- Boost-users - lists.preview.boost.org

[Filesystem] String corruption in path in V3 and Boost 1.44
by Will Watts 24 Sep '10

24 Sep '10

I have the following method: boost::filesystem::path Sfw::CFolders::GetModulePath() { char buffer[MAX_PATH+1]; chknzapi (GetModuleFileName (NULL, buffer, MAX_PATH)); return buffer; // Converted to fs::path object } Under Boost 1.43 this seemed to work fine. The char buffer is used to create a temporary path object, which is returned by value from the function. But when I upgraded to Boost 1.44, and recompiled with BOOST_FILESYSTEM_VERSION=3 and BOOST_FILESYSTEM_NO_DEPRECATED defined, I found that, although it still compiled, it no longer worked properly. Specifically, the contents of the path becomes corrupted to garbage. I got the impression that the path object returned, instead of containing a copy of the character string, retains a pointer to the original char buffer[] on the stack - which is naturally trampled on by subsequent activity. Changing the function to this: boost::filesystem::path Sfw::CFolders::GetModulePath() { char buffer[MAX_PATH+1]; chknzapi (GetModuleFileName (NULL, buffer, MAX_PATH)); return string(buffer); } seems to fix the problem. I admit I have not examined the code for the filesystem::path class - I am roundly intimidated by Boost code. Is my problem caused by a bug in the library introduced by 1.44, or am I just using the library incorrectly? Is my fixed version acceptable, or am I just 'lucky' that it seems to work? The environment is Visual C++ 10, targetting 32-bit. As well as the #defines listed above, I have also got BOOST_NO_RVALUE_REFERENCES defined, to address a compilation problem with another Boost library. Regards Will PS: Apologies if this is a dupe. I attempted to post this via an NNTP account, which I believed had the correct rights, but didn't seem to do the business. Applied Industrial Systems is a limited company registered in England. Registered number: 2552260. Registered office: 11 Riverview, The Embankment Business Park, Stockport, Cheshire SK4 3GN.

3 9

[bind] Doubt regarding the use of shared_ptr with boost.bind
by Shiou Ming Lee 24 Sep '10

24 Sep '10

Hi, I have a doubt on using bind library. I pass the output of Bind to Asio library, and at certain point of time another thread will ask Windows I/O service to execute the function append(): m_ioService.post(m_strand.wrap( boost::bind(&LogWriter::append, (*logWritersItr), _logMessage, _logLevelString) )); The second param of Bind, (*logWritersItr), is a shared_ptr of LogWriter's subclass. The signature of LogWriter::append() is as following: virtual void append(const std::string& _logMessage, const std::string& _logLevelString) = 0; Base on document at http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_44_0/libs/bind/bind.html, the way I use bind will duplicate a copy of that shared_ptr. Any idea when will the duplicated shared_ptr become invalid so that the reference count decreases by one? Thanks, Shiou Ming

3 5

Can I call async_write twice in a row?
by Germán Diago 23 Sep '10

23 Sep '10

Is this legal? I think I understood in the documentation that it isn't, but I'm not sure if it means this: void func() { async_write(....); async_write(...); } So, should I do this ALWAYS? void func() { async_write(..., another_func); } void another_func(const boost::system::error_code & ec, std::size_t bytes) { async_write(...); } Thanks in advance.

3 2

Using boost with map<int, map<int, class> >
by przemyslaw.sliwa＠uk.bnpparibas.com 23 Sep '10

23 Sep '10

Hello, I have a data structure which basically is a map of a map. It looks follwing class clss { void postprocess() { .... } } typedef std::map<int, clss> ciMap; typedef std::map<int, ciMap> ciiMap; ciiMap test; now in order to call postprocess() on each element in the second map I have to do the follwing: for(ciiMap::iterator i_ptr=test.begin(); i_ptr!=test.end(); ++i_ptr) { ciMap& tmpMap = (*i_ptr).second; for(ciMap::iterator j_ptr=tmpMap.begin(); j_ptr!=tmpMap.end(); ++j_ptr) { cls& temp = (*j_ptr).second; temp.postprocess; } } Can boost help me reducing this ridiculous loop? Should I use lambda or boost::bind in order to do this? Couls someone help me with this? Cheers ___________________________________________________________ This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is prohibited. Please refer to http://www.bnpparibas.co.uk/en/information/legal_information.asp?Code=ECAS-… for additional disclosures.

2 1

[TypeTraits] is_arithmetic and is_enum together?
by Steve Lorimer 23 Sep '10

23 Sep '10

Is there a type trait that defines both is_arithmetic and is_enum together? (not is_scalar though) I find I'm doing this often: BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(boost::is_arithmetic<Integer>::value == true || boost::is_enum<Integer>::value == true); which lead me to wondering if there was a more granular trait which included the two

2 1

[ASIO] Access violation on io_service::work destructor
by Daniele Barzotti 23 Sep '10

23 Sep '10

Hi, In my code I have a io_Service and a work object shared among my classes: // Main io_service static boost::asio::io_service io_service; static boost::scoped_ptr<boost::thread> io_service_thread; static boost::asio::io_service::work* p_work; static BOOL thread_started; void io_worker_thread(void) { #if(WIN32 && _WIN32_DCOM) struct com_init { com_init() { CoInitializeEx(NULL, COINIT_APARTMENTTHREADED); } ~com_init() { CoUninitialize(); } } initializer_object; #endif io_service.run(); io_service.reset(); thread_started = false; }; void Init(....) { if (!thread_started) { try { // create the work object on the heap p_work = new boost::asio::io_service::work(io_service); // run the IO service as a separate thread: // Instead of start the worker thread directly // by passing the io_service object, // I call the io_worker_thread function where // I can do some initialization tasks like // calling CoInitializeEx for COM io_service_thread.reset(new boost::thread(io_worker_thread)); thread_started = !thread_started; } catch (boost::thread_resource_error e) { // Failed to create the new thread return 0; } } } When my application ends and the io_service.run() returns I get: First-chance exception at 0x09299c18 (AxEuroATLib_debug.dll) in EuroSvr.exe: 0xC0000005: Access violation reading location 0xf0f0f0fc. at the following line (io_service.ipp): inline io_service::work::~work() { io_service_.impl_.work_finished(); } I wrong something? Regards, Daniele

2 6

Re: [Boost-users] [asio]Why std::ofstream AND boost::asio::async_read() fails?
by Yasuhiko Yoshimura (informax.co.jp) 23 Sep '10

23 Sep '10

> I'm not able to see why downloading is sometimes fails in asio asyncread(). I found out my bug resolution that is moving the std::ofstream as a class member to stack of function calling itself. Thanks, Yasuhiko Yoshimura class ftp_client_dtp { // Start socket and etc. void start() { work_resolver_.reset(new boost::asio::ip::tcp::resolver(work_io_service_)); work_socket_.reset(new boost::asio::ip::tcp::socket(work_io_service_)); work_.reset(new boost::asio::io_service::work(work_io_service_)); work_thread_.reset(new boost::thread( boost::bind(&boost::asio::io_service::run, &work_io_service_))); ... // Start an asynchronous resolve to translate the server and service names // into a list of endpoints. ... } ... private: ... void handle_read_content(const boost::system::error_code& err) { if (!err || err == boost::asio::error::eof) { std::string spath = scurrentpath_ + "\\" + sfilename_; // insert the next line that the ofstream to stack. std::ofstream f(spath.c_str(), std::ios::binary | std::ios_base::out | std::ios_base::app | std::ios_base::ate); if (response_.size() > 0) { f << &response_; } f.close(); if (!err) { // Continue reading remaining data until EOF. boost::asio::async_read(*work_socket_, response_, boost::asio::transfer_at_least(1), boost::bind(&ftp_client_dtp::handle_read_content, shared_from_this(), boost::asio::placeholders::error)); } else { // eof std::cout << err; do_close(); } } else { std::cout << err; do_close(); } } void do_close() { work_socket_->close(); } // comment out the next line. // std::ofstream f; std::string sip_, sport_, scurrentpath_, sfilename_; boost::asio::streambuf request_; boost::asio::streambuf response_; boost::scoped_ptr<boost::asio::ip::tcp::resolver> work_resolver_; boost::scoped_ptr<boost::asio::ip::tcp::socket> work_socket_; boost::asio::io_service work_io_service_; boost::scoped_ptr<boost::asio::io_service::work> work_; boost::scoped_ptr<boost::thread> work_thread_; };

1 0

[test] crash with the following test
by Felipe Magno de Almeida 22 Sep '10

22 Sep '10

With boost 1.44.0 (the same happens with 1.43) the following test causes a crash in framework.ipp:388 with a dereference of a NULL pointer. The test_unit* res returns NULL from s_frk_impl().m_test_units[id] where id is 1. id is equal to 1 because when unit_test::framework::run is ran, id is INV_TEST_UNIT_ID is passed to it. Then in framework.ipp:399 if id == INV_TEST_UNIT_ID id is assigned the value in master_test_suite().p_id which is 1. I've verified that when master_test_suite is constructed it assigns INV_TEST_UNIT_ID to p_id, so I'm lost why this is 1 here. Then, back in framework.ipp:386 s_frk_impl().m_test_units there's only one element in the map and the id is 65535 and not one. -- test.cpp -- #define BOOST_TEST_MODULE parse_empty_import_documents #include <boost/test/included/unit_test.hpp> BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE (parse_empty_import_documents) { } -- test.cpp -- Any help would be appreciated. -- Felipe Magno de Almeida

2 2

[Test] Unit test for const suggestion.
by MA 22 Sep '10

22 Sep '10

Hi there! I have been having some trouble unit testing const variables/types in my code. The problem I had was basically: The compiler stops the compilation with an error if you try to change a const variable/type. Still you want to write a unit test that checks that the variable cannot be changed. So to check that the variable/type cannot be changed we can just check if the variable/type is const or not. By doing so we indirectly check that the variable/type cannot be changed. So the suggestion for the Boost.Test library is to create a BOOST_CHECK_IS_CONST that works something like the code below but with the BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL syntax: ------ #include <iostream> #include <boost/type_traits.hpp> template<typename T > bool isconst(T&, typename boost::enable_if<boost::is_const< T >, T >::type* = 0 ) { return true; } template< typename T > bool isconst(T&, typename boost::disable_if<boost::is_const< T >, T>::type* = 0 ) { return false; } int main() { const int const_int = 0; int plain_int = 0; std::cout << isconst(const_int) << std::endl; std::cout << isconst(plain_int) << std::endl; } ----- By doing this you can check for const in a unit test like this: BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(isconst(const_int), true); But it would be nicer with a BOOST_CHECK_IS_CONST. Regards, anlmat

2 1

Problem with boost archive. Cannot solve in any way.
by Germán Diago 22 Sep '10

22 Sep '10

Hello. I have this code, which throws an exception and I cannot find in any way why. It throws an invalid_signature exception. I'm sure that the serialized data where it comes this data from is correct. The code: std::string data_bytes(std::get<1>(*datos).begin(), std::get<1>(*datos).end()); std::istringstream stream(data_bytes); MensajeRed msg; //FIXME: This constructor throws boost::archive::binary_iarchive archive(stream); archive >> msg; Throws in the constructor of boost::binary_iarchive. Thanks in advance.

5 8

[test] inconsistent dll linkage warnings and BOOST_TEST_DECL and unit_test_main.ipp
by Felipe Magno de Almeida 22 Sep '10

22 Sep '10

Hi, When I compile /boost//unit_test_framework as a dependency in a boost.build project I get errors with BOOST_TEST_DECL with some definitions in .ipp files. It seems BOOST_TEST_DECL is suppose to be used in functions that aren't defined for the user and that must be exported/imported depending if included by test's source or the user's source files. But .ipp files use BOOST_TEST_DECL which are included by the user with msvc-8.0 compiler and then it gives errors about that __declspec(dllimport) doesn't allow definition. To fix it I just changed BOOST_TEST_DECL for BOOST_TEST_CALL_DECL in the .ipp files. It works correctly with gcc in linux though. Regards, -- Felipe Magno de Almeida

1 0

[ASIO] Access violation on io_service::work destructor
by Daniele Barzotti 22 Sep '10

22 Sep '10

Hi, In my code I have a io_Service and a work object shared among my classes: // Main io_service static boost::asio::io_service io_service; static boost::scoped_ptr<boost::thread> io_service_thread; static boost::asio::io_service::work* p_work; static BOOL thread_started; void io_worker_thread(void) { #if(WIN32 && _WIN32_DCOM) struct com_init { com_init() { CoInitializeEx(NULL, COINIT_APARTMENTTHREADED); } ~com_init() { CoUninitialize(); } } initializer_object; #endif io_service.run(); io_service.reset(); thread_started = false; }; void Init(....) { if (!thread_started) { try { // create the work object on the heap p_work = new boost::asio::io_service::work(io_service); // run the IO service as a separate thread: // Instead of start the worker thread directly // by passing the io_service object, // I call the io_worker_thread function where // I can do some initialization tasks like // calling CoInitializeEx for COM io_service_thread.reset(new boost::thread(io_worker_thread)); thread_started = !thread_started; } catch (boost::thread_resource_error e) { // Failed to create the new thread return 0; } } } When my application ends and the io_service.run() returns I get: First-chance exception at 0x09299c18 (AxEuroATLib_debug.dll) in EuroSvr.exe: 0xC0000005: Access violation reading location 0xf0f0f0fc. at the following line (io_service.ipp): inline io_service::work::~work() { io_service_.impl_.work_finished(); } I wrong something? Regards, Daniele

1 0

Boost.PropertyTree - Iterating over child items with same name
by RUOFF, LARS (LARS)** CTR ** 22 Sep '10

22 Sep '10

Hello, concerning Boost.PropertyTree: First: Taking the example file from the Tutorial: <debug> <filename>debug.log</filename> <modules> <module>Finance</module> <module>Admin</module> <module>HR</module> </modules> <level>2</level> </debug> The module entries are parsed using BOOST_FOREACH(ptree::value_type &v, pt.get_child("debug.modules")) m_modules.insert(v.second.data()); But reading the documentation for "get_child" confuses me: --------------- self_type & get_child(const path_type & path); Get the child at the given path, or throw ptree_bad_path. Notes: Depending on the path, the result at each level may not be completely determinate, i.e. if the same key appears multiple times, which child is chosen is not specified. [...] --------------- So how is it garantueed that BOOST_FOREACH will iterate over all the children? Second: (This is my actual problem) If for example i extend the file a bit like this: <debug> <filename>debug.log</filename> <modules> <module>Finance</module> <param1>100</param1> <param2>200</param2> <module>Admin</module> <param1>100</param1> <param2>200</param2> <module>HR</module> <param1>100</param1> <param2>200</param2> </modules> <level>2</level> </debug> Now the "modules" have sub-items. How would i go to iterate over the modules and children if i'd need to create an object for each module and associate the right params to each? Thanks, regards, Lars

1 0

[PtrContainer] Inserting "this" Pointers
by Hossein Haeri 22 Sep '10

22 Sep '10

Dear all, Is inserting "this" pointers into pointer containers valid? If so, what are the consequences? Would that need special care for example? TIA, --Hossein

2 2

circular_buffer iterators
by Bosko Markovic 22 Sep '10

22 Sep '10

I have a simple use case for circular_buffer but I need a few advices. There is one producer and one consumer which only inspects elements and circular buffer will only be keeping history of last CB_SIZE elements. As far as I have understood there are two ways to access buffer elements, using indexes and operator[] or using iterators. I have chosen iterators. Since adding elements to buffer can invalidate iterators what is the proper way to check if they are still valid? Is it comparing it to .end() and .begin()? typedef boost::circular_buffer<data_type> CircularBuffer; CircularBuffer cb(CB_SIZE); CircularBuffer::iterator it = cb.begin(); ... if( it >= cb.begin() && it < cb.end() ){ cout << *it; } Regards, BoskoM.

2 2

Compiling boost::regex v4 with VC8 on Windows
by Wolfgang Goldbach 22 Sep '10

22 Sep '10

Hi, In my current project boost::regex was used previously from version v3 (boost 1.30.2) and there was no problem. Because I use a third party SDK that contains boost 1.33.1 I want to use boost and regex (v4) from this SDK. In the project there is a source file that includes "boost/regex.hpp". In the release version the file compiles, but in the debug version I get a lot of errors like: char_regex_traits.hpp(34) : error C2976: 'boost::regex_traits' : too few template arguments /basic_regex.hpp(186) : error C2825: 'traits': must be a class or namespace when followed by '::' basic_regex.hpp(186) : error C2039: 'size_type' : is not a member of '`global namespace'' I have now removed the preprocessor definition '_DEBUG' from the VC8 project that contains the source file but this makes no difference. Is there any idea what's going on here ? Wolfgang

2 2

boost thread, shared_mutex deadlock
by George George 22 Sep '10

22 Sep '10

threadA owns a shared_lock on the mutex, threadB tries to get a unique lock on the mutex and blocks, threadC tries to get a shared_lock on the mutex and blocks also!! I guess there is a LIFO kind of stack serving the mutex to the requesting locks. But what happens if threadA depends on threadC in order to complete and release the lock?I n this case I have got a deadlock. Is this a design flow of my app or boost?

2 1

[Serialization] compilation error on boost/serialization/item_version_type.hpp
by Paul Graphov 22 Sep '10

22 Sep '10

Hello Boost Users, File mentioned in subj (included via boost/serialization/vector.hpp -> /boost/serialization/collections_save_imp.hpp) fails to compile at my Ubuntu box because of blatant use of assert function. Problem was solved by including <boost/assert.hpp> and changing assert to BOOST_ASSERT Is it a bug or just my misconfiguration? Thanks.

1 0

Unresolved overloaded function type with local_time and function
by Nevin Liber 21 Sep '10

21 Sep '10

I'm getting the dreaded "unresolved overloaded function type" error on the following line of code: boost::function<boost::posix_time::ptime()> fn(boost::posix_time::microsec_clock::local_time); If I wrap the call to local_time() in a function or a function object, it works without any issues. I don't see any other overloads for local_time(). I'm sure it's something simple I'm just not seeing... -- Nevin ":-)" Liber <mailto:nevin@eviloverlord.com> (847) 691-1404

2 2

[Proto]: How to use complex grammars in a domain/extension
by Roland Bock 21 Sep '10

21 Sep '10

Hi, I am trying to create a DSEL with Boost.Proto, which (among other things) should allow expressions like i == j + 3 && t != "foo" and want to prevent disallowed operators to be generated by Proto. Please consider the code below. // ----------------------------------------------------------------------- #include<boost/proto/proto.hpp> using namespace boost; typedef proto::terminal<int>::type terminal; struct addition: proto::or_ < terminal, proto::plus<addition, addition> > {}; struct equation: proto::equal_to<addition, addition> {}; struct condition: proto::or_ < equation, proto::logical_and<equation, equation> > {}; template<class Expr> struct extension; struct my_domain: proto::domain < proto::pod_generator< extension>, condition > {}; template<class Expr> struct extension { BOOST_PROTO_EXTENDS( Expr , extension<Expr> , my_domain ) }; int main() { terminal c; BOOST_PROTO_ASSERT_MATCHES(c + c, addition); // OK BOOST_PROTO_ASSERT_MATCHES(c == c, equation); // OK BOOST_PROTO_ASSERT_MATCHES(c == c, condition); // OK BOOST_PROTO_ASSERT_MATCHES(c == c&& c == c, condition); // OK extension<terminal> i; // I was hoping for the following to be legal i + i; // ERROR: operator+ not found i == i; // ERROR: operator== not found i == i&& i == i; // ERROR: operator== not found } // ----------------------------------------------------------------------- In my_domain, I can replace condition by addition, which allows i + i, but then the == operator is still missing (and the &&, too, probably). How can I solve this? Thanks and regards, Roland

6 18

How to write a predicate for mpl::find_if that is able to work with placeholders?
by Michael Schulze 21 Sep '10

21 Sep '10

Hi list, I have a problem that bothers me since days. It seems, that I am always doing something wrong. I try to write a meta function, that is able to work with placeholders and is applicable to mpl::find_if. I understand the example from the documentation where is_same is used, which is in my understanding also a meta function. is_same gets always the current element of the sequence and compares it with the type given as second template argument to itself. Correct me if I am wrong at this point. So far so good, what I need is not the comparison to the type but instead a comparison with an encapsulated type, a kind of tag type if you want. Here is my class template template<int i> struct Slot { typedef Slot type; typedef int_<i> slot_id; }; and I would like to test whether a certain slot_id is contained within a sequence, because the Slot class template may have different further template arguments, here omitted for the sake of clarity. My created meta function is: template<typename A, typename B> struct contained : is_same< typename A::slot_id ,B> {}; A possible sequence may be defined as: typedef vector<Slot<0>, Slot<10>, Slot<15> > slots; and the find_if's invocation should look like this typedef find_if<slots, contained< _1, int_<10> > >::type t10; and a comparison with the dereferenced returned iterator should give true BOOST_MPL_ASSERT(( is_same< deref<t10>::type, Slot<10> > )); However, until now I have not much luck with my different tries because I get always compile errors that state that the mpl::arg<1> did not has slot_id type. This is totally right, however, how I reach it that not the placeholder is given to the meta function but instead the current element of the sequence to which the iterator points and for which the placeholder is a substitute. If I reflect it seems I have not fully understand how the placeholder mechanism works in detail but I would like to get it. Okey, I have two solution that work and give me the correct result for my problem. I created two different "contained" definitions and find_if invocations 1. version: template<typename Nr> struct contained1 { template <typename Slot> struct apply : ::boost::is_same< typename Slot::slot_id, Nr > {}; }; typedef find_if<slots, contained1<int_<10> > >::type t11; 2. version: struct contained2 { template<typename A, typename B> struct apply : is_same< typename A::slot_id,B>::type {}; }; typedef find_if<slots, bind< contained2, _1, int_<10> > >::type t12; Both versions work, because they are meta function classes, but the invocation of find_if and how the parameter is delivered to the predicate is not clear at least in the first version. In the second version this is clear but we need an additional bind. Is there a way, to get my initial version working, and to use a meta function instead of a meta function class. In my eyes, my initial find_if invocation is clearer and more readable e.g. for maintainers. Thanks and regards Michael

1 2

graph: PropertyMap needs lvalue for vertex_index
by Jens Weller 21 Sep '10

21 Sep '10

Hi, I've been playing arround with boost::graph (and the layout algorithms in special). Now I encountered a little problem, I'm trying to get Kamada Kawai Spring to work, but I do get an compile error when calling put for vertex_index. So, this problem has nothing to do with KKS. My Code: typedef boost::adjacency_list<boost::vecS, boost::vecS, boost::undirectedS, // Vertex properties boost::property<boost::vertex_index_t, int, boost::property<vertex_position_t, point> > // Edge properties ,boost::property<boost::edge_weight_t, double> > Graph; Graph g(scene->getNodeCount()); boost::graph_traits<Graph>::vertex_iterator vi,vi_end; int i = 0; for (boost::tie(vi, vi_end) = boost::vertices(g); vi != vi_end; ++vi) boost::put(boost::vertex_index, g, *vi, i++); put throws now a compile Error: ..\..\..\cpp\boost_1_43/boost/property_map/property_map.hpp:361: error: lvalue required as left operand of assignment The last argument of put does throw this error. I expected the code to work, as I have copied it out of the layout_tests file: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_43_0/libs/graph/test/layout_test.cpp So, where is my error here? I tried some different versions and some casts, but none made this code work. And I don't think that something that trivial is broken in the testcases. regards, Jens Weller -- GRATIS: Spider-Man 1-3 sowie 300 weitere Videos! Jetzt freischalten! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome

2 2

this_thread::get_id() never returns occasionally
by Samuel Williams 21 Sep '10

21 Sep '10

Hi, I'm running boost on an iPhone 3G compiled with the official 3.2 SDK on a regular iPhone (i.e. not jailbroken). Sometimes I get a strange situation where calling this_thread::get_id() never returns. #0 scoped_lock [inlined] () at spinlock_gcc_arm.hpp:45 #1 boost::detail::spinlock::lock () at boost_1_44_0/boost/smart_ptr/detail/spinlock_pool.hpp:41 #2 boost::detail::sp_counted_base::weak_add_ref () at spinlock_gcc_arm.hpp:61 #3 atomic_increment [inlined] () at boost_1_44_0/boost/smart_ptr/detail/sp_counted_base_spin.hpp:364 #4 0x000b6c38 in boost::(anonymous namespace)::make_external_thread_data () at spinlock_gcc_arm.hpp:189 #5 0x000b849c in boost::this_thread::get_id () at libs/thread/src/pthread/thread.cpp:189 Is this a bug? Kind regards, Samuel

2 1

[lexical_cast] Canonical representation for numbers?
by Francesco Biscani 21 Sep '10

21 Sep '10

Hello, does lexical_cast make some kind of guarantees on the output of arithmetic types cast as strings? I'm asking because I need to pass a lexical representation of integers and floats to the constructors of some 3rd party class that expects as input strings containing a certain representation of numbers. E.g., a float represented as string must be either in decimal or scientific notation, with "." as separator, "e" or "E" preceding the exponent, leading sign only in case of negative numbers and so on. So far I've used successfully lexical_cast for such purposes, but I'm wondering if other factors (e.g., locale) could alter the string representation of numbers. Is it safe to assume all numbers will always be cast in the same string structure regardless of platform, i18n, etc.? Cheers, Francesco.

3 3

has_trivial_copy for optimization
by Hite, Christopher 21 Sep '10

21 Sep '10

I noticed poor performance coping a structure with a bunch of optionals. The reason is the cost of checking if the optionals are set. CPU's hate branching it breaks their pipelining. if(that->a) this->a=*that->a; At the end of the day I just wrote a copy construct which does a memcpy(), since the data types were just POD. It makes me a bit nervous since my code might break with a different impl of opitonal. Then I thought hey wouldn't it be cool if defined a metafunction that specified memcpy/memmove are allowed? It looks like has_trivial_copy<> fits the bill. // Suggested code: namespace boost{ template<typename T> struct has_trivial_copy< boost::optional<T> > : has_trivial_copy<T> {}; }//namespace boost typedef boost::optional<int> OptionalInt; BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(( has_trivial_copy<OptionalInt>::value )); //fixed thanks to code above struct SomeOptionals{ OptionalInt a,b;}; BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(( has_trivial_copy<SomeOptionals>::value )); //fails The second test fails. It can't imagine how to make it work without some compiler magic. I wonder if a compiler could use metafunctions to know which optimizations were legal. Similar meta function specializations could be written for boost::variant and boost::fusion::map. I could imagine contains like std::vector using this to do memmove() for example. Chris

2 1

Using Boost.Spirit with Boost.Units
by Vitaly Budovski 21 Sep '10

21 Sep '10

Hi, I need to be able to construct expressions from a collection of basic units and prefixes. The expression is provided as a string and thus needs to be parsed first. I have been able to achieve without too much trouble. What I am having trouble with is constructing the appropriated expressions using the Boost.Units library. I'm still very new to these two boost libraries so any pointers on how to achieve what I'm after (is it possible?) would be very much appreciated. Please see my code below: ----------------------------------- #include <boost/spirit/include/phoenix.hpp> #include <boost/spirit/include/qi.hpp> #include <boost/units/systems/si.hpp> #include <boost/units/systems/si/prefixes.hpp> #include <boost/units/systems/cgs.hpp> #include <boost/units/systems/temperature/celsius.hpp> #include <boost/variant.hpp> #include <iostream> #include <string> using namespace boost::units; using namespace boost::units::si; // Most prefixes omitted for brevity. struct si_prefix_symbol_: boost::spirit::qi::symbols<char, int> { si_prefix_symbol_() { add ("k", 3) ("M", 6) ("G", 9) ("c", -2) ("m", -3) ; } } si_prefix_symbol; typedef boost::variant<quantity<cgs::mass>, quantity<length>, quantity<si::time>, quantity<absolute<si::temperature> >, quantity<absolute<celsius::temperature> >, double> variant_t; struct unit_symbol_: boost::spirit::qi::symbols<char, variant_t> { unit_symbol_() { add ("m", 1.0 * meter) ("g", 1.0 * cgs::gram) ("s", 1.0 * second) ("K", 1.0 * absolute<si::temperature>()) ("C", 1.0 * absolute<celsius::temperature>()) ; } } unit_symbol; template<class Iterator> struct unit_expression: boost::spirit::qi::grammar<Iterator, variant_t()> { unit_expression(): unit_expression::base_type(start) { using boost::spirit::int_; using boost::spirit::ascii::space; using boost::spirit::eps; using namespace boost::spirit::arg_names; start = eps[_val = 1.0] >> ( ( ( unit_symbol | si_prefix_symbol >> unit_symbol ) >> -( '^' >> int_ ) ) % space ) ; } boost::spirit::qi::rule<Iterator, variant_t()> start; }; int main() { std::string in("kg m^-2"); typedef std::string::const_iterator iterator_type; typedef unit_expression<iterator_type> unit_expression; iterator_type first = in.begin(); iterator_type last = in.end(); unit_expression unit_parser; variant_t result; bool r = parse(first, last, unit_parser, result); if(r && first == last) { std::cout << "success: " << result << std::endl; } else { std::cout << "parsing failed at: "; std::cout << std::string(first, last) << std::endl; } return 0; }

1 0

[multi_array] pointer type - does not compile
by Suresh Kumar 21 Sep '10

21 Sep '10

Hi The following code does not compile. #include <boost/multi_array.hpp> #include <iostream> int main () { typedef boost::multi_array<int, 3> array_type; typedef array_type::index index; array_type * A; A = new array_type(boost::extents[3][4][2]); array_type::extent_gen extents; A[0][0][0] =1; return 0; } gives large number of errro messages of which some are given below. /usr/include/boost/multi_array/concept_checks.hpp:92: error: ‘int’ is not a class, struct, or union type /usr/include/boost/multi_array/concept_checks.hpp:71: error: using invalid field ‘boost::detail::multi_array::ConstMultiArrayConcept<Array, NumDims>::id’ I am using a pointer type because, the size of the multi_array is only known at run time and I want the multi_array to be a private data element of a class so that the methods can store data in my multi_array. Thanks for suggestions suresh -- R Suresh Kumar, http://www.ee.ucr.edu/~sramachandranna Sarve bhavantu sukinaha (May everyone be happy) Sarve santu niramiyaha (May everyone be without affliction) Sarve bhadrani pashyantu (May everyone see only goodness) Ma kashchit dukha bhak bhavet (Let none be the victim of suffering)

2 1

[asio]Why std::ofstream AND boost::asio::async_read() fails?
by Yasuhiko Yoshimura (informax.co.jp) 21 Sep '10

21 Sep '10

Hi All, I'm not able to see why downloading is sometimes fails in asio asyncread(). And I appriciate any suggestion. When 'comment===>> //' and 'insert ===>>' lines are valid, download file size is sometimes short than the original size from internet server(with big files). But if I put 'comment===>> //' back to no comment and remove 'insert ===>>' lines, the downloading result is perfect. class ftp_client_dtp { ... void start() { work_resolver_.reset(new boost::asio::ip::tcp::resolver(work_io_service_)); work_socket_.reset(new boost::asio::ip::tcp::socket(work_io_service_)); work_.reset(new boost::asio::io_service::work(work_io_service_)); work_thread_.reset(new boost::thread( boost::bind(&boost::asio::io_service::run, &work_io_service_))); ... comment===>> // std::string spath = scurrentpath_ + "\\" + sfilename_; comment===>> // f.open(spath.c_str(), std::ios::binary | std::ios_base::out); ... } ... void handle_read_content(const boost::system::error_code& err) { if (!err) { insert ===>> std::string spath = scurrentpath_ + "\\" + sfilename_; insert ===>> f.open(spath.c_str(), std::ios::binary | std::ios_base::out | std::ios_base::app); if (response_.size() > 0) { f << &response_; } insert ===>> f.close(); // Continue reading remaining data until EOF. boost::asio::async_read(*work_socket_, response_, boost::asio::transfer_at_least(1), boost::bind(&ftp_client_dtp::handle_read_content, shared_from_this(), boost::asio::placeholders::error)); } else if (err == boost::asio::error::eof) { // eof std::cout << err; insert ===>> std::string spath = scurrentpath_ + "\\" + sfilename_; insert ===>> f.open(spath.c_str(), std::ios::binary | std::ios_base::out | std::ios_base::app); if (response_.size() > 0) { f << &response_; } insert ===>> f.close(); do_close(); } else { std::cout << err; do_close(); } } void do_close() { comment===>> // f.close(); ... } std::ofstream f; std::string sip_, sport_, scurrentpath_, sfilename_; ... boost::asio::streambuf response_; ... };

1 0

[Serialization] Problem serializing directly and through base pointer in the same program.
by Travis Abbott 21 Sep '10

21 Sep '10

Hi, I am using Boost.Serialization to serialize classes through a shared_ptr to an abstract base class. Sometimes, I also serialize these classes directly. This was working for me in version 1.40, but not versions 1.41 or 1.44. If I serialize only shared_ptr<BaseClass> instances, everything is fine. If I link in code that serializes the derived class directly, even if that code is never called, serialization of shared_ptr<BaseClass> instances throws an exception ("unregistered class"). A few notes about what I am doing: I am calling BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT in the implementation file for each serializable class. I am using a template function for serialization that accepts any serializable type, creates a new text_oarchiver on the stack, and returns a string. This is called from many places in my application with many different types of things (making it hard to have a central place to put all the BOOST_CLASS_EXPORTs). I am having this problem on RHEL5 with gcc 4.1.2 WITHOUT optimization turned on. It works as expected with -O1 or higher. On WinXP with Visual Studio 2005, it fails in both release and debug mode. The problem also seems to depend on the order that the object files get written into the executable. If I include the file that is calling BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT first, things work as expected, but fail otherwise. (e.g., g++ obj.cpp main.cpp ... works, g++ main.cpp obj.cpp ... fails). Here are 3 source files, obj.h, obj.cpp, main.cpp that demonstrate this problem. The line in main: fromString(toString(obj), obj2); causes the code just before it (using shared_ptr) to fail. If anyone can let me know if I am misusing the library somehow, or if there is a cleaner way to accomplish what I am trying to do, I would be very appreciative. Thanks, Travis Abbott --------------------------8< obj.h 8< -------------------------- #pragma once #include <boost/serialization/void_cast.hpp> #include <string> class Base { public: virtual ~Base() {} virtual std::string name() const = 0; }; class Obj : public Base { public: std::string name() const { return "Obj"; } template<typename Arch> void serialize(Arch& arch, const unsigned version) { boost::serialization::void_cast_register<Obj, Base>( static_cast<Obj*>(NULL), static_cast<Base*>(NULL)); arch & data; } int data; }; --------------------------8< obj.cpp 8< -------------------------- #include "obj.h" #include <boost/archive/text_oarchive.hpp> #include <boost/archive/text_iarchive.hpp> #include <boost/serialization/export.hpp> BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT(Obj) --------------------------8< main.cpp 8< -------------------------- #include "obj.h" #include <boost/serialization/shared_ptr.hpp> #include <boost/archive/text_iarchive.hpp> #include <boost/archive/text_oarchive.hpp> #include <boost/shared_ptr.hpp> #include <iostream> #include <sstream> #include <stdexcept> #include <string> using boost::shared_ptr; using namespace std; template<typename T> string toString(const T& obj) { ostringstream ss; boost::archive::text_oarchive arch(ss); arch << obj; return ss.str(); } template<typename T> void fromString(const string& s, T& obj) { istringstream ss(s); boost::archive::text_iarchive arch(ss); arch >> obj; } int main() { try { shared_ptr<Base> pobj(new Obj), pobj2; fromString(toString(pobj), pobj2); cout << pobj2->name() << endl; // Compiling this causes runtime failure in code above. Obj obj, obj2; fromString(toString(obj), obj2); cout << obj2.name() << endl; } catch (const exception& e) { cerr << "Error: " << e.what() << endl; } return 0; }

2 2

boost serialisation 1.44 /linux /gcc 4.2.1 boost serialisation 1.44 /linux /gcc 4.2.1 boost serialisation 1.44 /linux /gcc 4.2.1 boost serialisation 1.44 /linux /gcc 4.2.1 boost serialisation 1.44 /linux /gcc 4.2.1 Re:boost serialisatio
by Avi Bahra 21 Sep '10

21 Sep '10

> Having problems with boost 1.44 and serialisation on Linux, gcc 4.2.1 > I am migrating from boost 1.43 to boost 1.44 > and get compiler errors of the form: > > In file included from ACore/src/TimeSeries.hpp:13, > from ACore/test/TestTimeSeries.cpp:16: > /var/tmp/ma0/boost/boost_1_44_0/boost/date_time/posix_time/time_serialize.hpp: > In function ?void boost::serialization::save(Archive&, const > boost::posix_time::time_duration&, unsigned int)?: > /var/tmp/ma0/boost/boost_1_44_0/boost/date_time/posix_time/time_serialize.hpp:42: > error: there are no arguments to ?make_nvp? that depend on a template > parameter, so a declaration of ?make_nvp? must be available > > This is surprising as boost 1.44 release notes makes no mention of any > changes to boost serialisation ? > > Can anyone help ? > Bryce Lelbach wrote: >>Looks like a problem with date_time, not serialization. I know 1.44 builds on >>GNU/Linux GCC 4.2.1 for me. >> >>Can you make sure you have a file at >>/var/tmp/ma0/boost/boost_1_44_0/boost/serialization/nvp.hpp? If you do have it, >>could you show us? I just downloaded boost 1.44 today: The file: /var/tmp/ma0/boost/boost_1_44_0/boost/serialization/nvp.hpp exist. This is what I have: //=============================================================== #ifndef BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP_HPP #define BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP_HPP // MS compatible compilers support #pragma once #if defined(_MSC_VER) && (_MSC_VER >= 1020) # pragma once #endif /////////1/////////2/////////3/////////4/////////5/////////6/////////7/////////8 // nvp.hpp: interface for serialization system. // (C) Copyright 2002 Robert Ramey - http://www.rrsd.com . // Use, modification and distribution is subject to the Boost Software // License, Version 1.0. (See accompanying file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at // http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt) // See http://www.boost.org for updates, documentation, and revision history. #include <utility> #include <boost/config.hpp> #include <boost/detail/workaround.hpp> // supress noise #if BOOST_WORKAROUND(BOOST_MSVC, <= 1200) # pragma warning (disable : 4786) // too long name, harmless warning #endif #include <boost/mpl/integral_c.hpp> #include <boost/mpl/integral_c_tag.hpp> #include <boost/serialization/level.hpp> #include <boost/serialization/tracking.hpp> #include <boost/serialization/split_member.hpp> #include <boost/serialization/base_object.hpp> #include <boost/serialization/traits.hpp> #include <boost/serialization/wrapper.hpp> namespace boost { namespace serialization { template<class T> struct nvp : public std::pair<const char *, T *>, public wrapper_traits<const nvp<T> > { explicit nvp(const char * name_, T & t) : // note: redundant cast works around borland issue // note: added _ to suppress useless gcc warning std::pair<const char *, T *>(name_, (T*)(& t)) {} nvp(const nvp & rhs) : // note: redundant cast works around borland issue std::pair<const char *, T *>(rhs.first, (T*)rhs.second) {} const char * name() const { return this->first; } T & value() const { return *(this->second); } const T & const_value() const { return *(this->second); } // True64 compiler complains with a warning about the use of // the name "Archive" hiding some higher level usage. I'm sure this // is an error but I want to accomodated as it generates a long warning // listing and might be related to a lot of test failures. // default treatment for name-value pairs. The name is // just discarded and only the value is serialized. template<class Archivex> void save( Archivex & ar, const unsigned int /* file_version */ ) const { // CodeWarrior 8.x can't seem to resolve the << op for a rhs of "const T *" ar.operator<<(const_value()); } template<class Archivex> void load( Archivex & ar, const unsigned int /* file_version */ ){ // CodeWarrior 8.x can't seem to resolve the >> op for a rhs of "const T *" ar.operator>>(value()); } BOOST_SERIALIZATION_SPLIT_MEMBER() }; template<class T> inline #ifndef BOOST_NO_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_ORDERING const #endif nvp<T> make_nvp(const char * name, T & t){ return nvp<T>(name, t); } // to maintain efficiency and portability, we want to assign // specific serialization traits to all instances of this wrappers. // we can't strait forward method below as it depends upon // Partial Template Specialization and doing so would mean that wrappers // wouldn't be treated the same on different platforms. This would // break archive portability. Leave this here as reminder not to use it !!! #if 0 // #ifndef BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_SPECIALIZATION template <class T> struct implementation_level<nvp<T> > { typedef mpl::integral_c_tag tag; typedef mpl::int_<object_serializable> type; BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(int, value = implementation_level::type::value); }; // nvp objects are generally created on the stack and are never tracked template<class T> struct tracking_level<nvp<T> > { typedef mpl::integral_c_tag tag; typedef mpl::int_<track_never> type; BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(int, value = tracking_level::type::value); }; #endif } // seralization } // boost #include <boost/preprocessor/stringize.hpp> #define BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP(name) \ boost::serialization::make_nvp(BOOST_PP_STRINGIZE(name), name) /**/ #define BOOST_SERIALIZATION_BASE_OBJECT_NVP(name) \ boost::serialization::make_nvp( \ BOOST_PP_STRINGIZE(name), \ boost::serialization::base_object<name >(*this) \ ) /**/ #endif // BOOST_SERIALIZATION_NVP_HPP // ======================================== Best regards, Ta, Avi

2 1

Using boost::interprocess shared memory for both 32-bit and 64-bit processes
by Jonathon 21 Sep '10

21 Sep '10

Hello, I would like to read/write from/to boost::interprocess shared memory segments from a 32-bit process and a 64-bit process on the same machine. Is this possible? I've attempted to do this, but I seem to be experiencing some compatibility issues. Note that I am reading/writing boost::inteprocess containers to shared memory. For example, in my 32-bit process, I'll add some data to a boost::interprocess::vector and when I read this data from my 64-bit process, it returns garbage. Are there compiler options I can set to make things compatible? If it is not possible to do this, what are some possible solutions for this? Thanks, J

3 2

[multi_array] why this does not compile? allocator?
by Suresh Kumar 20 Sep '10

20 Sep '10

Could you kindly tell me why the following code does not compile? I guess it is an allocator issue, but how do I go further? #include <boost/multi_array.hpp> #include <iostream> using namespace std; int main () { class test{ int x; int y; }; typedef boost::multi_array<test, 3> array_type; typedef array_type::index index; array_type A(boost::extents[3][4][2]); array_type::extent_gen extents; return 0; } compile errors: multiArray.cpp:11: error: template argument for ‘template<class _Alloc> class std::allocator’ uses local type ‘main()::test’ multiArray.cpp:11: error: trying to instantiate ‘template<class _Alloc> class std::allocator’ multiArray.cpp:11: error: template argument 3 is invalid multiArray.cpp:11: error: invalid type in declaration before ‘;’ token multiArray.cpp:12: error: expected initializer before ‘index’ multiArray.cpp:13: error: cannot convert ‘boost::detail::multi_array::extent_gen<3ul>’ to ‘array_type’ in initialization multiArray.cpp:14: error: expected initializer before ‘extents’ -- R Suresh Kumar, http://www.ee.ucr.edu/~sramachandranna Sarve bhavantu sukinaha (May everyone be happy) Sarve santu niramiyaha (May everyone be without affliction) Sarve bhadrani pashyantu (May everyone see only goodness) Ma kashchit dukha bhak bhavet (Let none be the victim of suffering)

2 1

[Fusion] fusion::for_each with stateful functors
by Paul Graphov 20 Sep '10

20 Sep '10

Hello Boost Users, More than three years ago this question arose in this list: http://lists.boost.org/boost-users/2007/03/26338.php And as I understand it was concluded that overload for non-const references should be added. But now there are only const references to functor available. Was it forgotten or there are some reasons not to have such overload? What is the best way to solve the problem? Mutable members or some proxies look quirky. Thanks!

3 3

Re: [Boost-users] [SmartPtr] Memory Leak Perhaps
by Benjamin Sobotta 20 Sep '10

20 Sep '10

On Monday 20 September 2010 02:44:12 pm you wrote: > Dear Benjamin, > > > shared_ptr to this are dangerous. As soon as you do that > > twice you already have a problem. > > Oh, that's interesting. Could you please explain why? Well because you can only erase 'this' once. When you have two _independent_ smart pointers, both will attempt to delete the object they're pointing to. > > > If you want to create shared_ptrs to this, use > > shared_from_this. > > > > http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_44_0/libs/smart_ptr/enable_shared_from_th > >is.html > > Thank you for the reference. At the very bottom of the documentation, I see > "There must exist at least one shared_ptr instance p that owns t" (in the > requirements of template<class T> shared_ptr<T const> > enable_shared_from_this<T>::shared_from_this() const). So, does the > following code not meet this requirement? > > class Y: public T, public boost::enable_shared_from_this<Y> > { > public: > > boost::shared_ptr<Y> f() const > { > return shared_from_this(); > } > }; > > const T* tp = new Y;//where Y also derives from T > boost::shared_ptr<T> q = tp->f(); Yes, as far as I know this won't work. But why would you want that? boost::shared_ptr<T> q = boost::make_shared<Y>(); is the safe way to do it. No explicit 'new', no explicit 'delete', no problems. Call your insert_me_into routine through the shared_ptr. Then, inside insert_me_into, after you're done with your computations, use shared_from_this to get a shared_ptr to stick into the container. > TIA, > --Hossein HTH, Benjamin

1 0

[SmartPtr] Memory Leak Perhaps
by Hossein Haeri 20 Sep '10

20 Sep '10

Dear all, (Sorry for cross-posting.) I have a container which stores boost::shared_ptr's. The container has a strange behaviour upon insertion of a SPECIFIC pointer into it. The insertion itself happens with no problem and I can successfully do all my desired operations. Yet, I receive the following strange Win32 exceptions when I'm done and my program is ending (i.e., after the last instruction in my main function): 1) When I run the program from the CodeBlocks IDE (GCC 4.5.1, MinGW, WinXP-SP3), a message box from the JIT debugger pops up which says: "An unhandled Win32 exception occurred in ... [29436]". 2) When I run the same program from MSCV2008, an MSVC++ Debug Library message box pops up which says: "Program ... File f:\dd\... Line 52 Exception _BLOCK_TYPE_IS_VALID(pHead->nBlockUse)...". I call the above error messages strange because of the observations below: 1) The error reported by MSVC2008 refers to a file on my drive F: whereas, basically, I don't have such a drive on my system! 2) The CodeBlocks debugger (a GUI wrapped around GDB) runs the program with no problems over the debug sessions. Despite that, there are several "Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap." messages in the GDB debug log. Unfortunately, I don't know how to locate the place where these are related to. 3) MSVC2008 has the same behaviour over the debug session. The output of debug session ends with "The program '[29312] EE1Debugger.exe: Native' has exited with code 3 (0x3)." (Please find a copy of the debug log at the P.S. if you're interested.) My first guess was a memory leak but I didn't spot anything which smells like that over numerous debug sessions. I'm generally dubious about that because I'm using shared_ptr's. Shallow copy can't be the problem either again 'cause I only insert shared_ptr's (from just-allocated dynamic memory) into my container. On the other hand, the problem only occurs upon insertion of a SPECIFIC entry into my container. Strangely enough, if I delete that specific entry manually before the end of my program, everything goes fine! I even checked the count of that specific shared_ptr and it was 1, i.e., I'm not deleting anybody else's memory. I am really confused and left with no clue... Any suggestions? P.S. 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'D:\...\EE1Debugger.exe', Symbols loaded. 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'C:\WINDOWS\system32\ntdll.dll' 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'C:\WINDOWS\system32\kernel32.dll' 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'C:\WINDOWS\WinSxS\x86_Microsoft.VC90.DebugCRT_1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b_9.0.21022.8_x-ww_597c3456\msvcr90d.dll', Symbols loaded. 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'C:\WINDOWS\WinSxS\x86_Microsoft.VC90.DebugCRT_1fc8b3b9a1e18e3b_9.0.21022.8_x-ww_597c3456\msvcp90d.dll', Symbols loaded. First-chance exception at 0x7c812afb in EE1Debugger.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: std::runtime_error at memory location 0x0012f550.. First-chance exception at 0x7c812afb in EE1Debugger.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: std::runtime_error at memory location 0x0012f5a8.. First-chance exception at 0x7c812afb in EE1Debugger.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: std::runtime_error at memory location 0x0012f5a8.. First-chance exception at 0x7c812afb in EE1Debugger.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: std::runtime_error at memory location 0x0012f5a8.. First-chance exception at 0x7c812afb in EE1Debugger.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: std::runtime_error at memory location 0x0012f5a8.. First-chance exception at 0x7c812afb in EE1Debugger.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: std::runtime_error at memory location 0x0012f5a8.. First-chance exception at 0x7c812afb in EE1Debugger.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: std::runtime_error at memory location 0x0012f5a8.. First-chance exception at 0x7c812afb in EE1Debugger.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: std::runtime_error at memory location 0x0012f5a8.. First-chance exception at 0x7c812afb in EE1Debugger.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: std::runtime_error at memory location 0x0012f5a8.. First-chance exception at 0x7c812afb in EE1Debugger.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: std::runtime_error at memory location 0x0012f5a8.. First-chance exception at 0x7c812afb in EE1Debugger.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: std::runtime_error at memory location 0x0012f5a8.. First-chance exception at 0x7c812afb in EE1Debugger.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: std::runtime_error at memory location 0x0012f5a8.. First-chance exception at 0x7c812afb in EE1Debugger.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: std::runtime_error at memory location 0x0012f5a8.. First-chance exception at 0x7c812afb in EE1Debugger.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: std::runtime_error at memory location 0x0012f5a8.. First-chance exception at 0x7c812afb in EE1Debugger.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: std::runtime_error at memory location 0x0012f5a8.. First-chance exception at 0x7c812afb in EE1Debugger.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: std::runtime_error at memory location 0x0012f5a8.. First-chance exception at 0x7c812afb in EE1Debugger.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: std::runtime_error at memory location 0x0012f5a8.. First-chance exception at 0x7c812afb in EE1Debugger.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: std::runtime_error at memory location 0x0012f5a8.. First-chance exception at 0x7c812afb in EE1Debugger.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: std::runtime_error at memory location 0x0012f5a8.. First-chance exception at 0x7c812afb in EE1Debugger.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: std::runtime_error at memory location 0x0012f5a8.. First-chance exception at 0x7c812afb in EE1Debugger.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: std::runtime_error at memory location 0x0012f5a8.. First-chance exception at 0x7c812afb in EE1Debugger.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: std::runtime_error at memory location 0x0012f5a8.. First-chance exception at 0x7c812afb in EE1Debugger.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: std::runtime_error at memory location 0x0012f5a8.. First-chance exception at 0x7c812afb in EE1Debugger.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: std::runtime_error at memory location 0x0012f5a8.. First-chance exception at 0x7c812afb in EE1Debugger.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: std::runtime_error at memory location 0x0012f5a8.. First-chance exception at 0x7c812afb in EE1Debugger.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: std::runtime_error at memory location 0x0012f5a8.. 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'C:\WINDOWS\system32\user32.dll' 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'C:\WINDOWS\system32\gdi32.dll' 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'C:\WINDOWS\system32\imm32.dll' 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'C:\WINDOWS\system32\advapi32.dll' 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'C:\WINDOWS\system32\rpcrt4.dll' 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'C:\WINDOWS\system32\secur32.dll' 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'C:\WINDOWS\system32\lpk.dll' 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'C:\WINDOWS\system32\usp10.dll' 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'C:\WINDOWS\system32\msvcrt.dll' 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'C:\WINDOWS\system32\GDX32.dll', Binary was not built with debug information. 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'C:\WINDOWS\system32\acaptuser32.dll', Binary was not built with debug information. 'EE1Debugger.exe': Unloaded 'C:\WINDOWS\system32\acaptuser32.dll' 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'C:\WINDOWS\system32\uxtheme.dll' 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'C:\WINDOWS\system32\MSCTF.dll' 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'C:\Program Files\Trusteer\Rapport\bin\rooksbas.dll' 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'C:\WINDOWS\system32\version.dll' 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'C:\WINDOWS\system32\shlwapi.dll' 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'C:\WINDOWS\system32\psapi.dll' 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'C:\WINDOWS\system32\shell32.dll' 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'C:\WINDOWS\system32\ole32.dll' 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'C:\WINDOWS\WinSxS\x86_Microsoft.Windows.Common-Controls_6595b64144ccf1df_6.0.2600.5512_x-ww_35d4ce83\comctl32.dll' 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'C:\WINDOWS\system32\comctl32.dll' 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'C:\WINDOWS\system32\MSCTFIME.IME' 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'C:\WINDOWS\system32\PickWord.dll', Binary was not built with debug information. 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'C:\Program Files\Dell\QuickSet\dadkeyb.dll', Binary was not built with debug information. 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'C:\WINDOWS\system32\hccutils.dll', Binary was not built with debug information. 'EE1Debugger.exe': Loaded 'C:\WINDOWS\system32\oleaut32.dll' The program '[29312] EE1Debugger.exe: Native' has exited with code 3 (0x3).

4 5

boost serialisation 1.44 /linux /gcc 4.2.1 compilation problems
by avibahra 20 Sep '10

20 Sep '10

Having problems with boost 1.44 and serialisation on Linux, gcc 4.2.1 I am migrating from boost 1.43 to boost 1.44 and get compiler errors of the form: In file included from ACore/src/TimeSeries.hpp:13, from ACore/test/TestTimeSeries.cpp:16: /var/tmp/ma0/boost/boost_1_44_0/boost/date_time/posix_time/time_serialize.hpp: In function ‘void boost::serialization::save(Archive&, const boost::posix_time::time_duration&, unsigned int)’: /var/tmp/ma0/boost/boost_1_44_0/boost/date_time/posix_time/time_serialize.hpp:42: error: there are no arguments to ‘make_nvp’ that depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of ‘make_nvp’ must be available This is surprising as boost 1.44 release notes makes no mention of any changes to boost serialisation ? Can anyone help ? Best regards, Ta, Avi

2 1

Re: [Boost-users] boost::bond and assignment
by przemyslaw.sliwa＠uk.bnpparibas.com 20 Sep '10

20 Sep '10

Thank, This is true if you have a boost::shared_ptr<int> but in my case I have a class not an int and I want to assign a value of one of its members called mem, for(vector<clss>::iterator pos=tmp.begin(); pos!=tmp.end(); ++tmp) { clss& item = (*pos); item.mem = 1.0; } how this can be translated into the boost lambda or bind? Cheers ___________________________________________________________ This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is prohibited. Please refer to http://www.bnpparibas.co.uk/en/information/legal_information.asp?Code=ECAS-… for additional disclosures.

2 1

overload resolution with boost::function
by Jens Auer 20 Sep '10

20 Sep '10

Hi, I am trying to use objects of boost::function as parameters to overloaded function. However, the compiler fails to automatically resolve the function type when I use a function pointer: #include <boost/function.hpp> void f(int); void accept( boost::function< void () > g); void accept( boost::function< void (int) > g); int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { accept(f); return 0; } boost_function.cpp: In function ┬╗int main(int, char**)┬½: boost_function.cpp:11: Fehler: Aufruf des ├╝berladenen ┬╗accept(void (&)(int))┬½ ist nicht eindeutig boost_function.cpp:6: Anmerkung: Kandidaten sind: void accept(boost::function<vo id()>) boost_function.cpp:7: Anmerkung: void accept(boost::function<vo id(int)>) Sorry for the german error messages, the compiler complains about ambigous functions and shows two candidates. Is there any way to have the accept function call resolved automatically without creating explicit boost::function object?

2 2

[Concept] boost::FloatingPoint<T>
by Ruediger Berlich 20 Sep '10

20 Sep '10

Hi there, I'd like to make sure that some of my classes are only used with particular value types. This is easy enough to implement for integers, using BOOST_CONCEPT_ASSERT((boost::Integer<T>)) . However, there is no boost::FloatingPoint<T>, which is a bit odd. The following, easy code seems to do what I want, but reqires inclusion of boost/concept/detail/concept_def.hpp /*****************************************************************/ namespace boost { BOOST_concept(FloatingPoint, (T)) { BOOST_CONCEPT_USAGE(FloatingPoint) { x.error_type_must_be_a_floating_point_type(); } private: T x; }; template <> struct FloatingPoint<long double> {}; template <> struct FloatingPoint<double> {}; template <> struct FloatingPoint<float> {}; } /*****************************************************************/ >From what I understand, this means that I am relying on implementation details with the above code. Is there any way to do the above in a portable way ? Thanks and Best Regards, Ruediger P.S.: If the above seems acceptable, please feel free to include it in Boost.Concept.

2 2

Any "2D" iterator?
by lfrfly＠icqmail.com 20 Sep '10

20 Sep '10

I have on several occasions encountered situations in which it would be advantageous to view a container of containers as a flat sequence. It seems like there ought to be a natural way to do this using an iterator class. For instance, if you have vector<list<T>> v, you ought to be able to design an iterator which begins at v.begin()->begin() and runs until v.end(), over every element of every list. Does such a thing exist in Boost, or is it planned in the near future?

6 5

Re: [Boost-users] Serialization of functors and MPL use
by Anonymous user 20 Sep '10

20 Sep '10

Hello, Thanks for the quick response ! It is a good solution, but hhat I try to do is the following: template<class Object,class Type> struct my_class { �boost::function<Type ()> *m_f; template<typename Functor> my_class(Object &obj,Functor &f,Type & newValue) { �m_f= boost::bind(f,&obj); } �... �void serialize(Archive &ar, const unsigned int version) { ��ar & m_f; //does not compile �} �}; Instantiation:� �MyObject myObject("old value");� my_class�<�MyObject,std::string>�m(myObject,&MyObject::setName,e,"new value");� Thus the idea is to avoid changing the design (no inheritance to create functor) and just use boost::function to create dynamically functors. My problem is to rebuild dynamically the boost::function in the serialization step. I really needs to avoid using inheritance on my classes just to creates functors, thus I really need to keep the current design�and just build dynamically functors through boost::bind. One possible idea was to register a pair of types -> object which contains the function and the functor. Example: template<class Object,class Type> struct my_class { typedef boost::mpl::pair<Object,Type> key; typedef boost::function<Type ()> value; typedef�boost::mpl::map< key,value > > Functions; template<typename Functor> my_class(Object &obj,Functor &f,Type & newValue) { �m_f= boost::bind(f,&obj); typedef�boost::mpl::insert<�Functions,Functor > > t; } ... template <class Archive> void serialize( Archive & ar, constunsignedint version ) { ��typedef boost::mpl::at<key>()::type t; ��ar & t; //not possible -> does not instantiate the real functor address ! } }; The problem is the above solution is that we don't store the functor address but only it's signature. If you have an idea to make this example working or another idea to store functors which have been created dynamicaly, don't hesitate. � Thanks again for your help ! Regards. > ----- Original message ----- > From: "Robert Ramey‎" <ramey(a)rrsd.com> > To: boost-users(a)lists.boost.org > Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Serialization of functors and MPL use > Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 11:06:43 -0800 > > >Anonymous user wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Thanks for the response. > > > > Actually, I need to create dynamically functosr, because I call a lot > > of different methods coming from several classes. I don't want to > > implement the operator () inside each object used, because it is not > > appropriate in my code (too much classes). > > > > Can you please , give me an example of registration of functors ? > > I could if I had nothing else to do right now. I've got on my list to > make a "case study" in the documentation on how to do this. But > for now I'll just give a short explanation off the top of my head. > > A functor is just a structure. You can serialize just as you can > any other structure. > > The problem is that you want serialize a data variable which > refers to any one of a number of differently defined structures. > This is a specific instance of something that we want to do > in C++ all the time. The most common way of doing this > is to use a pointer to a virtual base class. e.g. > > struct functor_interface { > virtual int /* or other return type */ operator()(int /* other other > return types */ x, ...); > // virtual makes it polymorphic > // operator() ... makes a functor > }; > > So now we can define any number of functors which use the same interface: > > struct f1 : public functor_interface { > virtual int operator()(int x){ > ... whatever > template<class Archive> > void serialize(Archive &ar, const unsigned int version){ > //.. this functor has no parameters so nothing to do. > // .. serialization still needs this defined though > } > }; > > struct f2 : public functor_interface { > int m_a; // member variable which the functor uses at runtime > virtual int operator()(int x){ > ... whatever - something different than f1 > void serialize(Archive &ar, const unsigned int version){ > ar & m_a; > } > }; > > ... as many as you want. > > Register all the functors > BOOST_EXPORT_CLASS(f1) > ... > > The above makes the functors exportable - that is associates > the functor f1 with the external string name "f1". > > Now you can use a variable > > struct my_class { > functor_interface *m_f; > ... > void serialize(Archive &ar, const unsigned int version){ > ar & m_f; > } > }; > > Which uses the m_f variable as a "variable function". You > call it with > m_f->operator(112) > or maybe with something slicker like > (*m_f)(112) // or something similar > > Now you're done - just serialize m_class like anyother. > when you de-serialize it, it has the same state it did before > (whatever that was). > > Home this is helpful. > > Robert Ramey > > > > _______________________________________________ > Boost-users mailing list > Boost-users(a)lists.boost.org > http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users > -------------------------------------------------------------- Ovi Mail: Making email access easy http://mail.ovi.com

2 1

Re: [Boost-users] Serialization of functors and MPL use
by Anonymous user 19 Sep '10

19 Sep '10

Hello, Thanks for the response. Actually, I need to create dynamically functosr, because I call a lot of different methods coming from several classes.�I don't want to implement the operator () inside each object used, because it is not appropriate in my code (too much classes).� Can you please , give me an example of registration of functors ? Thanks in advance. Regards. > ----- Original message ----- > From: "OvermindDL1‎" <overminddl1(a)gmail.com> > To: boost-users(a)lists.boost.org > Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Serialization of functors and MPL use > Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:22:11 -0600 > > >On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Anonymous user <nokiac5eel(a)ovi.com> wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > > > > > > > I'm currently trying to serialize functors. > > > > Apparently, it is not possible to serialize boost::function objects, > > > > is it possible to find a way to serialize pointer to function ? (in order to > > make working the example below*) > > > > If it is definitively not possible, is there a way to 'register' a relation > > betwwen objects and functor ? (using MPL library). > > > > The idea is to rebuild the boost function according to the 'Object and > > 'Type' class of the template'. > > > > > > > > Example: > > > > > > > > mpl::pair<Object,Function> container; > > > > serialize() > > > > { > > > > boost::function<Type ()> m_getter=mpl::at< container,Object>; > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > *Here is the problem that� I'm trying to resolve: > > > > > > > > MyObject myObject("before"); > > > > > > > > SetCommand<std::string,MyObject> > > SetCommand(myObject,&MyObject::setName,&MyObject::getName,"after"); > > > > > > > > SetCommand.do(); � // call functor 'MyObject::setName("after")' > > > > SetCommand.undo(); // call functor 'MyObject::setName("before")' > > > > > > > > > > > > template<typename Type,typename Object> > > > > class SetCommand : public Command > > > > { > > > > > > > > > > > > � public: > > > > > > > > � � � � template <typename Setter, typename Getter> > > > > � � � � SetCommand(Object& o, const Setter& setter, const Getter& getter, > > const Type& value) : > > > > � � � � � � Command(), > > > > � � � � � � m_getter(boost::bind(getter, &o)), > > > > � � m_setter(boost::bind(setter, &o, _1)), > > > > � � � � � � initialValue(m_getter()), > > > > � � � � � � finalValue(value) > > > > � � � � { > > > > � � � � } > > > > > > > > virtual void undo() > > > > � � � � { > > > > � � � � � � m_setter(initialValue) ; > > > > � � � � } > > > > > > > > � � � � virtual void do() > > > > � � � � { > > > > � � � � � � m_setter(finalValue) ; > > > > � � � � } > > > > > > > > �� private: > > > > > > > > friend class boost::serialization::access; > > > > > > > > SetCommand(){} > > > > > > > > template <class Archive> > > > > void serialize( Archive & ar, const unsigned int version ) > > > > { > > > > > > > > � ar & m_getter; ERROR -> does not compile !!! > > > > � ar & m_setter; ERROR -> does not compile !!! > > > > > > > > � ar & initialValue; > > > > � ar & finalValue; > > > > } > > > > > > > > boost::function<Type ()> m_getter ; > > > > � � � � boost::function<void (Type)> m_setter ; > > > > > > > > � � � � Type initialValue ; > > > > � � � � Type finalValue ; > > > > }; > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance. > > You need to somehow register the function in there, if you know what a > limited set of types it might be, an integer that can rebuild it would > work, but the most common way is to just make a base class with an > operator() and have a (shared) pointer to that be your 'function', > then base classes (that can be properly serialized) to act as the > functions. Not pretty, not the easiest, but it works well and is > expandable. > _______________________________________________ > Boost-users mailing list > Boost-users(a)lists.boost.org > http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users > -------------------------------------------------------------- Ovi Mail: Making email access easy http://mail.ovi.com

2 1

Re: [Boost-users] Serialization of functors and MPL
by Anonymous user 19 Sep '10

19 Sep '10

Hello, Thanks for the response. Actually, I need to create dynamically functor, because I call a lot of different methods coming from several classes. see below: MyObject myObject("before"); SetCommand<std::string,MyObject> cmd(myObject,&MyObject::setName,&MyObject::getName,"after"); Thus, I'm wondering if it is not possible to use the MPL library to register the link between a class and it functor. Example: template<class Object,class Type> class SetCommand { typedef mpl::pair<MyObject,Function>::type �container; template<class Functor> SetCommand() { typedef mpl::insert<container,mpl::pair<Object,Functor>::type myType; } }; serialize() { boost::function<Type ()> getter=mpl::at< container,MyObject>::type; } MyObject myObject("before"); SetCommand<std::string,MyObject> cmd(myObject,&MyObject::setName,&MyObject::getName,"after"); The mechanism should be like the registration of serializable class with boost. The problem here is the registration of the functor, we don't register the address of the functor, but only its type(function signature). Thus it is difficult to allocate this functor ! If someone can give me a solution to this problem, it would be great :) Remark: I don't want to implement the operator () inside each object used, because it is not appropriate in my code (too much classes).� Thanks in advance. Regards. > ----- Original message ----- > From: "Robert Ramey‎" <ramey(a)rrsd.com> > To: boost-users(a)lists.boost.org > Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Serialization of functors and MPL > Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:20:06 -0800 > > >Anonymous user wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > > > I'm currently trying to serialize functors. > ... > > Thanks in advance. > > > Without going through your specific situation, I can say that this is an > easy problem. > Here are a couple of ways to do it. > > a) use boost::variant > > Make your functors: f, g, h > make a variant boost::variant<f, g, h> v; > > v = f or g or h ... > > #include boost/serialization/variant.hpp > serialize v > > b) make your functors f, g, h all derived from a base class - functors > make the base class polymorphic by making at least one member virtual > EXPORT f, g, and h > > functor *fx; > fx = &f, or &g, or &h > > serialize fx > > c) There might be a way to do it with boost::any also. > > Robert Ramey > > > > _______________________________________________ > Boost-users mailing list > Boost-users(a)lists.boost.org > http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users > -------------------------------------------------------------- Ovi Mail: Making email access easy http://mail.ovi.com

1 0

[serialization] When do I need to overload operators
by Sean Farrow 19 Sep '10

19 Sep '10

Hi: In trhe demo.cpp file in the Serialization examples, the << and >> operators are made friends of the gps_position class and are overridden. In what circumstances do I need to override these operators and when can I get away with just writing a Serialize template function. Regards Sean.

2 1

Performance of boost::serialization
by Daniel Herb 18 Sep '10

18 Sep '10

Hi! I'm having performance issues with boost::serilaization. First a short description what my data looks like: I serialize a container of boost::shared_ptr<Base> where i put polymorph objects in (no very deep hierarchy ~2 layers). The objects are ~40 byte each. The container has 100 elements in my test case. In the test application i can only serialize that container ~40 times per second. That's to slow for me because the data is used for the network communication. What i've found is this thread: http://old.nabble.com/-Serialization--Speedding-up-client-server-communicat… But it seems that i have to recreate the archive in my case because the data can get send, changed and send again. The documentation says that this behaviour can be disabled through disabling tracking. But that doesn't work for me because I use pointers. Robert Ramey also mentioned that implementing a lightweight version of stringstream could improve the performance. I liked to look at that but it seems that i'm missing something completely. class mystreambuf : public std::streambuf { public: virtual std::streamsize xsputn(const char*_Ptr, std::streamsize _Count) { } }; So this stream buffer does nothing right? But somehow serialization throughput is even worse with that implementation (compared to stringstream). I've never implemented a stream buffer so help would be nice. What are the requirements of boost::serialization for the stream buffer? Also generally it would be nice if you could share your oppinion if you think if the performance of boost::serialization can be tuned to serialize data for network communication. Is it only possible without polymorphism/shared_ptr? Any help is welcome! Thanks -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Performance-of-boost%3A%3Aserialization-tp29739639p29… Sent from the Boost - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

3 4

libboost*-mt.so (thread safety)
by Stanisław Findeisen 18 Sep '10

18 Sep '10

Hi! It looks that in some older Boost versions (up to 1.40 or so) several shared objects were coming in 2 versions: with or without -mt suffix. For instance: libboost_filesystem-gcc42-1_34_1.so.1.34.1 libboost_filesystem-gcc42-mt-1_34_1.so.1.34.1 libboost_program_options-gcc42-1_34_1.so.1.34.1 libboost_program_options-gcc42-mt-1_34_1.so.1.34.1 libboost_regex-gcc42-1_34_1.so.1.34.1 libboost_regex-gcc42-mt-1_34_1.so.1.34.1 (These are the names from my Debian GNU/Linux installation, perhaps they are a bit different than when building from source.) This seems to no longer be the case with Boost 1.44. I've just built it from source passing threading=multi parameter to bjam, and can't see any -mt shared objects. This is what I have: drwxr-xr-x 2 ... 4096 ... 11:55 . drwxr-xr-x 4 ... 4096 ... 11:43 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 ... 118790 ... 11:49 libboost_date_time.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 ... 28 ... 11:48 libboost_date_time.so -> libboost_date_time.so.1.44.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 ... 92296 ... 11:48 libboost_date_time.so.1.44.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 ... 294068 ... 11:50 libboost_filesystem.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 ... 29 ... 11:48 libboost_filesystem.so -> libboost_filesystem.so.1.44.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 ... 171758 ... 11:48 libboost_filesystem.so.1.44.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 ... 534858 ... 11:51 libboost_graph.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 ... 24 ... 11:49 libboost_graph.so -> libboost_graph.so.1.44.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 ... 379135 ... 11:49 libboost_graph.so.1.44.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 ... 286678 ... 11:52 libboost_math_c99.a -rw-r--r-- 1 ... 282978 ... 11:52 libboost_math_c99f.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 ... 28 ... 11:44 libboost_math_c99f.so -> libboost_math_c99f.so.1.44.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 ... 133041 ... 11:44 libboost_math_c99f.so.1.44.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 ... 288144 ... 11:52 libboost_math_c99l.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 ... 28 ... 11:45 libboost_math_c99l.so -> libboost_math_c99l.so.1.44.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 ... 132259 ... 11:44 libboost_math_c99l.so.1.44.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 ... 27 ... 11:44 libboost_math_c99.so -> libboost_math_c99.so.1.44.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 ... 137877 ... 11:44 libboost_math_c99.so.1.44.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 ... 1714884 ... 11:51 libboost_math_tr1.a -rw-r--r-- 1 ... 1723476 ... 11:52 libboost_math_tr1f.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 ... 28 ... 11:44 libboost_math_tr1f.so -> libboost_math_tr1f.so.1.44.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 ... 295638 ... 11:44 libboost_math_tr1f.so.1.44.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 ... 1716390 ... 11:52 libboost_math_tr1l.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 ... 28 ... 11:44 libboost_math_tr1l.so -> libboost_math_tr1l.so.1.44.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 ... 287712 ... 11:44 libboost_math_tr1l.so.1.44.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 ... 27 ... 11:43 libboost_math_tr1.so -> libboost_math_tr1.so.1.44.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 ... 287831 ... 11:43 libboost_math_tr1.so.1.44.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 ... 90942 ... 11:54 libboost_prg_exec_monitor.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 ... 35 ... 11:46 libboost_prg_exec_monitor.so -> libboost_prg_exec_monitor.so.1.44.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 ... 77833 ... 11:46 libboost_prg_exec_monitor.so.1.44.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 ... 742886 ... 11:53 libboost_program_options.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 ... 34 ... 11:45 libboost_program_options.so -> libboost_program_options.so.1.44.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 ... 440715 ... 11:45 libboost_program_options.so.1.44.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 ... 8868 ... 11:53 libboost_random.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 ... 25 ... 11:46 libboost_random.so -> libboost_random.so.1.44.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 ... 13058 ... 11:45 libboost_random.so.1.44.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 ... 2102620 ... 11:50 libboost_regex.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 ... 24 ... 11:49 libboost_regex.so -> libboost_regex.so.1.44.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 ... 1256561 ... 11:49 libboost_regex.so.1.44.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 ... 984416 ... 11:54 libboost_serialization.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 ... 32 ... 11:46 libboost_serialization.so -> libboost_serialization.so.1.44.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 ... 624366 ... 11:46 libboost_serialization.so.1.44.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 ... 139202 ... 11:54 libboost_signals.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 ... 26 ... 11:46 libboost_signals.so -> libboost_signals.so.1.44.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 ... 99503 ... 11:46 libboost_signals.so.1.44.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 ... 15498 ... 11:49 libboost_system.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 ... 25 ... 11:48 libboost_system.so -> libboost_system.so.1.44.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 ... 20109 ... 11:48 libboost_system.so.1.44.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 ... 1476598 ... 11:49 libboost_test_exec_monitor.a -rw-r--r-- 1 ... 149246 ... 11:54 libboost_thread.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 ... 25 ... 11:47 libboost_thread.so -> libboost_thread.so.1.44.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 ... 118667 ... 11:47 libboost_thread.so.1.44.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 ... 1634106 ... 11:54 libboost_unit_test_framework.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 ... 38 ... 11:47 libboost_unit_test_framework.so -> libboost_unit_test_framework.so.1.44.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 ... 941323 ... 11:47 libboost_unit_test_framework.so.1.44.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 ... 2909510 ... 11:55 libboost_wave.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 ... 23 ... 11:48 libboost_wave.so -> libboost_wave.so.1.44.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 ... 1686755 ... 11:48 libboost_wave.so.1.44.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 ... 694192 ... 11:54 libboost_wserialization.a lrwxrwxrwx 1 ... 33 ... 11:46 libboost_wserialization.so -> libboost_wserialization.so.1.44.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 ... 464203 ... 11:46 libboost_wserialization.so.1.44.0 Is it so, that all Boost libraries are now thread safe?? Or maybe I overlooked some build options??... I had some 50 million build errors though (something related to Python) so some targets were skipped by bjam. -- http://eisenbits.homelinux.net/~stf/ OpenPGP: DFD9 0146 3794 9CF6 17EA D63F DBF5 8AA8 3B31 FE8A Like hardship, risk & challenge? --- Follow Jesus!!

2 1

boost::asio::io_service destructor never returns
by custgmx.net 17 Sep '10

17 Sep '10

Hello, he timer also starts a thread in which an io_service hosts deadline timer until thread is terminated. so a continuous timer. The boost thread which needs the timer is create from within DLL. The DLL ExitInstance function is called, when the hosting App. unloads the DLL. The ExitInstance function stops the thread and before timer. But the io_service destruction in my timer never returns, so the app hangs. This happens NOT, when i am able to call a Dispose Function before ExitInstance is called. However, some application loading my DLL, give not the chance to call this expose function. Anyone know, how to work around this problem ? Here is the code of my timer core. It is the thread which restarts the service until thread is stopped. The thread get's stopped by setting _stop flag and setting deadlime timer to 1 ms in future. summary: hangs when within Dll::ExitInstance destructed. Hangs not, if destrcuted before Dll::ExitInstance Thank you Code: void tcTimerThread::timerLoop(void) { _running=true; _io_service = new boost::asio::io_service; /// create timer _pTimer = new boost::asio::deadline_timer(*_io_service); while(_stop==false) { _pTimer->expires_from_now(boost::posix_time::milliseconds(_delay)); /// bind timer event function _pTimer->async_wait(boost::bind(&tcTimerThread::timerEvent,this,boost::asio: :placeholders::error)); try { if(_stop==false) { /// reset async _io_service->reset(); /// wait for timer event _io_service->run(); } } catch(...) { } } try { _io_service->stop(); delete _pTimer; /// !! never returns if called within ExitInstance of DLL;returns always is called before ExitInstance of DLL delete _io_service; } catch(...) { } _running=false; }

1 0

[process] Determine if a process is still running?
by Allen Cronce 17 Sep '10

17 Sep '10

Hi all, I'm interested in a cross platform way to determine if a process as identified by process ID is still running. There is no parent/child relationship between the running and detecting processes. However it is easy in my particular scenario for the running process to communicate its ID to the detecting process for later evaluation. I know that I can write separate Windows and Posix implementations that would work. But I'd prefer a cross-platform implementation rather than conditionally calling native API's. I can see that boost::process supports obtaining a process ID. The question is can boost::process use this ID to determine if a given process, which was not launched as a child, is still running? Thanks in advance for any suggestions. Best, -- Allen Cronce

5 7

Re: [Boost-users] boost::bond and assignment
by przemyslaw.sliwa＠uk.bnpparibas.com 17 Sep '10

17 Sep '10

Thanks for help, but I want to assign the value of the member variable not the pointer itself: vector<boost::shared_ptr<clss> > tmp for(size_t i=0; i<tmp.size(), i++) tmp[i]->mem = 0.0; In this case clss::mem should be changed, I get an error doing std::for_each(tmp.begin(), tmp.end(), &_1::mem = 0); Can this be done? Thanks for help ___________________________________________________________ This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is prohibited. Please refer to http://www.bnpparibas.co.uk/en/information/legal_information.asp?Code=ECAS-… for additional disclosures.

2 1

boost::bond and assignment
by przemyslaw.sliwa＠uk.bnpparibas.com 17 Sep '10

17 Sep '10

Hello, I have to write a simple loop whihc assigns a member variable to a constant value, vector<boost::shared_ptr<clss> > tmp for(size_t i=0; i<tmp.size(), i++) tmp[i]->mem = 0.0; How this can be done using stl algorithms and boost::bind? Thanks for help, Pshemek ___________________________________________________________ This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is prohibited. Please refer to http://www.bnpparibas.co.uk/en/information/legal_information.asp?Code=ECAS-… for additional disclosures.

2 1

Re: [Boost-users] [boost] Interest in B-tree library for Boost?
by Imre Palik 17 Sep '10

17 Sep '10

> From: Cory Nelson <phrosty(a)gmail.com> > - Can this be adapted for in-memory use as well, with full non-POD support? You mean cache-oblivious B-trees? That would be really cool. BTW, anybody has real world performance data on them? I.

1 0

[Mpl, Fusion] using adapted struct with mpl algorithms
by Paul Graphov 17 Sep '10

17 Sep '10

Hello Boost Users, I've encountered a trouble using fusion adapted struct as mpl sequence: when I call mpl::push_front with fusion::vector it works but if I try to call it with adapted struct, it fails. Do I miss something? Is there any concise solution or I have to convert it by hand? source: http://pastebin.com/3ELipu1M 1. #include <string> 2. 3. #include <boost/fusion/adapted/struct/adapt_struct.hpp> 4. #include <boost/fusion/mpl.hpp> 5. #include <boost/fusion/container/vector.hpp> 6. #include <boost/mpl/push_front.hpp> 7. 8. typedef boost::fusion::vector<std::string, int> employee_1; 9. 10. struct employee_2 11. { 12. std::string name; 13. int age; 14. }; 15. 16. BOOST_FUSION_ADAPT_STRUCT( 17. employee_2, 18. (std::string, name) 19. (int, age)) 20. 21. /* this line compiles just fine */ 22. typedef boost::mpl::push_front<employee_1, bool>::typebool_employee_1 ; 23. 24. /* this fails */ 25. typedef boost::mpl::push_front<employee_2, bool>::typebool_employee_2 ; 26. 27. int main() { 28. return 0; 29. } Thanks!

1 1

download question: file checksums
by Stanisław Findeisen 17 Sep '10

17 Sep '10

What are the checksums of the release files?? STF -------- Original Message -------- Subject: download question Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:36:04 +0200 From: Stanisław Findeisen <stf(a)eisenbits.homelinux.net> To: boost-users(a)lists.boost.org Hi What are the file checksums? -- http://eisenbits.homelinux.net/~stf/ OpenPGP: DFD9 0146 3794 9CF6 17EA D63F DBF5 8AA8 3B31 FE8A Like Hardship, Risk & Challenge? --- Follow Jesus!!

2 1

Serialization of functors and MPL use
by Anonymous user 17 Sep '10

17 Sep '10

Hello everybody, � I'm currently trying to serialize functors. Apparently, it is not possible to serialize boost::function objects, is it possible to find a way to serialize pointer to function ? (in order to make working the example below*) If it is definitively not possible, is there a way to 'register' a relation betwwen objects and functor ? (using MPL library). The idea is to rebuild the boost function according to the 'Object and 'Type' class of the template'. � Example:� � mpl::pair<Object,Function> container; serialize() { boost::function<Type ()> m_getter=mpl::at< container,Object>; } � � *Here is the problem that� I'm trying to resolve: � MyObject myObject("before"); � SetCommand<std::string,MyObject> SetCommand(myObject,&MyObject::setName,&MyObject::getName,"after"); � SetCommand.do(); � // call functor 'MyObject::setName("after")' SetCommand.undo(); // call functor 'MyObject::setName("before")' � � template<typename Type,typename Object> class SetCommand : public Command { � � � public: � � � � � template <typename Setter, typename Getter> � � � � SetCommand(Object& o, const Setter& setter, const Getter& getter, const Type& value) : � � � � � � Command(), � � � � � � m_getter(boost::bind(getter, &o)), � � m_setter(boost::bind(setter, &o, _1)), � � � � � � initialValue(m_getter()), � � � � � � finalValue(value) � � � � { � � � � } � virtual void undo() � � � � { � � � � � � m_setter(initialValue) ; � � � � } � � � � � virtual void do() � � � � { � � � � � � m_setter(finalValue) ; � � � � } � �� private: � friend class boost::serialization::access; � SetCommand(){} � template <class Archive>� void serialize( Archive & ar, const unsigned int version ) { � � ar & m_getter; ERROR -> does not compile !!! � ar & m_setter; ERROR -> does not compile !!! � � ar & initialValue; � ar & finalValue; } � boost::function<Type ()> m_getter ; � � � � boost::function<void (Type)> m_setter ; � � � � � Type initialValue ; � � � � Type finalValue ; }; � Thanks in advance. � -------------------------------------------------------------- Ovi Mail: Making email access easy http://mail.ovi.com

2 1

BoostCon Proto Video
by OvermindDL1 17 Sep '10

17 Sep '10

Greetings, On the Proto video in BoostCon 2010, there are a few jumps, at least one of them major, skipping a large portion of the mini-phoenix setup. Is there a complete video of this conference up without the broken segments?

4 5

multi_array with user defined types?
by Suresh Kumar 17 Sep '10

17 Sep '10

Hi To use multi_array with user defined types, is there any restriction on the user defined types? When I tried compiler generates so many error messages like this: My definition is like this: typedef boost::multi_array<score, 2> array_type; //score is defined as a structure typedef array_type::index Index; Error messages: /usr/include/boost/multi_array/subarray.hpp:238: error: ‘const struct score’ has no member named ‘num_dimensions’ /usr/include/boost/multi_array/subarray.hpp:239: error: ‘const struct score’ has no member named ‘shape’ /usr/include/boost/multi_array/subarray.hpp:239: error: ‘const struct score’ has no member named ‘shape’ scoreAnalysis.cpp:34: instantiated from here /usr/include/boost/multi_array/subarray.hpp:242: error: ‘const struct score’ has no member named ‘begin’ /usr/include/boost/multi_array/subarray.hpp:242: error: ‘const struct score’ has no member named ‘end’ thanks suresh -- R Suresh Kumar, http://www.ee.ucr.edu/~sramachandranna Sarve bhavantu sukinaha (May everyone be happy) Sarve santu niramiyaha (May everyone be without affliction) Sarve bhadrani pashyantu (May everyone see only goodness) Ma kashchit dukha bhak bhavet (Let none be the victim of suffering)

1 0

eigen2 and multi_array
by Suresh Kumar 16 Sep '10

16 Sep '10

Hi I was trying to use boost::multi_array in a project where I am already using eigen2. The following lines does not compile in my code, though it compiles correctly outside my project ie as a standalone program where eigen is not used. typedef multi_array<double, 2> array_type; array_type scores(extents[1][1]); compiler error: ‘extents’ is not a type Any suggestions? thanks suresh -- R Suresh Kumar, http://www.ee.ucr.edu/~sramachandranna -- Dhyaana–moolam Guror murtih Puja-moolam Guroh padam Mantra – moolam Guror vakyam Moksha – moolam Guroh krpa.

3 6

Serialization of functors and MPL
by Anonymous user 16 Sep '10

16 Sep '10

�Hello everybody,�I'm currently trying to serialize functors.Apparently, it is not possible to serialize boost::function objects,is it possible to find a way to serialize pointer to function ? (in order to make working the example below*)If it is definitively not possible, is there a way to 'register' a relation betwwen objects and functor ? (using MPL library).The idea is to rebuild the boost function according to the 'Object and 'Type' class of the template'.�Example:��mpl::pair<Object,Function> container;serialize(){boost::function<Type ()>�m_getter=mpl::at<�container,Object>;}��*Here is the problem that �I'm trying to resolve:�MyObject�myObject("before");SetCommand<std::string,MyObject> SetCommand(myObject,&MyObject::setName,&MyObject::getName,"after");�SetCommand.do(); � // call functor 'MyObject::setName("after")'SetCommand.undo();�// call functor 'MyObject::setName("before")' template<typename Type,typename Object>class�SetCommand : public Command{ ��public:�� template�<typename�Setter,�typename�Getter>�� SetCommand(Object& o,�const�Setter& setter,�const�Getter& getter,�const�Type& value) :� � � � � ��Command(),� � � � � ��m_getter(boost::bind(getter, &o)),�� m_setter(boost::bind(setter, &o, _1)),� � � � � ��initialValue(m_getter()),� � � � � ��finalValue(value)� � � � {� � � � }�virtual�void�undo()� � � � {� � � � � ��m_setter(initialValue) ;� � � � }�� virtual�void�do()� � � � {� � � � � ��m_setter(finalValue) ;� � � � }�� private: friend�class�boost::serialization::access; SetCommand(){} template�<class�Archive>� void�serialize( Archive & ar,�const�unsigned�int�version ) { ��ar & m_getter;ERROR -> does not compile !!! ��ar & m_setter;ERROR -> does not compile !!! �� ar &�initialValue; �� ar &�finalValue; } boost::function<Type ()>�m_getter�;� � � ��boost::function<void�(Type)>�m_setter�;�� Type�initialValue�;� � � � Type�finalValue�;}; Thanks in advance. -------------------------------------------------------------- Ovi Mail: Making email access easy http://mail.ovi.com

2 1

questions on PBGL
by Raghava Mutharaju 16 Sep '10

16 Sep '10

Hello Boost users, I am looking at Parallel Boost Graph Library (PBGL) to check whether it fits our project needs. I have a few questions on PBGL. 1) How does PBGL know about the size of the cluster -- its IP address, name? 2) What is the performance of it -- are there any other numbers apart from ones in the paper http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.107.5681? Thank you. Regards, Raghava.

3 4

HTTP Parser
by Anand Patel 16 Sep '10

16 Sep '10

All, I am looking into developing an HTTP Proxy with content filtering and other mechanism as a fun project. Is there anything available in BOOST or in other libraries that I can read upon and use them. Specifically, I need to have HTML Parser and some sort of Proxy implementation. Few features that I aiming for are: 1. Intercept request on port 80. 2. Retrieve entire page and parse the page and check with current rules. 3. URL checking with current policy. Thanks, -AP

3 3

Connection refused after close then open.
by Doak, Roger (GE Healthcare) 16 Sep '10

16 Sep '10

I'm trying to limit the connections made to the server. So after creating the acceptor and accepting MAX connections I closed the acceptor. Further connections are properly rejected. However after one of the connections is closed by the client I attempt to re-open the acceptor but further connections are still rejected? Create and open: m_acceptor(m_ioService, m_endpoint = resolve(m_ioService, host, port), true) Async accept: m_acceptor.async_accept(connection->socket(), boost::bind(&IpServer::handleAccept, this, aph::error, connection)); Close after max connections: m_acceptor.close(); Reopen when a connection is available: m_acceptor.open(m_endpoint.protocol()); m_acceptor.set_option(boost::asio::ip::tcp::acceptor::reuse_address(true )); m_acceptor.bind(m_endpoint); m_acceptor.listen(); Thanks for your time. Roger

1 1

[DateTime] local_adjustor for run-time
by Igor R 16 Sep '10

16 Sep '10

Hello, I'm writing a client application that receives from a server UTC timestamps and the server local time-zone. I have to display this time in my client app in terms of the server time-zone (i.e. the server local time should be displayed, not the client one). For this purpose I intended to use local_adjustor, but I see it wants compile-time time-zone value. Is there a similar facility that allows run-time parameters? Thanks.

1 0

[Proto] Default-constructing a proto::terminal
by Roland Bock 16 Sep '10

16 Sep '10

Hi, I have a class which has boost::proto::terminal members like this: struct _table { struct id { id(); // default constructible /*...*/ }; boost::proto::terminal<id> id_terminal; }; _table table; Will table.id_terminal be constructed correctly? I am asking because in Proto's documentation terminals are always instantiated with curly braces, e.g.: typedef proto::terminal<int>::type int_; int_ i = {42}, j = {24}; template<int I> struct placeholder {}; proto::terminal<placeholder<0> >::type const _1 = {{}}; proto::terminal<placeholder<1> >::type const _2 = {{}}; Thanks and regards, Roland

2 2

OpenMP and Boost - can they be used together?
by Max S. Kaznady 16 Sep '10

16 Sep '10

Hello, I wrote a simple parallel program which computes the sum of elements across a matrix using Boost. When I use OpenMP, the program runs give different sums. When I use just simple arrays like double array[N][N], instead of boost::numeric::ublas::matrix<double>, the code work just fine and as expected. Does anyone know what is going on? It looks like the score function is not being modified properly, because Boost array returns just fine. The function compute_score() creates a matrix and computes the sum of its elements in parallel, copying the result to matrix temp and then printing temp, to make sure that the results can be copied in parallel too. The function is run infinitely many times, and if its return values differ then the program exits. [code] #include <iostream> #include <omp.h> #include <boost/numeric/ublas/io.hpp> #include <boost/numeric/ublas/matrix.hpp> #define ENABLE_OPENMP_SCORE 1 #define N 10 #define NUMTHREADS 2 using std::cout; using std::endl; using boost::numeric::ublas::matrix; double compute_score() { matrix<double> data1(N, N); for (unsigned i = 0; i < N; ++i) for (unsigned j = 0; j < N; ++j) data1(i, j) = i * N + j; double sc = 0.0; unsigned i, j; matrix<double> temp(N, N); #pragma omp parallel \ shared(sc,temp) \ private(i,j) \ if (ENABLE_OPENMP_SCORE) { omp_set_num_threads(NUMTHREADS); #pragma omp master sc = 0.0; #pragma omp for reduction(+:sc) schedule(static) collapse(2) nowait for (i = 0; i < N; ++i) { for (j = 0; j < N; ++j) { temp(i, j) = data1(i, j); sc += data1(i, j); } } } cout << temp << endl; return sc; } int main(void) { double oldval = compute_score(), newval; cout.precision(32); cout << "--" << endl; while (1) { newval = compute_score(); cout << "--" << endl; if (newval != oldval) { cout << " newval - oldval = diff, " << newval << " - " << oldval << " = " << newval - oldval << endl; exit(1); } oldval = newval; } return 0; } [/code] This problem is driving me insane... the code is really simple, but for some reason after using Boost it does not function as expected. Cheers, Max

2 2

[Serialization] Encrypting an xml archive
by Sean Farrow 16 Sep '10

16 Sep '10

Hi: Has anyone had the need to encrypt an xml or binary archive? If so what is the best way of going about it? Do I need to create a totally new archive class, or can I just derive from another one of boosts archive classes, if yes which methods should be overridden? Thanks for any pointers Regards Sean.

3 3

Editable XML Serialization
by Anne van Rossum 16 Sep '10

16 Sep '10

Dear list members, I guess it's one of the hardest search terms around but I would like to know if there is any editable XML serialization provided by Boost or other C++ libraries. And I don't mean the kind of thing that requires you to go jumping around through trees, with iterators etc. I don't want to see any iterator! I really iike the XML serialization method that boost::serialization provides: //! Give boost serialization libraries access to private fields friend class boost::serialization::access; //! Tell which private fields to serialize template<class Archive> void serialize(Archive & ar, const unsigned int version) { ar & boost::serialization::make_nvp("Phase", phase); ar & boost::serialization::make_nvp("Period", period); ar & boost::serialization::make_nvp("DutyCycle", dutycycle); } Just adding this to a file, and then: xml_out << boost::serialization::make_nvp("ApplicationConfig", config); Or: xml_in >> boost::serialization::make_nvp("ApplicationConfig", config); It's awesome! I don't need to care about descending trees, etc. However, the default serialization class does not allow for different orders of the XML tags, etc. It doesn't use the "ApplicationConfig" string, but just assumes that XML tag should be there if this read operation. If you change anything in the XML file, it is likely you will get a segfault, and you won't know what is causing the problem exactly. It would be so great if there is something like this in which the XML files can actually be edited! I am almost sure that there should be something like that, but I can't find it. Thanks in advance, Anne

3 5

ASIO Win32 Thread not terminated
by Manuel Drews 16 Sep '10

16 Sep '10

Hi all, I have a question regarding boost::asio: if I run the example boost_asio/example/http/client/async_client.cpp on a Windows 7 or Vista and set a breakpoint on the very last line (return 0;), VisualStudio tells me that (apart from the Main Thread) two Threads named Win32 Thread are still running. Since the whole ASIO code is within the try block, everything connected to the sockets should be terminated when leaving the block, right? I get this behaviour also in a custom project, where I explicitly call close on the socket. My concern is, that a project which uses a lot of socket connections will end up with a dozen or more lingering threads. How can I avoid that? Thanx in advance Manuel -- GMX DSL SOMMER-SPECIAL: Surf & Phone Flat 16.000 für nur 19,99 Euro/mtl.!* http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl

3 5

Boost.math statistical distributions - testing inverse gamma and inverse chi squared and Bayesan examples - help wanted.
by Paul A. Bristow 16 Sep '10

16 Sep '10

I am working on adding (by popular request;-) a few more statistical distributions inverse gamma and inverse chi squared are close to being done. But I would be most grateful for help with 1 A few spot test values to check that I haven't made mistakes. Ideally I'd like some very accurate values from the ultimate reference Wolfram Mathematica, or perhaps an R add-on (not in main release?). If anyone can spare a moment to evaluate a few values for me please email me privately. 2 I have some suggestions for an example of using these distribution(s), but would like others. (We like to provide a real-life example of statistics in action in our documentation). Do any you followers of the Reverend Bayes have any suggestions for examples, preferably fully worked through from raw data? Thanks Paul PS If there are other distributions for which there are 'popular requests', now is the moment to ask ;-) --- Paul A. Bristow, Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal LA8 8AB UK +44 1539 561830 07714330204 pbristow(a)hetp.u-net.com

1 0

[asio] An error occured in asio::win_mutex.hpp
by Yasuhiko Yoshimura (informax.co.jp) 16 Sep '10

16 Sep '10

Hi ALL, I have encountered this error, and would like to program a win32 FTP client with asio lib. In asio examples I reffenrenced at the 'Services(logger program)'. Could you help me ? I appriciate any suggestion. Thank all, Yasuhiko Yoshimura (Japan) An accsess violence occured at the below ===>> point. win_mutex.hpp:line 125: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Then variable values are: &crit_section_ 0xcdcdcdcd this 0xcdcdcdcd (boost::noncopyable_::noncopyable) // Locking must be performed in a separate function to lock() since the // compiler does not support the use of structured exceptions and C++ // exceptions in the same function. int do_lock() { __try { ===>> ::EnterCriticalSection(&crit_section_); } __except(GetExceptionCode() == STATUS_INVALID_HANDLE || GetExceptionCode() == STATUS_NO_MEMORY ? EXCEPTION_EXECUTE_HANDLER : EXCEPTION_CONTINUE_SEARCH) { if (GetExceptionCode() == STATUS_NO_MEMORY) return ERROR_OUTOFMEMORY; return ERROR_INVALID_HANDLE; } return 0; } ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Here are my codes below. And error point was ===>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ using boost::asio::ip::tcp; class ftp_client_dtp : public boost::enable_shared_from_this<ftp_client_dtp> { public: typedef boost::shared_ptr<ftp_client_dtp> pointer; static pointer create(boost::asio::io_service& io_service) { return pointer(new ftp_client_dtp(io_service)); } tcp::socket& socket() { return *work_socket_; } ... void start() { work_thread_.reset(new boost::thread( boost::bind(&boost::asio::io_service::run, &work_io_service_))); // Start an asynchronous resolve to translate the server and service names // into a list of endpoints. tcp::resolver::query query(sip_, sport_); work_resolver_->async_resolve(query, boost::bind(&ftp_client_dtp::handle_resolve, shared_from_this(), boost::asio::placeholders::error, boost::asio::placeholders::iterator)); } void close() { work_io_service_.post(boost::bind(&ftp_client_dtp::do_close, shared_from_this())); } ftp_client_dtp(boost::asio::io_service& io_service) : work_io_service_(), work_resolver_(new boost::asio::ip::tcp::resolver(work_io_service_)), work_socket_(new boost::asio::ip::tcp::socket(work_io_service_)) ===>> { } ~ftp_client_dtp() { work_.reset(); if (work_thread_) work_thread_->join(); } private: std::ofstream f; void handle_resolve(const boost::system::error_code& err, tcp::resolver::iterator endpoint_iterator) { ... } void handle_connect(const boost::system::error_code& err, tcp::resolver::iterator endpoint_iterator) { ... } void handle_read_content(const boost::system::error_code& err) { ... } void do_close() { work_socket_->close(); } std::string sip_, sport_, scurrentpath_, sfilename_; boost::asio::streambuf request_; boost::asio::streambuf response_; boost::scoped_ptr<boost::asio::ip::tcp::resolver> work_resolver_; boost::scoped_ptr<boost::asio::ip::tcp::socket> work_socket_; boost::asio::io_service work_io_service_; boost::scoped_ptr<boost::asio::io_service::work> work_; boost::scoped_ptr<boost::thread> work_thread_; }; ftp_client_dtp::pointer new_connection_; new_connection_ = ftp_client_dtp::create(io_service_); new_connection_->start(); ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Thank all, Yasuhiko Yoshimura (Japan)

2 3

upgrade_to_unique_lock doesn't compile with vc2010
by Braden McDaniel 16 Sep '10

16 Sep '10

Using Boost 1.43, this program: # include <boost/thread.hpp> int main() { boost::shared_mutex mutex; boost::upgrade_lock<boost::shared_mutex> lock(mutex); boost::upgrade_to_unique_lock<boost::shared_mutex> write_lock(lock); } ... produces this error when compiled with Visual C++ 2010: C:\Users\braden>cl /I include/boost-1_43 /MD /EHsc upgrade_to_unique_lock_test.cpp Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 16.00.30319.01 for x64 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. upgrade_to_unique_lock_test.cpp include/boost-1_43\boost/thread/locks.hpp(823) : error C2679: binary '=' : no operator found which takes a right-hand operand of type 'boost::unique_lock<Mutex>' (or there is no acceptable conversion) with [ Mutex=boost::shared_mutex ] include/boost-1_43\boost/thread/locks.hpp(659): could be 'boost::upgrade_lock<Mutex> &boost::upgrade_lock<Mutex>::operator =(boost::upgrade_lock<Mutex>&)' with [ Mutex=boost::shared_mutex ] include/boost-1_43\boost/thread/locks.hpp(710): or 'boost::upgrade_lock<Mutex> &boost::upgrade_lock<Mutex>::operator =(boost::detail::thread_move_t<T>)' with [ Mutex=boost::shared_mutex, T=boost::upgrade_lock<boost::shared_mutex> ] include/boost-1_43\boost/thread/locks.hpp(717): or 'boost::upgrade_lock<Mutex> &boost::upgrade_lock<Mutex>::operator =(boost::detail::thread_move_t<T>)' with [ Mutex=boost::shared_mutex, T=boost::unique_lock<boost::shared_mutex> ] while trying to match the argument list '(boost::upgrade_lock<Mutex>, boost::unique_lock<Mutex>)' with [ Mutex=boost::shared_mutex ] include/boost-1_43\boost/thread/locks.hpp(820) : while compiling class template member function 'boost::upgrade_to_unique_lock<Mutex>::~upgrade_to_unique_lock(void)' with [ Mutex=boost::shared_mutex ] upgrade_to_unique_lock_test.cpp(7) : see reference to class template instantiation 'boost::upgrade_to_unique_lock<Mutex>' being compiled with [ Mutex=boost::shared_mutex ] I've searched a bit for previous reports of this sort of thing and I haven't found any. Hopefully that means I'm just doing something wrong. -- Braden McDaniel <braden(a)endoframe.com>

7 15

selective enabling/disabling of BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE
by Suresh Kumar 16 Sep '10

16 Sep '10

Hi I have several tests in my unit test file each of them uniquely named using the function BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE. I may not need to run all of them always and as of now what I do is to comment out the tests which I dont want to run. Instead of commenting out code, is there any other way I can selectively enable or disable tests if i have created tests with BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE. thanks suresh -- R Suresh Kumar, http://www.ee.ucr.edu/~sramachandranna -- Dhyaana–moolam Guror murtih Puja-moolam Guroh padam Mantra – moolam Guror vakyam Moksha – moolam Guroh krpa.

2 1

[Parameter] abstract base class
by Noah Roberts 15 Sep '10

15 Sep '10

I have a design in which I must inherit from a class with a whole lot of construction parameters. I need to have a pure virtual function in the class that inherits from this thing and is then provided by subclasses. Since the classes in question must all accept this huge list of construction parameters I would like to use named parameters. Unfortunately there's a problem caused by the attempt to create a function pointer declaration that takes the base class by value. I don't really understand why this is going on. Instead of just calling the base's constructor directly, the BOOST_PARAMETER_CONSTRUCTOR macro creates a type resolution instantiation with this: boost::parameter::aux::unaryfunptr_arg_type< void(*)(B) >::type 'B' being the base class. This explodes if B is an abstract class. Both g++ 3.4.5 (mingw) and VS2010 hate this line. Before I go about attempting to devise a workaround, what is the purpose of this strange bit of code? Why not just use 'B' directly?? The type resolution metafunction simply returns the 'B' place argument as its type anyway... I note some weird workaround code for ancient versions of MSVC but they seem to be created to make this type resolution thing work, not because 'B' is not known or something. However, I figure the people who wrote this library are smarter and more knowlegeable than I so the fact that I see no need for this code is probably my problem and not a reflection of it being unnecessary. -- http://crazyeddiecpp.blogspot.com/

2 2

Read from serial devices on USB
by Alejandro Martínez 15 Sep '10

15 Sep '10

Hi, I'm trying to communicate with a usb serial device plugged to a USB port. I've seen some examples with boost::asio and connecting to ie: /dev/ttyUSB0 for linux, or COM1 for windows etc. But i need something more robust and multiplatform. Like listing all the available devices and choosing by looking at the vendor id, or device id or something like that. How can i do that? Can this same approach be used later for say... bluetooth serial devices? How? Thank you all in advance. Alejandro

3 6

M68K-Coldfire: Boost 1.44 seems to have a problem with low level locking
by Andreas Wehrmann 15 Sep '10

15 Sep '10

Hello, I recently upgraded boost on my embedded linux platform (m68k coldfire architecture) from version 1.41 (cmake release) to 1.44. Boost itself compiles flawlessly but when I tried to link my application (which makes use of the thread, regex, system libraries) it fails with (note the last line): squ_loopback_timer.o: In function `boost::asio::detail::wait_handler<boost::_bi::bind_t<void, boost::_mfi::mf1<void, rapp::squ_loopback_timer_t, boost::system::error_code const&>, boost::_bi::list2<boost::_bi::value<rapp::squ_loopback_timer_t*>, boost::arg<1> > > >::do_complete(boost::asio::detail::task_io_service*, boost::asio::detail::task_io_service_operation*, boost::system::error_code, unsigned int)': squ_loopback_timer.cpp:(.text._ZN5boost4asio6detail12wait_handlerINS_3_bi6bind_tIvNS_4_mfi3mf1IvN4rapp20squ_loopback_timer_tERKNS_6system10error_codeEEENS3_5list2INS3_5valueIPS8_EENS_3argILi1EEEEEEEE11do_completeEPNS1_15task_io_serviceEPNS1_25task_io_service_operationESA_j[boost::asio::detail::wait_handler<boost::_bi::bind_t<void, boost::_mfi::mf1<void, rapp::squ_loopback_timer_t, boost::system::error_code const&>, boost::_bi::list2<boost::_bi::value<rapp::squ_loopback_timer_t*>, boost::arg<1> > > >::do_complete(boost::asio::detail::task_io_service*, boost::asio::detail::task_io_service_operation*, boost::system::error_code, unsigned int)]+0x72): undefined reference to `__sync_lock_test_and_set_4' What changed about the locking mechanism? Btw. I'm also using boost version 1.38 in another project (but on the same platform). My compiler is g++ version 4.2.0 20070318 (prerelease) (Sourcery G++ Lite 4.2-35). Any hints or help is appreciated! Best regards -- Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Andreas Wehrmann Software Development -------------------------------------------------------------- Center Communication Systems GmbH A-1210 Wien, Ignaz-Köck-Straße 19 Sitz in Wien FN 796 88p, Firmenbuchgericht Wien www.centersystems.com Tel.: +43 (0) 190 199 - 3616 Mobile: +43 (0) 664 884 75916 Fax: +43 (0) 190 199 - 2110 E-Mail: a.wehrmann(a)centersystems.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

3 5

[asio] io_service::work and cpu load
by Daniele Barzotti 15 Sep '10

15 Sep '10

Hi, in my DLL I create an endless io_service::work object to assign to a serial_port. I noted that, when I load the application that uses this DLL my CPU load raise up to 50% only when the io_service is created. Any suggestions? regards, Daniele.

1 0

Building PBGL
by David Doria 15 Sep '10

15 Sep '10

I downloaded PBGL from here: http://osl.iu.edu/research/pbgl/ <http://osl.iu.edu/research/pbgl/>When running CMake, it said that it couldn't find boost_mpi. I read that I need to do ./bjam --with-mpi I did that and it seemed to be successful (though very very quick): -------------------- Component configuration: ... - mpi : building ... ...found 1 target... The Boost C++ Libraries were successfully built! -------------------- So my questions are: 1) Does PBGL not come with the normal boost package from sourceforge ( http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.44.0/)? 2) How can I tell if boost_mpi built properly? Thanks, David

2 1

Re: [Boost-users] Why doesn't boost::function use get_pointer() ?
by Peter Soetens 15 Sep '10

15 Sep '10

On Tuesday 14 September 2010 23:47:41 Steven Watanabe wrote: > AMDG > > Peter Soetens wrote: > > When using boost::bind, I can write this: > > > > struct X > > { > > void foo(int) {} > > }; > > > > shared_ptr<X> x( new X ); > > // bind takes shared_ptr: > > bind(&X::foo, x, 3)(); > > > > But I can't write this: > > > > function<void(X*,int)> foo = &X::foo; > > // function refuses shared_ptr: > > foo(x,1); > > > > Why doesn't boost::function have the same get_pointer() trick ? > > Overload resolution for calling a boost::function is exactly the > same as for calling a function with that signature. shared_ptr<X> > is not convertible to X*, so the call fails. So this is by design I presume. > > > Or how can I > > rewrite the function signature such that it does work with shared > > pointers ? > > function<void(const shared_ptr<X>&, int)> foo; Thank you. The problem was that I didn't know if the first argument was a regular pointer or a shared pointer (generic code!). I have also found another solution, that is, by 'always' writing the call like this: foo(get_pointer(x),1); Which will work for all cases of x, and the signature of foo can remain void(X*,int). Peter

1 0

[BGL] changes in graph => changes in filtered_graph?
by Adam Spargo 15 Sep '10

15 Sep '10

Hi, Just a simple question - if I have a filtered_graph fg, based on adjacency_list g, do changes to g automagically turn up in fg? Or do I need to make a new fg, once I have finished changing g? I know I could write a simple test to find out, which I am doing, but I'd be grateful if someone with more experience of BGL could let me know of any exceptions or potential pitfalls. Thanks in advance, Adam. -- Dr Adam Spargo High Performance Assembly Group email: aws(a)sanger.ac.uk Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute Tel: +44 (0)1223 834244 x7728 Hinxton, Cambridge CB10 1SA Fax: +44 (0)1223 494919 -- The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE.

3 2

[Filesystem] v3: preferred() vs. make_preferred()
by PB 15 Sep '10

15 Sep '10

Hello, I have built up a path in which the underlying string has a mixture of slashes and backslashes. I'm passing my_path.string().c_str() to a Windows API function which is getting confused because the string is being provided verbatim. I'm therefore looking to convert the string. According to the Filesystem tutorial (http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_44_0/libs/filesystem/v3/doc/tutorial.html) I can use the preferred() observer method to get the string that is suitable for the current (Windows) platform. This sounds like quite a nice design. However, it seems the preferred() method doesn't exist (i.e. the tutorial is wrong). There is a make_preferred() method which is non-const because it *changes the underlying representation* to the format preferred by the operating system. >From my application developer point of view, the preferred() observer is neater/better. I don't care and don't need to know what the underlying path format is. I have no desire to change it. All I am bothered about is that I can store it to a string (perhaps in an external file), and reconstruct the path from the same string. There are a few points in the application however where I need to present the path in a particular way, and it'd be nice to just throw a call to preferred() there. e.g. listBox_.AddString(my_path.preferred().c_str()); I've now got to do: bfs::path pref = my_path; pref.make_preferred(); listBox_.AddString(pref.string().c_str()); because the function that does the rendering of the string to the list box accepts the path as a const boost::filesystem::path& and therefore cannot change it. Wanted to point out the mismatch between the tutorial and the source code, and am wondering on the rationale behind make_preferred() over preferred()? Always possible I'm missing something! Thanks, Pete

2 1

boost::bind correct way
by Kraus Philipp 15 Sep '10

15 Sep '10

Hi, I'm using boost::bind for creating a thread group. My code shows this way: boost::thread_group l_threadgroup; for(std::size_t i=0; i < boost::thread::hardware_concurrency(); ++i) l_threadgroup .create_thread( boost::bind( &ncd<T>::multithread_deflate_symmetric, this, i ) ); The code runs within the class method "symmetric" and should be called from the self object the multithread_deflate_symmetric. My class "ncd" is a template class. I debug the code on a amd64 Gentoo Linux with valgrind 3.5 and get a "data race condition". Valgrind shows this message: ==6914== Possible data race during read of size 8 at 0x7fefff6d0 by thread #1 ==6914== at 0x4C2B138: ??? (in /usr/lib64/valgrind/ vgpreload_helgrind-amd64-linux.so) ==6914== by 0x6152B10: boost::thread::start_thread() (in /opt/ library/Boost/1.44/lib/libboost_thread.so.1.44.0) ==6914== by 0x414B50: boost::thread::thread<boost::_bi::bind_t<void, boost::_mfi::mf1<void, ncd<double>, unsigned long const&>, boost::_bi::list2<boost::_bi::value<ncd<double>*>, boost::_bi::value<unsigned long> > > >(boost::_bi::bind_t<void, boost::_mfi::mf1<void, ncd<double>, unsigned long const&>, boost::_bi::list2<boost::_bi::value<ncd<double>*>, boost::_bi::value<unsigned long> > >, boost::disable_if<boost::is_convertible<boost::_bi::bind_t<void, boost::_mfi::mf1<void, ncd<double>, unsigned long const&>, boost::_bi::list2<boost::_bi::value<ncd<double>*>, boost::_bi::value<unsigned long> > >&, boost::detail::thread_move_t<boost::_bi::bind_t<void, boost::_mfi::mf1<void, ncd<double>, unsigned long const&>, boost::_bi::list2<boost::_bi::value<ncd<double>*>, boost::_bi::value<unsigned long> > > > >, boost::thread::dummy*>::type) (in main) ==6914== by 0x419F4D: ncd<double>::symmetric(std::vector<std::string, std::allocator<std::string> > const&, bool const&) (in main) ==6914== by 0x40B10F: main (in main) ==6914== This conflicts with a previous write of size 8 by thread #2 ==6914== at 0x4C2B263: ??? (in /usr/lib64/valgrind/ vgpreload_helgrind-amd64-linux.so) Do I use boost::bind in the correct way? Thanks Phil

2 1

Property Tree problem with equal range.
by Andrew Maclean 14 Sep '10

14 Sep '10

I am using Boost 1.43 and last line in the following code causes this error: /usr/local/include/boost/property_tree/detail/ptree_implementation.hpp:471: error: ‘class boost::multi_index::detail::bidir_node_iterator<boost::multi_index::detail::ordered_index_node<boost::multi_index::detail::index_node_base<std::pair<const std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, boost::property_tree::basic_ptree<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::less<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > > >, std::allocator<std::pair<const std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, boost::property_tree::basic_ptree<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >, std::less<std::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > > > > > > > >’ has no member named ‘base’ Here is the code fragment. pt is the property tree. std::string key = "program.query"; std::size_t num = pt->count(key); std::cout << "Number = " << num << std::endl; typedef boost::property_tree::ptree::assoc_iterator assocIt; typedef std::pair< assocIt, assocIt > TRangeItPair; TRangeItPair er = pt->equal_range(key); The only fix I could see was here: http://lists.boost.org/boost-users/2010/02/55806.php But I cannot see how to apply it to the above code fragment. Any help is appreciated. Regards Andrew -- ___________________________________________ Andrew J. P. Maclean Centre for Autonomous Systems The Rose Street Building J04 The University of Sydney 2006 NSW AUSTRALIA Ph: +61 2 9351 3283 Fax: +61 2 9351 7474 URL: http://www.acfr.usyd.edu.au/ ___________________________________________

1 0

Why doesn't boost::function use get_pointer() ?
by Peter Soetens 14 Sep '10

14 Sep '10

When using boost::bind, I can write this: struct X { void foo(int) {} }; shared_ptr<X> x( new X ); // bind takes shared_ptr: bind(&X::foo, x, 3)(); But I can't write this: function<void(X*,int)> foo = &X::foo; // function refuses shared_ptr: foo(x,1); Why doesn't boost::function have the same get_pointer() trick ? Or how can I rewrite the function signature such that it does work with shared pointers ? Any chance it gets into C++0x ;-) ? Thanks, Peter

2 1

[Filesystem] query
by Sean Farrow 14 Sep '10

14 Sep '10

Hi: I have a path of the form: Drive\directory1\directory2, how would I go about retrieving the second directory only i.e in this example directory2? Is this the same code in filesystem 2 and 3? Regards Sean.

2 1

Building FileSystem Version 3 static libraries
by Bibbo, Joe 14 Sep '10

14 Sep '10

I have downloaded the boost v1.44 and would like to see if our usage of the FileSystem library is compatible with Version 3 of library. I am having trouble building the library. Using the command bjam toolset=msvc-9.0 variant=debug threading=multi link=static define=_BIND_TO_CURRENT_VCLIBS_VERSION define=BOOST_FILESYSTEM_VERSION=3 --with-filesystem I am seeing following error message " .. compile-c-c++ bin.v2\libs\system\build\msvc-9.0\debug\link-static\threading-multi\error_code.obj error_code.cpp msvc.archive bin.v2\libs\system\build\msvc-9.0\debug\link-static\threading-multi\libboost_system-vc90-mt-gd-1_44.lib common.copy stage\lib\libboost_system-vc90-mt-gd-1_44.lib bin.v2\libs\system\build\msvc-9.0\debug\link-static\threading-multi\libboost_system-vc90-mt-gd-1_44.lib 1 file(s) copied. compile-c-c++ bin.v2\libs\filesystem\build\msvc-9.0\debug\link-static\threading-multi\v2\src\v2_operations.obj v2_operations.cpp S:\sony4\boost\boost_1_44_0\boost/filesystem/v2/config.hpp(16) : fatal error C1189: #error : Compiling Filesystem version 2 file with BOOST_FILESYSTEM_VERSION defined != 2 call "G:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\vcvarsall.bat" x86 >nul cl /Zm800 -nologo @"bin.v2\libs\filesystem\build\msvc-9.0\debug\link-static\threading-multi\v2\src\v2_operations.obj.rsp" ...failed compile-c-c++ bin.v2\libs\filesystem\build\msvc-9.0\debug\link-static\threading-multi\v2\src\v2_operations.obj... compile-c-c++ bin.v2\libs\filesystem\build\msvc-9.0\debug\link-static\threading-multi\v2\src\v2_path.obj v2_path.cpp S:\sony4\boost\boost_1_44_0\boost/filesystem/v2/config.hpp(16) : fatal error C1189: #error : Compiling Filesystem version 2 file with BOOST_FILESYSTEM_VERSION defined != 2 call "G:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\vcvarsall.bat" x86 >nul cl /Zm800 -nologo @"bin.v2\libs\filesystem\build\msvc-9.0\debug\link-static\threading-multi\v2\src\v2_path.obj.rsp" ...failed compile-c-c++ bin.v2\libs\filesystem\build\msvc-9.0\debug\link-static\threading-multi\v2\src\v2_path.obj... compile-c-c++ bin.v2\libs\filesystem\build\msvc-9.0\debug\link-static\threading-multi\v2\src\v2_portability.obj v2_portability.cpp S:\sony4\boost\boost_1_44_0\boost/filesystem/v2/config.hpp(16) : fatal error C1189: #error : Compiling Filesystem version 2 file with BOOST_FILESYSTEM_VERSION defined != 2 call "G:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\vcvarsall.bat" x86 >nul cl /Zm800 -nologo @"bin.v2\libs\filesystem\build\msvc-9.0\debug\link-static\threading-multi\v2\src\v2_portability.obj.rsp" ... " Is there something else I need to configure to build this version of the library? Regards, Joe

4 4

[Unordered] size() != distance(begin(), end())
by Hossein Haeri 14 Sep '10

14 Sep '10

Dear all, I have an instance of boost::unordered_map<> somewhere in my codebase (GCC 4.5.1, MinGW, WinXP) with the following funny piece of test code: container_[id].insert(v); cout << "container insertion succesful" << endl; cout << "The container now contains " << container_.size() << " ids in it." << endl; cout << "distance from begin to end = " << distance(container_.begin(), container_.end()) << endl; Strangely enough, it happens sometimes that the output I get is: container insertion succesful The container now contains 2 ids in it. distance from begin to end = 1 I.e., size() != distance(begin(), end()) which is against the documentation: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_44_0/doc/html/boost/unordered_map.html#id13… Am I missing anything? Or, is this a bug in the implementation of boost::unordered_map<>? TIA, --Hossein

2 2

Is there still a way to explicitly compose functors ?
by Timothy Madden 14 Sep '10

14 Sep '10

Hello I just do not like the ugly syntax with using the _1 placeholder (or _2, or whatever) used in bind and lambda; is there still some other way to compose functors ? Like with compose ? Thank you, Timothy Madden

2 3

How to use %e for the format of time_input_facet?
by xiada74＠sina.com 14 Sep '10

14 Sep '10

Hello,   I tried the below code: #include <boost/date_time.hpp> #include <boost/date_time/posix_time/ptime.hpp> #include <iostream> using namespace boost::posix_time; int main() { std::string _format1 = "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S"; std::string _format2 = "%Y-%m-%e %H:%M:%S"; std::string teststring = "2010-09-10 10:01:01"; ptime time1, time2; time_input_facet facet1(_format1, 1); time_input_facet facet2(_format2, 1); std::stringstream ss1(teststring); std::stringstream ss2(teststring); ss1.imbue(std::locale(ss1.getloc(), &facet1)); ss1 >> time1; ss2.imbue(std::locale(ss2.getloc(), &facet2)); ss2 >> time2; std::cout << "Time1: " << time1 << std::endl; std::cout << "Time2: " << time2 << std::endl; return 0; } The output is: Time1: 2010-Sep-10 10:01:01 Time2: not-a-date-time   Howto fix the issue for the format using "%e"?   Thanks!

1 0

Boost & Pthreads
by ef 13 Sep '10

13 Sep '10

Hello, I want to build a bunch of different graphs at once,and it looks like the best way to do this is with pthreads. I need to be able to communicate information between the graphs (sadly in real time). Is Boost pthread friendly? I am just thinking of calling read_graphviz per thread, and when a vertex is waiting for data from another graph it just sits and waits. Communication should be easy and done by shared memory. I dont see any problems with this. I am just curious before I take this path that Boost is pthread friendly, or atleast in the way that I described? Thanks, EF

2 1

Re: [Boost-users] MSM & serialization
by Christophe Henry 13 Sep '10

13 Sep '10

>>> I'm planing to use the new MetaStateMachine library for a game. But i >>> want to create savegames with boost::serialization so i would need to >>> serialize the state machine. >>> There shouln't be too much to safe (the current state basically), but I >>> can't see how I can do this. >>> So, how can I do this? >> >> Hi, >> >> For the moment, unfortunately not at all, though it is something I >> want to do since a while and pretty high on my internal priority >> queue. >> How urgently do you need it? >> In the worst case, it would be easy to temporarily add a setter for >> the current state (we have a getter). >> >> Regards, >> Christophe > > Hi, > for the current project i just need 2 small state machines, so i can > hardcode them. But in the future it would really like to use MSM, at > thats impossible for me as long as i can't safe them. > So it's not very urgent, but if i could use it in 2 month, it would be > great. Hi, No, it won't be said so easily that MSM forces its users to hardcode state machines ;-) I just put something together and committed (without guarantee ;-) ) into the trunk. I also added into libs/msm/doc/HTML an example (Serialize.cpp) where you can serialize a state machine and even optionally states themselves (using a do_serialize typedef). It's not tested thoroughly in the little time I spent on it tonight and there are a few things I need to think about more but I hope it'll help you. Please keep me informed about your experience with this brand new feature ;-) Regards, Christophe

1 0

MSM & serialization
by Christophe Henry 13 Sep '10

13 Sep '10

> I'm planing to use the new MetaStateMachine library for a game. But i > want to create savegames with boost::serialization so i would need to > serialize the state machine. > There shouln't be too much to safe (the current state basically), but I > can't see how I can do this. > So, how can I do this? Hi, For the moment, unfortunately not at all, though it is something I want to do since a while and pretty high on my internal priority queue. How urgently do you need it? In the worst case, it would be easy to temporarily add a setter for the current state (we have a getter). Regards, Christophe

2 1

[Interprocess] Compile error when simply including managed_mapped_file.hpp in 1.44 using VC10
by Phil Ratzloff 13 Sep '10

13 Sep '10

Simply including managed_mapped_file.hpp in an empty project will generate an error in boost 1.44 using VC 2010. This doesn't occur in 1.43 and is a showstopper to me. Any ideas to work around this? I created a Console App using the New Project wizard. Here's the whole program: #include "stdafx.h" #include <boost/interprocess/managed_mapped_file.hpp> int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[]) { return 0; } The following output log is generated: 1>------ Build started: Project: boost144Err, Configuration: Debug Win32 ------ 1> boost144Err.cpp 1>c:\lib\boost_1_44_0\boost\interprocess\detail\move.hpp(342): error C2440: 'return' : cannot convert from 'boost::interprocess::mapped_region' to 'boost::interprocess::mapped_region &&' 1> You cannot bind an lvalue to an rvalue reference 1> c:\lib\boost_1_44_0\boost\interprocess\mapped_region.hpp(159) : see reference to function template instantiation 'boost::interprocess::mapped_region &&boost::interprocess::move<boost::interprocess::mapped_region&>(T)' being compiled 1> with 1> [ 1> T=boost::interprocess::mapped_region & 1> ] 1>c:\lib\boost_1_44_0\boost\interprocess\detail\move.hpp(342): error C2440: 'return' : cannot convert from 'boost::interprocess::detail::file_wrapper' to 'boost::interprocess::detail::file_wrapper &&' 1> You cannot bind an lvalue to an rvalue reference 1> c:\lib\boost_1_44_0\boost\interprocess\detail\file_wrapper.hpp(63) : see reference to function template instantiation 'boost::interprocess::detail::file_wrapper &&boost::interprocess::move<boost::interprocess::detail::file_wrapper&>(T)' being compiled 1> with 1> [ 1> T=boost::interprocess::detail::file_wrapper & 1> ] 1>c:\lib\boost_1_44_0\boost\interprocess\detail\move.hpp(342): error C2440: 'return' : cannot convert from 'boost::interprocess::file_mapping' to 'boost::interprocess::file_mapping &&' 1> You cannot bind an lvalue to an rvalue reference 1> c:\lib\boost_1_44_0\boost\interprocess\file_mapping.hpp(62) : see reference to function template instantiation 'boost::interprocess::file_mapping &&boost::interprocess::move<boost::interprocess::file_mapping&>(T)' being compiled 1> with 1> [ 1> T=boost::interprocess::file_mapping & 1> ] ========== Build: 0 succeeded, 1 failed, 0 up-to-date, 0 skipped ==========

2 2

[fusion] Non-default initialisation of sequence components.
by Hugh Dickinson 13 Sep '10

13 Sep '10

Hi Everyone, I'm wondering if there is a (built-in) way in boost::fusion to instantiate a sequence of heterogeneous elements while passing an identical set of arguments to the constructor of each element? It seems like the only options are to default construct the elements or to supply references to previously constructed elements. As a semi-concrete example, is there a way to achieve the equivalent of the following? template <int Label> struct TestType { TestType(int i, double d, string s):I(i), D(d), S(s){} int I; double D; string S; }; int main(int argc, char* argv[]){ typedef vector<int, double, string> ArgVector; typedef vector<Type<1>, Type<2>, Type<3> > TypeVector; ArgVector args(1, 2.5, "hello"); // Want to pass the elements of Args as constructor arguments to each element of vec. TypeVector vec(args); } Any help much appreciated, Hugh

2 1

[Unordered] No operator[] const?
by Hossein Haeri 13 Sep '10

13 Sep '10

Dear all, Is there any specific reason why there is no operator[] const for boost::unordered_map? Or, is that only an oversight? TIA, --Hossein

3 3

MSM & serialization
by Jonathan 13 Sep '10

13 Sep '10

I'm planing to use the new MetaStateMachine library for a game. But i want to create savegames with boost::serialization so i would need to serialize the state machine. There shouln't be too much to safe (the current state basically), but I can't see how I can do this. So, how can I do this? Greetings Jona

1 0

g++ compilation is slow with Boost's constructs
by Ilya Murav'jov 13 Sep '10

13 Sep '10

Hello, I've been using several Boost libraries since 1.33 and now I have a situation that it takes over 4 seconds to compile for some files <= 40Kb (not so big!), with gcc. I've upgraded my machine recently (AMD X3 425, 2700MHz, 2GB memory) and hoped that things would change but it is still somewhat a blocker to developing. So I began to investigate and found out each invocation of known Boost constructs has its non-zero cost. I chose a source file(*), commented out all and then incrementally uncommented functions from beginning, compiled and measured times. Here is my results (compile time, not run time!): - BOOST_FOREACH costs 0.1 sec - boost::function<> invocation costs 0.05 sec - boost::lambda::bind() with placeholders costs 0.1 sec - Boost.Range adaptor transformed() costs ~0.1 too As you can see, 10 boost::lambda::bind() slow down your compilation for whole 1 second! All that is measured against gcc 4.4, Ubuntu 9.10, with the most light options I picked up: "g++ -g -O0 -pipe" (I need -g for debugging anyway). Also I found out that gcc 4.2 is the quickest from 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4 version of gcc, and gcc 4.4 is the most slow one of them (~28% slower than gcc 4.2). :( Therefore, I have a few questions. 1) Are there more means/tricks for faster compilation with g++ I miss? (what a quickest gcc version?) 2) What compiler is known to be much more speedy for now, if any (icc, clang, msvc)? 3) Did someone try to investigate (and maybe fix) that gcc bottleneck(s)? Regards, Ilya Murav'jov (*) I did measures on a source file select.cpp from my project, Bombono DVD (http://gitorious.org/bombono-dvd/bombono-dvd/blobs/master/src/mgui/editor/s…)

6 17

how could I output the data of matrix(ublas) to txt file faster?
by Samurai Deeper 13 Sep '10

13 Sep '10

Example /***********begin**************/ void testMatrixRow() { matrix<double> m(1920, 1080); clock_t begin,end; begin = clock(); for(unsigned int i = 0; i < m.size1(); ++i) for(unsigned int j = 0; j < m.size2(); j++) { m.insert_element(i, j, i*3 + j); } end = clock(); cout<<"time of inserting data : "<<(double)(end-begin)/CLOCKS_PER_SEC<<" "<<endl; ofstream ob1("testing.txt",ios::out,ios::binary); begin = clock(); for (unsigned i = 0; i < m.size1 (); ++ i) { for(unsigned int j = 0; j < m.size2(); j++) ob1<<m(i, j); } end = clock(); cout<<"time of regular output : "<<(double)(end-begin)/CLOCKS_PER_SEC<<" "<<endl; begin = clock(); for (unsigned i = 0; i < m.size1 (); ++ i) { matrix_row<matrix<double> > mr(m, i); ob1.write((const char*)&mr(0), mr.size()); ob1<<endl; } end = clock(); cout<<"time of nonregular output : "<<(double)(end-begin)/CLOCKS_PER_SEC<<" "<<endl; ob1.close(); } /***********end**************/ As expected,ob1.write is much more faster than ob1<< But the results are not I want(ob1<< is) Do I have any way to solve this problem? Thanks a lot -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/how-could-I-output-the-data-of-matrix%28ublas%29-to-t… Sent from the Boost - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

1 0

follow to "[regex] Perl regex special characters"
by DBW 13 Sep '10

13 Sep '10

I found a thread from 2006-09-08 titled '[regex] Perl regex special characters' about whether ']' and '}' should be included in the documentation as characters that must be escaped. After spending quite some time today to discover that my '}' character did in fact need to be escaped, my opinion is that the documentation should be modified. Thanks, Brad

2 1

Re: [Boost-users] [Polygon] Test among 3 libraries
by Angus Johnson 13 Sep '10

13 Sep '10

Simonson, Lucanus J <http://search.gmane.org/?author=Simonson%2C+Lucanus+J&sort=date> wrote: "I've never seen a comparison with clipper before, I've never heard of clipper and would like to learn more. Can you provide a link or reference? I found a sourceforge site with minimal description of clipper, but it left me with a lot of unanswered questions." Hi Luke. I'm the author of Clipper and am happy to answer your questions as best I can, but perhaps I can preempt some of them with a little background about Clipper and myself. Firstly, I've only recently created the Clipper library (ie within the last 3-4 months) and that may explain why you haven't heard of it. I originally wrote it in Delphi Pascal, but I've translated it into C++ too, and has been released with a Boost license. I wrote Clipper because I wanted a polygon clipping library (in Delphi) that wasn't encumbered with restrictive licensing. I'm still refining the library and have several updates in the pipeline (including polyline-polygon and polybezier-polygon clipping). Clipper is based on the Vatti clipping algorithm which places no restrictions on the types of input (subject and clipping) polygons. However, Vatti's original paper completely omits any discussion of 1. how to handle what I call 'complex' intersections - intersections involving more than 2 edges; and 2. how to handle overlapping horizontal edges. My Clipper library extends the Vatti algorithm by addressing both these issues. Clipper also extends the Vatti algorithm by implementing the NonZero polygon filling rule for input polygons (as well as Vatti's EvenOdd filling). I'm aware of one limitation of my Clipper library: because it uses floating point math it isn't 'robust' in the strict sense. However, errors (which are extremely rare) are properly trapped and reported as a failed clipping operation. In my testing ( see http://www.angusj.com/delphi/clipper.php#features ), Clipper has a number of advantages over GPC, a well known clipping library that's also based on Vatti's algorithm. Clipper - 1. is significantly faster; 2. properly handles complex intersections; 3. accepts both EvenOdd and NonZero filling input polygons; 4. doesn't require payment for commercial use. The SourceForge site for Clipper is: http://sourceforge.net/projects/polyclipping/ About myself: I've been writing computer code for 30yrs as a hobby. (I was a medical practitioner before I retired 15 yrs ago due to illness.) For the last 15 years I've been using Delphi (Object Pascal) and until now have never used C++. The C++ translation of my Delphi Clipper library is the first code I've written in C++ and should explain any unorthodoxy in my C++ coding style. (I'm aware that the C++ code is currently about 15% slower that the Delphi code so I suspect I'm not making the most of this language.) I'm very happy to receive constructive feedback and hope I can answer any questions too. Angus

4 19

[Serialization] [Portable Binary]
by William Oquendo 12 Sep '10

12 Sep '10

Dear, In the documentation of boost::serialization, I read that there is still work needed to have a portable (32 and 64 bits) binary serialization implementation. The date of the TODO is 2008. Is still this a current TODO? is there a library implementing this? currently, It is not a matter of dead or live, but I would like to know. I have been trying to run a code in different (bits) systems, and I got the error "Incompatible native format - size of int" Best regards / Cordialmente, -- William Oquendo Phd Candidate Simulation Of Physical Systems Group Universidad Nacional de Colombia Linux User # 321481 ********************* Este correo puede carecer de tildes o eñes ya que el teclado no contiene estos caracteres. Presento excusas por eso. *********************

2 4

[thread] boost::thread automatically detached when thread terminates?
by Boris Schaeling 12 Sep '10

12 Sep '10

Is a boost::thread object automatically detached when a thread terminates? I read in the Boost.Thread 1.44 documentation: "If the thread of execution represented by the boost::thread object has already completed, or the boost::thread object represents Not-a-Thread, then join() returns immediately." Is it really required to call join() or timed_join()? Or can I also call joinable() which would return false then? Boris

6 12