10 Oct '15

10 Oct '15

Hi, I need to send some structures (and receive answers, of course) from a PHP5 front-end to a C++ back-end that already communicates with another C++ front-end via boost::serialization over a socket. Easiest would be to teach PHP5 to talk the same language. I know I can write a specific PHP5 extension in C++ and use boost::serialization there. Question is if such a beast (or something equivalent) already exists. Thanks in Advance Mauro

2 1

serialization code compilation problem - shared_ptr_helper.cpp in Boost 1.59
by Robert Fairlie 06 Oct '15

06 Oct '15

I tried building the serialization library only using the standard b2 approach and looking at the output. It looks like shared_ptr_helper.cpp isn’t included in the build (at least for serialization). So I just left it out of my own build and my code compiled and linked OK, and my serialization seems to be working. Does this approach sound safe or am I overlooking something?

2 1

serialization code compilation problem - shared_ptr_helper.cpp in Boost 1.59
by Robert Fairlie 06 Oct '15

06 Oct '15

Hi, I’m building the Boost serialization library in Visual Studio 2015 (for x86 and ARM) by copying the 40 or so files in libs\serialization\src and compiling them in my Visual Studio project. (I’m doing it this way because Visual Studio won’t seem to let me build everything with b2 in the ARM case). The last build of the 40 files I did used Boost 1.55 and that worked fine, but now with Boost 1.59, all files compile except shared_ptr_helper.cpp. I notice that shared_ptr_helper.cpp refers to a class called shared_ptr_helper_base, but I’ve done a full *.* search and it doesn’t seem to be declared anywhere. Also, I notice that usage of macros such as BOOST_ARCHIVE_DECL has been updated in other files, but not in shared_ptr_helper. Any advice on this would be much appreciated. Robert Fairlie

4 4

[geometry] is there an rtree version that works with boost.1.49 and MSVC2010?
by Jeff Flinn 05 Oct '15

05 Oct '15

I pulled the version down from the old svn sandbox, but msvc2010 doesn't support the variadic template args in indexable.hpp. Any help appreciated. Thanks, Jeff

2 1

Container features in regards to IPC
by David Schneider 04 Oct '15

04 Oct '15

Hello, I was wondering if I could suggest adding the ability to have separate allocators inside containers so that the structure (such as map) can be in a different shared memory region, or whatever, than the data. It would have variety of useful cases such as offline storage swapping out, inter-process communications, etc. This can be realized by a bit of a hack with a bunch of boiler-plate code, but I think that this could be a very useful extension over what is available in the standard library. Dave

1 0

how to get auto_link to use shared libraries
by Jeff Archer 04 Oct '15

04 Oct '15

I am trying to use Boost 1.59.0 with Visual Studio 2015 I believe I have built correctly the shared libraries as I have the following files in stage/lib 10/03/2015 04:48 PM 968,192 boost_regex-vc140-mt-1_59.dll 10/03/2015 04:48 PM 1,100,728 boost_regex-vc140-mt-1_59.lib 10/03/2015 03:59 PM 2,561,024 boost_regex-vc140-mt-gd-1_59.dll 10/03/2015 03:59 PM 1,103,914 boost_regex-vc140-mt-gd-1_59.lib I am trying to build the credit_card_example from http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_59_0/libs/regex/example/snippets/credit_car… I do have several static libraries in my stage/lib. Uncertain how they got there as I thought that I had only built the debug and release shared libraries. 10/03/2015 04:52 PM 395,432 libboost_chrono-vc140-mt-1_59.lib 10/03/2015 04:02 PM 2,223,204 libboost_chrono-vc140-mt-gd-1_59.lib 10/03/2015 04:48 PM 1,416 libboost_exception-vc140-mt-1_59.lib 10/03/2015 03:59 PM 29,648 libboost_exception-vc140-mt-gd-1_59.lib 10/03/2015 04:52 PM 88,934 libboost_system-vc140-mt-1_59.lib 10/03/2015 04:02 PM 660,700 libboost_system-vc140-mt-gd-1_59.lib 10/03/2015 04:52 PM 13,542,628 libboost_test_exec_monitor-vc140-mt-1_59.lib 10/03/2015 04:02 PM 42,599,796 libboost_test_exec_monitor-vc140-mt-gd-1_59.lib 10/03/2015 04:52 PM 177,682 libboost_timer-vc140-mt-1_59.lib 10/03/2015 04:02 PM 1,319,014 libboost_timer-vc140-mt-gd-1_59.lib Compiling with BOOST_LIB_DIAGNOSTIC defined gives this output 1>------ Build started: Project: BoostRegexCreditCardExample, Configuration: Debug x64 ------ 1> BoostRegexCreditCardExample.cpp 1> Linking to lib file: libboost_regex-vc140-mt-gd-1_59.lib ========== Build: 1 succeeded, 0 failed, 0 up-to-date, 0 skipped ========== Building the project gives this error 1>------ Build started: Project: BoostRegexCreditCardExample, Configuration: Debug x64 ------ 1>LINK : fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file 'libboost_regex-vc140-mt-gd-1_59.lib' ========== Build: 0 succeeded, 1 failed, 0 up-to-date, 0 skipped ========== Precompiled headers is turned off. I believe the shared libraries are built correctly because if I rename the import library to libboost_regex-vc140-mt-gd-1_59.lib the build succeeds and the boost_regex-vc140-mt-gd-1_59.dll module is shown as loaded by the debugger and the program produces the following output. C:\Dev.ja\BoostRegexCreditCardExample\x64\Debug>BoostRegexCreditCardExample.exe validate_card_format("0000111122223333") returned 0 validate_card_format("0000 1111 2222 3333") returned 1 validate_card_format("0000-1111-2222-3333") returned 1 validate_card_format("000-1111-2222-3333") returned 0 machine_readable_card_number("0000111122223333") returned 0000111122223333 machine_readable_card_number("0000 1111 2222 3333") returned 0000111122223333 machine_readable_card_number("0000-1111-2222-3333") returned 0000111122223333 machine_readable_card_number("000-1111-2222-3333") returned 000111122223333 human_readable_card_number("0000111122223333") returned 0000-1111-2222-3333 human_readable_card_number("0000 1111 2222 3333") returned 0000-1111-2222-3333 human_readable_card_number("0000-1111-2222-3333") returned 0000-1111-2222-3333 human_readable_card_number("000-1111-2222-3333") returned 000-1111-2222-3333 Therefore, I believe I have overlooked some detail in the setup of my project. Please, can someone point out what I have failed to do correctly? Also, can/should I just delete the several libboost_...lib files from my stage/lib directory? I would prefer to always used the shared libraries. Thanks, Jeff

2 1

problem in configuring the environment
by arto rasimus 03 Oct '15

03 Oct '15

I have Raspberry Pi, realtime kernel in it and machinekit 2.7-0 package. Boost version is 1.55-0.What to check, since the machinekit does not find the boost? (and therefore configuration script fails) Linux raspberrypi 3.18.11+ #781 PREEMPT Tue Apr 21 18:02:18 BST 2015 armv6l GNU/Linux configure: error: boost::python is required to build LinuxCNC pi@raspberrypi /machinekit/src $ dpkg -l | grep boost ii libboost-atomic1.55-dev:armhf 1.55.0+dfsg-3 armhf atomic data types, operations, and memory ordering constraints ii libboost-atomic1.55.0:armhf 1.55.0+dfsg-3 armhf atomic data types, operations, and memory ordering constraints ii libboost-chrono1.55-dev:armhf 1.55.0+dfsg-3 armhf C++ representation of time duration, time point, and clocks ii libboost-chrono1.55.0:armhf 1.55.0+dfsg-3 armhf C++ representation of time duration, time point, and clocks ii libboost-date-time1.55-dev:armhf 1.55.0+dfsg-3 armhf set of date-time libraries based on generic programming concepts ii libboost-date-time1.55.0:armhf 1.55.0+dfsg-3 armhf set of date-time libraries based on generic programming concepts ii libboost-dev:armhf 1.55.0.2 armhf Boost C++ Libraries development files (default version) ii libboost-filesystem-dev:armhf 1.55.0.2 armhf filesystem operations (portable paths, iteration over directories, etc) in C++ (default version) ii libboost-filesystem1.55-dev:armhf 1.55.0+dfsg-3 armhf filesystem operations (portable paths, iteration over directories, etc) in C++ ii libboost-filesystem1.55.0:armhf 1.55.0+dfsg-3 armhf filesystem operations (portable paths, iteration over directories, etc) in C++ ii libboost-program-options-dev:armhf 1.55.0.2 armhf program options library for C++ (default version) ii libboost-program-options1.55-dev:armhf 1.55.0+dfsg-3 armhf program options library for C++ ii libboost-program-options1.55.0:armhf 1.55.0+dfsg-3 armhf program options library for C++ ii libboost-python-dev 1.55.0.2 armhf Boost.Python Library development files (default version) ii libboost-python1.55-dev 1.55.0+dfsg-3 armhf Boost.Python Library development files ii libboost-python1.55.0 1.55.0+dfsg-3 armhf Boost.Python Library ii libboost-serialization-dev:armhf 1.55.0.2 armhf serialization library for C++ (default version) ii libboost-serialization1.55-dev:armhf 1.55.0+dfsg-3 armhf serialization library for C++ ii libboost-serialization1.55.0:armhf 1.55.0+dfsg-3 armhf serialization library for C++ ii libboost-system-dev:armhf 1.55.0.2 armhf Operating system (e.g. diagnostics support) library (default version) ii libboost-system1.55-dev:armhf 1.55.0+dfsg-3 armhf Operating system (e.g. diagnostics support) library ii libboost-system1.55.0:armhf 1.55.0+dfsg-3 armhf Operating system (e.g. diagnostics support) library ii libboost-test-dev:armhf 1.55.0.2 armhf components for writing and executing test suites (default version) ii libboost-test1.55-dev:armhf 1.55.0+dfsg-3 armhf components for writing and executing test suites ii libboost-test1.55.0:armhf 1.55.0+dfsg-3 armhf components for writing and executing test suites ii libboost-thread-dev:armhf 1.55.0.2 armhf portable C++ multi-threading (default version) ii libboost-thread1.55-dev:armhf 1.55.0+dfsg-3 armhf portable C++ multi-threading ii libboost-thread1.55.0:armhf 1.55.0+dfsg-3 armhf portable C++ multi-threading ii libboost1.55-dev:armhf 1.55.0+dfsg-3

1 1

range: partition a transformed range adaptor
by Auer, Jens 02 Oct '15

02 Oct '15

Hi, So today I wanted to partition a transformed range. I came up with something like std::vector<int> v; auto t2 = r | transformed( [](int) {return 0;} ); auto p2 = boost::range::partition(t2, [](int) {return true;} ); , but that didn't work. On Stackoverflow, it was explained that this doesn't work because partition needs to modify the range, and a transformed range is not modifiable. So far so good, I can follow this and see why and modify the program to use transform on the vector directly. What bothers me is that I was not able to figure that out from the documentation, and that the error message was not very intuitive to say the least. According to the documentation, the requirements on the range for partition are that it has to be a model of ForwardRange, which means that the iterators have to be forward traversable iterators. I think the important fact, namely that it has to be writeable iterator, is missing from the documentation completely. As far as I can see, readable/writable categories are not used in the range documentation at all. Best wishes, Jens -- Dr. Jens Auer | CGI | Software Engineer CGI Deutschland Ltd. & Co. KG Rheinstraße 95 | 64295 Darmstadt | Germany T: +49 6151 36860 154 jens.auer(a)cgi.com Unsere Pflichtangaben gemäß § 35a GmbHG / §§ 161, 125a HGB finden Sie unter de.cgi.com/pflichtangaben. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: Proprietary/Confidential information belonging to CGI Group Inc. and its affiliates may be contained in this message. If you are not a recipient indicated or intended in this message (or responsible for delivery of this message to such person), or you think for any reason that this message may have been addressed to you in error, you may not use or copy or deliver this message to anyone else. In such case, you should destroy this message and are asked to notify the sender by reply e-mail.

1 0

parallelised ODE solvers
by Vihan Pandey 01 Oct '15

01 Oct '15

Dear all, I am trying to integrate a simple 2 variable ODE system. I wanted to know which of the solvers listed here : http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_56_0/libs/numeric/odeint/doc/html/boost_num… are parallelised for multicore CPU’s and GPU’s? Perhaps using Thrust for the Nvidia/CUDA GPU end of things? I am principally interested if someone has managed to make/port a library for parallelised RK45 methods. Please note in later work I plan on having more ODE's - probably systems of 12-15 parameters though they will be all be first order equations. Thanks and Cheers! - vihan -- Listening to Ozzy again!

3 4