- Boost-users - lists.preview.boost.org

Upgrade from Boost v1.37.0 to v1.38.0
by biolaser 27 Feb '09

27 Feb '09

I have Boost v1.37.0 installed on Windows XP with Visual Studio v7.1 - is there an upgrade path to v1.38.0, or must I remove v1.37.0 and install v1.38.0 from scratch? William

2 2

Re: [Boost-users] make member functions (in)accessible
by Stefan Funck 27 Feb '09

27 Feb '09

This looks brilliant! Thanks a lot!! Stefan > > > > private: > > template<class Pwd, class ExpectedPwd> > > void set_impl( Type const& value > > , typename boost::enable_if<boost::is_same<Pwd, > > ExpectedPwd> >::type* enable =0 > > ) > > { > > value_ = value; > > } > > > > > Actually ExpectedPwd is not required as template parameter, but it helps to > understand the flow. It is possible to rewrite the Property as: > > > > template<class Type, class PasswordT=void> > class Property > { > > public: > Type const& get()const > { > return value_; > } > > > > template<class PwdT> > void set( Type const& value) > { > set_impl<PwdT>(value); > } > > void set(Type const& value) > { > set_impl<void>(value); > } > > > private: > template<class Pwd> > void set_impl( Type const& value > , typename boost::enable_if<boost::is_same<Pwd, PasswordT> > > >::type* enable =0 > ) > { > value_ = value; > } > > > > private: > Type value_; > };

1 0

[lambda]How to use the member of placeholder in std algorithm?
by 钱晓明 27 Feb '09

27 Feb '09

I have a struct: struct Coordinate { double x, y, z; }; There is no any operator definition for it. I want to sort a array of this struct with 3 elements by comparing the Z value, so: Coordinate coords[3]; ....... std::sort(coords, coords+3, _1 < _2); What should I write to replace "_1 < _2" here? How can I reference the Z member of _1 and _2? I hope I can sort this array without defining any new function. thanks!

2 1

Linking Boost in Code::Blocks
by mothdragon 27 Feb '09

27 Feb '09

Okay, I've been trying to figure this out for a couple of weeks now... I'm using Boost 1.37 on Ubuntu Hardy Heron with Code::Blocks 8.02, Programming in C++.... Now, I'm rather new to Ubuntu, and just as much so programming in Ubuntu... Well, I've been working on this project, and I've been cross-developing it on Windows and Linux, but I've hit a hiccup once i've started using Boost... All works great on Windows using MinGW and Code::Blocks, however I cannot get the same code to run in Linux. The best I can think of is that there's a problem with the linking.... I've added the include path, and the lib path to the search directories, and I've added the libboost_serialization-gcc42-mt-1_37.a to the list of libraries but for some reason it still doesn't work... I get the following error when I try to compile: obj/Debug/Griffin RPG V2.o||In function `extended_type_info_typeid_1':| /usr/include/boost/serialization/extended_type_info_typeid.hpp|77|undefined reference to `boost::serialization::extended_type_info::self_register()'| /usr/include/boost/serialization/extended_type_info_typeid.hpp|77|undefined reference to `boost::serialization::extended_type_info::self_register()'| /usr/include/boost/serialization/extended_type_info_typeid.hpp|77|undefined reference to `boost::serialization::extended_type_info::self_register()'| ]+0x8)||undefined reference to `boost::serialization::detail::extended_type_info_typeid_0::less_than(boost::serialization::extended_type_info const&) const'| ]+0x8)||undefined reference to `boost::serialization::detail::extended_type_info_typeid_0::less_than(boost::serialization::extended_type_info const&) const'| ]+0x8)||undefined reference to `boost::serialization::detail::extended_type_info_typeid_0::less_than(boost::serialization::extended_type_info const&) const'| ||=== Build finished: 6 errors, 0 warnings ===| I've looked everywhere I can think of and chatted on a few IRC's but I haven't been able to get anywhere with this... Because of this I've had to develop only on Windows (Yuck!) and not do any testing in Linux... I take comfort in knowing though that once I get Boost operational, my code will work in Linux too... ( probably better since Linux is so nice to me! ) I'd appreciate any help tat can be offered! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Linking-Boost-in-Code%3A%3ABlocks-tp21867302p21867302… Sent from the Boost - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

5 11

[filesystem] How to tell if a file is locked.
by Andrew Maclean 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

Is it possible using boost::filesystem functions to determine if a file is locked? I have a program which scans a directory for files and I want it to ignore locked files because other process are writing to them. Basically I want to do the following: get the file if (is_locked()) continue else process the file So I just want to know if it is locked. This must work for both Linux and Windows Vista. Has anyone any ideas or example code? Thanks Andrew -- ___________________________________________ Andrew J. P. Maclean Centre for Autonomous Systems The Rose Street Building J04 The University of Sydney 2006 NSW AUSTRALIA Ph: +61 2 9351 3283 Fax: +61 2 9351 7474 URL: http://www.acfr.usyd.edu.au/ ___________________________________________

1 0

make member functions (in)accessible
by Stefan Funck 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

Dear all, I'm trying to find some magic that makes a member function of some object x accessible if and only if it were called from within a class that has object x as a member. Is there a (boost)-way of doing this? As this may seem a bit obscure, I'm trying to give an example: template <typename T, bool Writable> class Property { public: T get() const; void set(const T& val); private: T m_val; }; is a simple class holding a value of T. I have some classes holding potentially many Properties. I'd like to have these properties publically available, some as only readable, others writable as well, so that others (e.g. gui-classes) can access them: class A { public: Property<double, true > propA; Property<int , false> propB; }; so I may do: A a; a.propA.get(); a.propA.set(0.5); a.propB.get(); but NOT: a.propB.set(1); because propB was defined with Writable=false. BUT, from within class A, I would like to do propB.set(1); because otherwise this property is useless. (How) can this be achieved (with boost)? I could make set() private in the Writable=false - specialisation of Property and declare A as a friend, but that's prohibitive since Property shouldn't know about A and it won't work for derived classes of A. Another option would be class A { public: A() : propA(propA_priv), propB(propB_priv) {} PropertyWrapper<double, true > propA; PropertyWrapper<int , false> propB; private: Property<double> propA_priv; Property<int > propB_priv; }; so the actual properties are private and the wrapper provides the actual interface to the outside world. But as there may be many properties I'd like to get away without the wrapper objects ... Thanks for any ideas! Stefan

5 5

BGL question about districting
by Barend Gehrels 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

Hi, We're about an automated districting tool. We want to create Y districts from X polygons, all having a specific value (e.g. area or inhabitants), where the total value of each district is as similar as possible and each district is also as similar as possible. Let's call the value the "potential". Of course this problem is NP-hard so we're glad with the first solution or e.g. the first ten solutions. We thought to implement this by the Boost Graph Library. First we detect neighbour relations with our own Geometry Library (using the still-to-build "touches" relationship). We've a graph then and can divide the graph into subgraphs, each having connected nodes and an (nearly) equal "potential". I've some experience with BGL, having used the "connected_components". But I cannot find an appropriate algorithm for this problem, if it is available. Actually it even could be a "network flow" algorithm dividing the total potential by Y, and starting at some point flowing the potential through the graph. But all network flow algorithms seem to be on directed graphs. This is an undirected graph. It it is not possible with a standard BGL algorithm I think we can still solve it using BGL and e.g. breadth-sort-first, but just want to verify if it is possible or maybe by an unexpected workaround. Thanks, Barend

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] metafunction invocation performance
by Hicham Mouline 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Abrahams" <dave(a)boostpro.com> > To: boost-users(a)lists.boost.org > Subject: Re: [Boost-users] metafunction invocation performance > Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:02:20 -0500 > > > > On Jul 4, 2008, at 7:36 AM, Hicham Mouline wrote: > > > The solution to this one is provided by Joaquin, in his reply below: > > > > I tried compiling your code with MSVC++ 8.0 and it is indeed incredibly > > slow. After playing a little with the code I realized that MPL views are > > the culprit here: for some reason it is much faster to fold on a > > vector-based computation rather than a view: > > > > I learned an interesting and somewhat depressing fact from Doug Gregor > recently. Most compilers don't use a canonical representation of types. > That is, in most compilers, int* and add_pointer<int>::type occupy separate > pieces of storage, and the complier jumps through some complicated hoops when > it needs to evaluate them for sameness. Of course that also means that > vector<int*> and vector<add_pointer<int>::type> are represented separately, > etc. That can totally skewer the gains of memoization, among other things.f > > Apparently recent versions of GCC have canonical type representation, and so > does Clang (for what that's worth -- no C++ yet), but I betcha MS doesn't, > and that would help explain why views cost more. I can try to experiment with this. I could try the view version versus the non-view version provided my Joaquin in g++. What minimum version of g++ ? regards,

1 0

Boost.Python linking error on Scratchbox
by Taneli R. 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

I have a program that uses Boost.Python and it compiles & links in normal desktop environment at x86 architecture (Ubuntu Linux) without any problems. I've compiled the same Boost libraries (1.37) in Scratchbox ARM environment, since my goal is to get my program running in Nokia N800 Internet Tablet as well. Compiling is successful, but when I try to link my code to Python libraries I get the following error: /usr/local/lib/libboost_python-gcc34-mt-1_37.so: undefined reference to `PyUnicodeUCS2_AsWideChar' /usr/local/lib/libboost_python-gcc34-mt-1_37.so: undefined reference to `PyUnicodeUCS2_FromEncodedObject' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status I haven't had any problems with other Boost libraries I've used in Scratchbox. Should I compile the Boost.Python libraries with some specific parameter? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Boost.Python-linking-error-on-Scratchbox-tp22176960p2… Sent from the Boost - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

2 1

Dynamic function call question
by Perry, Daniel 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

Hello, I've been trying to design a function dispatch system and I was wondering if the following is possible with the current boost libraries... I currently parse json data into an vector of variants, I would like to be able to take those variants and invoke an arbitrary boost function object with a consistent return type. Is it possible to determine the function argument types, get the typed value from the proper index in the array of variants, and call the function with arguments? This sounds like something the boost fusion library might be able to do, but I can't find any example code using the library to see if this is the right fit for the capabilities of the library or if what I'm looking to do is not possible without tons of boiler plate. Any insight would be greatly appreciated, Regards, Daniel Perry

3 4

Re: [Boost-users] Dynamic function call question
by Alan M. Carroll 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

1 0

accumulator taking a deduced argument - endless compilation time
by er 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

Hello, Comments are in the code. Any help appreciated. *.hpp template<typename RealType,typename Id> class mu : public accumulator_base { typedef mu<RealType,Id> self_type; typedef parameter::deduced<self_type> par0_type; typedef parameter::parameters<par0_type> params; public: typedef RealType result_type; mu(result_type value):value_(value){} template<typename Args> mu(const Args& args):value_((result_type)(0)){ // compile bottleneck (caused by the assigment, not the rhs) const self_type& input = params()(args); value_ = input.value_; } private: result_type value_; }; *cpp: typedef mpl::int_<0> id0_t; typedef accumulators::tag::mu<id0_t> mu0_t; typedef boost::mpl::vector< mu0_t > explicit_entities; typedef double value_type; typedef accumulators::accumulator_set< value_type, explicit_entities > acc_type; typedef mpl::apply<mu0_t::impl,value_type>::type input0_type; input0_type input0(0.5); // acc_type acc; // compiles fast acc_type acc((input0)); // compiles forever

2 4

C_time.hpp fails to get a vaild time
by Lukas.Orlowski＠dlr.de 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

Dear Boost users I'm experiencing problem with the latest Boost version 1.3.8. When ever I try to get the current system time or do anything that needs the system time like: boost::xtime xt; boost::xtime_get(&xt, boost::TIME_UTC); The function c_time.hpp "static std::tm* gmtime(const std::time_t* t, std::tm* result) " Throws it's "could not convert calendar time to UTC time" exception. This might be thread specific but since xtime.hpp uses date_time functions I'm certain it is not. Version 1.3.6 does work fine. Am I missing some API changes? Regards Luke

1 0

best way to remove duplicates from forwardIterator [startIter, endIter]
by Sandeep Gupta 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

Hi, Given a collection in terms of [startIter, endIter] how can obtain [uniqBeginIter, uniqEndIter] that represents unique elements of the original container. I can always explicitly instantiate a set S of [startIter, endIter] and use [S.begin(), S.end()]. Is it possible to express this in terms of algorithms. Please note that I won't be able to use std::sort as startIter does not conform to RandomAccessIterator. Its a forward iterator. Thanks Sandeep

3 5

Boost.Test on Non Exported Dll Classes
by Jon Black 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

I have a bunch of dll projects that make up an application. I'd like to unit test these projects, but I have two problems: 1) The classes I'd like to test are in the dll and not all of them are exported; 2) Boost.Test doesn't have a main entry point, so if I solve 1 by packing my tests in the dll, how can I run them? If there is a better solution to 1, I'd love to hear it. Otherwise, how can I solve 2?

2 1

[TR1] How to say BOOST_USE_BOOST_TR1
by Markus Werle 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

Hi! I'd like to #include <boost/tr1/*.hpp> while at the same time state that I am *not* interested in the compiler's TR1 implementation (vc9 ...) Any MACRO BOST_HAS_NO_TR1 I missed? The opposite (BOOST_HAS_TR1) exists. Markus

6 9

Re: [Boost-users] Boost-users Digest, Vol 1918, Issue 3
by Stefan Funck 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

I'm not sure how that could work, since I want different access rights for the very same object? Stefan > Though I have not used it myself, there is enable_if or disable_if in BOOST. That might help. > > -dhruva > > > > ----- Original Message ---- >> From: Stefan Funck <stefanfunck(a)web.de> >> To: boost-users(a)lists.boost.org >> Sent: Thursday, 26 February, 2009 7:34:01 PM >> Subject: [Boost-users] make member functions (in)accessible >> >> Dear all, >> >> I'm trying to find some magic that makes a member function of some object x >> accessible if and only if it were called from within a class that has object x >> as a member. Is there a (boost)-way of doing this? >> >> As this may seem a bit obscure, I'm trying to give an example: >> >> template <typename T, bool Writable> >> class Property >> { >> public: >> T get() const; >> void set(const T& val); >> private: >> T m_val; >> }; >> is a simple class holding a value of T. >> >> I have some classes holding potentially many Properties. I'd like to have these >> properties publically available, some as only readable, others writable as well, >> so that others (e.g. gui-classes) can access them: >> >> class A >> { >> public: >> Property propA; >> Property propB; >> }; >> >> so I may do: >> >> A a; >> a.propA.get(); >> a.propA.set(0.5); >> a.propB.get(); >> >> but NOT: >> >> a.propB.set(1); >> >> because propB was defined with Writable=false. BUT, from within class A, I would >> like to do >> >> propB.set(1); >> >> because otherwise this property is useless. (How) can this be achieved (with >> boost)? >> >> I could make set() private in the Writable=false - specialisation of Property >> and declare A as a friend, but that's prohibitive since Property shouldn't know >> about A and it won't work for derived classes of A. Another option would be >> >> class A >> { >> public: >> A() : propA(propA_priv), propB(propB_priv) {} >> >> PropertyWrapper propA; >> PropertyWrapper propB; >> private: >> Property propA_priv; >> Property propB_priv; >> }; >> >> so the actual properties are private and the wrapper provides the actual >> interface to the outside world. But as there may be many properties I'd like to >> get away without the wrapper objects ... >> >> Thanks for any ideas! >> Stefan

1 0

[archive]: Problem with creating a C-Interface DLL using Serialization/Archive
by von Arx, Martin 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

I'm writing a DLL which uses Boost for the Serialization (version 1.36.0). Because it has to maintain in different system I want to maintain a pure C-Interface DLL. As soon as I use the Boost-Library by activating the two lines boost::archive::text_iarchive ia(is); ia >> foo; in the function CNwDeSerialize_Test( ) it's C++ Interface becomes exposed in my C-Interface. Anybody got an idea why and what I can do to prevent it ? Regards Martin //===================================================== // Modul: stdafx.h #include <boost/archive/tmpdir.hpp> #include <boost/archive/text_iarchive.hpp> #include <boost/archive/text_oarchive.hpp> #include <boost/serialization/base_object.hpp> #include <boost/serialization/utility.hpp> #include <boost/serialization/list.hpp> #include <boost/serialization/assume_abstract.hpp> #include <boost/shared_ptr.hpp> //===================================================== // Modul: ChannelNwManager.h // ChannelNwManager.h : Defines the exported functions for the DLL application. // #ifdef __cplusplus extern "C" { #endif #ifdef CHANNELNWMANAGER_EXPORTS #define CHNNWMANAGER_API extern "C" __declspec(dllexport) #else #define CHNNWMANAGER_API extern "C" __declspec(dllimport) #endif CHNNWMANAGER_API void CNwDeSerialize_Test( void ); #ifdef __cplusplus } #endif //===================================================== // Modul: ChannelNwManager.cpp #include "stdafx.h" extern "C" __declspec(dllexport) void CNwDeSerialize_Test( ) { int foo; std::istringstream is("1"); // boost::archive::text_iarchive ia(is); // ia >> foo; } // ===================================================== // Modul: ChannelNwManager.cpp #include "stdafx.h" extern "C" __declspec(dllexport) void CNwDeSerialize_Test( ) { int foo; std::istringstream is("1"); boost::archive::text_iarchive ia(is); ia >> foo; }

2 1

problems building with boost filesystem on Solaris 9
by Guy LaCrosse 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

here is my make file # Makefile for tpg5webapp CC=g++ CFLAGS = -static -m32 -fPIC -Wall BOOSTINC = -I/export/home/mlacrosse/boost/include/boost-1_38 STATIC_LIB_OPT = -Wl,"-Bstatic" LINK_OPTS = -v -fident -Wl,"-Bdirect" -Wl,"-m" -z defs -z rescan BOOST_LIBPATH = -L/export/home/mlacrosse/boost/lib/ -lboost_filesystem-gcc34-mt -lboost_system-gcc34-mt BOOST_LIBS = $(STATIC_LIB_OPT) $(BOOST_LIBPATH) TNLIBS = -L/export/home/jshelly/work/tserve4/lib TNINCLUDE = -I/export/home/jshelly/work/tserve4/pub/include BASE_LIBS= -L/usr/local/lib LOCALLIB = -L/export/home/mlacrosse/work/gccroot/usr/local/lib INCLUDES = -I. -I./h $(BOOSTINC) $(TNINCLUDE) LIBS = $(BOOST_LIBS) $(TNLIBS) $(BASE_LIBS) $(LOCALLIBS) DEFINES = -D__SOLARIS__ -DBSD_COMP -DSTRICT_PROTO -DSSBIGENDIAN all: tpg5webapp tpg5webapp: tpg5webapp.cpp ConfigFile.cpp $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(DEFINES) $(INCLUDES) $(LIBS) \ -o tpg5webapp ConfigFile.cpp tpg5webapp.cpp run: tpg5webapp ./tpg5webapp | tee tpg5webapp.out tidy: @ rm -f *.o clean: tidy @ rm -f tpg5webapp tpg5webapp.out core* here are the error message that I'm getting Undefined first referenced symbol in file boost::filesystem::detail::dir_itr_first(void*&, void*&, std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >&, boost::filesystem::file_status&, boost::filesys tem::file_status&)/var/tmp//ccOQOOR8.o boost::system::get_generic_category() /var/tmp//ccOQOOR8.o boost::filesystem::detail::dir_itr_increment(void*&, void*&, std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char > >&, boost::filesystem::file_status&, boost::filesystem::file_status&)/var/tmp//ccOQOOR8.o boost::system::get_system_category() /var/tmp//ccOQOOR8.o boost::filesystem::detail::not_found_error() /var/tmp//ccOQOOR8.o boost::filesystem::detail::symlink_status_api(std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, boo st::system::error_code&)/var/tmp//ccOQOOR8.o boost::filesystem::detail::remove_api(std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&)/var/tmp//cc OQOOR8.o boost::filesystem::detail::create_directory_api(std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&)/v ar/tmp//ccOQOOR8.o boost::filesystem::detail::dir_itr_close(void*&, void*&)/var/tmp//ccOQOOR8.o boost::filesystem::detail::copy_file_api(std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, std::bas ic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&)/var/tmp//ccOQOOR8.o boost::filesystem::detail::status_api(std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&, boost::syst em::error_code&)/var/tmp//ccOQOOR8.o boost::filesystem::detail::get_current_path_api(std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >&)/var/tmp //ccOQOOR8.o ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to tpg5webapp collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [tpg5webapp] Error 1

2 5

Some questions about cross-compiling boost
by 磊周 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

Hi,everyone. The version of boost I used is 1.38. I have tried to cross-compile the boost library for a platform with ARM and Linux, but I failed. What I did is listed following: #cd mypath/boost_1_38_0/tools/jam/src #./build/build.sh By doing these, I got a executable file named bjam in the folder "bin.linuxx86". I copied the bjam to the directory "mypath/boost_1_38_0/", then : #cd mypath/boost_1_38_0 #./bjam "-sGCC_ROOT_DIRECTORY=/opt/mv_pro_4.0/montavista/pro/devkit/arm/v5t_le" "-sGCC=arm_v5t_le-gcc" "-sGXX=arm_v5t_le-g++" "-sGCC_BIN_DIRECTORY=/opt/mv_pro_4.0/montavista/pro/devkit/arm/v5t_le/bin" finally, there were some libraries gengerated in "usr/local/lib". Unfortunately, these libraries just can be used in the X86 platform but not ARM platform. Maybe my method was incorrect. Could anyone give me some advices to deal with my problem? Thanks! Best wishes Zou ___________________________________________________________ 好玩贺卡等你发，邮箱贺卡全新上线！ http://card.mail.cn.yahoo.com/

2 1

shared_ptr and global reset
by Matthieu Guillo 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

Hi Boosters Let's say that I have many shared_ptr<A> sharing ownership to the same A object. At some point, I would like all those shared_ptr to point to a new Object A. Is there an easy (and safe) way to accomplish that? I know how to do that for one shared_ptr using either "reset", either operator = but in order to do this for all shared_ptr sharing ownership, the only way I could think of is through a registration mechanism (like the Observer pattern) but this sounds an overkilling process to me. So basically, is there a "global" reset method? Thanks ------------------------------------------ Matthieu Guillo ------------------------------------------

6 7

Re: [Boost-users] metafunction invocation performance
by Hicham Mouline 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

The solution to this one is provided by Joaquin, in his reply below: I tried compiling your code with MSVC++ 8.0 and it is indeed incredibly slow. After playing a little with the code I realized that MPL views are the culprit here: for some reason it is much faster to fold on a vector-based computation rather than a view: template<typename Sequence1,typename Sequence2> struct sequence_product : boost::mpl::fold< Sequence1, boost::mpl::vector0<>, boost::mpl::copy< boost::mpl::transform< Sequence2, pair_with<boost::mpl::_2> >, boost::mpl::back_inserter<boost::mpl::_1> > > {}; This transformation on sequence_product and seq_seqpair_product alone improved the performance tremendously. Additionally I've tried a small optimization: in seq_seqpair_product it is preumable better to fold on Sequence rather than SequencePair, since on average the first is expected to be shorter. Truth be said, I haven't detected any improvement with this, anyway. > Shouldn't there be a dot-product or cross-product of mpl sequences as > a general algorithm? and not just 2 sequences but N. I guess it is the O(n^2) behavior that deterred the author from including the algorithm (much as STL usually does not contain quadratic algorithms). It might be a worthy addition, nonetheless Joaquin --------- Interesting why a joint_view slower than the alternative. This result confirmed then on MSVC8 , gcc4.1, Intel10... regards, /Hicham

2 1

Boost.IOStreams lzma support?
by anony 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

Is this going to be implemented? I might contribute some code if not. LZMA has amazing compression ratios.

1 0

scoped_ptr::release (again)
by Yang Zhang 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

From http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_36_0/libs/smart_ptr/scoped_ptr.htm: "If scoped_ptr had a release() member, it would become possible to transfer ownership of the held pointer, weakening its role as a way of limiting resource lifetime to a given context. Use std::auto_ptr where transfer of ownership is required. (supplied by Dave Abrahams)" But there already is a way to escape the scope, via swap(). Would it make more sense to just provide release() and have users specify const if they want? (const scoped_ptr/scoped_array would effectively disallow swapping/releasing.) -- Yang Zhang http://www.mit.edu/~y_z/

11 18

Boost; Default constructor work around.
by niranjan bangera 26 Feb '09

26 Feb '09

Hi, I need to know the information abt Constructor in my class to be serialized. What if i dont have defualt constructor in my class. Any other work around rather then putting the default construcor in my class, Pls Let me know if any workaround or doccumentaion. Boost: 1.38.0 ==== Compiler: ====== /_TOOLS_/dist/gnu-gcc-/4.1.1-binutils-2.16.1/x86_64-pc-linux2.4/bin/gcc class Myclass { Myclass (const string & a) { name=a; } private: int a; string name; //serialization code }; Thanks in Advance. Thanks, Niranjan

2 1