- Boost-users - lists.preview.boost.org

RE: [Boost-Users] Intel compiler, Boost and STLPort (3rd try)
by Tom Matelich 22 May '03

22 May '03

We've used Intel 6-7.1, with boost and STLPort for the last 9 months. I also make sure to use the latest Platform SDK. There were a few issues here and there, but things mostly went fine. Is your STLPort built with Intel or MSVC? Here are our instructions for building STLPort from our wiki: * edit stlport/stl_user_config,uncomment the macro _STLP_NEW_PLATFORM_SDK defined. * on the command line, go to the src subdirectory * run nmake -f intel50.mak clean all (make sure in your global include path that the SDK inlclude path comes before the VC98 path otherwise you will get build errors) * If successful, run nmake -f intel50.mak all install * In MSVC, go to tools/options/Directories, and make [path to msvc]/VC98/include/stlport the first entry in the list. After that: What command line options are you using? Are you using MSVC or Makefiles? I just went and looked at your errors again... It says std::. That implies you are not using STLPort, because theirs comes up saying STLP:: (or something like that). > -----Original Message----- > From: Andre du Toit [mailto:adutoit@stonethree.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 11:45 AM > To: boost-users > Subject: [Boost-Users] Intel compiler, Boost and STLPort (3rd try) > > > Ahem, could someone please answer my simple question: > > Is is possible to compile programs which use Boost and > STLPort (instead > of Microsoft Foundation Classes) with the Intel compiler, on Windows? > > I am getting all kinds of weird errors which relate to streaming > operators, which makes me think that my usage of STLPort might be > involved? On the other hand, if I use MSCV6 instead of Intel > compiler > (7.0) I do not get the same errors. It seems that some of > our in-house > software can't be compiled with MSVC6 because of problems > this specific > compiler has with templates. The same code compiles without > problem on > the latest GCC compilers. > > My latest source of joy is the following (about which I am totally > clueless) : > > C:\PROGRAM FILES\BOOST_1_30_0\boost/lexical_cast.hpp(147): error: no > operator "<<" matches these operands > operand types are: std::basic_stringstream<wchar_t, > std::char_traits<wchar_t>, std::allocator<wchar_t>> << const > std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>> > return stream << input; > ^ > detected during: > instantiation of "bool={bool} > boost::detail::lexical_stream<Target, > Source>::operator<<(const Source > &) [with Target=unsigned short, Source=std::basic_string<char, > std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>>]" at line 192 > instantiation of "Target > boost::lexical_cast<Target,Source>(Source) [with > Target=unsigned short, > Source=std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, > std::allocator<char>>]" at line 30 of "C:\PROGRAM > FILES\BOOST_1_30_0\boost/date_time/ > time_parsing.hpp" > instantiation of "time_duration > boost::date_time::parse_delimited_time_duration<time_duration>(const > std::string &) [with time_duration=boost::posix_time::time_duration]" > C:\PROGRAM FILES\BOOST_1_30_0\boost/lexical_cast.hpp(153): error: no > operator ">>" matches these operands > operand types are: std::basic_stringstream<char, > std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>> >> boost::int64_t > stream >> output && > ^ > detected during: > instantiation of "bool={bool} > boost::detail::lexical_stream<Target, > Source>::operator>>(InputStreamable &) [with > Target=boost::int64_t={__int64}, Source=std::basic_string<char, > std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>>, InputStreamab > le=boost::int64_t={__int64}]" at line 192 > instantiation of "Target > boost::lexical_cast<Target,Source>(Source) [with > Target=boost::int64_t={__int64}, Source=std::basic_string<char, > std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>>]" at line 47 of > "C:\PROGRAM FILES\BOOST_1_30_0\boost/ > date_time/time_parsing.hpp" > instantiation of "time_duration > boost::date_time::parse_delimited_time_duration<time_duration>(const > std::string &) [with time_duration=boost::posix_time::time_duration]" > > Greetings, > Andre. > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > ---------------------~--> > Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's > Important Questions. > http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lj3uPC/Me7FAA/uetFAA/EbFolB/TM > -------------------------------------------------------------- > -------~-> > > Info: <http://www.boost.org> > Wiki: <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl> > Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: Information contained in this message and/or attachment(s) may contain confidential information of Zetec, Inc. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by return email. -----------------------------------------------------------------------

2 1

RE: [Boost-Users] boost::date_time::posix_time and Intel Compiler 7.0?
by Jim.Hyslop 22 May '03

22 May '03

adutoit [mailto:adutoit@stonethree.com] wrote: > I know I said I will not return soon, but I finally realised > that stupid > Visual C++ is to blame for my original compilation error, not > anyone from > Boost or the Intel compiler writer team. > > For some reason, the order in which you specify include paths > (for crying > out loud!) matters in Visual C++!!! Er, Visual C++ is not alone in this behaviour. The compilers I'm familiar with all behave that way - the directories are searched in the order they are specified. When a match is found, the search stops. The same logic applies when using LIB to find libraries, PATH to find executables, and so on. Why should INCLUDE behave differently? Think about it - you have two different header files with the same name: the standard ones shipped with VC, and the StlPORT. How else would you expect the compiler to behave? Pick the last one it finds? Pick one at random? Spit out an error? -- Jim

2 1

singleton
by sashan 21 May '03

21 May '03

Is there construct that supports the singleton idea in boost? I've searched through the docs but may have missed it. I find it odd that it's not there. -- sashan http://sashan.netfirms.com -------------------------------------------------- Brain: Here we are, Pinky--at the dawn of time! Pinky: Narf, Brain. Wake me at the noon of time.

2 1

HPUX aCC regex problems
by ilopanaj 21 May '03

21 May '03

Hello, Has anyone had any success building the regex library (1_26_0 - 1_30_0) using any of the recent aCC versions under HPUX 11.11? If so, are there any tricks or modifications necessary to get it to work? Thanks in advance, Jerry

2 1

boost::mutex::scoped_lock conventions
by Mark Sizer 21 May '03

21 May '03

Is there a convention about whether or not to explicitly call .unlock()? In the case where everything to the end of the scope should be locked, there is no NEED to do it, but isn't it a bit sloppy to leave locks locked? Much like not using braces on one-line 'if' statements, it could cause maintenance problems later. What's the current thinking? Thanks, - Mark P.S. I'm currently always unlocking, because sometimes I want to unlock before the scope ends. This makes it clear exactly what I intend.

6 25

Intel compiler, Boost and STLPort (3rd try)
by Andre du Toit 21 May '03

21 May '03

Ahem, could someone please answer my simple question: Is is possible to compile programs which use Boost and STLPort (instead of Microsoft Foundation Classes) with the Intel compiler, on Windows? I am getting all kinds of weird errors which relate to streaming operators, which makes me think that my usage of STLPort might be involved? On the other hand, if I use MSCV6 instead of Intel compiler (7.0) I do not get the same errors. It seems that some of our in-house software can't be compiled with MSVC6 because of problems this specific compiler has with templates. The same code compiles without problem on the latest GCC compilers. My latest source of joy is the following (about which I am totally clueless) : C:\PROGRAM FILES\BOOST_1_30_0\boost/lexical_cast.hpp(147): error: no operator "<<" matches these operands operand types are: std::basic_stringstream<wchar_t, std::char_traits<wchar_t>, std::allocator<wchar_t>> << const std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>> return stream << input; ^ detected during: instantiation of "bool={bool} boost::detail::lexical_stream<Target, Source>::operator<<(const Source &) [with Target=unsigned short, Source=std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>>]" at line 192 instantiation of "Target boost::lexical_cast<Target,Source>(Source) [with Target=unsigned short, Source=std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>>]" at line 30 of "C:\PROGRAM FILES\BOOST_1_30_0\boost/date_time/ time_parsing.hpp" instantiation of "time_duration boost::date_time::parse_delimited_time_duration<time_duration>(const std::string &) [with time_duration=boost::posix_time::time_duration]" C:\PROGRAM FILES\BOOST_1_30_0\boost/lexical_cast.hpp(153): error: no operator ">>" matches these operands operand types are: std::basic_stringstream<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>> >> boost::int64_t stream >> output && ^ detected during: instantiation of "bool={bool} boost::detail::lexical_stream<Target, Source>::operator>>(InputStreamable &) [with Target=boost::int64_t={__int64}, Source=std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>>, InputStreamab le=boost::int64_t={__int64}]" at line 192 instantiation of "Target boost::lexical_cast<Target,Source>(Source) [with Target=boost::int64_t={__int64}, Source=std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char>>]" at line 47 of "C:\PROGRAM FILES\BOOST_1_30_0\boost/ date_time/time_parsing.hpp" instantiation of "time_duration boost::date_time::parse_delimited_time_duration<time_duration>(const std::string &) [with time_duration=boost::posix_time::time_duration]" Greetings, Andre.

1 0

RE: [Boost-Users] boost::date_time::posix_time and Intel Compiler 7.0?
by Tom Matelich 21 May '03

21 May '03

One other thing I should point out to you about building, or actually lack there of, inside MSVC. Intel doesn't know how to generate the PDB files themselves, so they call MSVC's cl to do it for them. This is a problem because if cl can't build the file, it doesn't generate any dependencies for it. If you use templates that MSVC can't handle, you'll probably want to switch to makefiles. We did. Fortunately, qmake rocks :) > -----Original Message----- > From: adutoit [mailto:adutoit@stonethree.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 7:16 AM > To: Boost-Users(a)yahoogroups.com > Subject: Re: [Boost-Users] boost::date_time::posix_time and Intel > Compiler 7.0? > > > Right; here are my compiler options, build configuration and the rest. > > Basically I am building a static library, which depends on > some in-house > software components, Qt and Boost. > Our own library S3FC (), uses templates in such a manner as > to make MSVC6 > very unhappy. Therefore we use the Intel compiler under M$. > Needless to say, our software compiles problemfree with GCC. For the > aforementioned and other reasons we do not make use of > Microsoft Foundation Classes when compiling under Windoze, but use the > latest version of STLPort (which has been at the same version > level for some > time now). > > Anyway; our Windows development work takes place under Visual > C++ but with > the Intel compiler (version 7.0) selected instead of the > MSVC6 compiler. > > OK; with this background then, here is the basic Visual C++ > project settings > for my build of the above-mentioned library. I have removed > include paths > etc. which point to in-house > software: > > 1) "Not Using MFCC" selected for general project settings (as > explained > above). > 2) Warning level => 3 > Optimizations => Maximise Speed > Debug info => None > 3) Project Options => > /nologo /ML /W3 /GR /GX /O2 /D "NDEBUG" /D "DEP_MS_WIN" > /D "WIN32" /D > "_WINDOWS" > /U "QT_NO_STL" /Fp"Release/libs3_qt.pch" /YX /Fo"Release/" > /Fd"Release/" /FD > /c > > The include and library paths for STLPort is set somewhere > else, but these > are basically the options. > > If anyone knows of any special project options, preprocessor > directives I am > perhaps missing for building Boost-related projects with the > Intel compiler, > please let me know! > I suspect that we will soon be using Boost for other > functionality besides > that provided by date_time at the moment. Besides, I like > the library and > works in our main development environment, > Linux with the GCC compiler. > > OK, I am forgetting about this problem for a day or two... > Thanks to everyone who has provided me with help so far, > especially Jeff > Garland. > > Greetings, > Andre. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jeff Garland" <jeff(a)crystalclearsoftware.com> > To: <Boost-Users(a)yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 3:42 PM > Subject: RE: [Boost-Users] boost::date_time::posix_time and > Intel Compiler > 7.0? > > > > > > > Anyway; it just irks me that I should have issues with > 'standard' stuff, > > > like streaming operators. > > > And the fact that the same code compiles with MSVC6 and > NOT the Intel > > > compiler. > > > > Ok. > > > > > Back on the #define which started my woes. The fact of > the matter is, I > get > > > everything compiled when using MSVC6 and not the Intel compiler! > > > I.e. the MSVC6-specific code works, the 'other' compiler > code for the > > > supposedly more Boost-compliant/friendly Intel compiler does not. > > > > I guess I was thinking that what was happening is that when > compiling > > with Intel you were getting the MSVC defined and hence were > taking the > > non-generic code. Perhaps not... > > > > Have you tried to run the tests in libs/date_time/test with your > > Intel/STLPort configuration? That might help diagnose the issue. > > Also, it might be instructive to post your compile command. Perhaps > > someone with experience on Intel can figure out why your > configuration > > differs from the one that apparently passes the tests. > > > > > Could it be because I am using STLPort in conjunction > with the Intel > > > compiler? > > > > Might be a factor. There have been some issues before with > the library > > configuration assuming MSVC limitations which don't apply > with STLPort > > in the mix. > > > > > Aargh. Just give me Linux and GCC... > > > > Agreed :-) > > > > Jeff > > > > > > > > Info: <http://www.boost.org> > > Wiki: > <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl> > > Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > ---------------------~--> > Get A Free Psychic Reading! > Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions. > http://us.click.yahoo.com/aM1XQD/od7FAA/uetFAA/EbFolB/TM > -------------------------------------------------------------- > -------~-> > > Info: <http://www.boost.org> > Wiki: <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl> > Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: Information contained in this message and/or attachment(s) may contain confidential information of Zetec, Inc. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender by return email. -----------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

Release builds and C++Builder
by Russell Hind 21 May '03

21 May '03

Does doing a release build of the boost libraries define NDEBUG. (don't know if this is standard) but in C++Builder, NDEBUG disables asserts so it is useful to define it when doing release builds. Thanks Russell

2 2

lambda library: How to access member variables?
by Chuck Messenger 21 May '03

21 May '03

I'm trying to figure out how to do something like this: for_each(c.begin(), c.end(), cout << _1.member << "\n"); which is obviously wrong, but hopefully you know what I mean... Experimenting with ways of accessing members inside a lambda, I wrote the following: #include <iostream> #include <boost/lambda/lambda.hpp> #include <vector> using namespace std; using namespace boost; using namespace lambda; struct XX { XX(int a, int b) { a_ = a; b_ = b; } int a_; int b_; }; int main() { XX xx(5, 6); XX *xxp = &xx; cout << "These should all be equivalent:\n"; cout << xxp ->* &XX::a_ << endl; cout << (_1 ->* &XX::a_)(xxp) << endl; //cout << (_1 ->* &XX::a_)(&xx) << endl; // Doesn't compile! cout << (&_1 ->* &XX::a_)(xx) << endl; cout << "Now, let's try with the vector:\n"; vector<XX> xxVec; xxVec.push_back(XX(3, 4)); cout << (&_1 ->* &XX::a_)(xxVec[0]) << endl; //cout << (_1 ->* &XX::a_)(&xxVec[0]) << endl; // Doesn't compile! cout << (_1 ->* &XX::a_)(xxp = &xxVec[0]) << endl; // Now it compiles... //cout << (_1 ->* &XX::a_)(xxVec.begin()) << endl; // Doesn't compile! //cout << (_1 ->* &XX::a_)(&*xxVec.begin()) << endl; // Still not... cout << (_1 ->* &XX::a_)(xxp = &*xxVec.begin()) << endl; // Now it compiles... exit(0); } I'm mystified by why some of these lines don't compile (gcc 3.2.2). Can anyone explain it? The compiler generates some horrific error messages -- I haven't tried to pick through them yet... - Chuck

1 0

MPL and apply_if trouble
by Tarjei Knapstad 20 May '03

20 May '03

I encountered the following problem today which I've reduced down to a simple example. Basically what I want to do is recurse through a typelist (mpl::vector) popping an element each time and end recursion by using apply_if with mpl::empty<List> as the condition. I've made a simple Reverse class template to illustrate the problem. (The Reverse class is of course intended to reverse the contents of a typelist....) --------------------- begin code --------------------- #include <boost/mpl/front.hpp> #include <boost/mpl/push_back.hpp> #include <boost/mpl/pop_front.hpp> #include <boost/mpl/apply_if.hpp> #include <boost/mpl/empty.hpp> #include <boost/mpl/size.hpp> #include <boost/mpl/vector.hpp> using namespace boost::mpl; template <typename List> struct Reverse { typedef typename front<List>::type FrontElem; typedef typename pop_front<List>::type Rest; typedef typename apply_if< empty<Rest>, vector<FrontElem>, typename push_back<typename Reverse<Rest>::Type, FrontElem>::type >::type Type; }; typedef vector<int,int,long> List; typedef Reverse<List>::Type RevList; --------------------- end code ----------------------- When attempting to create the RevList type however, gcc spits the following at me: reverse.cpp: In instantiation of `boost::mpl::pop_front<boost::mpl::vector0<boost::mpl::void_> >': reverse.cpp:15: instantiated from `Reverse<boost::mpl::vector0<boost::mpl::void_> >' reverse.cpp:21: instantiated from `Reverse<boost::mpl::vector1<long int> >' reverse.cpp:21: instantiated from `Reverse<boost::mpl::vector2<int, long int> >' reverse.cpp:21: instantiated from `Reverse<List>' reverse.cpp:25: instantiated from here reverse.cpp:15: base class ` boost::mpl::pop_front_traits<boost::mpl::aux::vector_tag<0> >::algorithm<boost::mpl::vector0<boost::mpl::void_> >' has incomplete type reverse.cpp: In instantiation of `Reverse<boost::mpl::vector0<boost::mpl::void_> >': reverse.cpp:21: instantiated from `Reverse<boost::mpl::vector1<long int> >' reverse.cpp:21: instantiated from `Reverse<boost::mpl::vector2<int, long int> >' reverse.cpp:21: instantiated from `Reverse<List>' reverse.cpp:25: instantiated from here reverse.cpp:15: no type named `type' in `struct boost::mpl::pop_front<boost::mpl::vector0<boost::mpl::void_> >' reverse.cpp:21: no type named `type' in `struct boost::mpl::pop_front<boost::mpl::vector0<boost::mpl::void_> >' reverse.cpp: In instantiation of `Reverse<boost::mpl::vector1<long int> >': reverse.cpp:21: instantiated from `Reverse<boost::mpl::vector2<int, long int> >' reverse.cpp:21: instantiated from `Reverse<List>' reverse.cpp:25: instantiated from here reverse.cpp:21: no type named `Type' in `struct Reverse<boost::mpl::vector0<boost::mpl::void_> >' reverse.cpp: In instantiation of `Reverse<boost::mpl::vector2<int, long int> >': reverse.cpp:21: instantiated from `Reverse<List>' reverse.cpp:25: instantiated from here reverse.cpp:21: no type named `Type' in `struct Reverse<boost::mpl::vector1<long int> >' reverse.cpp: In instantiation of `Reverse<List>': reverse.cpp:25: instantiated from here reverse.cpp:21: no type named `Type' in `struct Reverse<boost::mpl::vector2<int, long int> >' reverse.cpp:25: syntax error before `;' token I cannot see why it reaches the point where it tries to instantiate Reverse with an empty typelist - the apply_if should stop that (at least that's my intention. Am I being a complete ass somewhere in this code snippet? I've become blinded by now, so if anyone can point out what's wrong I would greatly appreciate it. Sincerely, -- Tarjei

2 5

BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME error
by Pete Cilliers 20 May '03

20 May '03

I get the following error when trying to use the filesystem library on MSVC 6.0 : error C2061: syntax error : identifier 'BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME' The line causing the problem is in the \detail\iterator.hpp file: template <class T> type_traits::yes_type is_mutable_iterator_helper(T const*, BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME T::value_type*); I have run a config Test and both BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME and BOOST_NO_DEDUCED_TYPENAME are defined but have no value. Since MSVC 6.0 supports the 'typename' keyword I would think that the declaration above in the iterator.hpp file should use 'typename' rather than BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME. Anyone else experience this problem? ******************************************************************************************* <http://www.intec-telecom-systems.com/> This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged and/or copyright material of Independent Technology Systems Limited (or its affiliated companies). If you are not the intended or authorised recipient of this email or have received it in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by e-mail. In such a case reading, reproducing, printing or further dissemination of this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Independent Technology Systems Limited does not represent or warrant that an attachment hereto is free from computer viruses or other defects. The opinions expressed in this e-mail and any of the attachments may be those of the author and are not necessarily those of Independent Technology Systems Limited. ******************************************************************************************

2 1

dollar sign doesn't work in regular and format expressions
by Douglas Roberts 20 May '03

20 May '03

I am compiling a program that uses the boost RegEx library on an AS/400 native C compiler. When compiled with VC6 it runs fine, but when compiled with the AS/400 compiler, the dollar sign doesn't function in either the regular and format expressions. For example, when I try a regex_merge and I have a format expression something like this "Example $1 and $2", it will find the submatches, but not insert anything in for $1 and $2, it'll just be "Example and ". Also, in a regular expression when the dollar sign serves as a line anchor, it won't match when it should. Both usages of the dollar sign run fine when compiled on the PC. Everything else, so far, seems to be working okay on the AS/400. Anyone have any ideas? Thanks, Doug

2 1

Newbie: Problem with Signals
by Ray 20 May '03

20 May '03

I am having some problems with boost::signals version 1_30_0 on XP, compiled and linked using VC6. I am building a timer mechanism, similar to that with Qt. A user instanciates a timer with some millisecond value, starts the timer via t.Start(), and then enters the event loop (or in most cases, returns from a function call by the event loop). Timer definition: class Timer { typedef boost::signal1<void, int> TimerSignalType; typedef TimerSignalType::slot_type TimerSlotType; public: boost::signals::connection TimerConnect(const TimerSlotType& slot ) { return OnRing.connect( slot ); } Timer(); Timer( const Timer& ); Timer( unsigned long millesecInterval, TimerType t = Continous ); ~Timer(); void Start(); void Ring() {OnRing( myId );} private: TimerSignalType OnRing; int myId; }; void Rang( int i ) { cout << "Received timer " << endl; } main() { EventLoop *eventLoop = EventLoop::Instance(); Timer t1( 3000, Continous ); t1.TimerConnect( boost::bind( Rang, _1) ); t1.Start(); eventLoop->Exec(); } eventLoop->Exec() start an event loop. The code always crashes when atteping to execute the connected function. What am I doing wrong? Ray

2 3

RE: [Boost-Users] newbie regex problem
by Ferdinand Prantl 20 May '03

20 May '03

Hi Mark, boost::regex_match requires the regex to match the _whole_ string, use another regex - "^Now.*$" - or another method - boost::regex_search. See the documentation: http://www.boost.org/libs/regex/template_class_ref.htm#query_match http://www.boost.org/libs/regex/template_class_ref.htm#reg_search Ferda -----Original Message----- From: Mark Sizer [mailto:yg-boost-users@gmane.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 01:25 To: boost-users(a)yahoogroups.com Subject: [Boost-Users] newbie regex problem Everything builds and runs fine, I'm just not getting the result I expect. std::string sString = "Now is the time for all good men..."; std::string sRegEx1 = "^Now"; boost::regex regex1( sRegEx1 ); CPPUNIT_ASSERT( boost::regex_match(sString, regex1) ); is failing. I have to assume I'm doing something really stupid. Could someone tell me what? Thanks, - Mark ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions. http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lj3uPC/Me7FAA/uetFAA/EbFolB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Info: <http://www.boost.org> Wiki: <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl> Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

1 0

Borland 5 and indirect_iterator
by Stephen Love 19 May '03

19 May '03

Hi all, Using Borland C++Builder5 (which has bcc32 5.5.1) I've attempted the tests for indirect_iterator which compile fine. However, the following fails: list< shared_ptr< int > > ctr; void foo( int x ) { } for_each( make_indirect_iterator( ctr.begin() ), make_indirect_iterator( ctr.end() ), foo ); with the first error being: [C++ Error] iterator.h(125): E2404 Dependent type qualifier 'shared_ptr<int>' has no member type named 'difference_type' which then causes a failure to instantiate the iterator_traits. I'm no template guru, so I can make the full error list available if required. Anyone know what's going on? Thanks Steve -- Steve Love: steve.love(a)essennell.co.uk ACCU - accu.org Promoting Professionalism in Programming

3 3

MPL pop_back problem
by Tarjei Knapstad 19 May '03

19 May '03

I get some weird error messages which I don't really understand when I tried using mpl::pop_back today. The following example (more or less an exact copy of the one in the documentation): ------------------ start code ----------------- #include <boost/mpl/list.hpp> #include <boost/mpl/pop_back.hpp> using namespace boost::mpl; void f() { typedef list<int, double>::type ListType; typedef pop_back<ListType>::type PoppedList; } ------------------ end code ---------------------- fails on gcc 3.2 (Boost 1.30) with: pop_back.cpp: In instantiation of `boost::mpl::pop_back<f()::ListType>': pop_back.cpp:9: instantiated from here pop_back.cpp:9: base class ` boost::mpl::pop_back_traits<boost::mpl::aux::list_tag>::algorithm<f()::ListType> ' has incomplete type pop_back.cpp: In function `void f()': pop_back.cpp:9: ISO C++ forbids declaration of `type' with no type pop_back.cpp:9: typedef name may not be class-qualified pop_back.cpp:9: parse error before `;' token I'd appreciate if someone could clear this up for me. Regards, -- Tarjei

2 4

[thread] confusion about recursive_try_mutex
by Christopher Currie 19 May '03

19 May '03

I've been looking at the implementation of recursive_try_mutex, and something struck me as odd in the pthreads implementation: bool recursive_try_mutex::do_trylock() { # if defined(BOOST_HAS_PTHREAD_MUTEXATTR_SETTYPE) int res = 0; res = pthread_mutex_trylock(&m_mutex); assert(res == 0); if (res == 0) { if (++m_count > 1) { res = pthread_mutex_unlock(&m_mutex); assert(res == 0); } return true; } return false; # else // ... } It appears that if BOOST_HAS_PTHREAD_MUTEXATTR_SETTYPE is defined, in debug mode this function will never return false, because the assert will fire first instead. Am I reading this incorrectly, or is there something happening somewhere else that I'm missing? Thanks in advance, Christopher Currie [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

1 0

initial function of boost::thread
by Mark Sizer 19 May '03

19 May '03

This is also stuff that has been answered before. I really have searched. Links to the answers will be as appreciate as an inline responses. I've been using free file-scoped functions up to now because I really don't understand what a boost::function0<void>& is. I get, I think, that it can't be a member function, because there is no 'this' attached. However, I'm having trouble with two things: #1 from: function.tutorial.html <quote> boost::function2<float, int, int> f; struct int_div { float operator()(int x, int y) const { return ((float)x)/y; }; }; f = int_div(); </quote> operator() _is_ a member function. When assigning int_div() to f, which of potentially zillions of instances of int_div is being referenced? Is a new one created on invocation? (the example uses std::cout << f(5,2) << endl;) I'm missing a theoretical bit of information that makes this hang together. Help, please. #2 from: http://www.cuj.com/articles/2002/0205/0205a/0205a.htm?topic=articles <quote> However, because Boost.Threads uses a function object instead of just a function pointer, it is possible for the function object to carry data needed by the thread. This approach is actually more flexible and is type safe. When combined with functional libraries, such as Boost.Bind, this design actually allows you to easily pass any amount of data to the newly created thread. </quote> BUT HOW?!?! Any pointers (with many examples, please) would be much appreciated. Thanks, - Mark

2 2

BGL sample code error -- edge_property.cpp
by Chuck Messenger 19 May '03

19 May '03

edge_proprety.cpp, as included in Boost release 1.30.0, generates warnings under gcc 3.2.2, since it is missing a couple of typenames. Here's the needed patch: 95c95 < property_map<Graph, edge_mycapacity_t>::const_type --- > typename property_map<Graph, edge_mycapacity_t>::const_type 97c97 < property_map<Graph, edge_myflow_t>::const_type --- > typename property_map<Graph, edge_myflow_t>::const_type - Chuck Messenger

2 1

Using time_duration::rep_type::ticks_per_second
by d_zakaib 18 May '03

18 May '03

I have written a function to convert a posix_time::ptime to a windows FILETIME (which is in essence a 64-bit value counting 100-nanosecond intervals since Jan 01, 1601). In order to do so, I do a time difference between the ptime and a time setup to the FILETIME reference time. To convert from this time_duration to the FILETIME count, I use time_duration::rep_type::ticks_per_second. Since this does not seem to be documented I just wanted to make sure I was using it correctly (or if I should be using it at all). Here is my code (which seems to work): const ULONGLONG nanosecPerFileTimeUnit = 100; using namespace boost::posix_time; using namespace boost::gregorian; FILETIME toFileTime ( const ptime& time ) { ptime refTime(date(1601,Jan,01)); time_duration sinceRefDate = time - refTime; ULARGE_INTEGER durationInFileTimeUnits; const ULONGLONG timeDurTicksPerSec = time_duration::rep_type::ticks_per_second; const ULONGLONG fileTimeUnitsPerTimeDurTick = (nanosecPerSec/timeDurTicksPerSec) / nanosecPerFileTimeUnit; durationInFileTimeUnits.QuadPart = sinceRefDate.ticks()*fileTimeUnitsPerTimeDurTick ; FILETIME ft; ft.dwLowDateTime = durationInFileTimeUnits.LowPart; ft.dwHighDateTime = durationInFileTimeUnits.HighPart; return ft; }

2 1

regex build problem
by Benedikt Weber 18 May '03

18 May '03

Hi everybody I tried to build boost out of the box. Everthing worked fine except the following: ------------------------------------- D:\boost\boost_1_30_0>bjam "-sTOOLS=cwpro8" ... FileClone libs\regex\build\bin-stage\boost_regex_debug.lib The system cannot find the file specified. ... FileClone libs\regex\build\bin-stage\boost_regex.lib The system cannot find the file specified. -------------------------------------- The actual file names generated in libs\regex\build\bin-stage are: libboost_regex_debug.lib and libboost_regex.lib, i.e. they have an extra "lib" prepended. Interestingly enough the analogous dll files are: boost_regex_debug.dll and boost_regex.dll as expected. Any ideas? Benedikt

2 1

more ublas test problems
by Benedikt Weber 18 May '03

18 May '03

When compling the bench* tests for ublas using the jamfiles, both cwpro8 and borland do not seem to know about the function rand(). I think that <stdlib.h> should be included somewhere. MSVC seems to do this implicitely. Furthermore, only debug versions are generated for all tests (test* and bench*). Benedikt

3 7

strange behaviour at setup on windows2000
by Anthony Lichnewsky 17 May '03

17 May '03

I had the following trouble setting up boost 1.29.0 on windows 2000 (using vc7, but that's not the point) the first thing bjam did (the version downloaded from sourceforge) was to erase all the files and folders in tools\ so that no build could be performed... setting those files to read-only was enough but that's an unexpected behaviour. Anthony Lichnewsky

2 3

Signals lib - causes mysterious multiple destructor calls
by Chuck Messenger 16 May '03

16 May '03

Testing out the Boost signals lib, I wrote: ----------- #include <boost/signal.hpp> #include <iostream> using namespace std; using namespace boost; struct X { void operator()(int val) { cout << "X <- " << val << endl; } X() { cout << "X constructor\n"; } ~X() { cout << "X destructor\n"; } }; int main() { { cout << " phase 1\n"; signal<void (int)> sig; cout << " phase 2\n"; X x; cout << " phase 3\n"; sig.connect(x); cout << " phase 4\n"; } cout << " phase 5\n"; return 0; } ------------------- The following output is generated (gcc3.2.2 on Mandrake 9.1): ------------------------ phase 1 phase 2 X constructor phase 3 X destructor X destructor X destructor X destructor X destructor X destructor X destructor X destructor phase 4 X destructor X destructor phase 5 ------------------------ Why the multiple calls to X's destructor? I'd have expected just one. It looks like the signals lib is misbehaving. Can anyone offer an explanation? - Chuck

3 2

lambda library: how to use io manipulators?
by Chuck Messenger 16 May '03

16 May '03

The following compiles: (cout << _1 << "\n")(x); but this doesn't: (cout << _1 << endl)(x); (gcc 3.2.2) I can't figure out how to use an io manipulator within a lambda function. Firstly, how do I do it? (e.g. suppose I want to use flush, for which there is no workaround like using "\n"). Secondly, a suggestion: it would be nice if support was built in for the io manipulators. - Chuck

1 0