- Boost-users - lists.preview.boost.org

Creating a thread and blocking its execution
by Jean-Sebastien Stoezel 31 Aug '10

31 Aug '10

Hello, I use boost::thread as follow: mp_Thread = new boost::thread(boost::bind(CSubsystem::TaskWrapper, this)); to create a thread in an initialization method. I observe that this thread gets to run before my initialization method has completed its execution. I would like to create a thread from this initialization method, and wait for it to execute until the whole initialization process it done. Is it possible to create a thread in suspended mode, and then release it once the system is ready? Or do I need to use a synchronization mechanism like a semaphore to release it? Jean-Sebastien

3 3

Does BOOST ASIO HTTP support 1.1
by Manna Patri 31 Aug '10

31 Aug '10

Hi, Looking at the boost::asio:: http server I am very much interested to have it in my application server.However before proceeding further I would like to know does HTTP server implmentation supports HTTP 1.1 ? Looking at the example available under HTTP client it seems "HTTP 1.0" is sent across in header as part of HTTP message. And to my curoisity when I modifeid the client code to send "HTTP 1.1" that also worked. Reply in this regard is appreciated. Thanks. Manna

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] Boost.Serialization: Restoring object state(preventcreation of a new object)?
by ray＠maya-studio.com 31 Aug '10

31 Aug '10

> That's likely something else entirely. We'd have to see more code. Forget my previous post, the exception was due to mixed up ofstream and ifstream... Just to resume - if I have a list of pointers to the objects (all derived from the same base class) and I'd like to serialize them through a reference, a code like this would be needed: // List of pointers A a; B b; // Derived from A C c; // Derived from C std::list<A*> list; list.push_back(&a); // Base list.push_back(&b); // Derived list.push_back(&c); // Derived ... // Save std::ofstream ofs("c:/test.xml"); boost::archive::xml_oarchive oa(ofs); BOOST_FOREACH(A* pA, list) { if (dynamic_cast<B*>(pA)) { B& b = *static_cast<B*>(pA); oa & BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(b); } else if (dynamic_cast<C*>(pA)) { C& c = *pA; BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(c); } else { A& a = *pA; BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(a); } } Am I right?

2 2

multi_array: error: expected primary-expression before ‘)’
by Valmor de Almeida 31 Aug '10

31 Aug '10

Hello, I am trying from the multi_array web site doc: typedef boost::multi_array<double,3> array_type; array_type A(boost::extents[3][4][2],boost::fortran_storage_order); and getting the following compile-time error: g++ img2hermes2dmsh.cpp In function ‘int main()’: error: expected primary-expression before ‘)’ token Any insights? I am using boost-1.41 on gentoo linux. Thanks, -- Valmor

2 2

download question
by Stanisław Findeisen 31 Aug '10

31 Aug '10

Hi What are the file checksums? -- http://eisenbits.homelinux.net/~stf/ OpenPGP: DFD9 0146 3794 9CF6 17EA D63F DBF5 8AA8 3B31 FE8A Like Hardship, Risk & Challenge? --- Follow Jesus!!

1 0

Comparing boost bind object with a pointer to member function
by jej 31 Aug '10

31 Aug '10

Hello, Is is possible to compare a pointer to member function with a function object returned by boost bind? I have a class with several different functions; for each member function I use boost bind to bind the function object to several args. At the point where I want call the function object, I would like to check which member function it's been bound to, and decide whether or no it should be executed. For example, I would like the second comparison in the code snippet below to return "Bind match." For any other member function of foo it should return "Bind not match." Thanks. int main(int, char**) { Data d(1, 2); Foo fx, fy; //typedef void (Foo::*foofunctwo_t)(const Data&); //foofunctwo_t del1 = &Foo::FuncTwo; boost::function<void (Foo*, const Data&)> bf(&Foo::FuncTwo); if(bf == &Foo::FuncTwo) { cout << "match" <<endl; } else { cout << "no match" << endl; } boost::function<void (const Data&)> boundfunc = boost::bind(&Foo::FuncTwo, &fx, _1); if(boundfunc == &Foo::FuncTwo) { cout << "Bind match" << endl; } else { cout << "Bind not match" << endl; } return 0; }; -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Comparing-boost-bind-object-with-a-pointer-to-member-… Sent from the Boost - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

2 2

Overloading boost::for_each()
by Jeremiah Willcock 31 Aug '10

31 Aug '10

There are several container types (such as typical deque implementations, if you have access to their internals) that can have for_each() implemented for them in a way that is faster than using iterators and a generic for_each() function. Is there a way to take advantage of that in Boost.Range, such as by overloading boost::for_each()? Is there some kind of Iterable concept that doesn't require actual iterators or allows them to be slow? Would it be worthwhile to add one? Are there any other techniques that would be useful instead, such as always calling for_each() unqualified in my code and using ADL to find custom versions (like is done for swap)? I am not interested in making Boost.Range algorithms use this new concept, but there are places in my own code that could use for_each() rather than explicit loops if that was faster. Thank you for any answers or advice. -- Jeremiah Willcock

7 17

asio HTTP client example always returns error 400
by G S 31 Aug '10

31 Aug '10

Hi all. I copied the boost::asio HTTP client example code: http://live.boost.org/doc/libs/1_39_0/doc/html/boost_asio/example/http/clie… and just replaced the argv stuff with a hard-coded domain name and "index.html". It appears to make the socket connection OK, but the response to the request is 400 ("bad request"). Is there something wrong with this request? boost::asio::streambuf request; std::ostream request_stream(&request); request_stream << "GET " << "index.html" << " HTTP/1.0\r\n"; request_stream << "Host: " << "musicobsession.com" << "\r\n"; request_stream << "Accept: */*\r\n"; request_stream << "Connection: close\r\n\r\n"; It doesn't matter what host I use (as long is it's real). Thanks for any insight!

2 3

[log] cost of record instantiation
by Matthias Vallentin 31 Aug '10

31 Aug '10

Hello, I am trying to understand the cost of log record instantiation. Say I have a global severity logger with several levels, of which the debug level produces a lot of output and record creation is expensive. Because the overhead should only incur when actually logging in debug mode, I would like to know how costly the level check is. That is, in the following code // The custom logger class here accommodates multiple severity // loggers for different facilities. #define LOG(level, facility) \ BOOST_LOG_SEV(global::logger->get(facility), level) LOG(debug, core) << ... some expensive construction would the stream expression be instantiated regardless of the logging level, yet simple be discarded when being in level lower than debug? (I am asking because I recall they are not streamed in a lazy fashion.) If this is the case, preventing the construction of the stream expression would need a different logging mechanism, e.g., /// Expensive logging when in Debug mode. #ifdef DEBUG #define LOGD(facility) \ LOG(log::debug, facility) #endif // Not being compiled. LOGD(core) << ... some expensive constrution However, this design does not have a uniform approach to logging, which makes it less attractive. Any thoughts? Matthias

2 1

[Boost.DateTime][Boost.Python] Year out of valid range error when streaming via Python module
by SamuelG 31 Aug '10

31 Aug '10

This problem occurs at a higher level but I've tried to strip it back. I've reproduced this problem GCC 4.3.4, Python 2.6.5 and Boost 1.41.0 32bit and 64bit Debians/Ubuntu. The problem does not seem to happen on Windows XP. I have embedded the Python interpreter in the attached http://old.nabble.com/file/p29579563/run_python.cpp run_python.cpp . When running this with the attached script http://old.nabble.com/file/p29579563/test.py test.py and which uses a test module http://old.nabble.com/file/p29579563/test_date_time.cpp test_date_time.cpp , the following Boost.DateTime error occurs: $ run_python test.py out() - entry out() - to_simple_string(): 2010-Aug-31 14:30:33.439172000 out() - manual format: 2010-Aug-31 14509:17:19.172000 out() - oss.str(): 2010-Aug-31 14509:17:19.172000 out() - now: Traceback (most recent call last): File "test.py", line 6, in <module> test_date_time.output() IndexError: Year is out of valid range: 1400..10000 However, when running the same script via python it is fine: $ python test.py out() - entry out() - to_simple_string(): 2010-Aug-31 14:30:31.208160000 out() - manual format: 2010-Aug-31 14:30:31.208160000 out() - oss.str(): 2010-Aug-31 14:30:31.208160000 out() - now: 2010-Aug-31 14:30:31.208160000 out() - exit Note that the time stamp in the first example is corrupt. Note also that the valid range error does not occur when using the date and time facets manually but when streaming the ptime object to std::cerr. The problem first arose for me when using Boost.Log with separate Python modules via *both* run_python and /usr/bin/python. See http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost-log/forums/forum/710022/topic/3748054 http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost-log/forums/forum/710022/topic/3748054 For this simple case, /usr/bin/python seems okay but the run_python error is identical to what happens in our proper application (where Boost.Log is used and multiple Python modules loaded). Has anyone witnessed similar behaviour? Or can they please test my example out? Thanks for any help, Sam -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/-Boost.DateTime--Boost.Python--Year-out-of-valid-rang… Sent from the Boost - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] boost::asio SSL connection thru proxy server
by Kumar, Akhilesh 31 Aug '10

31 Aug '10

Hi All, Considering that nobody replied my question I am wondering if anybody who has knowledge of this kind of problem has seen my previous message/question. I really need help on this issue if anybody has any thought on this pls. reply. Thanks, Akhilesh Kumar From: Kumar, Akhilesh Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 5:10 PM To: 'boost-users(a)lists.boost.org' Subject: boost::asio SSL connection thru proxy server Hi, I am writing a boost socket client using boost::asio to do secure HTTP (HTTPS) communication. I Implemented my client based on the code sample based on (http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_39_0/doc/html/boost_asio/example/ssl/client…) with little changes as I am using sync socket. My client woks fine, when I am connecting to server directly, but I am not sure what changes I need to make when my communication going thru proxy. The unsecure connection(HTTP) work fine thru proxy, and here is what I do for unsecure connection, 1. Initialize boost socket(IO service and other stuff). 2. Resolve and Connect to Proxy server. 3. Start writing to actual server(HTTP send request). 4. Start uploading/downloading. 5. Close Socket. But I can't use this above procedure for (SSL) secure connection as I need to do handshaking with the server before I can write anything if my understanding is correct. Can somebody give me some pointer or code sample or step I need to do when I am doing secure connection thru proxy server. Just to clarify Microsoft WinInet does do (secure) HTTPS connection thru same proxy fine. If providing my code sample I am using for SSL might help understand the problem I can provide that. Thanks in advance for any help. Akhilesh Kumar

3 5

Re: [Boost-users] Boost.Serialization: Restoring object state (preventcreation of a new object)?
by ray＠maya-studio.com 30 Aug '10

30 Aug '10

>> Just avoid serialization through a pointer, serialize either the >> object or a reference to the object. Thanks, Robert. Serializing through a reference seems to be the only viable solution in my case. However, I'm not able to make it work (I didn't find any specific information about references in the library documentation - except for member variables) . For example: A a; ... A& aRef = a; ia & BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(aRef);; // Throws an exception in load_override

2 1

[parameter] Using named parameter types in return type
by Jeremiah Willcock 30 Aug '10

30 Aug '10

In BOOST_PARAMETER_FUNCTION, one argument to specify is the return type of the function. How do I refer to the types deduced for the named parameters in the return type? I am creating a factory function for a class template (similar to std::make_pair) and would like to use named parameters for it. I did not see any obvious way to do this in the documentation. Is there a way? A documented name for the ArgPack? I am using C++0x so it would be OK to have a solution that requires that. -- Jeremiah Willcock

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] [filesystem] Using filesystem library from Boost version 1.44 on Cygwin 1.7
by Clarke, Carus V 30 Aug '10

30 Aug '10

> Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 08:36:49 -0700 > From: Steven Watanabe <watanabesj(a)gmail.com> > To: boost-users(a)lists.boost.org > Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [filesystem] Using filesystem library from > Boost version 1.44 on Cygwin 1.7 > Message-ID: <4C7BD011.6010707(a)providere-consulting.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > AMDG > > Clarke, Carus V wrote: > > Steven Watanabe wrote: > >> Your code doesn't appear to print this last line. > > > > You are right. I added the last line after pasting in the > code. Here it is: > > > > boost_fs::file_status st = boost_fs::status(path, ec); > > <snip> > > std::cout << "Does file exist? " << boost_fs::exists(st) > << std::endl; > > return 0; > > } > > > > Is there anything I can do to make this work? > > > > It looks like stat is setting errno to ENOENT. > Do you get the same behavior if the file exists before > starting the program? > > In Christ, > Steven Watanabe > Yes, the behavior is the same whether the program writes the file or if the file had been previously written. Thanks, Carus V. (Bud) Clarke carus.v.clarke(a)boeing.com

2 1

Boost.Serialization: Restoring object state (prevent creation of a new object)?
by ray＠maya-studio.com 30 Aug '10

30 Aug '10

If an object is serialized (saved) from a pointer, the loading part automatically creates (instantiates) a new object. However, there are situations when the object is already created and all we need is to restore its state. The following code demonstrates one possible - although not elegant - solution using a temporary object:#include <fstream> #include <iostream> #include <boost/archive/xml_iarchive.hpp> #include <boost/archive/xml_oarchive.hpp> #include <boost/serialization/string.hpp> #include <boost/serialization/export.hpp> class A { public: A() : m_val(100) { } int m_val; private: friend class boost::serialization::access; template <typename Archive> void serialize(Archive &ar, const unsigned int version) { ar & BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(m_val); } }; int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { A *a = new A(); // Save the object { std::ofstream os("d:/test.xml"); boost::archive::xml_oarchive oa(os); // Save from pointer oa & BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(a); } // Change the object state a->m_val = 200; // Restore the state { std::ifstream is("d:/test.xml"); boost::archive::xml_iarchive ia(is); A* aTemp; ia & BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(aTemp); a->m_val = aTemp->m_val; // Copy object state assert(a->m_val == 100); delete aTemp; } } Here is my question: Is there some more convenient way to restore the object state? In other words, is it possible to prevent creation of a new object and just 'populate' an existing object?

2 1

[filesystem] Using filesystem library from Boost version 1.44 on Cygwin 1.7
by Clarke, Carus V 30 Aug '10

30 Aug '10

Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:39:29 -0700 From: Steven Watanabe <watanabesj(a)gmail.com> To: boost-users(a)lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [filesystem] Using filesystem library from Boost version 1.44 on Cygwin 1.7 Message-ID: <4C783EA1.4070400(a)providere-consulting.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed AMDG Clarke, Carus V wrote: > I have been using the filesystem library from Boost version 1.43 on a Cygwin 1.7.6-1 platform without any problems. The library was built using the Cygwin version of GCC 4.3.4. The library from the 1.44 version of Boost compiles compiles o.k., but the functions that access files no longer work. This appears to be true for both versions 2 and 3 of the library. Below is a simple program that runs o.k. with the Boost version 1.43 version of the library. The program runs but can not read the file status using Boost version 1.44. This program also works fine when built using MSVC 9.0 and Boost version 1.44. > > //-------------------- > > <snip> > > int main() > { > <snip> > std::cout << "Error code message: " << ec.message() << std::endl; > return 0; > } > > //-------------------- > > This program's output on my system is shown below. The file 'foo' is written by the program and does actually exist. > > For version 2: > > boost::filesystem library version is v2 > Checking status of file foo... > Error code value: 0 > Error code message: The operation completed successfully > Does file exist? false > Your code doesn't appear to print this last line. In Christ, Steven Watanabe ------------------------------ You are right. I added the last line after pasting in the code. Here it is: boost_fs::file_status st = boost_fs::status(path, ec); <snip> std::cout << "Does file exist? " << boost_fs::exists(st) << std::endl; return 0; } Is there anything I can do to make this work? Thanks, Carus V. (Bud) Clarke carus.v.clarke(a)boeing.com ------------------------------

2 1

[parameter] Weird behavior with bools
by Ryan McConnehey 30 Aug '10

30 Aug '10

I'm new to the parameter library and started with a simple example to get my feet wet. The first problem I'm having is with type restriction. The "name" variable is being restricted to a boolean type. This doesn't seem to be enforced since I can pass this variable a value of 15 and get this same value out. Currently my output has "name = 15" and I expected the output to be "name = 1". Did I not correctly enforce the type? The second problem is with the default value of my variable. I thought if the variable wasn't used then the third parameter, in the declaration, is used for instantiation of that variable. I thought that meant I could do this "m_name(args[_name])". The compiler gives an error saying the operator[] can't deduce the arguments. What did I not do that would allow this behavior. Thank you for your time in helping me out. Ryan BOOST_PARAMETER_NAME(name) struct myclass_impl { template <class ArgumentPack> myclass_impl(ArgumentPack const& args) : m_name(args[_name | false]) //: m_name(args[_name]) //gives a compile error { std::cout << "name = " << m_name << std::endl; } private: int m_name; }; struct myclass : public myclass_impl { BOOST_PARAMETER_CONSTRUCTOR( myclass, (myclass_impl), tag , (optional (name, (bool), bool(false)))) // no semicolon }; int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { myclass x(_name = 15); return 0; }

4 7

Can I fstat or get the file date/time for a file stream ?
by Timothy Madden 30 Aug '10

30 Aug '10

Hello Is there a way to stat or to get file last accessed time from an opened std::fstream or boost::filesystem::fstream or a boost::iostreams::stream ? Or is there a way to get the underlaying file descriptor (or a FILE *) from a fstream so I can call POSIX fstat ? Thank you, Timothy Madden

1 0

Fwd: Some trouble using mutexes
by Ernest Galbrun 30 Aug '10

30 Aug '10

Ok, thank you for your reply, I have been away for a week and I am back to work, with this problem still preventing my program to work fine. To answer your question, I have only one Robot in my project (for now) and the io_service is a Robot member. I now get why the active_count goes negative when the count goes up, but now I can't figure how it can ever be incremented twice. When debugging, I see the active_count being either 0, -2147483648, OR -2147483647. In fact, even when the active_count is not ==0, the lock() call returns instantly. Any clue ? Ernest Galbrun. > > Ernest Galbrun wrote: > > I would be really grateful if someone could give me a hint about what I > am > > doing wrong with the mutex and thread class (I am using boost 1.43, on > > windows XP running visual c++ 2010, the library has been built using the > > bjam utility). > > > > I have a main thread that creates an object of class robot : > > > > class Robot > > { > > private: > > boost::mutex tcpLock; > > boost::thread continuousThread; > > ... > > } > > > > Robot k3; > > > > this thread launches a thread that makes continuous calls to a member > > function of the robot. Since this function uses network ressources, I > want > > it to be safe so i use a lock The function called is the only function in > my > > program that uses this lock : > > > > int Robot::sendMsg(string msg, int n, vector<string>* answer) > > { > > tcpLock.lock(); > > (do stuff with the tcp io service) > > tcpLock.unlock(); > > return 0; > > } > > > > Of course, I also call this function from the main thread. > > > > And I have disruptive behavior, which I don't understand. > > Do you have multiple Robots? Is the io_service shared between them? > > > When debugging, I > > see that the 'active_count' of the tcpLock object stays negative or ==0, > > which seem absolutely wrong to me, but I don't understand how it could > ever > > be anything other than 0 or 1. > > > > The implementation indicates that the mutex is locked with the > high-order bit, which means that a locked mutex will have > a negative active count. > > In Christ, > Steven Watanabe >

1 0

boost transfer pointers by serialize
by Jack Bryan 29 Aug '10

29 Aug '10

Dear All, I need to transfer some pointers from one process to another process on Open MPI cluster. These pointers are members of a class. They are like: class myClass{double *;int *;double**; } When I use serialize in boost , I got errors: /boost/serialization/access.hpp:118: error: request for member âserializeâ in âtâ, which is of non-class type âdoubleâ Any help is appreciated. JACK Aug. 29 2010

2 5

boost thread - bug pthread
by Kraus Philipp 29 Aug '10

29 Aug '10

Hi, I'm writing a multithread application and I test my program with valgrind. I create a thread group and valgrind shows this message: ==4608== Thread #1: Bug in libpthread: recursive write lock granted on mutex/wrlock which does not support recursion ==4608== at 0x503FC: pthread_cond_wait* (hg_intercepts.c:653) ==4608== by 0x19C3B7: boost::thread::join() (in libboost_thread.dylib) ==4608== by 0x15D8C: boost::thread_group::join_all() (in ./main) I use Boost 1.44 on OSX 10.5. How can I solve this "Bug"? Thanks Phil

1 0

string algo - documentation bug?
by mafeusek＠gmail.com 29 Aug '10

29 Aug '10

Hallo Group Members. in http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_44_0/doc/html/string_algo/concept.html I can read: * Function Finder. Finder can be any function object. That is, any ordinary function with the required signature can be used as well. However, such a function can be used only for a specific iterator type. boost::iterator_range<std::string> simple_finder( std::string::const_iterator Begin, std::string::const_iterator End ) { return boost::make_range( Begin, End ); } but following code does not compile: #include <iostream> #include <string> #include <boost/algorithm/string.hpp> #include <boost/range.hpp> int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { boost::iterator_range<std::string> dd; return 0; } As I understand, I need to put iterator as template parameter to iterator_range, thus: #include <iostream> #include <string> #include <boost/algorithm/string.hpp> #include <boost/range.hpp> /* boost::iterator_range<std::string> simple_finder( std::string::const_iterator Begin, std::string::const_iterator End ) { return boost::make_range( Begin, End ); } */ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { boost::iterator_range<std::string::iterator> dd; return 0; } compiles ok. Is it documentation bug? best regards, Pawel

1 0

Any stream class for C standard FILE * streams ?
by Timothy Madden 29 Aug '10

29 Aug '10

Hello Is there a stream class in boost that would use a C standard FILE * stream as the buffer ? Thank you, Timothy Madden

2 1

Multiple link errors when using boost 1.44 boost::filesystem and gcc 4.1.2 on CentOS 5.5
by Potato Soup 29 Aug '10

29 Aug '10

I have installed gcc 4.1.2 (from Cent OS 5.5 repos), boost 1.44, and built all the libraries. I am able to link to all other libraries I try. As soon as I so much as add the include for boost::filesystem, and attempt to build my single .cpp file, I get the following errors: In function `__static_initialization_and_destruction_0(int, int)': testbuild.cpp:(.text+0xfa): undefined reference to `boost::system::generic_category()' testbuild.cpp:(.text+0x106): undefined reference to `boost::system::generic_category()' testbuild.cpp:(.text+0x112): undefined reference to `boost::system::system_category()' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status The linking stage fails and despite hours of googling I see no clear solution. I would be grateful for any advice on how to move past this, as it's the only thing holding me back from developing with boost. To be clear again, simply including <boost/filesystem.hpp> is enough to cause this when performing a link against libboost_filesystem.a.

2 1

boost serialize error
by Jack Bryan 29 Aug '10

29 Aug '10

Dear All: I am trying to use boost (1.43) serialize to transfer data. But I got errors: ---------------------------------------------------------------- path/boost_1_43_0/boost/config/stdlib/libstdcpp3.hpp:40:1: warning: "BOOST_HAS_THREADS" redefined<command line>:1:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definitionpath/boost_1_43_0/boost/serialization/access.hpp: In static member function âstatic void boost::serialization::access::serialize(Archive&, T&, unsigned int) [with Archive = boost::mpi::packed_iarchive, T = int*]â:path/boost_1_43_0/boost/serialization/serialization.hpp:74: instantiated from âvoid boost::serialization::serialize(Archive&, T&, unsigned int) [with Archive = boost::mpi::packed_iarchive, T = int*]âpath/boost_1_43_0/boost/serialization/serialization.hpp:133: instantiated from âvoid boost::serialization::serialize_adl(Archive&, T&, unsigned int) [with Archive = boost::mpi::packed_iarchive, T = int*]âpath/boost_1_43_0/boost/archive/detail/iserializer.hpp:182: instantiated from âvoid boost::archive::detail::iserializer<Archive, T>::load_object_data(boost::archive::detail::basic_iarchive&, void*, unsigned int) const [with Archive = boost::mpi::packed_iarchive, T = int*]â myProg.cpp:413: instantiated from herepath/boost_1_43_0/boost/serialization/access.hpp:118: error: request for member âserializeâ in âtâ, which is of non-class type âint*âpath/boost_1_43_0/boost/serialization/access.hpp: In static member function âstatic void boost::serialization::access::serialize(Archive&, T&, unsigned int) [with Archive = boost::mpi::packed_iarchive, T = double]â:path/boost_1_43_0/boost/serialization/serialization.hpp:74: instantiated from âvoid boost::serialization::serialize(Archive&, T&, unsigned int) [with Archive = boost::mpi::packed_iarchive, T = double]âpath/boost_1_43_0/boost/serialization/serialization.hpp:133: instantiated from âvoid boost::serialization::serialize_adl(Archive&, T&, unsigned int) [with Archive = boost::mpi::packed_iarchive, T = double]âpath/boost_1_43_0/boost/archive/detail/iserializer.hpp:182: instantiated from âvoid boost::archive::detail::iserializer<Archive, T>::load_object_data(boost::archive::detail::basic_iarchive&, void*, unsigned int) const [with Archive = boost::mpi::packed_iarchive, T = double]â myProg.cpp:413: instantiated from herepath/boost_1_43_0/boost/serialization/access.hpp:118: error: request for member âserializeâ in âtâ, which is of non-class type âdoubleâpath/boost_1_43_0/boost/serialization/access.hpp: In static member function âstatic void boost::serialization::access::serialize(Archive&, T&, unsigned int) [with Archive = boost::mpi::packed_oarchive, T = int*]â:path/boost_1_43_0/boost/serialization/serialization.hpp:74: instantiated from âvoid boost::serialization::serialize(Archive&, T&, unsigned int) [with Archive = boost::mpi::packed_oarchive, T = int*]âpath/boost_1_43_0/boost/serialization/serialization.hpp:133: instantiated from âvoid boost::serialization::serialize_adl(Archive&, T&, unsigned int) [with Archive = boost::mpi::packed_oarchive, T = int*]âpath/boost_1_43_0/boost/archive/detail/oserializer.hpp:148: instantiated from âvoid boost::archive::detail::oserializer<Archive, T>::save_object_data(boost::archive::detail::basic_oarchive&, const void*) const [with Archive = boost::mpi::packed_oarchive, T = int*]â ---------------------------------------------------------------- It does not indicate the line number of my program with errors. The 413 is the last line of myProg.cpp. What is the meaning of "request for member serialize in t, which is of non-class type double" ? Any help is appreciated. Jack Aug. 28 2010

1 0

Fwd: Bundled properties for GraphProperties
by Saeed Nari 29 Aug '10

29 Aug '10

Hi all, I wonder if I can use a user defined class (bundled property) as a GraphProperty. The documentation just says about vertex and edge properties. Actually I could compile the below line with no errors: typedef adjacency_list<listS, vecS, directedS, vClass, eClass, gClass> Graph; vClass, eClass and gClass are my own classes. I don't know how to access the members from gClass anyway. Graph g; Vertex v; Edge e; g[v].vMember and g[e].eMember work fine. But I get error for g.gMember. Thanks Saeed

4 3

Is Boost-CMake Dead or Alive?
by Michael Jackson 28 Aug '10

28 Aug '10

http://ryppl.org/news/ So the boost-svn tracking is now hosted at Github. Ok. If you read farther down the page then it looks like Boost-CMake really _is_ going to be resurrected in the future? Is there any current activity with respect to Boost and git and cmake? I am so confused. I was going to take over for Troy S. in getting Boost-CMake ready after each release but if there is "Official" work doing this then I am not going to waste me time. Clarifications would be wonderful at this point. Thanks Mike Jackson

5 5

Any class for a buffer or temporary file ?
by Timothy Madden 28 Aug '10

28 Aug '10

Hello Is there a class or stream class in boost to implement a buffer that will use memory storage fro small data sizes, and disk storage in temporary files for large data sizes ? Or is there a (random-access) file stream class to open some unnamed or temporary file that will automatically be deleted after closing ? Thank you, Timothy Madden

1 0

[filesystem] Using filesystem library from Boost version 1.44 on Cygwin 1.7
by Clarke, Carus V 27 Aug '10

27 Aug '10

I have been using the filesystem library from Boost version 1.43 on a Cygwin 1.7.6-1 platform without any problems. The library was built using the Cygwin version of GCC 4.3.4. The library from the 1.44 version of Boost compiles compiles o.k., but the functions that access files no longer work. This appears to be true for both versions 2 and 3 of the library. Below is a simple program that runs o.k. with the Boost version 1.43 version of the library. The program runs but can not read the file status using Boost version 1.44. This program also works fine when built using MSVC 9.0 and Boost version 1.44. Am I doing something wrong? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Carus V. (Bud) Clarke carus.v.clarke(a)boeing.com //-------------------- #include <fstream> #include <iostream> #include <string> #include <boost/version.hpp> #define BOOST_FILESYSTEM_NO_DEPRECATED # if !defined(BOOST_FILESYSTEM_VERSION) # define BOOST_FILESYSTEM_VERSION 3 // disabled: # define BOOST_FILESYSTEM_VERSION 2 # endif #include <boost/filesystem.hpp> #include <boost/system/error_code.hpp> int main() { namespace boost_fs = boost::filesystem; const std::string pathStr = "foo"; std::ofstream ostrm(pathStr.c_str()); if (ostrm) { ostrm << "abcde-12345" << std::endl; ostrm.close(); } boost_fs::path path(pathStr); boost::system::error_code ec; std::cout << std::boolalpha; std::cout << "Checking status of file " << pathStr << "..." << std::endl; boost_fs::file_status st = boost_fs::status(path, ec); std::cout << "Error code value: " << ec.value() << std::endl; std::cout << "Error code message: " << ec.message() << std::endl; return 0; } //-------------------- This program's output on my system is shown below. The file 'foo' is written by the program and does actually exist. For version 2: boost::filesystem library version is v2 Checking status of file foo... Error code value: 0 Error code message: The operation completed successfully Does file exist? false For version 3: boost::filesystem library version is v3 Checking status of file foo... Error code value: 2 Error code message: The system cannot find the file specified Does file exist? false //--------------------

2 1

Re: [Boost-users] [Boost.MPI] question about serializingcustomobject
by Elli Barasch 27 Aug '10

27 Aug '10

Robert Ramey <ramey(a)rrsd.com> wrote: >David Abrahams wrote: >>>> And since Boost.MPI and Boost.Serialization are so closely >>>> related, I think it's especially important that *you* underestand. >>> >>> I disagree. Boost MPI depends upon Boost.Serialization >>> but not the other way around. >> >> I didn't say they were interdependent, just that they were >> closely-related. But anyway, I think you're being shortsighted: The >> success of tools built on top of Boost.Serialization is an important >> indicator of the correctness and genericity of its design. > >> Boost.Serialization *is* dependent on Boost.MPI for a portion of its >> userbase, > ><off topic> what portion of the user base? (This is a rhetorical question >please don't spend any time answering it.) It's always bothered me >that we have no per library data/feedback on the interest/usage >on a library by library basis. I've spoken about this before and >I know you agree with me about it. But until this get's addressed >I think we just have to set these questions aside and recognize >that the answers are anyone's guess. > ><snip> > >> You can't be a generic serialization library without reference to real >> applications. Maybe you still haven't really decided whether serving >> Boost.MPI and its users is something you want to do. > > I think that >> might account for a good deal of the recurring friction we experience. >> It would be a good idea to settle on an answer to that question, along >> with the question of what other applications you're willing to >> support. > >I am acutely aware of this aspect of "generic library design". Every >post on this list reminds me of it. > >>> I only really have few observations/suggestions at this point. >>> >>> a) It would be helpful if there were a way to test the serialization >>> of the archive classes in boost MPI without having MPI installed. >>> If this is not possible, it would seem to me that the serialization >>> is intertwined with the data transport - rather than be separated >>> as it is in the stream/streambuf io/stream design. This would look >>> like a design flaw to me. >> >> Helpful to whom? I agree this is all a good idea, but I'm not sure >> how this relates to anything else we're discussing. > >It would permit me to use the MPI serialization as a use case >to verify that I hadn't broken anything. I know what your going >to say - concepts - but that is going to be a while before that >happens. > >>> b) user experience seems to show that archive >>> construction/destruction is a significant performance issue when a >>> new archive is made for each data transmission. On the other hand, >>> one has to do this since the current archive implemenation track >>> addresses of serialized obects so the same archive can't be use send >>> the same structure (maybe with changed data) multiple times. > >> I can't understand how you reach that conclusion. In my long >> explanation I thought I made it clear that Boost.MPI and its database >> get a great deal of its performance advantage from exactly that: >> sending the same structure multiple times with the same MPI type map. > >hmm - what about tracked objects? I suggested turning off tracking >and Matthias told me that it was needed to send pointers. But for this >to work an archive has to be reconstructed everytime to re-initialize >the tracking lists. I don't want to spend a lot of time on this as that >means I have to delve into the MPI serialization and I don't want >to do this. > >>> Given that MPI has a focus on performance, I wonder if this has been >>> considered. I looked a the documentation, code and examples and it >>> wasn't obvious to me how this is question was addressed - if at all. >> >> We've obviously misunderstood one another somewhere along the way. It >> would be good if we could get that cleared up. > >I think it would take too much time for me to understand. And if I did >come to understand it, I might have something to say about it. If I >said it, then it might start a thread which would cost even more time >which I don't have right now. > >Robert Ramey > > > > >_______________________________________________ >Boost-users mailing list >Boost-users(a)lists.boost.org >http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] [Boost.MPI] question about serializingcustomobject
by Elli Barasch 27 Aug '10

27 Aug '10

Robert Ramey <ramey(a)rrsd.com> wrote: >David Abrahams wrote: >>>> And since Boost.MPI and Boost.Serialization are so closely >>>> related, I think it's especially important that *you* underestand. >>> >>> I disagree. Boost MPI depends upon Boost.Serialization >>> but not the other way around. >> >> I didn't say they were interdependent, just that they were >> closely-related. But anyway, I think you're being shortsighted: The >> success of tools built on top of Boost.Serialization is an important >> indicator of the correctness and genericity of its design. > >> Boost.Serialization *is* dependent on Boost.MPI for a portion of its >> userbase, > ><off topic> what portion of the user base? (This is a rhetorical question >please don't spend any time answering it.) It's always bothered me >that we have no per library data/feedback on the interest/usage >on a library by library basis. I've spoken about this before and >I know you agree with me about it. But until this get's addressed >I think we just have to set these questions aside and recognize >that the answers are anyone's guess. > ><snip> > >> You can't be a generic serialization library without reference to real >> applications. Maybe you still haven't really decided whether serving >> Boost.MPI and its users is something you want to do. > > I think that >> might account for a good deal of the recurring friction we experience. >> It would be a good idea to settle on an answer to that question, along >> with the question of what other applications you're willing to >> support. > >I am acutely aware of this aspect of "generic library design". Every >post on this list reminds me of it. > >>> I only really have few observations/suggestions at this point. >>> >>> a) It would be helpful if there were a way to test the serialization >>> of the archive classes in boost MPI without having MPI installed. >>> If this is not possible, it would seem to me that the serialization >>> is intertwined with the data transport - rather than be separated >>> as it is in the stream/streambuf io/stream design. This would look >>> like a design flaw to me. >> >> Helpful to whom? I agree this is all a good idea, but I'm not sure >> how this relates to anything else we're discussing. > >It would permit me to use the MPI serialization as a use case >to verify that I hadn't broken anything. I know what your going >to say - concepts - but that is going to be a while before that >happens. > >>> b) user experience seems to show that archive >>> construction/destruction is a significant performance issue when a >>> new archive is made for each data transmission. On the other hand, >>> one has to do this since the current archive implemenation track >>> addresses of serialized obects so the same archive can't be use send >>> the same structure (maybe with changed data) multiple times. > >> I can't understand how you reach that conclusion. In my long >> explanation I thought I made it clear that Boost.MPI and its database >> get a great deal of its performance advantage from exactly that: >> sending the same structure multiple times with the same MPI type map. > >hmm - what about tracked objects? I suggested turning off tracking >and Matthias told me that it was needed to send pointers. But for this >to work an archive has to be reconstructed everytime to re-initialize >the tracking lists. I don't want to spend a lot of time on this as that >means I have to delve into the MPI serialization and I don't want >to do this. > >>> Given that MPI has a focus on performance, I wonder if this has been >>> considered. I looked a the documentation, code and examples and it >>> wasn't obvious to me how this is question was addressed - if at all. >> >> We've obviously misunderstood one another somewhere along the way. It >> would be good if we could get that cleared up. > >I think it would take too much time for me to understand. And if I did >come to understand it, I might have something to say about it. If I >said it, then it might start a thread which would cost even more time >which I don't have right now. > >Robert Ramey > > > > >_______________________________________________ >Boost-users mailing list >Boost-users(a)lists.boost.org >http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] [Boost.MPI] question about serializingcustomobject
by Elli Barasch 27 Aug '10

27 Aug '10

Robert Ramey <ramey(a)rrsd.com> wrote: >David Abrahams wrote: >>>> And since Boost.MPI and Boost.Serialization are so closely >>>> related, I think it's especially important that *you* underestand. >>> >>> I disagree. Boost MPI depends upon Boost.Serialization >>> but not the other way around. >> >> I didn't say they were interdependent, just that they were >> closely-related. But anyway, I think you're being shortsighted: The >> success of tools built on top of Boost.Serialization is an important >> indicator of the correctness and genericity of its design. > >> Boost.Serialization *is* dependent on Boost.MPI for a portion of its >> userbase, > ><off topic> what portion of the user base? (This is a rhetorical question >please don't spend any time answering it.) It's always bothered me >that we have no per library data/feedback on the interest/usage >on a library by library basis. I've spoken about this before and >I know you agree with me about it. But until this get's addressed >I think we just have to set these questions aside and recognize >that the answers are anyone's guess. > ><snip> > >> You can't be a generic serialization library without reference to real >> applications. Maybe you still haven't really decided whether serving >> Boost.MPI and its users is something you want to do. > > I think that >> might account for a good deal of the recurring friction we experience. >> It would be a good idea to settle on an answer to that question, along >> with the question of what other applications you're willing to >> support. > >I am acutely aware of this aspect of "generic library design". Every >post on this list reminds me of it. > >>> I only really have few observations/suggestions at this point. >>> >>> a) It would be helpful if there were a way to test the serialization >>> of the archive classes in boost MPI without having MPI installed. >>> If this is not possible, it would seem to me that the serialization >>> is intertwined with the data transport - rather than be separated >>> as it is in the stream/streambuf io/stream design. This would look >>> like a design flaw to me. >> >> Helpful to whom? I agree this is all a good idea, but I'm not sure >> how this relates to anything else we're discussing. > >It would permit me to use the MPI serialization as a use case >to verify that I hadn't broken anything. I know what your going >to say - concepts - but that is going to be a while before that >happens. > >>> b) user experience seems to show that archive >>> construction/destruction is a significant performance issue when a >>> new archive is made for each data transmission. On the other hand, >>> one has to do this since the current archive implemenation track >>> addresses of serialized obects so the same archive can't be use send >>> the same structure (maybe with changed data) multiple times. > >> I can't understand how you reach that conclusion. In my long >> explanation I thought I made it clear that Boost.MPI and its database >> get a great deal of its performance advantage from exactly that: >> sending the same structure multiple times with the same MPI type map. > >hmm - what about tracked objects? I suggested turning off tracking >and Matthias told me that it was needed to send pointers. But for this >to work an archive has to be reconstructed everytime to re-initialize >the tracking lists. I don't want to spend a lot of time on this as that >means I have to delve into the MPI serialization and I don't want >to do this. > >>> Given that MPI has a focus on performance, I wonder if this has been >>> considered. I looked a the documentation, code and examples and it >>> wasn't obvious to me how this is question was addressed - if at all. >> >> We've obviously misunderstood one another somewhere along the way. It >> would be good if we could get that cleared up. > >I think it would take too much time for me to understand. And if I did >come to understand it, I might have something to say about it. If I >said it, then it might start a thread which would cost even more time >which I don't have right now. > >Robert Ramey > > > > >_______________________________________________ >Boost-users mailing list >Boost-users(a)lists.boost.org >http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] [Boost.MPI] question about serializingcustomobject
by Elli Barasch 27 Aug '10

27 Aug '10

Robert Ramey <ramey(a)rrsd.com> wrote: >David Abrahams wrote: >>>> And since Boost.MPI and Boost.Serialization are so closely >>>> related, I think it's especially important that *you* underestand. >>> >>> I disagree. Boost MPI depends upon Boost.Serialization >>> but not the other way around. >> >> I didn't say they were interdependent, just that they were >> closely-related. But anyway, I think you're being shortsighted: The >> success of tools built on top of Boost.Serialization is an important >> indicator of the correctness and genericity of its design. > >> Boost.Serialization *is* dependent on Boost.MPI for a portion of its >> userbase, > ><off topic> what portion of the user base? (This is a rhetorical question >please don't spend any time answering it.) It's always bothered me >that we have no per library data/feedback on the interest/usage >on a library by library basis. I've spoken about this before and >I know you agree with me about it. But until this get's addressed >I think we just have to set these questions aside and recognize >that the answers are anyone's guess. > ><snip> > >> You can't be a generic serialization library without reference to real >> applications. Maybe you still haven't really decided whether serving >> Boost.MPI and its users is something you want to do. > > I think that >> might account for a good deal of the recurring friction we experience. >> It would be a good idea to settle on an answer to that question, along >> with the question of what other applications you're willing to >> support. > >I am acutely aware of this aspect of "generic library design". Every >post on this list reminds me of it. > >>> I only really have few observations/suggestions at this point. >>> >>> a) It would be helpful if there were a way to test the serialization >>> of the archive classes in boost MPI without having MPI installed. >>> If this is not possible, it would seem to me that the serialization >>> is intertwined with the data transport - rather than be separated >>> as it is in the stream/streambuf io/stream design. This would look >>> like a design flaw to me. >> >> Helpful to whom? I agree this is all a good idea, but I'm not sure >> how this relates to anything else we're discussing. > >It would permit me to use the MPI serialization as a use case >to verify that I hadn't broken anything. I know what your going >to say - concepts - but that is going to be a while before that >happens. > >>> b) user experience seems to show that archive >>> construction/destruction is a significant performance issue when a >>> new archive is made for each data transmission. On the other hand, >>> one has to do this since the current archive implemenation track >>> addresses of serialized obects so the same archive can't be use send >>> the same structure (maybe with changed data) multiple times. > >> I can't understand how you reach that conclusion. In my long >> explanation I thought I made it clear that Boost.MPI and its database >> get a great deal of its performance advantage from exactly that: >> sending the same structure multiple times with the same MPI type map. > >hmm - what about tracked objects? I suggested turning off tracking >and Matthias told me that it was needed to send pointers. But for this >to work an archive has to be reconstructed everytime to re-initialize >the tracking lists. I don't want to spend a lot of time on this as that >means I have to delve into the MPI serialization and I don't want >to do this. > >>> Given that MPI has a focus on performance, I wonder if this has been >>> considered. I looked a the documentation, code and examples and it >>> wasn't obvious to me how this is question was addressed - if at all. >> >> We've obviously misunderstood one another somewhere along the way. It >> would be good if we could get that cleared up. > >I think it would take too much time for me to understand. And if I did >come to understand it, I might have something to say about it. If I >said it, then it might start a thread which would cost even more time >which I don't have right now. > >Robert Ramey > > > > >_______________________________________________ >Boost-users mailing list >Boost-users(a)lists.boost.org >http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] BoostSerialization callinga customserialize method
by Elli Barasch 27 Aug '10

27 Aug '10

Robert Ramey <ramey(a)rrsd.com> wrote: >Pooyan Dadvand wrote: > >> Can you please explain me more the idea of extradata structure? >> Consider that my extradata can be a double, ublas::vector, or even >> std::vector<weak_ptr<Element> > or any new type of variables. I >> have: >> >> std::vector<std::pair<VariableData, extradata> > mData >> ... >> ar << mData; >> >> >> and each element of vector can have a different type of data with >> different size or even have pointers. (It's a heterogeneous >> container) > >The above will work as written. > >Maybe what you want is: > >template<class T> >class mytype : std::vector<std::pair<VariableData, T> > { > template<class Archive> > void serialize(Archive &ar, const unsigned int version){ > ar << boost::serialization::base_object(*this); > } >}; > >then you can > >mytype<double> m_t >... >ar << m_t > >The possibilities are endless. This really isn't about the serialization >library >but about C++ > >Robert Ramey > > > >_______________________________________________ >Boost-users mailing list >Boost-users(a)lists.boost.org >http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

1 0

[boost::wave] Hooks not called for conditionals
by Alden King 27 Aug '10

27 Aug '10

I am currently working on a project that uses Wave to pre-process and tokenize C/C++ code, but I am not getting everything that I expect from the preprocessing hooks. We use the preprocessing hooks to extract data about false-branches, macro calls and macro expansions so this is a major roadblock for us. I am trying to extract information about the true and false branch of #if 1 int foo; #elif 0 float foo; #else struct { } foo; #endif The first #if is seen by 'found_directive'. If that returns false, then I get #ifint foo; #eliffloat foo; #else struct { } foo; #endif Note that it skips the newline after the #if and #elif and that it doesn't reveal their conditions. If it returns true, then 'evaluated_conditional_expression also gets called and I get #if 1 // [Taken] int foo; #elif0 float foo; struct { } foo; Without the #else directive, the #endif directive, and the whitespace between #elif and it's condition. My problem is that the false branch is not seen by either function (the endif also has trouble sometimes). I therefore expected all tokens in the false branch to be processed by 'may_skip_whitespace' or 'skipped_token', but that is not the case. Could you please help me to find our how to get the tokens from the false branch of the conditional expression using the preprocessing hooks? I've attached my wave test program and a sample input file. Thanks.

2 1

Boost Serialization calling a custom serialize method
by Pooyan Dadvand 27 Aug '10

27 Aug '10

Hi, Im trying to use the boost serialization in our project Kratos (a Multi-physics finite element code) in which I found the following problem, I have a class Variable which is derived from VariableData as follow: Class VariableData { std::size_t mKey; public: ..... }; template<class TDataType> class Variable : public VariableData { .... } Now I have a container which holds a pairs, consist of VariableData pointer to the Variable and a void* pointer to its value: std::vector<std::pair<const VariableData*, void*> > which I want to serialize but as it can be seen I dont have the pointer to data in my variable and I might need to implement a costumized version of Serialized with void* pValue as an additional parameter for VariableData and Variable classes: template<class TArchiveType> Variable::serialize(TArchiveType &rArchive, const unsigned int Version, void* pValue) { rArchive & static_cast<TDataType>(pVAlue); } The problem here is the template definition of this method which make it impossible to be virtual. I note that the library uses get_extended_type_info for this porposed. But I dont know how is its correct way of use. Can anybody give me a hint about how I can handle this problem? Just to add some restriction: - I dont want to add a hierarchy of handlers instead of pair because it adds another pointer jump to the container and reduce its performance in normal use of it - I dont want to add a version of non template members for each archive type while it makes a lot of duplications and makes extra dependency to the archive types in a layer of code which is not expected to have this dependency Thanks, Pooyan. ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ _______________________ Dr. Pooyan Dadvand Member of Kratos team International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering - CIMNE Campus Norte, Edificio C1 c/ Gran Capitán s/n 08034 Barcelona, España Tel: (+34) 93 401 56 96 Fax: (+34) 93.401.65 17 web: <http://www.cimne.com> www.cimne.com <http://www.cimne.com/kratos/> www.cimne.com/kratos/ ____________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________ _______________________ AVISO IMPORTANTE Los datos de carácter personal contenidos en el mensaje, se registrarán en un fichero para facilitar la gestión de las comunicaciones de CIMNE. Se pueden ejercitar los derechos de acceso, rectificación, cancelación y oposición por escrito, dirigiéndose a nuestras oficinas de CIMNE, Gran Capitán s/n, Edificio C1 - Campus Norte UPC, 08034 Barcelona, España. AVÍS IMPORTANT Les dades de caràcter personal contingudes en aquest missatge es registraran en un fitxer per facilitar la gestió de les comunicacions del CIMNE. Es poden exercir els drets d'accés, rectificació, cancel·lació i oposició, per escrit a les nostres oficines del CIMNE, Gran Capità s/n, Edifici C1, Campus Nord UPC, 08034 Barcelona, Espanya. IMPORTANT NOTICE All personal data contained in this mail will be processed confidentially and stored in a file property of CIMNE in order to manage corporate communications. You may exercise the right of access, rectification, deletion and objection by letter sent to CIMNE, Gran Capitán, Edificio C1 - Campus Norte UPC, 08034 Barcelona, Spain.

5 17

[Hash] Custom hash_value for Pointers
by Hossein Haeri 27 Aug '10

27 Aug '10

Dear all, Should not the program in the P.S. output "I got used!"? If not, how can I ensure that it's size_t hash_value(B*) which gets called upon use of bPtrHasher's operator()? TIA, --Hossein P.S. namespace Bs { struct B { virtual string id() const {return "This is a B!";} }; struct D: B { string id() const {return "And, this one is a D.";} }; size_t hash_value(B* bptr) { cout << "I got used!" << endl; boost::hash<string> hasher; return hasher(bptr->id()); } } int main() { Bs::B* bp1 = new Bs::B; Bs::B* bp2 = new Bs::D; boost::hash<Bs::B*> bPtrHasher; size_t h1 = bPtrHasher(bp1), h2 = bPtrHasher(bp2); }

2 1

NDEBUG causes a compilation error in Boost.Interprocess
by Sergey Kurenkov 27 Aug '10

27 Aug '10

I use Boost 1.42 and gcc 4.3.1 on HP-UX 11.31. So today I defined NDEBUG and BOOST_DISABLE_ASSERTS in my makefile, ran make and got this error: ../../../src/libs/src/external/boost/1.42.0/boost/interprocess/sync/posix/semaphore_wrapper.hpp: In function 'void boost::interprocess::detail::semaphore_close(sem_t*)': ../../../src/libs/src/external/boost/1.42.0/boost/interprocess/sync/posix/semaphore_wrapper.hpp:102: error: 'assert' was not declared in this scope ../../../src/libs/src/external/boost/1.42.0/boost/interprocess/sync/posix/semaphore_wrapper.hpp: In function 'void boost::interprocess::detail::semaphore_destroy(sem_t*)': ../../../src/libs/src/external/boost/1.42.0/boost/interprocess/sync/posix/semaphore_wrapper.hpp:137: error: 'assert' was not declared in this scope If I do not set NDEBUG and BOOST_DISABLE_ASSERTS everything is OK. Seems like the problem is that in semaphore_wrapper.hpp there is a call to assert() and if NDEBUG is set then correct headers are not included.

2 1

[Serialization] Combination of templates and polymorphism
by Michal Gregor 27 Aug '10

27 Aug '10

I am writing serialization for a template library I created. The problem is that I cannot figure out how to serialize templates of polymorphic classes (combination of polymorphism and templates). Polymorphic classes generally need to be exported using BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT, which however takes in a complete type so this would require me to register all possible instantiations of the templates, which is not possible - I don't know beforehand what instantiations might the library user make (I would have to rely on the user of the library to do the work and there is no way the user will even know which template classes may be instantiated behind the scenes somewhere). What I would like is a mechanism that would automagically register the class upon instantiation. Any ideas? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/-Serialization--Combination-of-templates-and-polymorp… Sent from the Boost - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

1 0

How to disable warnings on gcc?
by Jean-Pierre Bergamin 27 Aug '10

27 Aug '10

Dear boost users On FreeBSD 8.1 with boost 1.43 and gcc 4.2.1 we have lots of warnings like: ... /usr/local/include/boost/type_traits/is_unsigned.hpp: In instantiation of 'boost::detail::is_ununsigned_helper<short int>': /usr/local/include/boost/type_traits/is_unsigned.hpp:73: instantiated from 'boost::detail::is_unsigned_imp<short int>' /usr/local/include/boost/type_traits/is_unsigned.hpp:123: instantiated from 'boost::is_unsigned<short int>' /usr/local/include/boost/type_traits/make_unsigned.hpp:110: instantiated from 'boost::detail::make_unsigned_imp<short int>' /usr/local/include/boost/type_traits/make_unsigned.hpp:130: instantiated from 'boost::make_unsigned<short int>' /usr/local/include/boost/lexical_cast.hpp:846: instantiated from here /usr/local/include/boost/type_traits/is_unsigned.hpp:40: warning: comparison between 'enum boost::detail::is_unsigned_values<short int>::<anonymous>' and 'enum boost::detail::is_unsigned_values<short int>::<anonymous>' ... Similar warnings about "comparison between ..." pop up in the serialization library as well. What is the easiest way to suppress these warnings? I tried using the switches "-Wno-sign-compare" and "-Wno-conversion", but the warnings don't go away. Thanks for your help James

2 4

[Serialization] Is there any documentation on make_nvp()?
by Robert Jones 27 Aug '10

27 Aug '10

If so, please point me to it. Thx - Rob.

2 2

Missing lib with Boost::Regex
by Emir D. 27 Aug '10

27 Aug '10

Hello everybody, I'm having some problems with using Boost's Regex in MS Visual Studio 2010. I've included the header file and downloaded the "bjam.exe" file, which I have run and it generated some lib and obj files. After including the newly generated files in VS2010, when I try to compile, I get the following: "fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file 'libboost_regex-vc100-mt-gd-1_43.lib' " I've inspected the bjam.exe generated files and it appears to have a lib file 'libboost_regex-vc100-mt-1_43.lib', but not 'libboost_regex-vc100-mt-gd-1_43.lib'. After doing some more googling, I have found a number of related questions, but failed to find an answer, although it seems to be a common problem. Can you please help me solve my problem? Thanks in advance, p.s. If i rename the lib file, it works, at least for now. However, it is a 'Release' version and therefore I can't using it in VS in debugging mode, meaning that I can only BatchBuild and create Release versions of my program, although I also need to create debug ones. p.s.s. My first Boost Mailing List post! p.s.s.s. I've just found out that VS10 has TR1 support, so I can TR1 Regex, which is Boost's Regex :) but I am still wondering how could of I solved the above stated problem? It's bound to happen with some other Boost library.

4 3

Boost test, segmentation fault.
by Matthijs Mohlmann 27 Aug '10

27 Aug '10

Hello all, First of all: I'm building an application and with that I use Boost test for unit testing. This helped me already to fix some obscure bugs. (I am very happy with boost test) I have the Master suite test setup in one file and the normal test suites each in one file. This worked very well. Now I have the following test suite which gives me a segmentation fault and I have no idea why: BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE(ProgramOptions) BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(ProgramOptions_Valid_Options) { // Output boost::test_tools::output_test_stream output("misc/ProgramOptions_01.output", true); // Save output buffer std::streambuf *strmbuffer; strmbuffer = std::cout.rdbuf(); // Redirect the output. std::cout.rdbuf(output.rdbuf()); // Redirect output stream so we can do some checks. printSomething(); BOOST_REQUIRE(output.match_pattern()); // Now lets process some arguments. printSomething(); BOOST_REQUIRE(output.match_pattern()); // Restore output buffer std::cout.rdbuf(strmbuffer); } BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END() The function that gets tested: void printSomething() { std::cout << "Test output" << std::endl; } If I put the same content 'Test output' in the ProgramOptions_01.output file then everything is fine and executes ok. When putting different content in that file it goes wrong. I have also a gdb backtrace if that is interesting: (gdb) r Starting program: /home/matthijs/Projects/cppcms/trunk/cmsapp_test [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Running 10 test cases... Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0xb7f6f9e8 in vtable for boost::unit_test::progress_monitor_t () from /usr/lib/libboost_unit_test_framework.so.1.42.0 (gdb) bt full #0 0xb7f6f9e8 in vtable for boost::unit_test::progress_monitor_t () from /usr/lib/libboost_unit_test_framework.so.1.42.0 No symbol table info available. #1 0xb7e5b77f in std::ostream::flush() () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 No symbol table info available. #2 0xb7f0a13d in boost::unit_test::output::compiler_log_formatter::log_finish(std::ostream&) () from /usr/lib/libboost_unit_test_framework.so.1.42.0 No symbol table info available. #3 0xb7f2e492 in boost::unit_test::unit_test_log_t::test_finish() () from /usr/lib/libboost_unit_test_framework.so.1.42.0 No symbol table info available. #4 0xb7f1a593 in boost::unit_test::framework::run(unsigned long, bool) () from /usr/lib/libboost_unit_test_framework.so.1.42.0 No symbol table info available. #5 0xb7f2f469 in boost::unit_test::unit_test_main(bool (*)(), int, char**) () from /usr/lib/libboost_unit_test_framework.so.1.42.0 No symbol table info available. #6 0x08062133 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbffff824) at /usr/include/boost/test/unit_test.hpp:59 No locals. Hopefully someone with some insight in boost.test can help me out here... Regards, Matthijs Möhlmann

2 2

[MPL] has_xxx always returns false!
by Eric 27 Aug '10

27 Aug '10

This code: BOOST_MPL_HAS_XXX_TRAIT_DEF(normal); template<class T, bool HasNormal> class getVertexHasNormal { public: static void getNormal(T &tv) {} }; template<class T> class getVertexHasNormal<T, true> // true case { public: static void getNormal(T &tv) { // do something } }; template<class VT> class A : public base { void doit(v) /* override */ { VT tv; getVertexHasNormal<VT, has_normal<VT>::value >::getNormal(tv); } } if I understand correctly, this code is suppose to do call a different "getNormal" method if the method "normal" exists (or not) in the template parameter class. Basically mimicking the infamous "__if_exists" macro on the Microsoft c++ compiler.... right? but, has_normal<VT> always return false (visual studio 2008) so we don't get the right expected behavior! Feel free to educate me.... thanks in advance. eric

5 6

[Serialization] Is this example legal usage of the serialization library
by Elizabeta 26 Aug '10

26 Aug '10

Hi, Is it ok to serialize/deserialize in the object I get when dereference a pointer ? void f() { B* bObj=new B(); /// save { std::ofstream ofs("C:\\hh.txt"); boost::archive::xml_oarchive oa(ofs); oa & make_nvp("bObj",*bObj); } //// Load { std::ifstream ifs("C:\\hh.txt"); boost::archive::xml_iarchive ia(ifs); ia & make_nvp("bObj",*bObj); } } My second question : Is it ok to serialize/deserialize in *this ? Thanks

3 3

[serialization] problem with custom archive type
by Kenneth Riddile 26 Aug '10

26 Aug '10

I have a custom input archive type that has worked fine when statically linked to the serialization library. I'm now must use serialization as a DLL and the code no longer compiles. This is under MSVC9 with BOOST_ALL_DYN_LINK defined. This code works fine on Linux/GCC with serialization built as a shared library...so the problem appears specific to Windows/MSVC. Here is a boiled down version of the code that exhibits the problem: // HEADER CONTENTS #include <boost/archive/xml_iarchive.hpp> class CustomArchive : public boost::archive::xml_iarchive_impl<CustomArchive> , public boost::archive::detail::shared_ptr_helper { public: CustomArchive( std::istream& is, int foo ) : boost::archive::xml_iarchive_impl<CustomArchive>( is, 0 ) , m_foo( foo ) { } int GetFoo() const { return m_foo; } template<class T> void load( T& t ) { boost::archive::xml_iarchive_impl<CustomArchive>::load( t ); } private: friend class boost::archive::xml_iarchive_impl<CustomArchive>; friend class boost::archive::basic_xml_iarchive<CustomArchive>; friend class boost::archive::load_access; int m_foo; }; // CPP CONTENTS #include <CustomArchive.hpp> #include <boost/archive/impl/basic_xml_iarchive.ipp> #include <boost/archive/impl/xml_iarchive_impl.ipp> #include <boost/archive/impl/archive_serializer_map.ipp> namespace boost { namespace archive { template class basic_xml_iarchive<CustomArchive>; template class xml_iarchive_impl<CustomArchive>; template class detail::archive_serializer_map<CustomArchive>; } } BOOST_SERIALIZATION_REGISTER_ARCHIVE( CustomArchive ) and here are the errors: 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/basic_xml_iarchive.ipp(41) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::basic_xml_iarchive<Archive>::load_start' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/basic_xml_iarchive.ipp(77) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::basic_xml_iarchive<Archive>::load_end' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/basic_xml_iarchive.ipp(83) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::basic_xml_iarchive<Archive>::load_override' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/basic_xml_iarchive.ipp(89) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::basic_xml_iarchive<Archive>::load_override' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/basic_xml_iarchive.ipp(95) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::basic_xml_iarchive<Archive>::load_override' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/basic_xml_iarchive.ipp(101) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::basic_xml_iarchive<Archive>::load_override' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/basic_xml_iarchive.ipp(108) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::basic_xml_iarchive<Archive>::basic_xml_iarchive' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/basic_xml_iarchive.ipp(111) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::basic_xml_iarchive<Archive>::~basic_xml_iarchive' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>Warning: This header is deprecated. Please use: boost/spirit/include/classic_rule.hpp 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/xml_iarchive_impl.ipp(83) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::xml_iarchive_impl<Archive>::load' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/xml_iarchive_impl.ipp(114) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::xml_iarchive_impl<Archive>::load' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/xml_iarchive_impl.ipp(127) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::xml_iarchive_impl<Archive>::load' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/xml_iarchive_impl.ipp(140) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::xml_iarchive_impl<Archive>::load' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/xml_iarchive_impl.ipp(153) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::xml_iarchive_impl<Archive>::load_override' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/xml_iarchive_impl.ipp(162) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::xml_iarchive_impl<Archive>::init' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/xml_iarchive_impl.ipp(189) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::xml_iarchive_impl<Archive>::xml_iarchive_impl' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/xml_iarchive_impl.ipp(202) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::xml_iarchive_impl<Archive>::~xml_iarchive_impl' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/archive_serializer_map.ipp(45) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::detail::archive_serializer_map<Archive>::insert' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/archive_serializer_map.ipp(57) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::detail::archive_serializer_map<Archive>::erase' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/archive_serializer_map.ipp(67) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::detail::archive_serializer_map<Archive>::find' : definition of dllimport function not allowed

2 4

[interprocess] Checking for existence Named Mutex
by Brian Davis 26 Aug '10

26 Aug '10

How do I check for the existence of a named resource in using boost interprocess without wrapping a open_only in a try catch block and waiting for the exception? Also are there calls for launching a process such as std::system that are nonblocking in Windows using the _spawnlp and friends calls?

3 5

Boost's additional test compilers - test results available?
by Jon Payne 26 Aug '10

26 Aug '10

Hi all, In the boost release notes (I was looked at 1.44) there is a section listing the "additional test compilers" - I use Borland/Codegear C++ 2010. Presumably this means the tests are run on those compilers? If so, are the results available anywhere? Thanks, Jon

1 0

Bost.thread: how to force Pthreads-w32 usage with MingW (x-compile)?
by Joost Kraaijeveld 26 Aug '10

26 Aug '10

Hi, I have x-compiled Boost using Pthreads-w32, using threading=multi,single threadapi=pthread. But when I x-compile my application Boost uses the win32 headers. I have looked at the thread sources but I cannot find out if it just should work or that I should use some macros. Can anyone help me with this? TIA -- Groeten, Joost Kraaijeveld Askesis B.V. Molukkenstraat 14 6524NB Nijmegen tel: 024-3888063 / 06-51855277 fax: 024-3608416 web: www.askesis.nl

1 0

X-compile: undefined reference to `boost::this_thread::interruptible_wait using Boost 1.42
by Joost Kraaijeveld 26 Aug '10

26 Aug '10

Hi, I am cross compiling an application from Linux to Windows using Boost 1.42. Doing that I get an undefined reference error when linking one of my own dll's to my own application: /bin/bash ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link i586-mingw32msvc-g++ -pipe -Wall -Wextra -Wundef -Wshadow -Wconversion -I/home/jkr/mingw/boost/include -g -O2 -Wl,--enable-runtime-pseudo-reloc,--enable-auto-import -no-undefined -L/home/jkr/mingw/boost/lib -o ORBRegistration.exe ORBRegistration-Main.o ../../../library/DagdaORB/libdagdaorb.la ../../../library/DagdaCom/libdagdacom.la /home/jkr/Programming/C++/Danu/mingw/library/DanuBase/libdanubase.la /home/jkr/Programming/C++/Danu/mingw/library/DanuStream/libdanustream.la /home/jkr/Programming/C++/Danu/mingw/library/DanuDB/libdanudb.la -lboost_system-mt -lboost_serialization-mt -lboost_thread-mt -lboost_date_time-mt -lboost_filesystem-mt -lws2_32 -lmswsock libtool: link: i586-mingw32msvc-g++ -pipe -Wall -Wextra -Wundef -Wshadow -Wconversion -I/home/jkr/mingw/boost/include -g -O2 -Wl,--enable-runtime-pseudo-reloc -Wl,--enable-auto-import -o .libs/ORBRegistration.exe ORBRegistration-Main.o -L/home/jkr/mingw/boost/lib ../../../library/DagdaORB/.libs/libdagdaorb.a /home/jkr/Programming/C++/Dagda/mingw/library/DagdaCom/.libs/libdagdacom.a ../../../library/DagdaCom/.libs/libdagdacom.a /home/jkr/Programming/C++/Danu/mingw/library/DanuDB/.libs/libdanudb.a /home/jkr/Programming/C++/Danu/mingw/library/DanuStream/.libs/libdanustream.a /home/jkr/Programming/C++/Danu/mingw/library/DanuBase/.libs/libdanubase.a -lpthread -lodbc32 -lboost_system-mt -lboost_serialization-mt -lboost_thread-mt -lboost_date_time-mt -lboost_filesystem-mt -lws2_32 -lmswsock ../../../library/DagdaORB/.libs/libdagdaorb.a(libdagdaorb_la-IMRServer.o): In function `_ZN5boost6detail19basic_cv_list_entry4waitENS0_7timeoutE': /home/jkr/mingw/boost/include/boost/thread/win32/condition_variable.hpp:82: undefined reference to `boost::this_thread::interruptible_wait(void*, boost::detail::timeout)' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status I have no idea why I get this error, and hence no idea how to solve it. Does anyone have any idea? Additional info: - I cross-compiled Boost itself using the Debian's gcc-mingw32 4.4.4-0.1+b1 crosscompiler, - I used Pthreads-w32 release 2.8.0 (2006-12-22) - The full commandline I used was (the commandline is split for readability): PTW32_INCLUDE=/home/jkr/mingw/pthreads/include PTW32_LIB=/home/jkr/mingw/pthreads/lib bjam --prefix=/home/jkr/mingw/boost --layout=tagged link=shared variant=debug,release toolset=gcc target-os=windows threading=multi,single runtime-link=shared --without-python --without-mpi -sNO_BZIP2=1 -sNO_ZLIB=1 install TIA -- Groeten, Joost Kraaijeveld Askesis B.V. Molukkenstraat 14 6524NB Nijmegen tel: 024-3888063 / 06-51855277 fax: 024-3608416 web: www.askesis.nl

1 0

unresolved external when building Boost.Thread
by Kenneth Riddile 25 Aug '10

25 Aug '10

OS - Windows7 x64 compiler - MSVC9 Boost version - 1.44 Running the following command fails to build the thread library with the following error: bjam variant=release link=shared threading=multi runtime-link=shared --layout=tagged install thread.obj : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol "__declspec(dllimport) pu blic: __thiscall boost::gregorian::greg_month::greg_month(unsigned short)" (__im p_??0greg_month@gregorian@boost@@QAE@G@Z) referenced in function "public: __this call boost::gregorian::date::date(enum boost::date_time::special_values)" (??0da te@gregorian@boost@@QAE@W4special_values@date_time@2@@Z) bin.v2\libs\thread\build\msvc-9.0\release\threading-multi\boost_thread-vc90-mt-1 _44.dll : fatal error LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals Removing "--layout=tagged" from the command results in the thread library building successfully, but of course that isn't what I want :)

2 1

Running mcgregor_common_subgraphs on a graph with bundled properties
by Saeed Nari 25 Aug '10

25 Aug '10

Hi, Is it possible to run mcgregor_common_subgraphs algorithm on a graph with bundled properties? Thanks Saeed

2 2

[MultiArray, Thread] Setting the _ITERATOR_DEBUG_LEVEL
by lfrfly＠icqmail.com 24 Aug '10

24 Aug '10

It's probably well-known by now that multi_array has a problem with Visual Studio 2010: due to the way it identifies its iterators, you get errors unless you set the _ITERATOR_DEBUG_LEVEL preprocessor symbol to 0. First of all, when can we expect a fix for this (or is there one already)? Secondly, even if I manually set the _ITERATOR_DEBUG_LEVEL to 0 in Debug configuration (that's the default in Release), I am unable to build because when I try to link in the Boost Thread library, I get 2>libboost_thread-vc100-mt-gd-1_43.lib(thread.obj) : error LNK2038: mismatch detected for '_ITERATOR_DEBUG_LEVEL': value '2' doesn't match value '0' in test.obj This indicates that I need to build Boost Thread with that variable set to 0 as well, even in the debug mode; or else I need to somehow get the Release version of the library linked in instead. I'm not sure how to do either one of these options. Can anyone help me configure bjam to override the variable, or else override which lib is linked?

2 2

[boost-users][asio] Interaction problem with signals2?
by Germán Diago 24 Aug '10

24 Aug '10

Hello. I'm trying to call a signal after an async_read from inside a function called by boost::asio::io_service. The run function runs in a thread, and the observers are connected in a different thread. This is causing errors. It's my program or it's not possible to invoke a handler that is running in another thread from io_service::run? Thanks in advance.

1 0

using Regex and other Boost libraries that require a build
by Bhushan Inamdar 24 Aug '10

24 Aug '10

Hi all, I am relatively new to Boost but was wanting to install and do development on it for long now. Finally, I can now spare some time for that. I am using Visual Studio 2008 professional edition as a development IDE. I have installed Visual Assist X to assist me with the intellisense as well. I am having Windows 7 ultimate installed on my machine and I am trying to install latest i.e. BOOST 1.44.0 version. So far I have had partial success. I am able to build and compile the sample program on Boost site that needs only headers. But I am facing problems while building programs that reference other libraries. So here is what I did: - Tried unsuccessfully to install it using BoostPro; installation broke quite a few times. - So I gave up and downloaded the Boost compressed version and extracted it successfully in C: drive - The current location is C:\Program Files\Boost\Boost_1_44_0\....and the respective dir structure thereafter. - Then I downloaded the bjam utility and extracted it and then copied it to the Boost root dir - Following this, I double clicked bjam.exe and it ran the build. However, a lot of projects were skipped and virtually nothing was build. - Then I realized that it was Windows 7 we were dealing with and then immediately ran Bjam.exe as an administrator. - This time, it took a lot longer and I was seeing the compilation in progress and I think that it was satisfactory. - Then comes the part of linking the libraries through VC++ compiler to the code. - I then navigated to Tools->Options->Projects and Solutions->VC++Directories and selected Win32 on first combo on top left - There I selected Includes in the other combo on top right and added the C:\Program Files\Boost\Boost_1_44_0\Boost to the list - Then on the same page I changed the top right combo to Libraries and added C:\Program Files\Boost\Boost_1_44_0\libs to the list - Considering that I should not miss out on any other libraries, I added C:\Program Files\Boost\Boost_1_44_0\bin.V2 to the list as well; this directory was constructed as a result of build by Bjam.exe - Following that, I quickly followed the 2 tutorials on Boost site 1 for simple iostream (which worked after some adjustments) and the other for regex (which did not work). - Considering I might still have missed something, I went on to add the path C:\Program Files\Boost\Boost_1_44_0 to System variables and made changes to VC IDE accordingly. - Also, to mention, I did not find any simple way to build the libraries that need a separate build and neither did I found any simple tutorial on Boost site...where they have put the regex sample that extracts matched text from a paragraph So my questions: - I want to know if I have missed anything to build any of Boost libraries or link to VC IDE or else? - Is there a better way to make sure if all the variants of all the libraries are build and linked with VC? - Is there a way to do this with CMake? - I read that, some libraries have some dependencies like libz...etc. where can I get the list for all Boost libraries? - Although this Question is not related to Boost, on a lighter note, I would just want ask this. Please ignore this if it does not hold ground. I have installed Boost after I installed Visual Assist for Visual Studio. Hence, whereever I use Boost members and classes, it keeps on saying that refactoring data is not available. Hence, I presume that, if I uninstall and reinstall Visual Assist, it should help? Or in other words, is there a better way to refactor boost library code so that intellisense can pick that? I will continue searching for this and hope that there is an option in Visual Assist itself. Nonetheless, it is not as important as Boost build related questions. Hope to hear from you soon... Thanks and Regards, Bhushan.

4 3

preprocessing error
by Arnaud GELAS 24 Aug '10

24 Aug '10

Hi all, When compiling some code using boost, I get the following error: /usr/include/boost/type_traits/type_with_alignment.hpp:142: error: Not a valid preprocessing token ")BOOST_PP_LIST_FOLD_LEFT_CHECK_BOOST_PP_IIF" For more details, I posted the log here: http://gofigure2.sourceforge.net/temp/boost-error.txt Any idea what I could do wrong? My machine is a Fedora 13 (64 bits), the installed version of boost is 1.41.0, and I used gcc 4.4.4... Thanks in advance, Arnaud

1 0

Boost.Format
by John Dlugosz 24 Aug '10

24 Aug '10

I'm using Boost.Format as a simple way to create strings to pass to exception constructors and primitive logging output during debugging (Windows' OutputDebugString). I see that the format object can be inserted into a stream, easily. But, with arguments, it's awkward to convert it to a string -- you need extra parens around the whole thing. Is there some good reason why there is no implicit conversion to string? E.g. string message= boost.format("blah") % argument % errorcode; OutputDebugStringA (message.c_str()); throw std::runtime_error (message); Or, is there some simple way that I'm missing? Thanks, --John TradeStation Group, Inc. is a publicly-traded holding company (NASDAQ GS: TRAD) of three operating subsidiaries, TradeStation Securities, Inc. (Member NYSE, FINRA, SIPC and NFA), TradeStation Technologies, Inc., a trading software and subscription company, and TradeStation Europe Limited, a United Kingdom, FSA-authorized introducing brokerage firm. None of these companies provides trading or investment advice, recommendations or endorsements of any kind. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.

1 0

building all libs
by Kraus Philipp 24 Aug '10

24 Aug '10

Hi, I use boost with thread, iostreams and random. I compiled bjam first and uses them to compile all, but I must call every lib manual with ./bjam variant=release toolset=darwin threading=multi variant=release libs/iostreams/build How can I build the full boost with all libs in one run? Thanks Phil

4 4

cstdint.hpp causes warnings on VC10
by Michael Kaes 24 Aug '10

24 Aug '10

HI all, after switching to VC10 I recognized that including the cstdint.hpp header causes a warning. After looking into this header I saw that all defines like INT8_C are guarded to prevent multiple defines, except of the UINT8_C define (cstdint.hpp Line:400). Is this done on purpose because to me it looks as if the guard was just forgotten. Regards, Michael

2 1

[accumulators] chaining accumulator outputs
by Allen Chuang 24 Aug '10

24 Aug '10

Is there a way to chain the output of an accumulator and use it as the input of another accumulator? The sort of case I am thinking about is for example calculating the max of a rolling_mean. One obvious way to do this is to write a new rolling_mean_max accumulator and make it depend on rolling_mean, but the inner logic would be 99% duplicate of max. I was wondering if there was a way to do this without so much code duplication. -- GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01

1 0

number cores / cpu
by Kraus Philipp 24 Aug '10

24 Aug '10

Hello, can I determine how many physical cpu and cores are installed in a system with the boost lib? Under *nix I would read /proc but I would like to do that with boost, because of "os-less". Thanks Phil

9 10

boost::asio SSL connection thru proxy server
by Kumar, Akhilesh 24 Aug '10

24 Aug '10

Hi, I am writing a boost socket client using boost::asio to do secure HTTP (HTTPS) communication. I Implemented my client based on the code sample based on (http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_39_0/doc/html/boost_asio/example/ssl/client…) with little changes as I am using sync socket. My client woks fine, when I am connecting to server directly, but I am not sure what changes I need to make when my communication going thru proxy. The unsecure connection(HTTP) work fine thru proxy, and here is what I do for unsecure connection, 1. Initialize boost socket(IO service and other stuff). 2. Resolve and Connect to Proxy server. 3. Start writing to actual server(HTTP send request). 4. Start uploading/downloading. 5. Close Socket. But I can't use this above procedure for (SSL) secure connection as I need to do handshaking with the server before I can write anything if my understanding is correct. Can somebody give me some pointer or code sample or step I need to do when I am doing secure connection thru proxy server. Just to clarify Microsoft WinInet does do (secure) HTTPS connection thru same proxy fine. If providing my code sample I am using for SSL might help understand the problem I can provide that. Thanks in advance for any help. Akhilesh Kumar

1 0

Using boost::bind with stl algorithms
by przemyslaw.sliwa＠uk.bnpparibas.com 24 Aug '10

24 Aug '10

Hello, I have the following question. I have two containers std::set<std::string> insertedEvents; std::vector<std::string> eventNames; How I would like to copy all those elements from eventNames which are not in insertedEvents. Can this can be done somehow using the boost::bind feature? I am doing it at the moment using a silly loop: for(size_t i=0; i<eventNames.size(); i++) { if (m_insertedEvents.find(eventNames[i])==m_insertedEvents.end()) eventNamesDegraded.push_back(eventNames[i]); } Thanks for any kind of help, Pshemek ___________________________________________________________ This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is prohibited. Please refer to http://www.bnpparibas.co.uk/en/information/legal_information.asp?Code=ECAS-… for additional disclosures.

4 4

bug in asio?
by Hei Chan 23 Aug '10

23 Aug '10

Hi, I am using a 3rd party library that uses boost::asio. The 3rd party library will call asyn_receive() with a callback handler, then when boost::asio::detail:: receive_op::do_complete() calls the callback handler, the handler consumes the message, calls asyn_receive() and then if there is no more message, it (the thread) waits for a condition -- the callback handler gets called again. The problem now is that once there is no more message, the thread enters the wait condition, and it never gets waken up again. Is it incorrect to enter the wait condition in the same thread that calls boost::asio::detail:: receive_op::do_complete()? Thanks in advance. Cheers, Hei

1 0

Getting started with Boost.Test
by Otto 23 Aug '10

23 Aug '10

Hi, I'm very new to C++ and Boost. I want to make a simple desktop application (a game editor, basically read/write a binary file) using QtCreator. Right now I'm only interested in Boost.Test for the unit tests. I tried to install using the instructions in "Getting started" but wasn't able to, probably because of bad english and lack of C++ knowledge. I unpacked Boost to /home/otto/boost_1_44_0/ >From there, I ran: $ mkdir dist $ ./bootstrap.sh --prefix=/home/otto/boost_1_44_0/dist --show-libraries --with-libraries=test $ ./bjam install It seems that config had no effect as it built everything (instead of just test) and to bin.v2/. A few "cp: cannot create regular file `/usr/local/lib/libboost_wave.a': Permission denied" errors too. What went wrong? Now I have bin.v2/libs/test/build/gcc-4.4.4/release with directories link-static and threading-multi. I also would like to configure it for usage with QtCreator. Thanks

3 5

Best method for making synchronous call from async handler
by David Daeschler 23 Aug '10

23 Aug '10

Good evening, Currently I have an application running on boost asio working very well. To simplify the heck out of it, it takes requests via tcp and passes back binary information stored on disk. However, I now need to add an extra step to processing. If the data is not available on the local disk, the server needs to contact one or more peer servers it knows about, send a query to each one via UDP asking if it has the data, and then use an existing TCP connection to that server to retrieve the asset. This step must be completed before any more processing can be done for the current client even though the client may be sending even more requests while we process. My question is, what is the best method for me to achieve the goal? Should I set up another io_service for the UDP query step along with retrieving the data from the other server? Is there a good wait to wait on that io_service to complete? Also in the case that one of the servers has gone away, can I use a deadline timer to cancel the UDP recvfrom if I don't get a response in time from one or more servers? I should also probably keep this second io_service alive throughout the lifetime of the application? Thank you in advance for advice on tackling this problem the right way with asio. -- David Daeschler

2 2

mpl::fold problems
by sergey kostanbaev 23 Aug '10

23 Aug '10

Hello everybody! I'm a newbie in boost and I've got some problems with boost::mpl #include <boost/mpl/vector.hpp> #include <boost/mpl/fold.hpp> #include <boost/mpl/arithmetic.hpp> template <class T, unsigned space=1> struct tr_field2 { static const unsigned count = space; } typedef boost::mpl::vector4< tr_field2<int, 4>, tr_field2<int, 7>, tr_field2<char, 1>, tr_field2<char, 1> > Test_description; I want to calculate a sum of all tr_field2::count I've read in the docs mpl::fold is for the case. I tried to compose typedef boost::mpl::fold<Test_description, boost::mpl::int_<0>, boost::mpl::plus<boost::mpl::_, boost::mpl::_::count > > >::type fcount; but it won't compile. It seems I misundestood something.

2 2

[BGL] Change order of edge iterator
by John Robertson 23 Aug '10

23 Aug '10

I want to be able to iterate through the edges in any given order, not just the order specified by tie(edge_iter, edges_end) = edges(g);. Is it possible to do something like the following. typename graph_traits<Graph>::edge_iterator edge_iter1, edges_end1, edge_iter2, edges_end2, edge_iter3, edges_end3; tie(edge_iter1, edges_end1) = edges(g); sort(edge_iter1, edges_end1, ordering_1()); tie(edge_iter2, edges_end2) = edges(g); sort(edge_iter2, edges_end2, ordering_2()); tie(edge_iter3, edges_end3) = edges(g); sort(edge_iter3, edges_end3, ordering_3()); (ordering_x() specified by some struct) Then I would have 3 different orderings of the edges available. Would this work or should I use an iterator adapter, or create a map and (if its possible) obtain an iterator from the mapping, or something else. Thanks

2 1

[DateTime] from time_t to ptime and back - or not
by Christoph Duelli 23 Aug '10

23 Aug '10

[I am using Boost 1.43.0 on linux, gcc 4.4.1] I am having trouble with date_time's ptime. I am passing it a time_t, and store that in a ptime object. When I retrieve the time_t, I am getting a different value than the one I passed to it originally. (the difference seems to be 2 hours - in all probability due to UTC vs local time issues). Code: time_t now = time(NULL); boost::posix_time::ptime pt = boost::posix_time::from_time_t(now); struct tm tm = to_tm(pt); time_t should_be_now = mktime(&tm); BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(now, should_be_now); fails for me: now is by 7200 seconds (i.e. 2 hours) ahead of. Is this a bug in date_time or am I just failing to use it properly? Thank you, and best regards Christoph

3 3

[bind]Help! Can we modify parameters before pass them into bind (see the context below for details)
by jungleman 23 Aug '10

23 Aug '10

Hi, I have some problems on function template bind. the original usage of bind is : bind(func, _1, _2), and I wonder whether I can modify the parameters before pass them into bind, for example, functype function = bind(func, *_1, *_2). So that, when I use function(a, b), it will do like this: func(*a, *b). May it work, or some way else to do this? I just wanna do this in one line code. thanks in advance. -- Stay hungry, stay foolish !

3 2

Boost.Intrusive issues on IBM compiler
by Jeremiah Willcock 22 Aug '10

22 Aug '10

It appears that almost all of the Boost.Intrusive tests (at <URL:http://tinyurl.com/2bzhglh>, for example) fail on IBM's compiler. I get similar results, like the following from the test suite, from my own code: An expression of type "overloaded function: U::to_node_ptr" cannot be converted to type "boost::intrusive::list_node<void *> *(boost::intrusive::detail::base_hook_traits<boost::intrusive::testvalue<hooks<void *>,0>,boost::intrusive::list_node_traits<void *>,1,boost::intrusive::default_tag,1>::*)(testvalue<hooks<void *>,0> &)" Is there an easy workaround for this issue? Is there a plan to fix it? This has also been reported a couple of months ago as bug 4412 (<URL:https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/4412>). Thank you. -- Jeremiah Willcock

2 1

axpy_prod Weirdness
by Jane Shevtsov 22 Aug '10

22 Aug '10

I have a little program that implements an ecological network analysis algorithm. (It looks at the importance of indirect energy or matter flows between species.) 01 //dea.cpp -- The fundamental DEA algorithm 02 03 #include <boost/numeric/ublas/matrix.hpp> 04 #include <boost/numeric/ublas/operation.hpp> 05 #include <boost/numeric/ublas/io.hpp> //for test 06 #include "storage_adaptors.hpp" //for test 07 08 using boost::numeric::ublas::matrix; 09 10 void dea(const matrix<double>[], int, int, matrix<double>[]); 11 matrix<double> indflow(const matrix<double> & Ndea, const matrix<double> & Gdea); 12 13 int main() { 14 using boost::numeric::ublas::make_matrix_from_pointer; 15 matrix<double> Garr[4]; 16 matrix<double> Narr[2]; 17 double G1[3][3] = {0, 0, 0, 0.33333, 0, 0, 0.66667, 1, 0}; 18 double G2[3][3] = {0, 0, 0, 0.6, 0, 0, 0.4, 1, 0}; 19 double G3[3][3] = {0, 0, 0, 0.55, 0, 0, 0.45, 1, 0}; 20 double G4[3][3] = {0, 0, 0, 0.5, 0, 0, 0.5, 1, 0}; 21 Garr[0] = make_matrix_from_pointer(G1); 22 Garr[1] = make_matrix_from_pointer(G2); 23 Garr[2] = make_matrix_from_pointer(G3); 24 Garr[3] = make_matrix_from_pointer(G4); 25 dea(Garr, 2, 4, Narr); 26 std::cout << Narr[0] << std::endl; 27 matrix<double> ratio = indflow(Narr[0], Garr[0]); 28 std::cout << ratio << std::endl; 29 return 0; 30 } 31 32 //The fundamental DEA algorithm 33 //Takes array of G matrices, window size, array length and empty array for N_DEA matrices as input 34 void dea(const matrix<double> Garr[], int win, int arrLen, matrix<double> Narr[]) { 35 using namespace boost::numeric::ublas; 36 int matSize = Garr[0].size1(); 37 for (int i = 0; i < arrLen - win; i++) { 38 matrix<double> Gprod = identity_matrix<double>(matSize); 39 Narr[i] = identity_matrix<double>(matSize); 40 //the core loop 41 for (int j = 0; j < win; j++) { 42 Gprod = prod(Gprod, Garr[i+j]); 43 Narr[i] += Gprod; 44 } 45 } 46 } 47 48 //computes indirect flow fraction 49 matrix<double> indflow(const matrix<double> & Ndea, const matrix<double> & Gdea) { 50 using namespace boost::numeric::ublas; 51 int matSize = Ndea.size1(); 52 matrix<double> iflow = Ndea - Gdea - identity_matrix<double>(matSize); //Ind = N-G-I 53 matrix<double> frac = zero_matrix<double>(matSize, matSize); //inialize indirect flow fraction matrix 54 //perform division for nonzero, off-diagonal elements 55 for (int i=0; i<matSize; i++) { 56 for (int j=0; j<matSize; j++) { 57 if (i != j && Ndea(i,j) != 0) //avoid division by zero 58 frac(i, j) = iflow(i, j) / Ndea(i, j); 59 } 60 } 61 return frac; 62 } The correct output is below. [3,3]((1,0,0),(0.33333,1,0),(1.26667,1,1)) [3,3]((0,0,0),(0,0,0),(0.473683,0,0)) The code given above works, but to speed it up, I tried replacing the first line of the core loop in dea() with axpy_prod(Gprod, Garr[i+j], Gprod, true);. This gives the following wrong output: [3,3]((1,0,0),(0,1,0),(0,0,1)) [3,3]((0,0,0),(0,0,0),(0,0,0)) And if I use axpy_prod(Gprod, Garr[i+j], Gprod, false);, I get: [3,3]((3,0,0),(1.26666,3,0),(2.33334,3,3)) [3,3]((0,0,0),(0.736843,0,0),(0.714285,0.666667,0)) What gives? When should I avoid using axpy_prod? -- ------------- Jane Shevtsov Ecology Ph.D. candidate, University of Georgia co-founder, <www.worldbeyondborders.org> Check out my blog, <http://perceivingwholes.blogspot.com>Perceiving Wholes "The whole person must have both the humility to nurture the Earth and the pride to go to Mars." --Wyn Wachhorst, The Dream of Spaceflight

1 0

[bind]Help! Can we modify parameters before pass them into bind (see the context below for details)
by jungleman 22 Aug '10

22 Aug '10

Hi, I have some problems on function template bind. when I uses stl algorithm adjacent_find(inputIterator begin, inputIterator) -- Stay hungry, stay foolish !

2 1

[asio] Feature request for serializable types.
by Germán Diago 22 Aug '10

22 Aug '10

Hello. I'm using boost.asio and trying to serialize a boost.variant, which is serializable because each of the fields I used in the variant have a serialize method required by boost.serialization library. I want to send my variant as binary data. This is not easy although I have a serialize method because this does not work: async_write(mysocket, boost::asio::buffer(myserializablevariant), when_done); I think all serializable types should be automatically usable as boost::asio::buffer, like std::vector, in this call. I think this shouldn't be too hard to implement, but I don't know how to serialize my data in binary format in a straight-forward way. Any ideas? Thanks in advance.

1 0

thread-safe initialization for singleton
by Kraus Philipp 22 Aug '10

22 Aug '10

Hi, I have written a class with static methods and properties. Now the class must be used in a multithreaded environment, so I get some race conditions error. I use boost::thread for implementating the threads. I have found boost_once but I don't know how to use it, so my class properties are initialized once. Thanks Phil

6 10

multiple serialized objects to same file
by Oscar Pernas 21 Aug '10

21 Aug '10

Hi! I know that this question is asked before but I cant see any answer about it. Is posible with boost serialization to write different objects to the same file? if is possible, is possible to access to each object with an iterator or with position like binary files? thanks -- Óscar Pernas Plaza.

2 1

[BGL] segFault
by John Robertson 21 Aug '10

21 Aug '10

I'm trying to obtain an iterator of edges with a different ordering than that given in egdes(g). The following compiles but segfaults at std::sort( VE.begin(), VE.end(), ordering< Graph, edd >() ); (runs ok if the above line is commented out) //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// typedef Traits::edge_descriptor edd; // Create ordering template < typename Graph, typename edd > struct ordering { Graph & g; bool operator ()(const edd & a, const edd & b) { return g[a].eName < g[b].eName; } }; template < typename Graph > int initialize_container( Graph & g ) { typename graph_traits<Graph>::edge_iterator edge_iter, edges_end; // create vector of edge descriptors. std::vector< Traits::edge_descriptor > VE(num_edges(g)+1); int i = 1; // (Sometimes I like to start at 1.) //insert edge descriptors into vector of edge descriptors. for (tie(edge_iter, edges_end) = edges(g); edge_iter != edges_end; ++edge_iter) { cout << " *edge_iter = " << *edge_iter << endl; VE[i++] = *edge_iter; } // segfaults here //sort vector of edge descriptors. std::sort( VE.begin(), VE.end(), ordering< Graph, edd >() ); //print sorted edge descriptors. for( int i = 1; i < num_edges(g)+1; ++i ) cout << " -Edge " << i << " = " << VE[i] << endl; } Thanks

2 1

[BGL] Updating the source vertex of an edge in-place
by Daniel Trebbien 21 Aug '10

21 Aug '10

I need to be able to update the source vertex of an edge in-place. The only option that I see is to remove the edge with `remove_edge` and then add a new edge with `add_edge`. The problem, however, is that I think this will mess up a property map of an edge property if it cannot expand to map a new value for the newly-added edge. Thus, I would like to update the edge in-place. How do I do this?

2 1

[propertytree] more beginners questions
by Dietmar Hummel 21 Aug '10

21 Aug '10

Hi! I have some more questions regarding property tree (for parsing xml) and maybe someone could help me. Lets assume we have the following xml file to read: <a> <b> <c><d>1</d></c> <c><d>2</d></c> <c><d>3</d></c> <x></x> </b> </a> Now, my idea was to parse all the c-nodes by calling a specific function for each of them. Something like this... void parseDNode( const boost::property_tree::ptree& v ) { //... } void parseCNode( const boost::property_tree::ptree::value_type& v ) { parseDNode( v.second.get_child( "d" ) ); } void load( const std::string& filename ) { boost::property_tree::ptree pt; boost::property_tree::read_xml(filename, pt); BOOST_FOREACH( boost::property_tree::ptree::value_type &v, pt.get_child( "a.b.c" ) ) { parseCNode( v ); } } ---- Now I have several questions for this: 1. The code doesn't work as expected, it just handles the first one of the c nodes 2. The function parseCNode() also doesn't work. I assumed that v is a reference to the c node where I have to claim the d-node by get_child. But it seems v is already pointing to d? 3. I don't understand why BOOST_FOREACH is working with value_type here. As far as I see, get_child returns a self_type which should be a ptree? See also the different parameter lists for parseCNode and parseDNode... Thanks in advance.... Regards Dietmar

2 1

MPICH2 + Boost.MPI Collective Problems
by Stephan Hackstedt 21 Aug '10

21 Aug '10

Hi there, i have a big problem by running MPI programs which use the Boost.MPI library. When i'm trying to run programs on *more *than one node, collective operations like communicator::barrier<http://boost.org/doc/libs/1_44_0/doc/html/boost/mpi/communicator.html#id918…>or broadcast,<http://boost.org/doc/libs/1_44_0/doc/html/boost/mpi/broadcast.html>or even the environment<http://boost.org/doc/libs/1_44_0/doc/html/boost/mpi/environment.html>destructor (cause of FINALIZE, which is colletive) causing the programm to crash. I got errors like this : *[1]terminate called after throwing an instance of 'boost::exception_detail::clone_impl<boost::exception_detail::error_info_injector<boost::mpi::exception> >' [1] what(): MPI_Barrier: Other MPI error, error stack: [1]PMPI_Barrier(362).................: MPI_Barrier(MPI_COMM_WORLD) failed [1]MPIR_Barrier_impl(255)............: [1]MPIR_Barrier_intra(79)............: [1]MPIC_Sendrecv(186)................: [1]MPIC_Wait(534)....................: [1]MPIDI_CH3I_Progress(184)..........: [1]MPID_nem_mpich2_blocking_recv(895): [1]MPID_nem_tcp_connpoll(1746).......: Communication error with rank 0: * I also tested this with the simple broadcast example from the Boost.MPI tutorial - same errors.. But when using the original MPI equivalent without the Boost.MPI library, such as MPI_Barrier<http://www.mpi-forum.org/docs/mpi-11-html/node66.html#Node66>, the programm runs well. I am using MPICH2 on Ubuntu 10.04 platforms. Someone had problems like this or know a fix for that? Regards, stephan

1 2

Using unordered_set or unordered_map to hold small array(s) of ints
by B Hart 21 Aug '10

21 Aug '10

Can someone please provide an example of how to best use unordered_map/set to store/lookup many small arrays of integers. e.g. unsigned int I[5] = {1000,3344455,12455222,8832232}; I'm guessing that there is no facility for using raw C++ arrays, and that one must wrap them in a struct. Thanks in advance.

5 9

Beginner question: Why boost::signal creates another instance of the slot object ?
by Mauricio Gomes 20 Aug '10

20 Aug '10

Hi, I am running the program below (Vista with boost 1.43, mingw/gcc 4.5.1). I would expect slot.x to be 5 but it is zero. Why boost::signal creates another instance of the slot object ? What am I missing here ? Thank you in advance for your attention, Mau. ---------------------------------------------------------------- #include <iostream> #include <boost/signal.hpp> struct S { int x; S (): x(0) {} void operator () (int i) { std::cout << "&slot1 = " << this << std::endl; x = i; std::cout << "slot1.x = " << this->x << std::endl; } }; int main () { S slot; boost::signal<void (int)> sig; std::cout << "&slot2 = " << &slot << std::endl; sig.connect (slot); sig (5); std::cout << "slot2.x = " << slot.x << std::endl; return 0; } -------------------------------------------------------------------- Output: &slot2 = 0x22fee4 &slot1 = 0x341448 slot1.x = 5 slot2.x = 0

4 8

How to best use unordered_set or unordered_map to hold small array(s) of ints
by B Hart 20 Aug '10

20 Aug '10

I posted this last night, but not sure it went through to the list as I don't see it in my sent items and I never got any responses. Sorry if it is duplicate. I'm hoping someone could offer an example or advice on how to best use unordered_set or unordered_map to hold many small arrays of unsigned integers. I would like to use the built in hash function rather than have to create one. Also, since I have many of these small arrays, keeping the memory footprint small and the hash time at a minimum are important concerns. A typical int array would hold 5 unsigned ints. Maybe someone could offer example code or suggestions. The samples I see are always the trivial case of just entering a single number or string as key or value. Thanks.

2 1

[property tree] silly beginners question
by Dietmar Hummel 20 Aug '10

20 Aug '10

Hi all! I am trying to read an xml file with property tree (first try). Because I have dots int the tag names I must use the extended version of the get functions. So here is the slightly modified example code, which sadly does'nt compile on vc2008. Probably its a totally silly error on my side... // Loads debug_settings structure from the specified XML file void load(const std::string &filename) { // Create an empty property tree object using boost::property_tree::ptree; ptree pt; // Load the XML file into the property tree. If reading fails // (cannot open file, parse error), an exception is thrown. read_xml(filename, pt); // Get the filename and store it in the m_file variable. // Note that we construct the path to the value by separating // the individual keys with dots. If dots appear in the keys, // a path type with a different separator can be used. // If the debug.filename key is not found, an exception is thrown. std::string m_file = pt.get< std::string >( '/', "debug/filename" ); // Get the debug level and store it in the m_level variable. // This is another version of the get method: if the value is // not found, the default value (specified by the second // parameter) is returned instead. The type of the value // extracted is determined by the type of the second parameter, // so we can simply write get(...) instead of get<int>(...). int m_level = pt.get( '/', "debug/level", 0); // Iterate over the debug.modules section and store all found // modules in the m_modules set. The get_child() function // returns a reference to the child at the specified path; if // there is no such child, it throws. Property tree iterators // are models of BidirectionalIterator. std::vector< std::string > m_modules; BOOST_FOREACH( ptree::value_type &v, pt.get_child( '/', "debug/modules" ) ) { m_modules.push_back( v.second.data() ); } } vc says: 1>c:\projekte\proptreetest\proptreetest\proptreetest.cpp(23) : error C2664: 'std::basic_string<_Elem,_Traits,_Ax> boost::property_tree::basic_ptree<Key,Data>::get<std::string>(const boost::property_tree::string_path<String,Translator> &,const Type &) const': Konvertierung des Parameters 1 von 'char' in 'const boost::property_tree::string_path<String,Translator> &' nicht möglich 1> with 1> [ 1> _Elem=char, 1> _Traits=std::char_traits<char>, 1> _Ax=std::allocator<char>, 1> Key=std::string, 1> Data=std::string, 1> String=std::string, 1> Translator=boost::property_tree::id_translator<std::string>, 1> Type=std::string 1> ] 1> and 1> [ 1> String=std::string, 1> Translator=boost::property_tree::id_translator<std::string> 1> ] So, it looks to me like the compiler does'nt know about the extended get functions... Regards Dietmar

2 1

[Log] How to use?
by Olivier Tournaire 20 Aug '10

20 Aug '10

Hi all, i am currently trying to use Boost.Log in my application. After fighting the two last days, I still do not understand how to correctly use the lib. I would like the result to be the same as the one provided by the example advanced_use.cpp. So, I wrote a simple class to make some tests. As I want to use the logging library in a shared library (an application plugin), I made a simple test: compile the class which uses Log in a shared library and link an executable against this library. I also have created an executable which directly compiles the class (so does not link against the shared library). Basically, I have a test_boost_log class. The constructor is a copy/paste of the code from the example advanced_use.cpp: #include "test_boost_log.hpp" #include <cassert> #include <iostream> #include <fstream> #include <boost/shared_ptr.hpp> #include <boost/log/common.hpp> #include <boost/log/filters.hpp> #include <boost/log/formatters.hpp> #include <boost/log/attributes.hpp> #include <boost/log/sinks.hpp> #include <boost/log/utility/empty_deleter.hpp> #include <boost/log/utility/scoped_attribute.hpp> namespace logging = boost::log; namespace fmt = boost::log::formatters; namespace flt = boost::log::filters; namespace sinks = boost::log::sinks; namespace attrs = boost::log::attributes; namespace src = boost::log::sources; namespace keywords = boost::log::keywords; using boost::shared_ptr; // Here we define our application severity levels. enum severity_level { normal, notification, warning, error, critical }; // The formatting logic for the severity level template< typename CharT, typename TraitsT > inline std::basic_ostream< CharT, TraitsT >& operator<< ( std::basic_ostream< CharT, TraitsT >& strm, severity_level lvl) { static const char* const str[] = { "normal", "notification", "warning", "error", "critical" }; if (static_cast< std::size_t >(lvl) < (sizeof(str) / sizeof(*str))) strm << str[lvl]; else strm << static_cast< int >(lvl); return strm; } int foo(src::logger& lg) { BOOST_LOG_FUNCTION(); BOOST_LOG(lg) << "foo is being called"; return 10; } test_boost_log::test_boost_log() { // For now we only create a text output sink: typedef sinks::synchronous_sink< sinks::text_ostream_backend > text_sink; shared_ptr< text_sink > pSink(new text_sink); { text_sink::locked_backend_ptr pBackend = pSink->locked_backend(); shared_ptr< std::ostream > pStream(&std::clog, logging::empty_deleter()); pBackend->add_stream(pStream); shared_ptr< std::ofstream > pStream2(new std::ofstream("sample.log")); assert(pStream2->is_open()); pBackend->add_stream(pStream2); } logging::core::get()->add_sink(pSink); src::logger lg; BOOST_LOG(lg) << "Hello, World!"; pSink->locked_backend()->set_formatter(fmt::stream << fmt::attr("LineID") // First an attribute "LineID" is written to the log << " [" << fmt::date_time< boost::posix_time::ptime >("TimeStamp", "%d.%m.%Y %H:%M:%S.%f") << "] [" << fmt::attr< severity_level >("Severity", std::nothrow) << "] [" << fmt::time_duration< boost::posix_time::time_duration >("Uptime") << "] [" // then this delimiter separates it from the rest of the line << fmt::if_(flt::has_attr("Tag")) [ fmt::stream << fmt::attr< std::string >("Tag") << "] [" // yet another delimiter ] << fmt::named_scope("Scope", keywords::iteration = fmt::reverse) << "] " << fmt::message()); // here goes the log record text shared_ptr< logging::attribute > pCounter(new attrs::counter< unsigned int >(1)); // Since we intend to count all logging records ever made by the application, // this attribute should clearly be global. logging::core::get()->add_global_attribute("LineID", pCounter); // And similarly add a time stamp shared_ptr< logging::attribute > pTimeStamp(new attrs::local_clock()); logging::core::get()->add_global_attribute("TimeStamp", pTimeStamp); // And an up time stopwatch BOOST_LOG_SCOPED_THREAD_ATTR("Uptime", attrs::timer); // Let's also track the execution scope from which the records are made boost::shared_ptr< logging::attribute > pNamedScope(new attrs::named_scope()); logging::core::get()->add_thread_attribute("Scope", pNamedScope); // We can mark the current execution scope now - it's the 'main' function BOOST_LOG_FUNCTION(); // Let's try out the counter attribute and formatting BOOST_LOG(lg) << "Some log line with a counter"; BOOST_LOG(lg) << "Another log line with the counter"; { BOOST_LOG_NAMED_SCOPE("Tagging scope"); // Now these lines will be highlighted with the tag BOOST_LOG(lg) << "Some tagged log line"; BOOST_LOG(lg) << "Another tagged log line"; } // And this line is not highlighted anymore BOOST_LOG(lg) << "Now the tag is removed"; pSink->set_filter( flt::attr< severity_level >("Severity", std::nothrow) >= warning // Write all records with "warning" severity or higher || flt::attr< std::string >("Tag", std::nothrow).begins_with("IMPORTANT")); // ...or specifically tagged src::severity_logger< severity_level > slg; // These two lines test filtering based on severity BOOST_LOG_SEV(slg, normal) << "A normal severity message, will not pass to the output"; BOOST_LOG_SEV(slg, error) << "An error severity message, will pass to the output"; { // Next we try if the second condition of the filter works // We mark following lines with a tag BOOST_LOG_SCOPED_THREAD_TAG("Tag", std::string, "IMPORTANT MESSAGES"); BOOST_LOG(slg) << "Some really urgent line"; } pSink->reset_filter(); // And moreover, it is possible to nest logging records. For example, this will // be processed in the order of evaluation: BOOST_LOG(lg) << "The result of foo is " << foo(lg); } I have added another method to test the logger state: void test_boost_log::a_test_method_to_see_if_the_logger_is_still_working() { src::severity_logger< severity_level > slg; BOOST_LOG_SEV(slg, error) << "An error severity message, will pass to the output"; } My main: #include "test_boost_log.hpp" int main(int argc, char** argv) { test_boost_log tbl; tbl.a_test_method_to_see_if_the_logger_is_still_working(); return 0; } Here is the output of the program: Hello, World! 1 [17.08.2010 21:22:43.083302] [] [00:00:00.000076] [test_boost_log::test_boost_log()] Some log line with a counter 2 [17.08.2010 21:22:43.083445] [] [00:00:00.000217] [test_boost_log::test_boost_log()] Another log line with the counter 3 [17.08.2010 21:22:43.083484] [] [00:00:00.000256] [Tagged line] [Tagging scope<-test_boost_log::test_boost_log()] Some tagged log line 4 [17.08.2010 21:22:43.083517] [] [00:00:00.000289] [Tagged line] [Tagging scope<-test_boost_log::test_boost_log()] Another tagged log line 5 [17.08.2010 21:22:43.083556] [] [00:00:00.000328] [test_boost_log::test_boost_log()] Now the tag is removed 6 [17.08.2010 21:22:43.083598] [error] [00:00:00.000370] [test_boost_log::test_boost_log()] An error severity message, will pass to the output 7 [17.08.2010 21:22:43.083633] [normal] [00:00:00.000405] [IMPORTANT MESSAGES] [test_boost_log::test_boost_log()] Some really urgent line 9 [17.08.2010 21:22:43.083673] [] [00:00:00.000444] [int foo(boost::log_mt_posix::sources::logger&)<-test_boost_log::test_boost_log()] foo is being called 8 [17.08.2010 21:22:43.083668] [] [00:00:00.000440] [test_boost_log::test_boost_log()] The result of foo is 10 *terminate called after throwing an instance of 'boost::exception_detail::clone_impl<boost::exception_detail::error_info_injector<boost::log_mt_posix::missing_value> >'* * what(): Requested attribute value not found* So, the logger throws, sample.log is created, but empty. The library and the executable are compiled with -DBOOST_LOG_USE_CHAR and -DBOOST_LOG_DYN_LINK If someone could help... Best regards, Olivier PS: boost_1.42, log_1.0 (from sourceforge), g++4.3.4, 64bits ubuntu

2 10

A question about "prim_minimum_spanning_tree.hpp"
by 王伟 20 Aug '10

20 Aug '10

Hi, I'm studying MST algorithms in GPU recently.I need BGL implementation as coparison,But I have a problem in using prim_minimum_spanning_tree.hpp.The problem is:when I use large input(e.g. >1M),there's a "segmnetation error" problem.But when the input(e.g. 1K) is small,the result is noproblem. I haven't found know the reason yet.My complier is gcc 4.1.2,OS is RHEL5. Help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. Wang wei The complete code is in the attachment.

2 1

Some trouble using mutexes
by Ernest Galbrun 20 Aug '10

20 Aug '10

Dear boost users, I would be really grateful if someone could give me a hint about what I am doing wrong with the mutex and thread class (I am using boost 1.43, on windows XP running visual c++ 2010, the library has been built using the bjam utility). I have a main thread that creates an object of class robot : class Robot { private: boost::mutex tcpLock; boost::thread continuousThread; ... } Robot k3; this thread launches a thread that makes continuous calls to a member function of the robot. Since this function uses network ressources, I want it to be safe so i use a lock The function called is the only function in my program that uses this lock : int Robot::sendMsg(string msg, int n, vector<string>* answer) { tcpLock.lock(); (do stuff with the tcp io service) tcpLock.unlock(); return 0; } Of course, I also call this function from the main thread. And I have disruptive behavior, which I don't understand. When debugging, I see that the 'active_count' of the tcpLock object stays negative or ==0, which seem absolutely wrong to me, but I don't understand how it could ever be anything other than 0 or 1. Any clue, advice, web link, or soft injures are welcome ! -- Ernest Galbrun

2 1

ptree info format - block commenting
by Hite, Christopher 20 Aug '10

20 Aug '10

http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_41_0/doc/html/boost_propertytree/parsers .html#boost_propertytree.parsers.info_parser I'm using the ptree info format. How about C-style commenting out of a block of config stuff like? /* Stuff I { don't need } */ Chris

1 0

[Interprocess] "You cannot bind an lvalue to an rvalue reference" in 1.44 using VC10
by Phil Ratzloff 20 Aug '10

20 Aug '10

When I attempt to compile a project using boost::interprocess I get compile errors when I include managed_mapped_file.hpp when using VC10. I can create a simple project that is just the following code: #include <boost\interprocess\managed_mapped_file.hpp> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { return 0; } When compiling, I get the following errors: Empty.cpp c:\lib\boost_1_44_0\boost\interprocess\detail\move.hpp(342): error C2440: 'return' : cannot convert from 'boost::interprocess::mapped_region' to 'boost::interprocess::mapped_region &&' You cannot bind an lvalue to an rvalue reference c:\lib\boost_1_44_0\boost\interprocess\mapped_region.hpp(159) : see reference to function template instantiation 'boost::interprocess::mapped_region &&boost::interprocess::move<boost::interprocess::mapped_region&>(T)' being compiled with [ T=boost::interprocess::mapped_region & ] c:\lib\boost_1_44_0\boost\interprocess\detail\move.hpp(342): error C2440: 'return' : cannot convert from 'boost::interprocess::detail::file_wrapper' to 'boost::interprocess::detail::file_wrapper &&' You cannot bind an lvalue to an rvalue reference c:\lib\boost_1_44_0\boost\interprocess\detail\file_wrapper.hpp(63) : see reference to function template instantiation 'boost::interprocess::detail::file_wrapper &&boost::interprocess::move<boost::interprocess::detail::file_wrapper&>(T)' being compiled with [ T=boost::interprocess::detail::file_wrapper & ] c:\lib\boost_1_44_0\boost\interprocess\detail\move.hpp(342): error C2440: 'return' : cannot convert from 'boost::interprocess::file_mapping' to 'boost::interprocess::file_mapping &&' You cannot bind an lvalue to an rvalue reference c:\lib\boost_1_44_0\boost\interprocess\file_mapping.hpp(62) : see reference to function template instantiation 'boost::interprocess::file_mapping &&boost::interprocess::move<boost::interprocess::file_mapping&>(T)' being compiled with [ T=boost::interprocess::file_mapping & ] When I look at move.hpp(342) I find the following code: #if defined(BOOST_MOVE_DOXYGEN_INVOKED) ...unused code... #else template <class T> inline typename remove_reference<T>::type&& move(T&& t) { return t; } #endif It is complaining about the "return t;" statement. I have just moved up from boost 1.43, where I have been working without problems with VC10. Is there something I should be doing to prevent this, or is it a bug?

1 0

[log] calling init_from_stream() or init_from_settings() more than once (reinitialize at runtime)
by Oskar Nordquist 19 Aug '10

19 Aug '10

Hello, I've just started experimenting with the unofficial Boost.Log by Andrey Semashev. I would like to know the defined behaviour of calling init_from_stream() and init_from_settings() more than once, i.e. is it possible to re-initialize with new settings at run time? Basically I would like to do this: boost::log::settings setts; setts["Sink:File"]["Filter"] = "%Severity% > 4"; setts["Sink:File"]["Destination"] = "TextFile"; setts["Sink:File"]["FileName"] = "MyApp_%3N.log"; setts["Sink:File"]["AutoFlush"] = true; setts["Sink:File"]["RotationSize"] = 10 * 1024 * 1024; // 10 MiB boost::log::init_from_settings(setts); // ... later on change severity filter to >= 0 setts["Sink:File"]["Filter"] = "%Severity% >= 0"; boost::log::init_from_settings(setts); This does not work. It seems I am able to add new sinks without problem, but modifying existing sinks is not possible. I think that being able to reinitialize at runtime is an absolutely vital feature. Being able to change a settings file and then just reinit to turn on logging! Please tell me this is already supported and I am doing something wrong, or at least that this will be supported in the future :) Regards, Oskar

1 0

[mpl] Reconstructing an mpl::list from mpl::l_item's.
by AJG 19 Aug '10

19 Aug '10

Hi there, Using mpl::remove, et al. I can eliminate types from an mpl::list. However, it appears that the result is not an actual mpl::list, but some sort of indexed, cons-like structure composed of mpl::l_item types. Is there a way to recreate an mpl::list proper using these l_item's? E.g. typedef mpl::list<foo, bar, qux> L; typedef mpl::remove<L, bar>::type R; typedef mpl::???<R>::type => mpl::list<foo, qux>; Thanks!

2 1

filesystem lambda and for_each
by Jean-Christophe Roux 19 Aug '10

19 Aug '10

hello, Despite some research, I am struggling to combine boost filesystem, boost lambda and STL for_each. 32 std::string str = ""; 33 std::string path = "/tmp"; 34 boost::filesystem::directory_iterator it(path); 35 while(it != boost::filesystem::directory_iterator()) 36 { 37 str += it->path().filename() + "<br>"; 38 ++it; 39 } works fine but 40 std::for_each(boost::filesystem::directory_iterator(path), boost::filesystem::directory_iterator(), 41 str += *boost::lambda::_1.path().parent_path() ); does not compile with the error message that : error: ‘const struct boost::lambda::lambda_functor<boost::lambda::placeholder<1> >’ has no member named ‘path’ I don't understand why and I don't really see how I could have this work. Also, I am wondering why with _1 instead of boost::lambda::_1 I am getting: error: reference to ‘_1’ is ambiguous /usr/local/include/boost/lambda/core.hpp:69: thanks!

2 1

Throwing an exception in a packaged_task: is there a clear example?
by Mark Wilson 19 Aug '10

19 Aug '10

Hello, I am throwing an exception from a packaged_task, and then trying to catch it with f.get() (where f is a unique_future); it doesn't work, the program just terminates with: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'boost::exception_detail::clone_impl<boost::unknown_exception>' what(): std::exception Is there a simple example somewhere, or could someone provide one, that makes clear how this mechanism is supposed to work? The Threads documentation does not show how to do this... Here is my simple program, based on the example in the docs: #include <boost/thread.hpp> #include <boost/thread/future.hpp> #include <boost/exception/all.hpp> struct MyException { MyException() { } }; int calculate_the_answer_to_life_the_universe_and_everything() { throw MyException(); return 42; } int main() { boost::packaged_task<int> task(calculate_the_answer_to_life_the_universe_and_everything); boost::unique_future<int> f(task.get_future()); boost::thread t(boost::move(task)); try { f.get(); } catch(MyException& ex) { std::cout << "EXCEPTION!" << std::endl; } } Thanks, Mark Wilson

2 2

[serialization] tuples and portable_binary_archive
by Richard Ulrich 19 Aug '10

19 Aug '10

I used boost serialize with some smaller projects, which always worked nicely. But now I want to use it on a bigger one. And I wonder why some things seem to be missing. - tuple: There is code on the Internet in various places for bridging boost::serialize with boost::tuple. But why isn't there an official version in either boost::serialize or boost::tuple? - portable_binary_archive: There are also some implementations around, one even in the examples of boost::serialization. But why is it not in the official library itself? Sure I could use the code I found, but it would feel better if it was part of the library. That's especially true for serialization where I want to be 99.99999999% sure, the data can always be read back in. Rgds Richard

2 1

[serialization] Different behaviors between archive and its polymorphic variant
by Maxime van Noppen 19 Aug '10

19 Aug '10

Hi, I'm trying to make a custom archive class that works either with the template flavor or via the polymorphic_archive. It compiles but produces a different behavior and I can't find why. Basically I did a trivial oarchive class that overloads (via save_override) how are treated NVP. When used with the template version it works, whereas with the polymorphic version it doesn't. The code is attached. There is a preprocessor switch to choose the template or polymorphic version (-DPOLY). $ g++ poly.cc -lboost_serialization && ./a.out <name=u><name=id_>42</name=id_> </name=u> $ g++ -DPOLY poly.cc -lboost_serialization && ./a.out 42 This is with Boost 1.43 and g++ 4.5.0. I looked at various archive implementations but couldn't find any code that I could relate to this problem. Thanks, -- Maxime

3 9

A problem in using "prim_minimum_spanning_tree.hpp"
by 王伟 19 Aug '10

19 Aug '10

Hi, I'm studying MST algorithms in GPU recently.I need BGL implementation as coparison,But I have a problem in using prim_minimum_spanning_tree.hpp.The problem is:when I use large input(e.g. >1M),the result is wrong,all the parent of vertices is "no parent".But when the input(e.g. 1K) is small,the result is noproblem. I haven't found know the reason yet.My complier is gcc 4.1.2,OS is RHEL5. Help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. Wang wei The complete code is: #include <iostream> #include <boost/graph/adjacency_list.hpp> #include <boost/graph/prim_minimum_spanning_tree.hpp> #include <fstream> #include <string.h> using namespace std; int main() { using namespace boost; typedef adjacency_list < vecS, vecS, undirectedS, property<vertex_distance_t, long>, property < edge_weight_t, int > > Graph; typedef std::pair < long, long >E; //read graph data from file long num_nodes,num_edges,u,v; int w; ifstream infile; infile.open("convertResult.txt"); if(!infile) { cerr<<"error:unable to open file."<<endl; return -1; } infile>>num_nodes>>num_edges; E edges[num_edges]; int weights[num_edges]; for(long i=0;i<num_edges;i++) { infile>>u>>v>>w; edges[i] = make_pair(u,v); weights[i] = w; } //construct input parameters Graph g(edges, edges + sizeof(edges) / sizeof(E), weights, num_nodes); property_map<Graph, edge_weight_t>::type weightmap = get(edge_weight, g); std::vector < graph_traits < Graph >::vertex_descriptor > p(num_vertices(g)); //call the BGL PRIM prim_minimum_spanning_tree(g, &p[0]); //output the result ofstream outfile; outfile.open("primResult.txt"); for (std::size_t i = 0; i != p.size(); ++i) if (p[i] != i) outfile<< "parent[" << i << "] = " << p[i] << std::endl; else outfile<< "parent[" << i << "] = no parent" << std::endl; return EXIT_SUCCESS; }

1 0

[Serialization] serializing derived class through base class pointer
by Dante Stroe 19 Aug '10

19 Aug '10

Hi, I have a problem with serializing a derived classes through a pointer to a base class. I tried registering with the syntax from the documentation: |ar.template register_type<derived_one>(); | , which works well in case the derived class has a default constructor (just like the example). I just don't know what the syntax is for the case where the derived class does not have a default constructor (if I use the same syntax to register the derived class then I get a compilation error about the fact that there is no. I can provide an example in case this is not clear enough. Or, is it an absolute requirement for all derived classes to have a default constructor? Thank you and best regards, Dante

1 0

[Filesystem] is_directory( ) for a non-existent path.
by Robert Jones 19 Aug '10

19 Aug '10

This is probably something of a shot in the dark, but somewhere between 1.33.1 and 1.37 the behaviour of is_directory() for a non-existent directory changed from failing (or throwing) in 1.33.1 to simply returning false (1.37). Can anyone enlighten me when this was. Trac references would be lovely. Thx - Rob.

1 0

[1.43.0] Release notice
by Beman Dawes 19 Aug '10

19 Aug '10

Release 1.43.0 of the Boost C++ Libraries is now available. These open-source libraries work well with the C++ Standard Library, and are usable across a broad spectrum of applications. The Boost license encourages both commercial and non-commercial use. This release contains two new libraries (functional/factory, functional/forward), a major range library upgrade, plus numerous enhancements and bug fixes for other libraries. For details, including download links, see http://www.boost.org/users/news/version_1_43_0 The release can also be downloaded directly from SourceForge. See http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/ To install this release on your system, see http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_43_0/more/getting_started/index.html Thanks to all who contributed, --The Boost release team

4 5

[BGL] adjacency_list.hpp requires to link with serialization lib in 1.44?
by Oliver Koenig 19 Aug '10

19 Aug '10

Hello, when trying to update Boost from 1.43 to 1.44 in our code we noticed that in 1.44 we need to link to the serialization lib as soon as boost/graph/adjacency_list.hpp is included. Is this correct behavior or is this a bug? To reproduce this it is sufficient to build the following test program hello_adjacency_list.cpp (tested with MSVC-9.0): #include <iostream> #include <boost/graph/adjacency_list.hpp> int main(){ std::cout << "hello adjacency_list\n"; return 0; } With the boost build rule "exe hello_adjacency_list : hello_adjacency_list.cpp ;" compilation fails with: compile-c-c++ ..\..\..\bin\even_utils\test\graph\msvc-9.0\release\address-model-64\threading-multi\hello_adjacency_list.obj hello_adjacency_list.cpp msvc.link ..\..\..\bin\even_utils\test\graph\msvc-9.0\release\address-model-64\threading-multi\hello_adjacency_list.exe LINK : fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file 'libboost_serialization-vc90-mt-1_44.lib' Using the build rule "exe hello_adjacency_list : hello_adjacency_list.cpp /boost//serialization : <link>shared<define>BOOST_SERIALIZATION_DYN_LINK ;" everything works fine. Sincerely ok -- -------------------------------------------- Oliver Koenig Dr.sc.techn. ETH Email: koenig(a)even-ag.ch EVEN - Evolutionary Engineering AG Technoparkstrasse 1 CH-8005 Zurich Tel : +41 (0)44 500 93 60 Fax : +41 (0)44 500 93 61 Mail : info(a)even-ag.ch WWW : www.even-ag.ch -------------------------------------------- -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

5 6