- Boost-users - lists.preview.boost.org

Re: [Boost-users] [release] Boost 1.82.0
by Marshall Clow 14 Apr '23

14 Apr '23

On Apr 14, 2023, at 7:38 AM, Damien via Boost-users <boost-users(a)lists.boost.org> wrote: > > FYI the link does to the new sql library does not work: > > https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_82_0/libs/msyql/ Thanks. This link works: https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_82_0/libs/mysql/doc/html/index.html <https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_82_0/libs/mysql/doc/html/index.html> We’ll take a look. — Marshall

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] [release] Boost 1.82.0
by Damien 14 Apr '23

14 Apr '23

FYI the link does to the new sql library does not work: https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_82_0/libs/msyql/ On 4/13/2023 9:37 PM, Marshall Clow via Boost-users wrote: > Release 1.82.0 of the Boost C++ Libraries is now available. > > These open-source libraries work well with the C++ Standard Library, > and are usable across a broad spectrum of applications. The Boost > license encourages both commercial and non-commercial use. > > This release contain numerous enhancements and bug fixes for existing libraries. > > For details, including download links, see > <http://www.boost.org/users/news/version_1.82.0> > > You can also download directly from: > <https://boostorg.jfrog.io/artifactory/main/release/1.82.0/> > > To install this release on your system, see > <http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/release/more/getting_started/index.html> > > Thanks to everyone who participated in this release. > > -- The Boost Release Team > > Marshall Clow, Glen Fernandes > > _______________________________________________ > Boost-users mailing list > Boost-users(a)lists.boost.org > https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

1 0

[release] Boost 1.82.0
by Marshall Clow 14 Apr '23

14 Apr '23

Release 1.82.0 of the Boost C++ Libraries is now available. These open-source libraries work well with the C++ Standard Library, and are usable across a broad spectrum of applications. The Boost license encourages both commercial and non-commercial use. This release contain numerous enhancements and bug fixes for existing libraries. For details, including download links, see <http://www.boost.org/users/news/version_1.82.0> You can also download directly from: <https://boostorg.jfrog.io/artifactory/main/release/1.82.0/> To install this release on your system, see <http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/release/more/getting_started/index.html> Thanks to everyone who participated in this release. -- The Boost Release Team Marshall Clow, Glen Fernandes

1 0

New video on TCP/IP Networking with Boost.Asio
by Richard 13 Apr '23

13 Apr '23

Utah C++ Programmers has released a new video on TCP/IP Networking with Boost.Asio <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tyDWXT8-Ykc> -- "The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline> The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals-wiki.org> The Computer Graphics Museum <http://ComputerGraphicsMuseum.org> Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://LegalizeAdulthood.wordpress.com>

1 0

Format a JSON string
by Markus Pieper 13 Apr '23

13 Apr '23

Hi there, I convert a std::vector<std::vector<float>> to a JSON string. Basically it works, but the format is scientific: "[[1.017E3,1.017E3,1.017E3 ... ]]" My method looks now like this: std::string Class::convertFieldAsJSON(std::vector<std::vector<float>> field) { return boost::json::serialize(boost::json::value_from(field)); } It works, but my colleagues want to see a 1017 and not 1.017E3 in the output. Is there a way to format the string? Thanks in advance, Markus

4 3

ASIO: Support for SQPOLL in io_uring backend
by Cyan Reddish 05 Apr '23

05 Apr '23

I was wondering if anything like that is planned. I am also interested in other general io_uring options like setting affinity masks for IO worker threads. As far as I can see there is no way to pass parameters from io_context to io_uring_service.

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] Cannot compile Boost JSON under Visual Studio 2022 with /clr
by Gavin Lambert 05 Apr '23

05 Apr '23

On 5/04/2023 12:08, Kevin Frey wrote: > This works fine on X86 and X64 builds, but when I try a .NET /clr > compile, I get errors coming out of parser.ipp and a few other places, > all of this type: > > Error C2679 binary '=': no operator found which takes a right-hand > operand of type 'boost::json::error_code' (or there is no acceptable > conversion) > > The code producing the error is trying to convert the > boost::system::error_code to a std::error_code, via a simple assignment, > so clearly relying on a conversion operator. > > It appears that the conversion to std::error_code is conditionally > included based on the BOOST_SYSTEM_HAS_SYSTEM_ERROR macro, but if I > manually define this macro I get a whole lot of other errors instead > (mainly relating to Mutex). > > Is this a bug in the library, or a misconfiguration on my part in order > to compile correctly for /clr? Several of the STL facilities (including std::error_code, sadly) react poorly to /clr. For best results you're recommended to compile code that run into these sorts of things as pure native, by putting them into a separate .cpp that's compiled without /clr, and wrapping any header includes from /clr .cpps with #pragma managed(...) to switch to native mode. In some cases you will have to hide the native code entirely from your /clr code (e.g. behind PIMPL) where even the headers aren't safe to include. (Anything that uses <atomic> tends to fall into this.) Unfortunately it appears Microsoft has put C++/CLI onto life support so this is not likely to improve much in the future. The Way of the Future™ is apparently to write all managed code in C#, all native code in C++, and either entirely avoid C++/CLI (via p/invoke) or write only the most minimal interop glue layer in it between the other two.

1 0

Cannot compile Boost JSON under Visual Studio 2022 with /clr
by Kevin Frey 05 Apr '23

05 Apr '23

Hello Boosters, I have a simple file to compile the Boost JSON source (Boost 1.81) to avoid creating a library: #define BOOST_CONTAINER_NO_LIB #include "boost\json\src.hpp" This works fine on X86 and X64 builds, but when I try a .NET /clr compile, I get errors coming out of parser.ipp and a few other places, all of this type: Error C2679 binary '=': no operator found which takes a right-hand operand of type 'boost::json::error_code' (or there is no acceptable conversion) The code producing the error is trying to convert the boost::system::error_code to a std::error_code, via a simple assignment, so clearly relying on a conversion operator. It appears that the conversion to std::error_code is conditionally included based on the BOOST_SYSTEM_HAS_SYSTEM_ERROR macro, but if I manually define this macro I get a whole lot of other errors instead (mainly relating to Mutex). Is this a bug in the library, or a misconfiguration on my part in order to compile correctly for /clr? Thanks in advance Kevin

1 0

[compute] test_constant_iterator.cpp fails on msvc 2022 (boost 1_81_0)
by Ran Regev 03 Apr '23

03 Apr '23

Hi, The file in the subject fails to compile under MSVC 2022. Does someone have any idea why and how to fix it? Details: This file: boost_1_81_0\libs\compute\test\test_constant_iterator.cpp With these errors: Build started... 1>------ Build started: Project: BoostTests, Configuration: Debug x64 ------ 1>test_constant_iterator.cpp 1>C:\Externals\boost_1_81_0\boost\compute\iterator\constant_iterator.hpp(114,17): error C2440: 'return': cannot convert from 'const T' to 'int &' 1> with 1> [ 1> T=int 1> ] 1>C:\Externals\boost_1_81_0\boost\compute\iterator\constant_iterator.hpp(114,17): message : Conversion loses qualifiers 1>C:\Externals\boost_1_81_0\boost\compute\iterator\constant_iterator.hpp(112,1): message : while compiling class template member function 'int &boost::compute::constant_iterator<int>::dereference(void) const' 1>C:\Externals\boost_1_81_0\boost\iterator\iterator_facade.hpp(550,11): message : see reference to function template instantiation 'int &boost::compute::constant_iterator<int>::dereference(void) const' being compiled 1>C:\Externals\boost_1_81_0\libs\compute\test\test_constant_iterator.cpp(30,59): message : see reference to class template instantiation 'boost::compute::constant_iterator<int>' being compiled 1>Done building project "BoostTests.vcxproj" -- FAILED. ========== Build: 0 succeeded, 1 failed, 0 up-to-date, 0 skipped ========== ========== Build started at 4:39 PM and took 03.713 seconds ========== Ran.

1 0

Boost configuration errors and problems
by Raivo Rebane 20 Mar '23

20 Mar '23

Hi, I have installed boost by conda and it install correctly. The following packages will be downloaded: package | build ---------------------------|----------------- boost-1.78.0 | py310h220cb41_4 555 KB conda-forge ------------------------------------------------------------ Total: 555 KB The following NEW packages will be INSTALLED: boost conda-forge/win-64::boost-1.78.0-py310h220cb41_4 But CMake gives configuration errors : CMake Error at C:/Users/Raivo/miniconda3/Library/lib/cmake/Boost-1.78.0/BoostConfig.cmake:141 (find_package): Found package configuration file: C:/Users/Raivo/miniconda3/Library/lib/cmake/boost_filesystem-1.78.0/boost_filesystem-config.cmake but it set boost_filesystem_FOUND to FALSE so package "boost_filesystem" is considered to be NOT FOUND. Reason given by package: No suitable build variant has been found. The following variants have been tried and rejected: * boost_filesystem.lib (shared, Boost_USE_STATIC_LIBS=ON) Still Boost is useless for me as I wanted to build Point CLoud Lib, bud CMake stops on these errors. What I have to do ? And how to go forward ? Can anybody help me ? Regards Raivo

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] Boost.DLL on MacOS (Intel) building Universal Binary ?
by Bo Zhou 18 Mar '23

18 Mar '23

It might not be the issue on Boost but macOS, the*.dylib file to be signed if you want it to run it as distribution. https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/Security/Conceptu… On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 12:49 PM Nicholas Yue via Boost-users < boost-users(a)lists.boost.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I have an application which uses Boost.DLL > > I have built and run them successfully on Linux, Windows and MacOS. > > I have an Intel Mac running Big Sur and have built Boost 1.81.0 > successfully as a universal binary with both arm64 and x86_64 libraries > combined. > > However, while other parts of boost library runs fine, I have found that > Boost.DLL will fail to load the plugins (also built as universal binary). > > Is there additional steps we need to take when building DLL plugins via > Boost.DLL as universal binary so that the loading mechanism is able to pick > the correct portion of the *.dylib that is for the current architecture of > the host application ? > > Cheers > -- > Nicholas Yue > https://www.linkedin.com/in/nicholasyue/ > _______________________________________________ > Boost-users mailing list > Boost-users(a)lists.boost.org > https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users >

2 1

Boost.DLL on MacOS (Intel) building Universal Binary ?
by Nicholas Yue 18 Mar '23

18 Mar '23

Hi, I have an application which uses Boost.DLL I have built and run them successfully on Linux, Windows and MacOS. I have an Intel Mac running Big Sur and have built Boost 1.81.0 successfully as a universal binary with both arm64 and x86_64 libraries combined. However, while other parts of boost library runs fine, I have found that Boost.DLL will fail to load the plugins (also built as universal binary). Is there additional steps we need to take when building DLL plugins via Boost.DLL as universal binary so that the loading mechanism is able to pick the correct portion of the *.dylib that is for the current architecture of the host application ? Cheers -- Nicholas Yue https://www.linkedin.com/in/nicholasyue/

1 0

New video: Getting Started with Boost.Asio: Timers and Serial Ports
by Richard 15 Mar '23

15 Mar '23

Utah Cpp Programmers has released a new video Getting Started with Boost.Asio: Timers and Serial Ports <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XB3uEit5R_Y> I/O operations are inherently asynchronous -- we don't know when input will arrive and when output will be generated. Network I/O can be particularly bothersome because of the long delays between sending a request and obtaining the response. Boost.Asio is a cross-platform C++ library for network and low-level I/O programming that provides developers with a consistent asynchronous model using a modern C++ approach. Boost.Asio covers timers, serial ports, files, pipes and TCP/IP networking. This month, Richard Thomson will give us an introduction to Boost.Asio concepts and asynchronous programming with this library. We'll look at how to use timers to notify our application of time passing and how to talk to serial ports asynchronously. Other Utah Cpp Programmers videos: <https://www.youtube.com/@UtahCppProgrammers> -- "The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline> The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals-wiki.org> The Computer Graphics Museum <http://ComputerGraphicsMuseum.org> Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://LegalizeAdulthood.wordpress.com>

1 0

[release] Boost 1.82.0 beta 1 released
by Marshall Clow 15 Mar '23

15 Mar '23

Boost release 1.82.0 beta 1 is now available at: https://boostorg.jfrog.io/artifactory/main/beta/1.82.0.beta1/source/ The SHA256 checksums are: efe17bea3f0b2c11f34828f37d5777f30eb6fef57af355c6a6664b08a4339999 boost_1_82_0_b1.7z 0af2a60f76abb4f411b1bd9c1a553f64454d9414990e8cc12f02f3b431e2ac45 boost_1_82_0_b1.tar.gz 495b2ae2f6970ea1e635f80222d9f6978148496cdd163e87c37cdd6de3b5ccfc boost_1_82_0_b1.zip edf4cb9e8e5a14412b91311438478ef6ce12afe2a54714eb2f0632a454c3d8d5 boost_1_82_0_b1.tar.bz2 Release notes (still need updates): https://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_82_0.html Please try the beta and report any problems you encounter. Thanks to everyone who contributed to the release. -- Boost Release Team

1 0

ASIO: Support for SQPOLL in io_uring backend
by Cyan Reddish 15 Mar '23

15 Mar '23

Hi. I was wondering if anything like that is planned. I am also interested in other general io_uring options like setting affinity masks for IO worker threads.

1 0

Boost Asio help
by Richard, Charles 01 Mar '23

01 Mar '23

Hi, I've been tasked with trying to figure out why we are getting an error in our log file, the error is "error: End of file". I'm still fairly new to doing real-world C++ development and I struggle with understanding why the code does what it does. The errors in our log file specifically are: 2023.02.20 08:45:49.470[UTC] [19626:140486796130176] TRACE - Process::CmdRunner::AsyncReadStdout<0x7fc594013b20> len = 0 2023.02.20 08:45:49.470[UTC] [19626:140486796130176] TRACE - Process::CmdRunner::AsyncReadStdout<0x7fc594013b20> error: End of file At a high level, my understanding is that we use Boost Asio to run python scripts where our C++ process will fork a new child process to run these python scripts. What I don't understand is why the code we have like the below was chosen to implement that functionality and to handle error handling. I've looked at some Asio boost tutorials but I still have gaps between our implementation and the Boost Asio tutorials and documentation. I'm also wondering why the a_errCode == boost::asio::error::eof is not seemingly catching the end of file. The code in the method CmdRunner::AsyncReadStdout does the following: void CmdRunner::AsyncReadStdout(boost::system::error_code a_errCode, size_t a_readSize) { DoLOG(TRACE, "Process::CmdRunner::%s<%p> len = %zu", __func__, this, a_readSize); if ( a_errCode ) { DoLOG(TRACE, "Process::CmdRunner::%s<%p> error: %s", __func__, this, a_errCode.message().c_str()) } if ( a_readSize > 0 ) { DoLOG(TRACE, "Process::CmdRunner::%s<%p> - read this: %zu bytes", __func__, this, a_readSize) _stdoutBufList.Copy(_stdoutReadBuf, a_readSize); // Call user callback to push out bytes Daemon::Service::DispatchEvent([this]() { _cbHandler(_cbCtxt, false); }); } else if ( a_errCode == boost::asio::error::eof ) { // Read done, call user callback function! DoLOG(TRACE, "Process::CmdRunner::%s<%p> - Child process (%d) STDOUT reached EOF", __func__, this, _childPid) _cmdDone = _eofStdout = true; _procStdout->close(); _procStderr->close(); Daemon::Service::DispatchEvent([this]() { _cbHandler(_cbCtxt, true); }); } else { // Async-read more, until EOF seen _procStdout->async_read_some(boost::asio::buffer(_stdoutReadBuf, PROC_READ_BUF_SIZE), [this](boost::system::error_code ec, std::size_t a_readSize) { AsyncReadStdout(ec, a_readSize); }); } } Any hints or specific links to look at to further clarify my understanding would be appreciated. Thanks! Chach Internal Use - Confidential

1 0

Precompiled Windows ARM/ARM64 binaries
by Stephan Brunner 01 Mar '23

01 Mar '23

Hi, are there any plans to ship precompiled windows binaries for ARM and/or ARM64 at some time on SourceForge [1]? Currently only a x86 and a x64 build is available there. If not, I'll look into building my own version for those architectures. Thanks a lot! [1] https://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost-binaries/1.81.0/ -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards Stephan Brunner, M.Sc. Matrix: @boomer41:boomer41.net PGP: 5FB325E81E548282D458A65114A30C9CE3AE4CE2

1 0

Boost Libraries and Dropping C++ Language Support
by Glen Fernandes 23 Feb '23

23 Feb '23

*Boost library authors and maintainers are free to drop support for old C++ standards in their libraries, at any time. * This includes libraries that other Boost libraries depend on. It even includes core libraries like Boost.Core or Boost.Static_Assert. We ask that maintainers do the right thing by all our users (which may include other Boost libraries) by announcing a future breakage *at least two Boost releases in advance*. When that eventual release time arrives, if Boost libraries are broken in older standards modes due to another Boost library dropping support, it will not block the Boost release. This means that we do not need to announce "Boost is dropping C++03" because Boost doesn't "support C++03" now as it is. It means that you, maintainer of Boost.X, should realize that you are free to announce that "Boost.X is dropping C++XY in version 1.Z" as you see fit. Boost in its infancy thrived because its libraries were on the cutting edge. Boost libraries today should similarly not be confined simply because other Boost libraries have chosen to depend on them. Furthermore, as Boost release managers we support authors exercising this freedom, and do not intend to impose any restrictions on what language support they must maintain. We will add a page to the Boost website stating the above formally. -- The release team (Glen Fernandes, Marshall Clow)

2 1

[iostreams] When plan to move to C++20
by Seyyed Soroosh Hosseinalipour 17 Feb '23

17 Feb '23

ITNOA I have question about the plan to migrate code base from C++03 to C++20 for iostreams library I think iostreams library have very more clean if using modern C++ features, such as Concept Did you have any plan about that? thanks

4 5

Abwesenheitsnachricht: Re: [iostreams] When plan to move to C++20
by Sören Textor 17 Feb '23

17 Feb '23

Derzeit bin ich nicht im Hause Ihre E-Mail wird nicht weitergeleitet. In dringenden Fällen bitte support(a)ditec-gmbh.de oder Telefonhotline +49-6221-31698-110 oder die Zentrale +49-6221-31698-0 kontaktieren. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Dr. Sören Textor ----------------------------------------------- DiTEC Dr. Siegfried Kahlich & Dierk Langer GmbH Im Breitspiel 19 | 69126 Heidelberg | Germany Handelsregister | Mannheim | HRB 341229 Dieses Dokument ist vertraulich zu behandeln. Die Weitergabe, sowie Vervielfältigung, Verwertung und Mitteilung seines Inhalts ist nur mit unserer ausdrücklichen Genehmigung gestattet. Alle Rechte vorbehalten, insbesondere für den Fall der Schutzrechtsanmeldung. This document has to be treated confidentially. Its contents are not to be passed on, duplicated, exploited or disclosed without our express permission. All rights reserved, especially the right to apply for protective rights.

1 0

boost serialization of non-POD 16bit float : Half
by Nicholas Yue 17 Feb '23

17 Feb '23

Hi, I am trying to serialize out the value of OpenEXR's Half type values. I came across mention that custom types requires something like the following ``` namespace boost { namespace serialization { template<class Archive> void serialize(Archive & ar, half & h, const unsigned int version) { ar & boost::serialization::make_nvp("value", h); } } // namespace serialization } // namespace boost ``` The code compiles but when I run it, it segfaults. Is boost serializer a suitable for such use case ? Cheers -- Nicholas Yue https://www.linkedin.com/in/nicholasyue/

1 0

Unable to compile when using BOOST_DETAIL_SPINLOCK_INIT
by radiatejava 09 Feb '23

09 Feb '23

I have an existing code for an application that uses BOOST_DETAIL_SPINLOCK_INIT from boost/smart_ptr/detail/spinlock.hpp. It is all fine when using with boost ver 1.53. I am trying to migrate to boost ver 1.66 and now this compilation fails. To isolate the issue, I have a sample program: #include <iostream> #include <boost/smart_ptr/detail/spinlock.hpp> class BoostTest { public: BoostTest(int v): val(v), bLock(BOOST_DETAIL_SPINLOCK_INIT) { std::cout << "constructor called" << std::endl; } int getValue() { std::cout << "getValue() called" << std::endl; return val; } private: int val; boost::detail::spinlock bLock; }; int main() { std::cout << "starting test" << std::endl; BoostTest bt(10); std::cout << "value now " << bt.getValue() << std::endl; } With ver 1.66, it now gives me the error. Why this error after upgrade to 1.66? How do I correct it? $ g++ -std=c++11 -I/data/hdd/code/mgmt/common/external/boost/ifc/dist/include -c boosttest.cc boosttest.cc: In constructor 'BoostTest::BoostTest(int)': boosttest.cc:6:63: error: use of deleted function 'boost::detail::spinlock::spinlock(boost::detail::spinlock&&)' BoostTest(int v): val(v), bLock(BOOST_DETAIL_SPINLOCK_INIT) { ^ In file included from /data/hdd/code/mgmt/common/external/boost/ifc/dist/include/boost/smart_ptr/detail/spinlock.hpp:47:0, from boosttest.cc:2: /data/hdd/code/mgmt/common/external/boost/ifc/dist/include/boost/smart_ptr/detail/spinlock_std_atomic.hpp:27:7: note: 'boost::detail::spinlock::spinlock(boost::detail::spinlock&&)' is implicitly deleted because the default definition would be ill-formed: class spinlock ^ /data/hdd/code/mgmt/common/external/boost/ifc/dist/include/boost/smart_ptr/detail/spinlock_std_atomic.hpp:27:7: error: use of deleted function 'std::atomic_flag::atomic_flag(const std::atomic_flag&)' In file included from /usr/include/c++/4.8/atomic:41:0, from /data/hdd/code/mgmt/common/external/boost/ifc/dist/include/boost/smart_ptr/detail/spinlock_std_atomic.hpp:19, from /data/hdd/code/mgmt/common/external/boost/ifc/dist/include/boost/smart_ptr/detail/spinlock.hpp:47, from boosttest.cc:2: /usr/include/c++/4.8/bits/atomic_base.h:275:5: error: declared here atomic_flag(const atomic_flag&) = delete; ^

2 1

boost::process : write both stdout and stderr to the same stream ?
by Nicholas Yue 02 Feb '23

02 Feb '23

Hi, Is it possible to write both the stdout and stderr stream to the same output file/stream ? I am hoping to emulate ``` bp_stdout_stderr_app > output.txt 2>&1 ``` I tried doing something like that but get a runtime error Run output ``` terminate called after throwing an instance of 'boost::process::process_error' what(): dup3() failed: Bad file descriptor stdout : 000 stdout : 020 stdout : 040 Aborted (core dumped) ``` Source code ``` #include <boost/process.hpp> #include <iostream> using namespace boost::process; int main() { ipstream pipe_stream; child c("bp_stdout_stderr_app", std_out > pipe_stream, std_err > pipe_stream); std::string line; while (pipe_stream && std::getline(pipe_stream, line) && !line.empty()) std::cerr << line << std::endl; c.wait(); } ``` Cheers -- Nicholas Yue https://www.linkedin.com/in/nicholasyue/

1 0

boost::log - tmp output log with decorated name ?
by Nicholas Yue 26 Jan '23

26 Jan '23

Hi, I plan to use boost::log for my C++ application logging needs. Does boost log have a convenient function for generating decorated filename in /tmp ? Something along the line of <app_name>_<timestamp>_<process_id>_<thread_id>.log This allows me to accumulate logs between runs to capture and compare. Cheers -- Nicholas Yue https://www.linkedin.com/in/nicholasyue/

1 0

Fwd: [boost.interprocess] Are there pitfalls using managed_shared_memory?
by M L 10 Jan '23

10 Jan '23

Are there common pitfalls when using boost::interprocess::managed_shared_memory in order to share a variable in the following way (Cpp,Windows OS)? managed_shared_memory managed_shm(open_or_create, "my_shm", 1024); // Write int *i = managed_shm.construct<int>("Integer")(42); // Read std::pair<int*, std::size_t> p = managed_shm.find<int>("Integer"); - Is the shared memory deleted, when the application is stopped? - Do other programs or services can bear with this method without crashing? -is there a danger that shared memory could be accumulated with some kind of overflow? Question: what does one have to consider when using this method? Thanks for help.

1 0