- Boost-users - lists.preview.boost.org

[boost::concept_check] Question about possible feature
by Ovanes Markarian 02 Nov '06

02 Nov '06

Hi! Thanks for the great library. Currently I have to deal with constants as template parameters and I wonder, why there is no library to model constant concepts. Like: template<class T, size_t MAX_SIZE> struct Allocator { Allocator()throw(); }; template<class T, size_t MAX_SIZE> Allocator<T,MAX_SIZE>::Allocator()throw() { boost::function_requires<ConstGreaterThen<MAX_SIZE,O> >(); } I understand I could model it with BOOST_MPL_ASSERT etc. But would not it be better to unite all these features in one lib? With Kind Regards, Ovanes Markarian

2 2

Compiling with VC8 gives libraries and DLLs with vc71
by Javier Estrada 02 Nov '06

02 Nov '06

I'm running into a problem when compiling with VC8 regarding the library names that are produced. The names come out with an infix of 'vc71' (e.g., libboost_thread-vc71-mt-1_33_1.lib). I gathered that this infix comes from some of the macros that are defined, but have been unable to uncover why the name is not picked up correctly, given that the compiler version is correct. I'm quite sure I've followed the installation instructions correctly, open the right command prompt and the vcvars batch file, etc. Ultimately, the problem I'm experiencing is that when porting a VC71 project to VC8, the names of the libraries required have changed :-) Regards, Javier

2 1

Boost ROCKS !!!!!
by Nindi Singh 02 Nov '06

02 Nov '06

For the past few months I have been making more and more use of Boost, in fact I would say becoming more and more reliant on Boost, every so often introducing myslef to a new library. But discovering the MPL, well that was awsome. The first time I applied it was to implement a factory. I would NEVR have though of doing it this way WITHOUT the MPL. Any comments on my use ( or indeed abuse !) of Boost would be more than apprieciated. <Factory.h> #ifndef FACTORY_HEADER_GUARD #define FACTORY_HEADER_GUARD #include<string> #include<map> #include"Singleton.h" #include<boost/shared_ptr.hpp> #include<boost/mpl/size.hpp> #include<boost/mpl/list.hpp> #include<boost/mpl/at.hpp> //Constructors of different Hierachies take a different humber fo parameters , so we set up //some helper macros, for constructirs taking up to 10 parameters. More can be defined if required #define PARAM_0 #define PARAM_1 typename boost::mpl::at_c<typename BaseClass::Constructor_TypeList,0>::type P1 #define PARAM_2 PARAM_1 , typename boost::mpl::at_c<typename BaseClass::Constructor_TypeList,1>::type P2 #define PARAM_3 PARAM_2 , typename boost::mpl::at_c<typename BaseClass::Constructor_TypeList,2>::type P3 #define PARAM_4 PARAM_3 , typename boost::mpl::at_c<typename BaseClass::Constructor_TypeList,3>::type P4 #define PARAM_5 PARAM_4 , typename boost::mpl::at_c<typename BaseClass::Constructor_TypeList,4>::type P5 #define PARAM_6 PARAM_5 , typename boost::mpl::at_c<typename BaseClass::Constructor_TypeList,5>::type P6 #define PARAM_7 PARAM_6 , typename boost::mpl::at_c<typename BaseClass::Constructor_TypeList,6>::type P7 #define PARAM_8 PARAM_7 , typename boost::mpl::at_c<typename BaseClass::Constructor_TypeList,7>::type P8 #define PARAM_9 PARAM_8 , typename boost::mpl::at_c<typename BaseClass::Constructor_TypeList,8>::type P9 #define PARAM_10 PARAM_9 , typename boost::mpl::at_c<typename BaseClass::Constructor_TypeList,9>::type P10 #define Q0 #define Q1 P1 #define Q2 Q1, P2 #define Q3 Q2, P3 #define Q4 Q3, P4 #define Q5 Q4, P5 #define Q6 Q5, P6 #define Q7 Q6, P7 #define Q8 Q7, P8 #define Q9 Q8, P9 #define Q10 Q9, P10 // One Registration object per class in a hireachy, this is the template blue print for the base classes of // the registration objects template < class BaseClass, typename Key = std::string, unsigned long = boost::mpl::size<typename BaseClass::Constructor_TypeList>::value > struct RegistraBase {}; // This is the template blue print for the concrete classes of // the registration objects template < class BaseClass, class Derived, typename Key = std::string, unsigned long n = boost::mpl::size<typename BaseClass::Constructor_TypeList>::value > struct Registra :public RegistraBase<BaseClass,Key,n>{}; // This is the factory template blue print of the Factory class template < class BaseClass, typename Key = std::string , unsigned long n = boost::mpl::size<typename BaseClass::Constructor_TypeList>::value > class Factory {}; // This is the Factory 'concrete' class for Hireachies where the constrcutors tales no parameters template < class BaseClass, typename Key > class Factory<BaseClass,Key,0> { public: bool Register(const Key & theKey,RegistraBase<BaseClass,Key,0> *theRegistra){ return theInnerMap.insert(InnerMap::value_type(theKey,theRegistra)).second; } boost::shared_ptr<BaseClass> RetrieveObject(const Key &id )const { InnerMapIterator theIterator (theInnerMap.find(id)); if(theIterator==theInnerMap.end())return boost::shared_ptr<BaseClass>(static_cast<BaseClass *>(0)); return theIterator->second->RetrieveObject(Q0); } private: typedef typename std::map<Key,RegistraBase<BaseClass,Key,0> *> InnerMap; typedef typename std::map<Key,RegistraBase<BaseClass,Key,0> *>::const_iterator InnerMapIterator; std::map<Key,RegistraBase<BaseClass,Key,0> *> theInnerMap; }; // This is ta Macro definition Factory 'concrete' class for Hireachies where the constrcutors take // a non xero number of parameters #define FACTORY(NnN) \ template \ < \ class BaseClass, \ typename Key \ > \ class Factory<BaseClass,Key,NnN> { \ public: \ bool Register(const Key & theKey,RegistraBase<BaseClass,Key,NnN> *theRegistra){ \ return theInnerMap.insert(InnerMap::value_type(theKey,theRegistra)).second; \ } \ \ boost::shared_ptr<BaseClass> RetrieveObject(const Key &id,PARAM_##NnN )const { \ InnerMapIterator theIterator (theInnerMap.find(id)); \ if(theIterator==theInnerMap.end())return boost::shared_ptr<BaseClass>(static_cast<BaseClass *>(0)); \ return theIterator->second->RetrieveObject(Q##NnN ); \ } \ private: \ typedef typename std::map<Key,RegistraBase<BaseClass,Key,NnN> *> InnerMap; \ typedef typename std::map<Key,RegistraBase<BaseClass,Key,NnN> *>::const_iterator InnerMapIterator; \ std::map<Key,RegistraBase<BaseClass,Key,NnN> *> theInnerMap; \ }; FACTORY(1) FACTORY(2) FACTORY(3) FACTORY(4) FACTORY(5) FACTORY(6) FACTORY(7) FACTORY(8) FACTORY(9) FACTORY(10) // The macro defintions of the Registration Objects #define REGISTRA(NnN) \ template<class BaseClass,typename Key> struct RegistraBase<BaseClass,Key,NnN> { \ virtual boost::shared_ptr<BaseClass> RetrieveObject(PARAM_##NnN)const=0; \ }; \ template<class BaseClass,class Derived,typename Key> \ struct Registra<BaseClass,Derived,Key,NnN>:public RegistraBase<BaseClass,Key,NnN> { \ Registra(const Key & theKey){Singleton<Factory<BaseClass,Key,NnN> >::instance().Register(theKey,this);} \ boost::shared_ptr<BaseClass> RetrieveObject(PARAM_##NnN)const{return boost::shared_ptr<BaseClass>(new Derived(Q##NnN));} \ virtual ~Registra(){} \ }; REGISTRA(0) REGISTRA(1) REGISTRA(2) REGISTRA(3) REGISTRA(4) REGISTRA(5) REGISTRA(6) REGISTRA(7) REGISTRA(8) REGISTRA(9) REGISTRA(10) #endif ----------------------------- end of Factory.h <main.cpp> #include<vector> #include<iostream> #include"Factory.h" using namespace std; struct MyClassVoid { typedef boost::mpl::list<> Constructor_TypeList; MyClassVoid(){} virtual void f()const=0; virtual ~MyClassVoid(){}; }; struct MyClassVoidDerived :public MyClassVoid { MyClassVoidDerived(){} virtual void f()const{cout << " I am in MyClassVoidDerived \n";} virtual ~MyClassVoidDerived(){}; }; namespace { Registra<MyClassVoid,MyClassVoidDerived> theRegistraVoid(std::string("MyClassVoidDerived")); } struct MyClassDouble { typedef boost::mpl::list<double> Constructor_TypeList; MyClassDouble(double){} virtual void f(){cout << " I am in MyClassDouble \n";} virtual ~MyClassDouble(){}; }; struct MyClassDoubleDerived :public MyClassDouble { MyClassDoubleDerived(double x):MyClassDouble(x){} virtual void f(){cout << " I am in MyClassDoubleDerived \n";} virtual ~MyClassDoubleDerived(){}; }; namespace { Registra<MyClassDouble,MyClassDouble> theRegistra(std::string("MyClassDouble")); Registra<MyClassDouble,MyClassDoubleDerived> theRegistraD(std::string("MyClassDoubleDerived")); } struct MyClassMultiple { typedef boost::mpl::list<std::string,std::vector<double>,double,MyClassDoubleDerived > Constructor_TypeList; MyClassMultiple(std::string,std::vector<double>,double,MyClassDoubleDerived){} virtual void f(){cout << " I am in MyClassMultiple \n";} virtual ~MyClassMultiple(){}; }; namespace { Registra<MyClassMultiple,MyClassMultiple> theRegistraM(std::string("MyClassMultiple")); } int main() { boost::shared_ptr<MyClassVoid> thePtrVoid(Singleton<Factory<MyClassVoid> >::instance().RetrieveObject("MyClassVoidDerived")); thePtrVoid->f(); boost::shared_ptr<MyClassDouble> thePtrDoubleDerived(Singleton<Factory<MyClassDouble> >::instance().RetrieveObject("MyClassDoubleDerived",1.0)); thePtrDoubleDerived->f(); boost::shared_ptr<MyClassDouble> thePtrDouble(Singleton<Factory<MyClassDouble> >::instance().RetrieveObject("MyClassDouble",1.0)); thePtrDouble->f(); boost::shared_ptr<MyClassMultiple> thePtrM(Singleton<Factory<MyClassMultiple> >::instance().RetrieveObject("MyClassMultiple",std::string("String"),std::vector<double>(2),1.0,MyClassDoubleDerived(1.0))); thePtrM->f(); } Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

2 1

Re: [Boost-users] Thread pool
by Sohail Somani 02 Nov '06

02 Nov '06

Ooh, there is a bunch of stuff in here. Thanks! > -----Original Message----- > From: boost-users-bounces(a)lists.boost.org > [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of > Oliver.Kowalke(a)qimonda.com > Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 9:37 PM > To: boost-users(a)lists.boost.org > Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Thread pool > > Hello Sohail, > take a look at defer library in the vault (section 'Concurrent > Programming'). > Oliver

1 0

Failure to compile the Boost library on Win XP with MinGW
by Colin Smith 02 Nov '06

02 Nov '06

Hi, I'm running into some large frustrations with trying to compile the Boost library on WinXP using MinGW 3.4.2 (I would like to compile it so that I can use the project_options). I can't get the library to compile and I'm finding that the opaqueness of the error messages and the lack of troubleshooting documentation are very well effectively preventing me from making progress. Either this gets resolved quickly, or I'll have to drop Boost from my project and implement the functionality I need with other libraries or by hand. It seems that every compilation rule inexplicably fails when I run the jam script. I'm using the command "bjam -sTOOLS=mingw install". All the compiling rules fail and then the header files get copied. A sample of the failure messages are below. Unfortunately, the error messages do not give me any useful clues as to what is going wrong. I've also tried the command "bjam -sTOOLS=mingw stage" and received equally unimpressive results. Any help on this would be very much appreciated. -- Colin gcc-C++-action bin\boost\libs\date_time\build \boost_date_time.dll\mingw\debug\gr eg_month.obj g++: no input files "c:\MinGW\bin\g++" -c -Wall -ftemplate-depth-255 -DBOOST_ALL_DYN_LINK=1 -D USE_DATE_TIME_PRE_1_33_FACET_IO -g -O0 -fno-inline -mno-cygwin -I"bin\boost\lib s\date_time\build" -I "c:\MinGW\include\" -I "C:\boost_1_33_1" -o "bin\boost\lib s\date_time\build\boost_date_time.dll\mingw\debug\greg_month.obj" "C:\boost_1_33 _1\libs\date_time\build\../src/gregorian/greg_month.cpp" ...failed gcc-C++-action bin\boost\libs\date_time\build\boost_date_time.dll\ming w\debug\greg_month.obj... gcc-C++-action bin\boost\libs\date_time\build\boost_date_time.dll\mingw\debug\gr eg_weekday.obj g++: no input files "c:\MinGW\bin\g++" -c -Wall -ftemplate-depth-255 -DBOOST_ALL_DYN_LINK=1 -D USE_DATE_TIME_PRE_1_33_FACET_IO -g -O0 -fno-inline -mno-cygwin -I"bin\boost\lib s\date_time\build" -I "c:\MinGW\include\" -I "C:\boost_1_33_1" -o "bin\boost\lib s\date_time\build\boost_date_time.dll\mingw\debug\greg_weekday.obj" "C:\boost_1_ 33_1\libs\date_time\build\../src/gregorian/greg_weekday.cpp" ...failed gcc-C++-action bin\boost\libs\date_time\build\boost_date_time.dll\ming w\debug\greg_weekday.obj... gcc-C++-action bin\boost\libs\date_time\build\boost_date_time.dll\mingw\debug\da te_generators.obj g++: no input files "c:\MinGW\bin\g++" -c -Wall -ftemplate-depth-255 -DBOOST_ALL_DYN_LINK=1 -D USE_DATE_TIME_PRE_1_33_FACET_IO -g -O0 -fno-inline -mno-cygwin -I"bin\boost\lib s\date_time\build" -I "c:\MinGW\include\" -I "C:\boost_1_33_1" -o "bin\boost\lib s\date_time\build\boost_date_time.dll\mingw\debug\date_generators.obj" "C:\boost _1_33_1\libs\date_time\build\../src/gregorian/date_generators.cpp" ...failed gcc-C++-action bin\boost\libs\date_time\build\boost_date_time.dll\ming w\debug\date_generators.obj... ...skipped <@boost!libs!date_time!build\boost_date_time.dll\mingw\debug>boost_da te_time-mgw-d-1_33_1.dll for lack of <@boost!libs!date_time!build\boost_date_tim e.dll\mingw\debug >greg_month.obj... ...skipped <@boost!libs!date_time!build\boost_date_time.dll\mingw\debug>boost_da te_time-mgw-d-1_33_1.lib for lack of <@boost!libs!date_time!build\boost_date_tim e.dll\mingw\debug>greg_month.obj... ...skipped <@boost!lib>boost_date_time-mgw-d-1_33_1.dll for lack of <@boost!libs !date_time!build\boost_date_time.dll\mingw\debug>boost_date_time-mgw-d-1_33_1.dl l... ...skipped <@boost!lib>boost_date_time-mgw-d-1_33_1.lib for lack of <@boost!libs !date_time!build\boost_date_time.dll\mingw\debug>boost_date_time-mgw-d-1_33_1.li b... gcc-C++-action bin\boost\libs\date_time\build\boost_date_time.dll\mingw\debug\th reading-multi\greg_month.obj g++: no input files "c:\MinGW\bin\g++" -c -Wall -ftemplate-depth-255 -DBOOST_ALL_DYN_LINK=1 -D USE_DATE_TIME_PRE_1_33_FACET_IO -g -O0 -fno-inline -mthreads -mno-cygwin -I"bin \boost\libs\date_time\build" -I "c:\MinGW\include\" -I "C:\boost_1_33_1" -o "bin \boost\libs\date_time\build\boost_date_time.dll\mingw\debug\threading-multi\greg _month.obj" "C:\boost_1_33_1\libs\date_time\build\../src/gregorian/greg_month.cp p" ...failed gcc-C++-action bin\boost\libs\date_time\build\boost_date_time.dll\ming w\debug\threading-multi\greg_month.obj... gcc-C++-action bin\boost\libs\date_time\build\boost_date_time.dll\mingw\debug\th reading-multi\greg_weekday.obj g++: no input files "c:\MinGW\bin\g++" -c -Wall -ftemplate-depth-255 -DBOOST_ALL_DYN_LINK=1 -D USE_DATE_TIME_PRE_1_33_FACET_IO -g -O0 -fno-inline -mthreads -mno-cygwin -I"bin \boost\libs\date_time\build" -I "c:\MinGW\include\" -I "C:\boost_1_33_1" -o "bin \boost\libs\date_time\build\boost_date_time.dll\mingw\debug\threading-multi\greg _weekday.obj" "C:\boost_1_33_1\libs\date_time\build\../src/gregorian/greg_weekda y.cpp" ...failed gcc-C++-action bin\boost\libs\date_time\build\boost_date_time.dll\ming w\debug\threading-multi\greg_weekday.obj... gcc-C++-action bin\boost\libs\date_time\build\boost_date_time.dll\mingw\debug\th reading-multi\date_generators.obj g++: no input files -- ********************************* Colin Smith smithco(a)gmail.com *********************************

1 0

[filesystem] unable to parse file path
by Küppers, Ben 02 Nov '06

02 Nov '06

Greetings, I posted this topic on the boost mailing list but believe this is a better place to discuss it. I am trying to write some cross-platform code that processes a Windows provided file path. The file path is of the form .\filename.ext (i.e. Windows style relative to current directory). Using the construct boost::filesystem::path path( ".\\filename.ext", boost::filesystem::native ) I have been able to successfully parse this path on Windows. However, I can't seem to find a construct that yields similar results on Linux. I have tried using default and explicit name checkers which result in either a filesystem_error exception or the obscurely named hidden file .\filename.ext. The library contains the logic to do this right otherwise the Windows version wouldn't work either. However, it seems the necessary code is excluded from compilation for systems other than Windows. I am trying to understand why this decision is made at compile time and is not accessible at runtime. Ideally, I would like to be able to tell the path class to use Windows path parsing (regardless of the platform the app is running on). Something in the style of: boost::filesystem::path path( ".\\filename.ext", boost::filesystem::windows ) There is a windows_name checker but it doesn't support the ".". Neither would the library be able to parse the path because of the compile-time exclusion mentioned above. At the moment, I don't see any other option than to process the path string manually before passing it to the path constructor (kind-a defeats the whole purpose of using this class). Anybody have any ideas? Also, am I really trying to do something that exotic or is this library missing some essential functionality? Ben This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] Boost ROCKS !!!!!
by Sohail Somani 02 Nov '06

02 Nov '06

> -----Original Message----- > From: boost-users-bounces(a)lists.boost.org > [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Nindi Singh > Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006 5:06 PM Dude, please stop posting html email :)

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] Boost ROCKS !!!!!
by Nindi Singh 02 Nov '06

02 Nov '06

OK did it . <Phactory.h> #ifndef PHACTORY_HEADER_GUARD #define PHACTORY_HEADER_GUARD #include<string> #include<map> #include<cassert> #include<boost/shared_ptr.hpp> #include<boost/variant.hpp> #include<boost/utility.hpp> #include<boost/static_assert.hpp> #include<boost/mpl/size.hpp> #include<boost/mpl/list.hpp> #include<boost/mpl/at.hpp> template<unsigned long i> struct unsigned_long {enum {value=i};}; template<class BaseClass> struct PhRegistraBase { typedef typename boost::make_variant_over<typename BaseClass::variant_type_list::type>::type variant; typedef std::map<std::string,variant> ParameterMap; virtual boost::shared_ptr<BaseClass> RetrieveObject(const std::string &theKey,const ParameterMap& theMap )const=0; }; template<class BaseClass> class Phactory { public: typedef typename boost::make_variant_over<typename BaseClass::variant_type_list::type>::type variant; typedef std::map<std::string,variant> ParameterMap; bool Register(const std::string &theKey, const PhRegistraBase<BaseClass>* theRegistra){ return theInnerMap.insert(InnerMap::value_type(theKey,theRegistra)).second; } boost::shared_ptr<BaseClass> RetrieveObject(const std::string &id, const ParameterMap & theMap)const { InnerMapIterator theIterator (theInnerMap.find(id)); if(theIterator==theInnerMap.end())return boost::shared_ptr<BaseClass>(static_cast<BaseClass *>(0)); return theIterator->second->RetrieveObject(id,theMap); } private: typedef typename std::map<std::string,const PhRegistraBase<BaseClass> *> InnerMap; typedef typename std::map<std::string,const PhRegistraBase<BaseClass> *>::const_iterator InnerMapIterator; std::map<std::string,const PhRegistraBase<BaseClass> *> theInnerMap; }; #define CPARAM_1 boost::get<const boost::mpl::at_c<signature,0>::type &>(theMap.find(theVarNames[0])->second) #define CPARAM_2 CPARAM_1, boost::get<const boost::mpl::at_c<signature,1>::type &>(theMap.find(theVarNames[1])->second) #define CPARAM_3 CPARAM_2, boost::get<const boost::mpl::at_c<signature,2>::type &>(theMap.find(theVarNames[2])->second) #define CPARAM_4 CPARAM_3, boost::get<const boost::mpl::at_c<signature,3>::type &>(theMap.find(theVarNames[3])->second) #define CPARAM_5 CPARAM_4, boost::get<const boost::mpl::at_c<signature,4>::type &>(theMap.find(theVarNames[4])->second) #define CPARAM_6 CPARAM_5, boost::get<const boost::mpl::at_c<signature,5>::type &>(theMap.find(theVarNames[5])->second) #define CPARAM_7 CPARAM_6, boost::get<const boost::mpl::at_c<signature,6>::type &>(theMap.find(theVarNames[6])->second) #define CPARAM_8 CPARAM_7, boost::get<const boost::mpl::at_c<signature,7>::type &>(theMap.find(theVarNames[7])->second) #define CPARAM_9 CPARAM_8, boost::get<const boost::mpl::at_c<signature,8>::type &>(theMap.find(theVarNames[8])->second) #define CPARAM_10 CPARAM_9, boost::get<const boost::mpl::at_c<signature,9>::type &>(theMap.find(theVarNames[9])->second) #define INNER_RETRIVE_OBJECT(Nb) \ template<> boost::shared_ptr<BaseClass> InnerRetrieveObject< Nb >(const std::string &theKey,const ParameterMap& theMap)const{ \ CheckMap(theMap); \ return boost::shared_ptr<BaseClass>(new DerivedClass( CPARAM_##Nb ) \ ); \ } template < class BaseClass, class DerivedClass > class PhRegistra:public PhRegistraBase<BaseClass>{ public: typedef typename DerivedClass::constructor_signature_typelist signature; typedef typename boost::make_variant_over<typename BaseClass::variant_type_list::type>::type variant; typedef std::map<std::string,variant> ParameterMap; enum {ssize = boost::mpl::size<signature>::value}; template<unsigned long i> PhRegistra(const std::string &theKey, const char *theVariableNames[],const unsigned_long<i> *p=0) { BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(i==ssize); // Must have ONE variable name for each paramter of the constructor for(unsigned long i(0);i<ssize;++i) theVarNames[i]=std::string(theVariableNames[i]); Singleton<Phactory<BaseClass> >::instance().Register(theKey,this); } boost::shared_ptr<BaseClass> RetrieveObject(const std::string &theKey,const ParameterMap& theMap)const{ return InnerRetrieveObject<ssize>(theKey,theMap); } template<int i> boost::shared_ptr<BaseClass> InnerRetrieveObject(const std::string &theKey,const ParameterMap&)const; INNER_RETRIVE_OBJECT(1) INNER_RETRIVE_OBJECT(2) INNER_RETRIVE_OBJECT(3) INNER_RETRIVE_OBJECT(4) INNER_RETRIVE_OBJECT(5) INNER_RETRIVE_OBJECT(6) INNER_RETRIVE_OBJECT(7) INNER_RETRIVE_OBJECT(8) INNER_RETRIVE_OBJECT(9) INNER_RETRIVE_OBJECT(10) private: void CheckMap(const ParameterMap& theMap)const { assert(theMap.size()==ssize); for(unsigned long i(0);i<ssize;++i)assert(theMap.find(theVarNames[i])!=theMap.end()); } std::string theVarNames[ssize]; }; #define PARAM_NAMES(n) n , static_cast<unsigned_long<sizeof(n)/sizeof(char*)> *>(0) #endif ----------------- end of Phactory.h <main,cpp> #include<vector> #include<iostream> #include"Phactory.h" using namespace std; template<class Object> //Quick liitle singletone just to demonstrate class Singleton { public: static Object & instance(){static Object theObject;return theObject;} virtual ~Singleton(){} private: Singleton(); Singleton(const Singleton<Object> & illegal); Singleton<Object> & operator=(const Singleton<Object> & illegal){return *this;} }; struct Dummy{}; struct Base { typedef boost::mpl::list<double,int,unsigned long,std::string,std::vector<double>,float,Dummy> variant_type_list; Base(){} virtual void f()const=0; virtual ~Base(){}; }; struct Derived :public Base { typedef boost::mpl::list<double,int,std::string,std::vector<double> > constructor_signature_typelist; Derived(double x_,int n_,const std::string &s_,const std::vector<double>&v_): x(x_),n(n_),s(s_),v(v_){} virtual void f()const{ cout << "My Double is " << x << "\n" << "My int is " << n << "\n" << "My String is " << s << "\n" << "My Vector Size is " << v.size() << "\n"; } private: double x; int n; std::string s; std::vector<double> v; }; namespace { const char * theVarNames[]={"Double","Int","String","Vector"}; PhRegistra<Base,Derived> thePhRegistra(std::string("DerivedObject"),PARAM_NAMES(theVarNames)); } int main() { std::map<std::string,typename boost::make_variant_over<typename Base::variant_type_list::type>::type> theMap; theMap["Double"]=1.0; theMap["Int"]=1; theMap["String"]="hello"; theMap["Vector"]=std::vector<double>(10); boost::shared_ptr<Base> thePtrSM(Singleton<Phactory<Base> >::instance().RetrieveObject("DerivedObject",theMap)); thePtrSM->f(); } ----- Original Message ---- From: Nindi Singh <nindi73(a)yahoo.co.uk> To: boost-users(a)lists.boost.org Sent: Wednesday, 1 November, 2006 8:59:31 PM Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Boost ROCKS !!!!! Cool ! Actualy I am now working another factory implementation. In the new implementation, the Base Class will hold a typedef for a Boost Variant, and then the derived objects can be instantiated by the factory by being given a std::map of the variants and stripping out the values to make a call to the constructor of the derived class. The ONLY intrusion on the classes would be a typelist in the Base class to type the appropriate Boost::Variant and a typelist in the derived class identifing the signature of the constructor to be called by the factory, similar to the factory i have posted previously. The MPL really is VERY cool, and I think I have JUST touched the surface !!!. In fact I put my order in for 'C++ Template Metaprogramming: Concepts, Tools, and Techniques from Boost and Beyond' at Amazon this afternoon !!!! ----- Original Message ---- From: Sohail Somani <s.somani(a)fincad.com> To: boost-users(a)lists.boost.org Sent: Wednesday, 1 November, 2006 8:46:28 PM Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Boost ROCKS !!!!! > -----Original Message----- > From: boost-users-bounces(a)lists.boost.org > [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Nindi Singh > > For the past few months I have been making more and more use > of Boost, in fact I would say becoming more and more reliant > on Boost, every so often introducing myslef to a new library. > But discovering the MPL, well that was awsome. The first time > I applied it was to implement a factory. I would NEVR have > though of doing it this way WITHOUT the MPL. Any comments on > my use ( or indeed abuse !) of Boost would be more than apprieciated. [snip code] Actually, I've been thinking of doing something similar and I am also interested in what people say! PS: Boost does rock _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users(a)lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users All new Yahoo! Mail "The new Interface is stunning in its simplicity and ease of use." - PC Magazine _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users(a)lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] Boost ROCKS !!!!!
by Nindi Singh 01 Nov '06

01 Nov '06

Cool ! Actualy I am now working another factory implementation. In the new implementation, the Base Class will hold a typedef for a Boost Variant, and then the derived objects can be instantiated by the factory by being given a std::map of the variants and stripping out the values to make a call to the constructor of the derived class. The ONLY intrusion on the classes would be a typelist in the Base class to type the appropriate Boost::Variant and a typelist in the derived class identifing the signature of the constructor to be called by the factory, similar to the factory i have posted previously. The MPL really is VERY cool, and I think I have JUST touched the surface !!!. In fact I put my order in for 'C++ Template Metaprogramming: Concepts, Tools, and Techniques from Boost and Beyond' at Amazon this afternoon !!!! ----- Original Message ---- From: Sohail Somani <s.somani(a)fincad.com> To: boost-users(a)lists.boost.org Sent: Wednesday, 1 November, 2006 8:46:28 PM Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Boost ROCKS !!!!! > -----Original Message----- > From: boost-users-bounces(a)lists.boost.org > [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Nindi Singh > > For the past few months I have been making more and more use > of Boost, in fact I would say becoming more and more reliant > on Boost, every so often introducing myslef to a new library. > But discovering the MPL, well that was awsome. The first time > I applied it was to implement a factory. I would NEVR have > though of doing it this way WITHOUT the MPL. Any comments on > my use ( or indeed abuse !) of Boost would be more than apprieciated. [snip code] Actually, I've been thinking of doing something similar and I am also interested in what people say! PS: Boost does rock _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users(a)lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users ___________________________________________________________ The all-new Yahoo! Mail goes wherever you go - free your email address from your Internet provider. http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] Boost ROCKS !!!!!
by Sohail Somani 01 Nov '06

01 Nov '06

> -----Original Message----- > From: boost-users-bounces(a)lists.boost.org > [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Nindi Singh > > For the past few months I have been making more and more use > of Boost, in fact I would say becoming more and more reliant > on Boost, every so often introducing myslef to a new library. > But discovering the MPL, well that was awsome. The first time > I applied it was to implement a factory. I would NEVR have > though of doing it this way WITHOUT the MPL. Any comments on > my use ( or indeed abuse !) of Boost would be more than apprieciated. [snip code] Actually, I've been thinking of doing something similar and I am also interested in what people say! PS: Boost does rock

1 0

Lambda probs
by Noah Roberts 01 Nov '06

01 Nov '06

My statement: T::iterator it = std::find_if(container.begin(), container.end(), l::bind(&typename T::value_type::GetName, l::_1) != l::constant(0) && !l::bind(stricmp, l::bind(&typename T::value_type::GetName, l::_1), l::var(name))); GetName() returns a char*. I get errors about there being no != or ! for const boost::lambda::lambda_functor<T> I also tried == 0 and == constant(0) for the second part. More detailed error follows: 1>c:\documents and settings\nroberts\my documents\visual studio 2005\projects\pipeflo refactor\code\clist_util.h(60) : error C2678: binary '!=' : no operator found which takes a left-hand operand of type 'const boost::lambda::lambda_functor<T>' (or there is no acceptable conversion) 1> with 1> [ 1> T=boost::lambda::lambda_functor_base<boost::lambda::action<2,boost::lambda::function_action<2>>,boost::tuples::tuple<char *(__thiscall NamedObject::* const )(void),const boost::lambda::lambda_functor<boost::lambda::placeholder<1>>,boost::lambda::detail::bind_traits<boost::tuples::null_type>::type,boost::lambda::detail::bind_traits<boost::tuples::null_type>::type,boost::lambda::detail::bind_traits<boost::tuples::null_type>::type,boost::lambda::detail::bind_traits<boost::tuples::null_type>::type,boost::lambda::detail::bind_traits<boost::tuples::null_type>::type,boost::lambda::detail::bind_traits<boost::tuples::null_type>::type,boost::lambda::detail::bind_traits<boost::tuples::null_type>::type,boost::lambda::detail::bind_traits<boost::tuples::null_type>::type>> 1> ] 1> c:\program files\microsoft visual studio 8\vc\platformsdk\include\guiddef.h(197): could be 'int operator !=(const GUID &,const GUID &)' 1> while trying to match the argument list '(const boost::lambda::lambda_functor<T>, boost::lambda::lambda_functor<T>)' 1> with 1> [ 1> T=boost::lambda::lambda_functor_base<boost::lambda::action<2,boost::lambda::function_action<2>>,boost::tuples::tuple<char *(__thiscall NamedObject::* const )(void),const boost::lambda::lambda_functor<boost::lambda::placeholder<1>>,boost::lambda::detail::bind_traits<boost::tuples::null_type>::type,boost::lambda::detail::bind_traits<boost::tuples::null_type>::type,boost::lambda::detail::bind_traits<boost::tuples::null_type>::type,boost::lambda::detail::bind_traits<boost::tuples::null_type>::type,boost::lambda::detail::bind_traits<boost::tuples::null_type>::type,boost::lambda::detail::bind_traits<boost::tuples::null_type>::type,boost::lambda::detail::bind_traits<boost::tuples::null_type>::type,boost::lambda::detail::bind_traits<boost::tuples::null_type>::type>> 1> ] 1> and 1> [ 1> T=boost::lambda::identity<const int> 1> ] 1> c:\documents and settings\nroberts\my documents\visual studio 2005\projects\pipeflo refactor\code\clist.h(358) : see reference to function template instantiation 'bool NameInUse<CList_tmpl<VALUE_TYPE>>(T &,const char *,DLinkObject *,HWND)' being compiled 1> with 1> [ 1> VALUE_TYPE=DLinkObject, 1> T=CList_tmpl<DLinkObject> 1> ] 1> c:\documents and settings\nroberts\my documents\visual studio 2005\projects\pipeflo refactor\code\clist.h(357) : while compiling class template member function 'bool CList_tmpl<VALUE_TYPE>::NameInUse(char *,VALUE_TYPE *,HWND)' 1> with 1> [ 1> VALUE_TYPE=DLinkObject 1> ] 1> c:\documents and settings\nroberts\my documents\visual studio 2005\projects\pipeflo refactor\code\lineupchangeable.h(13) : see reference to class template instantiation 'CList_tmpl<VALUE_TYPE>' being compiled 1> with 1> [ 1> VALUE_TYPE=DLinkObject 1> ]

1 0

microsec_clock not recognized in VC8
by Cheng, Victor S 01 Nov '06

01 Nov '06

> I'm using 1.33.1 date_time library, but ran into a problem with > microsec_clock. It's not recognized in VC8: > > error C2653: 'microsec_clock' : is not a class or namespace name > > If I change it to second_clock, then it's fine. Is this a known > problem for VC8? > ---- Here is my test code -------- #include "boost/date_time/posix_time/posix_time.hpp" #include <iostream> int main() { using namespace boost::posix_time; using namespace boost::gregorian; ptime now = microsec_clock::local_time(); //second_clock::local_time(); ... } ----- Here is how I built the library ---- "C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 8"\vc\bin\vcvars32.bat c: cd \dev\boost_1_33_1 bjam -sTOOLS=vc-8_0 --prefix=C:\Dev\Boost --without-python --builddir=build install ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. This communication is for information purposes only and should not be regarded as an offer to sell or as a solicitation of an offer to buy any financial product, an official confirmation of any transaction, or as an official statement of Lehman Brothers. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. All information is subject to change without notice. -------- IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: Please be advised that any discussion of U.S. tax matters contained within this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used and cannot be used for the purpose of (i) avoiding U.S. tax related penalties or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

2 1

Re: [Boost-users] [boost.serialization] serialization crash
by RIVASSEAU Jean Noel 01 Nov '06

01 Nov '06

I've had the same problems. The problem is with the bool field. Code restoring the archive crashes if the bool stored in the archive is not equal to 0 or 1. But since you did not write a constructor in the Obj class, the boolean will actually be initialized with anything( eg, read 14675002 for example), and will be serialized that way in the archive since it seems the serialization code does not check if the bool is equal to 0 or 1 (only the restoration code). So, the solution is to initialize your boolean correctly and be very careful whenever you use booleans. However, I think the Serialization code should be fixed (remove the check for 0 or 1, it probably does more bad than good. Jean-Noël ________________________________ De : boost-users-bounces(a)lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] De la part de Pavlo Korzhyk Envoyé : jeudi 26 octobre 2006 16:09 À : boost-users(a)lists.boost.org Objet : [Boost-users] [boost.serialization] serialization crash The following code crashes under cygwin+boost1.33 and under mingw+boost1.33 I create text archive in a file, and then serialization crashes when restoring object from that archive. The problem seem to be with bool field, if I replace bool x; with int x; in the class Obj implementation, everything runs fine. Is this a bug in serialization code? #include <iostream> #include <sstream> #include <fstream> #include <vector> #include <map> using namespace std; #include <boost/archive/text_oarchive.hpp> #include <boost/archive/text_iarchive.hpp> #include <boost/serialization/vector.hpp> #include <boost/serialization/map.hpp> using namespace boost; using namespace boost::serialization; class Obj { friend class boost::serialization::access; template<class Archive> void serialize(Archive & ar, const unsigned int version) { ar & x; } public: bool x; }; class Item; class Cheq : public Obj{ friend class boost::serialization::access; template<class Archive> void serialize(Archive & ar, const unsigned int version) { ar & boost::serialization::base_object<Obj>(*this); ar & v; ar & id; } public: vector<Item> v; int id; Cheq(){} }; class Item{ friend class boost::serialization::access; template<class Archive> void serialize(Archive & ar, const unsigned int version) { ar & a; ar & s; } public: int a; string s; }; class Row{ friend class boost::serialization::access; template<class Archive> void serialize(Archive & ar, const unsigned int version) { ar & m1; ar & m2; } public: map<string,string> m1,m2; }; class Data{ friend class boost::serialization::access; template<class Archive> void serialize(Archive & ar, const unsigned int version) { ar & a; ar & m; ar & cheque; } public: int a; map<string,string> m; map<int,Cheq> cheque; }; BOOST_CLASS_TRACKING(Data, boost::serialization::track_never) #include "boost/serialization/export.hpp" BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT(Data); BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT(Cheq); BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT(Item); int main(int argc, char** argv) { Data d; d.cheque[0]=Cheq(); //if(argc>1 && argv[1][0]=='1') { ofstream os("datfile"); boost::archive::text_oarchive oar(os); oar << d; } //if(argc>1 && argv[1][0]=='2') { ifstream is("datfile"); boost::archive::text_iarchive iar(is); iar >> d; } cout << "without crash\n"; return 0; } -- WBR, Pavlo Korzhyk ICQ#155870780

4 5

boost filesystem
by Aubrey, Jason 01 Nov '06

01 Nov '06

Hi, When I run the following program it runs successfully but throws an exception during shutdown. I don't know why, but it seems that the call to boost::filesystem::file_size() is corrupting memory somehow. This example only shows the call to file_size() but I think I've seen similar trouble with other calls within boost::filesystem. Am I doing something wrong here or is this a bug? Regards, Jason Aubrey ---------------------- Environment: OS: Win2k Compiler: VS7.1 Boost: v1.33.1 ---------------------- #include <boost/filesystem/operations.hpp> #include <fstream> int main(int, char**) { // Create a file using namespace std; const string fileName("/temp/test.txt"); ofstream file; file.open(fileName.c_str()); const string message("this is a test"); file << message; file.close(); const boost::intmax_t fileSize = boost::filesystem::file_size(fileName); if( fileSize != message.size() ) throw std::exception("Bad result"); return 0; } ---------------------- The following pop-up occurs during program completion: Window Title="Microsoft Visual C++ Debug Library" Window Icon=Critical Error Window Text=" Debug Assertion Failed! Program: .... File: dbgdel.cpp Line: 52 Expression: _BLOCK_TYPE_IS_VALID(pHead->nBlockUse) For information on how your program can cause an assertion failure, see the Visual C++ documentation on asserts. (Press Retry to debug the application)" Buttons=[Abort] [Retry] [Ignore]

3 4

Error when build boost using GCC on AIX, "stdint.h not exist"
by kongko kongko 01 Nov '06

01 Nov '06

Hi,I want to install boost 1.33.1 on PowerPC AIX 5.1,my complier is GCC 4.0.1. This error occure: "/boost_1_33_1/boost/cstdint.hpp:42:23: error: stdint.h: A file or directory in the path name does not exist." I have can't find stdint.h in my system,Does anybody has the same problem?How can i solve it ? Thanks a lot. _________________________________________________________________ 免费下载 MSN Explorer: http://explorer.msn.com/lccn/

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] [Boost.Parameter] How to Use Named Parameters in a Class Hierarchy?
by james.jones＠firstinvestors.com 01 Nov '06

01 Nov '06

From: "Wu Yinghui, Freddie" <yhwu(a)volumeinteractions.com> > To use the class hierarchy, my program loads the DLL requested by user > using LoadLibrary() (We're using Windows, but it should be similar to > Linux, I suppose), and makes use of the Derived1/Derived2 classes via a > pointer to the Base class. > > Since I have no information about the derived classes when building my > main executable (only Base class is known then), I cannot make direct > use of Derived1/Derived2 types in my main program. -- Yet, I need a way > to provide some arbitrary set of arguments to the derived classes. > > Hope my explanation clears your doubts. Do you have any suggestion or > alternative design in mind? Try a single boost::any parameter. Then pass structures as needed. This is essentially equivalent to the void* method everyone used in the bad old pre-Boost days, but it's type-safe. - James Jones Administrative Data Mgmt. Webmaster 375 Raritan Center Pkwy, Suite A Data Architect Edison, NJ 08837

1 0

boost/format/alt_sstream_impl.hpp fails on Solaris
by Martin Lester 31 Oct '06

31 Oct '06

boost/format/alt_sstream_impl.hpp fails to compile on Solaris with Sun Studio 11 compiler (I think). The error complains about being unable to assign a void* to a char* on line 248. I believe an explicit cast fixes this. Martin. (Apologies for diff filenames.) ---- --- alt_sstream_impl.hpp?revision=1.9 2006-10-31 22:55:23.000000000 +0000 +++ alt_sstream_impl.hpp 2006-10-31 22:55:58.000000000 +0000 @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ add_size /= 2; if(0 < add_size) { new_size += add_size; - newptr = alloc_.allocate(new_size, is_allocated_? oldptr : 0); + newptr = (Ch *) alloc_.allocate(new_size, is_allocated_? oldptr : 0); } if(0 < prev_size) ___________________________________________________________ Copy addresses and emails from any email account to Yahoo! Mail - quick, easy and free. http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/trueswitch2.html

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] boost filesystem
by Lawrence Spector 31 Oct '06

31 Oct '06

I'm running on WinXP with VS7.1 and Boost v1.33.1. I compiled and tried it and was able to reproduce the error. Whenever you open a file, you should always do a check on file.fail() to make sure it opened successfully. You didn't, so you didn't realize the error happened earlier. Boost correctly threw an exception when you tried to check the size of the file. #include <boost/filesystem/operations.hpp> #include <fstream> #include <iostream> int main() { try { // Create a file using namespace std; const string fileName("/temp/test.txt"); ofstream file; file.open(fileName.c_str()); if (file.fail()) { throw std::runtime_error("Unknown file"); } const string message("this is a test"); file << message; file.close(); const boost::intmax_t fileSize = boost::filesystem::file_size(fileName); if( fileSize != message.size() ) throw std::exception("Bad result"); } catch(std::exception& e) { std::cout << "Caught fatal error: " << e.what() << std::endl; } catch(...) { std::cout << "Caught unknown error" << std::endl; } std::cin.get(); // so the window stays up to view output return 0; } Output: Caught fatal error: Unknown file. You probably wanted to make your path C:\temp\test.txt, since it's a Windows program, right? -----Original Message----- From: boost-users-bounces(a)lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Rush Manbert Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 2:45 PM To: boost-users(a)lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [Boost-users] boost filesystem Aubrey, Jason wrote: > > Replies are at the end of this message: > Aubrey, Jason wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>When I run the following program it runs successfully but throws an >>exception during shutdown. I don't know why, but it seems that the >>call to boost::filesystem::file_size() is corrupting memory somehow. >>This example only shows the call to file_size() but I think I've seen >>similar trouble with other calls within boost::filesystem. >> >>Am I doing something wrong here or is this a bug? >> >>Regards, >>Jason Aubrey >> >>---------------------- >> >>Environment: >> OS: Win2k >> Compiler: VS7.1 >> Boost: v1.33.1 >> >>---------------------- >> >>#include <boost/filesystem/operations.hpp> #include <fstream> >> >>int main(int, char**) >>{ >> // Create a file >> using namespace std; >> const string fileName("/temp/test.txt"); >> ofstream file; >> file.open(fileName.c_str()); >> const string message("this is a test"); >> file << message; >> file.close(); >> >> const boost::intmax_t fileSize = >>boost::filesystem::file_size(fileName); >> >> if( fileSize != message.size() ) >> throw std::exception("Bad result"); >> >> return 0; >>} >> > > > Either I'm missing something, or... > > file_size takes a path reference as its calling argument. You're passing > a string. How does this even compile? > > - Rush > _______________________________________________ > > Thanks for the Reply Rush. > > If I modify the above code to contain the following I still see the same > behavior: > const boost::filesystem::path filePath(fileName); > const boost::intmax_t fileSize = > boost::filesystem::file_size(filePath); > > Regards, > Jason Aubrey > _______________________________________________ > > Would you be able to print out what the values of message.size() and > fileSize are, right before you do that comparison? > > Thanks, > Lawrence Spector > _______________________________________________ > > Both fileSize and message.size() are 14. The exception thrown is not a > result of the if-block, but the result of a check by the runtime when it > does its cleanup during program shutdown. > Hi Jason, Well, it's too bad that the Easy Answer wasn't the correct answer. :-) I made a console app using VS2005 and Boost 1.33.1, and used your exact code as my main routine. It just works. I also tried setting things up so that my debug build would link against the release version of the library, because the last person that was having filesystem problems had done that, but it just works in that case too. So I'm afraid that I can't reproduce your problem with my Windows setup. If you run your app under the debugger and break when it gets the error, can you tell what sort of object it's trying to delete by backtracking up the stack? That might give some hint about what's happening. Best regards, Rush _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users(a)lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

3 2

Portable SafeInt?
by Troels Arvin 31 Oct '06

31 Oct '06

Hello, I'm wondering: Does Boost have a class like Microsoft's SafeInt? (Portable, of course.) If not: Does anyone have some good guidelines on how to make code (on Linux) integer overflow safe? (Here: Safe == exception generating.) I'm thinking specialized compilers, etc. -- Regards, Troels Arvin <troels(a)arvin.dk> http://troels.arvin.dk/

2 2

Re: [Boost-users] boost filesystem
by Lawrence Spector 31 Oct '06

31 Oct '06

Hmm that's even more interesting, maybe a 2k vs. XP compability issue? The file fails when trying to open on my system. I don't have a 2k system to try it on, so I don't know how much more assistance I can be. Based on the posts so far in this thread, though, I get the impression that different users are getting different results, which is definitely concerning. If I get a chance, I'll try it on my Fedora system tonight and see what happens. In the meantime, good luck. -----Original Message----- From: boost-users-bounces(a)lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Aubrey, Jason Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 4:43 PM To: boost-users(a)lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [Boost-users] boost filesystem Thanks for your suggestion Lawrence but I don't think it's related to the problem. I added the following after opening the file but it doesn't throw (since the file is valid): if( !file.is_open() ) throw std::exception("Unable to open file"); To prove that the file is valid: 1) I verified that the program creates the file 2) main() completes as expected. The following is in regard to Rush's comment: The call stack when trouble occurs is as follows: msvcr71d.dll!operator delete(void * pUserData=0x00343418) msvcp71d.dll!std::allocator<char>::deallocate(char * _Ptr=0x00343418, unsigned int __formal=48) msvcp71d.dll!std::string::_Tidy(bool _Built=true, unsigned int _Newsize=0) msvcp71d.dll!std::string::~string() TestsD.exe!$E2() msvcr71d.dll!doexit(int code=0, int quick=0, int retcaller=0) msvcr71d.dll!exit(int code=0) TestsD.exe!mainCRTStartup() kernel32.dll!7c816d4f() ntdll.dll!7c915b4f() kernel32.dll!7c8399f3() The offending code within delete() is: _ASSERTE(_BLOCK_TYPE_IS_VALID(pHead->nBlockUse)); Unfortunately, I couldn't make any sense of the data in or near the bad block. Regards, Jason ---------------------- Environment: OS: Win2k Compiler: VS7.1 Boost: v1.33.1 ---------------------- #include <boost/filesystem/operations.hpp> #include <fstream> // Contrary to simplicity I've enhanced the following to satisfy suggestions int main(int, char**) { // Create a file using namespace std; const string fileName("/temp/test.txt"); ofstream file; file.open(fileName.c_str()); if( !file.is_open() ) throw std::exception("Unable to open file"); const string message("this is a test"); file << message; file.close(); const boost::filesystem::path filePath(fileName); const boost::intmax_t fileSize = boost::filesystem::file_size(filePath); if( fileSize != message.size() ) throw std::exception("Bad result"); return 0; // This line is reached without trouble } _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users(a)lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] boost filesystem
by Lawrence Spector 31 Oct '06

31 Oct '06

Would you be able to print out what the values of message.size() and fileSize are, right before you do that comparison? Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: boost-users-bounces(a)lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Aubrey, Jason Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 1:12 PM To: boost-users(a)lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [Boost-users] boost filesystem Replies are at the end of this message: Aubrey, Jason wrote: > Hi, > > When I run the following program it runs successfully but throws an > exception during shutdown. I don't know why, but it seems that the > call to boost::filesystem::file_size() is corrupting memory somehow. > This example only shows the call to file_size() but I think I've seen > similar trouble with other calls within boost::filesystem. > > Am I doing something wrong here or is this a bug? > > Regards, > Jason Aubrey > > ---------------------- > > Environment: > OS: Win2k > Compiler: VS7.1 > Boost: v1.33.1 > > ---------------------- > > #include <boost/filesystem/operations.hpp> #include <fstream> > > int main(int, char**) > { > // Create a file > using namespace std; > const string fileName("/temp/test.txt"); > ofstream file; > file.open(fileName.c_str()); > const string message("this is a test"); > file << message; > file.close(); > > const boost::intmax_t fileSize = > boost::filesystem::file_size(fileName); > > if( fileSize != message.size() ) > throw std::exception("Bad result"); > > return 0; > } > Either I'm missing something, or... file_size takes a path reference as its calling argument. You're passing a string. How does this even compile? - Rush _______________________________________________ Thanks for the Reply Rush. If I modify the above code to contain the following I still see the same behavior: const boost::filesystem::path filePath(fileName); const boost::intmax_t fileSize = boost::filesystem::file_size(filePath); Regards, Jason Aubrey _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users(a)lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

3 2

Serialization problem on 64-bit Windows release
by Sigurd Saue 31 Oct '06

31 Oct '06

We've started to use boost serialization and I've run into problems with serialization of derived classes. The "funny" thing is that this happens only on 64-bit Windows release compiled with MS Visual 2005. The same code works fine on Linux 32/64 bit debug/release, on Windows 32-bit debug/release and on Windows 64-bit debug. But not Windows 64-bit release. We use boost version 1.33.1. Here's the code that causes problems (Parameter is the base class, ParamCollection is a vector of Parameters): template<class Archive> static void serialize(Archive & ar, ParamCollection & col, const unsigned int /*version*/) { ar.register_type(static_cast<FloatParameter*>(NULL)); ar.register_type(static_cast<IntParameter*>(NULL)); ar.register_type(static_cast<ChoiceParameter*>(NULL)); ar.register_type(static_cast<StringParameter*>(NULL)); ar.register_type(static_cast<BlobParameter*>(NULL)); ar & boost::serialization::base_object<std::vector<Parameter*> >(col); } When serializing the ParamCollection (serializing, not deserializing) an archive exception is thrown: unregistered class. I've tried to use both abstract and non-abstract base class without any success. I did some research in the boost code and found that the exception was thrown in polymorphic::save (oserializer.hpp) by the last condition (NULL == bpos_ptr). Any clues? Is there a workaround? Thanks, Sigurd

3 4

Re: [Boost-users] Safe way to allocate block of memory
by Nat Goodspeed 31 Oct '06

31 Oct '06

> -----Original Message----- > From: boost-users-bounces(a)lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users- > bounces(a)lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Torri > Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 9:34 AM > To: boost-users(a)lists.boost.org > Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Safe way to allocate block of memory > > On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 06:49 -0500, Nat Goodspeed wrote: > > [Nat] Have you tried using a std::vector<unsigned char>? You can get a > > pointer to the first byte in the vector by &myVector[0]. Then > > std::vector takes care of all the rest for you -- including allocation, > > cleanup and the STL container support. > > // present_pos is an std::vector<boost::uint8_t>::iterator to the > // where the reading will start. > // > // dest_addr_ptr is where to write in memory > // > // length is how many bytes to read. > void read ( boost::uint8_t* dest_addr_ptr, boost::uint32_t const& length ) > { > if ( present_pos + length > data.end() ) > { > // ERROR > } > > memcpy ( dest_addr_ptr, *(*present_pos), length; [Nat] memcpy ( dest_addr_ptr, &(*present_pos), length ); or even // trust STL implementation to optimize appropriately std::copy(present_pos, present_pos + length, dest_addr_ptr); > }

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] Safe way to allocate block of memory
by Nat Goodspeed 31 Oct '06

31 Oct '06

> -----Original Message----- > From: boost-users-bounces(a)lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users- > bounces(a)lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Torri > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 11:53 PM > To: boost > Subject: [Boost-users] Safe way to allocate block of memory > > I am trying to create a class which I can use to safely allocate a block > of bytes. > > My present method is create a block via 'new char[size]' and store this > pointer in a class. > > I was wondering if there was a boost method for creating an array of > bytes? [Nat] Have you tried using a std::vector<unsigned char>? You can get a pointer to the first byte in the vector by &myVector[0]. Then std::vector takes care of all the rest for you -- including allocation, cleanup and the STL container support.

2 1

Safe way to allocate block of memory
by Stephen Torri 31 Oct '06

31 Oct '06

I am trying to create a class which I can use to safely allocate a block of bytes. One purpose is to allow me to easily fill in a variable with N bytes from the block. For example the code below would attempt to fill a variable (e.g. boost::uint32_t val ). template <typename Value_Type> void read (Value_Type* value) { m_file_img->read (reinterpret_cast<char*>(value), sizeof(Value_Type)); } The second purpose is to create a block of bytes which I can write bytes to at particular offsets from the beginning. For example if I created a block of 50 bytes I may want to fill in bytes 5 through 8 with 4 bytes of data. My present method is create a block via 'new char[size]' and store this pointer in a class. This works for reading by when later in my program when I create a instance to write data to it I get a segfault. I was wondering if there was a boost method for creating an array of bytes? My code is below. I would greatly appreciate comments on how to utilize more of boost's functionality. Stephen ----------------------- #ifndef MEMORY_MAP_H_ #define MEMORY_MAP_H_ #include <boost/cstdint.hpp> #include <boost/scoped_ptr.hpp> #include <boost/shared_ptr.hpp> #include <boost/format.hpp> #include <iostream> #include <iomanip> #include "io/exceptions/IO_Exception.hpp" namespace libreverse { namespace data_types { class Memory_Map { public: typedef char data_type; typedef char const* const_iterator; typedef data_type* iterator; typedef boost::shared_ptr<Memory_Map> ptr; Memory_Map ( boost::uint32_t const& size ); Memory_Map ( boost::uint64_t const& size ); Memory_Map ( Memory_Map const& rhs ); virtual ~Memory_Map(); template <typename Offset_Type> void seek ( Offset_Type offset ) { if (offset > m_size) { std::cerr << "The offset given, " << offset << " is invalid. Its pointing to a " << std::endl << "memory location outside of space " << "allocated to" << std::endl << "this Memory Map. (" << m_size << ")" << std::endl; throw errors::IO_Exception ( errors::IO_Exception::OUT_OF_RANGE ); } m_present_pos = m_base_addr + offset; std::cout << boost::format ("Memory_Map::seek - new present pos = %1p") % *m_present_pos << std::endl; } void read ( iterator dest_addr_ptr, boost::uint32_t const& len); void copy ( const_iterator src_addr_ptr, boost::uint32_t const& len ); iterator begin(); const_iterator begin() const; const_iterator end() const; iterator get_Present_Position (void); const_iterator get_Present_Position (void) const; boost::uint32_t const& size (void) const; private: char* m_base_addr; boost::uint32_t m_size; // Size of memory iterator m_present_pos; iterator m_end_addr; }; #endif /* MEMORY_MAP_H_ */ ---------------- #include "Memory_Map.hpp" namespace libreverse { namespace data_types { Memory_Map::Memory_Map ( boost::uint32_t const& size ) : m_size ( size ) { m_base_addr = new char[size]; m_present_pos = m_base_addr; /* std::cout << boost::format ("Memory_Map::constructor - start present pos = %1%") % boost::io::group ( std::hex, m_present_pos ) << std::endl; */ m_end_addr = m_base_addr + size; } Memory_Map::Memory_Map ( boost::uint64_t const& size ) : m_size ( size ) { m_base_addr = new char[size]; m_present_pos = m_base_addr; m_end_addr = m_base_addr + size; } Memory_Map::Memory_Map ( Memory_Map const& rhs ) : m_base_addr (rhs.m_base_addr), m_size (rhs.m_size), m_present_pos ( rhs.m_present_pos ), m_end_addr ( rhs.m_end_addr ) { /* std::cout << "Memory_Map::copy_constructor - start present pos = " << m_present_pos << std::endl; */ #warning We do not deep copy the data here } Memory_Map::~Memory_Map () { delete[] m_base_addr; } void Memory_Map::read ( iterator dest_addr_ptr, boost::uint32_t const& length ) { if ( m_present_pos > m_end_addr ) { std::cerr << "The present position pointer is invalid. " << "Its pointing" << std::endl << "to a memory location out side of space " << "allocated to" << std::endl << "this Memory Map." << std::endl; throw errors::IO_Exception ( errors::IO_Exception::INVALID_INDEX ); } memcpy ( dest_addr_ptr, m_present_pos, length ); m_present_pos += length; } Memory_Map::iterator Memory_Map::begin() { return m_base_addr; } Memory_Map::const_iterator Memory_Map::begin() const { return m_base_addr; } Memory_Map::const_iterator Memory_Map::end() const { return m_end_addr; } Memory_Map::iterator Memory_Map::get_Present_Position (void) { return m_present_pos; } Memory_Map::const_iterator Memory_Map::get_Present_Position (void) const { return m_present_pos; } boost::uint32_t const& Memory_Map::size (void) const { return m_size; } void Memory_Map::copy ( const_iterator src_addr_ptr, boost::uint32_t const& length ) { // If m_present_pos + length > m_end_addr ERROR if ( m_present_pos + length > m_end_addr ) { std::cerr << "The present position pointer will be" << " invalid if we write from the present" << std::endl << "position with the given length. It will" << " cause an segfault. Recheck the value" << std::endl << "given for length (" << length << ") or check" << " the setting of the present position." << std::endl; throw errors::IO_Exception ( errors::IO_Exception::OUT_OF_RANGE ); } memcpy ( m_present_pos, src_addr_ptr, length ); m_present_pos += length; }

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] boost filesystem
by Nat Goodspeed 31 Oct '06

31 Oct '06

> -----Original Message----- > From: boost-users-bounces(a)lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users- > bounces(a)lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Peng Yu > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 11:53 AM > To: boost-users(a)lists.boost.org > Subject: Re: [Boost-users] boost filesystem > > > > I have the following program and files .test.seg and test.seg. I try > > > to run the main program. It seems that boost filesystem doesn't > > > recognize file name starting with a dot. > > > > > > Is it a bug in boost filesystem. Or I didn't use it properly? > > > http://boost.org/libs/filesystem/doc/portability_guide.htm#name_check-_f un > ctions > > > > If you use the default constructor for path, then it uses a name > > checker that doesn't allow filenames starting with dots. This was > > intended to promote portability, but has been found to be a bad idea > > and will not be in boost 1.34 (nor is it in the tr2 proposal). > > There is only version 1.33 online. How can I get 1.34? [Nat] You don't need to use 1.34 to suppress the name check. Pass (e.g.) boost::filesystem::no_check as the second parameter to the boost::filesystem::path constructor.

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] boost filesystem
by Wu Yinghui, Freddie 31 Oct '06

31 Oct '06

> > There is only version 1.33 online. How can I get 1.34? > 1.34 is not yet officially released. Check out page http://sourceforge.net/cvs/?group_id=7586 for CVS checkout instructions. Cheers, Freddie -- Wu Yinghui, Freddie Research & Development Senior Software Engineer Volume Interactions Pte Ltd 1 Kim Seng Promenade, #12-01 Great World City East Tower Singapore 237994 Tel: +65 62226962 (Ext 216) Fax: +65 62226215 Email: yhwu(a)volumeinteractions.com URL: http://www.volumeinteractions.com Important: This message is intended for the recipient(s) addressed above. It contains privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. You must not read, copy, use, or disseminate this communication in any form. Thank you.

1 0

[boost::shared_ptr] lightweight_mutex question
by Ovanes Markarian 30 Oct '06

30 Oct '06

Hi! I saw that shared_ptr used lightweight_mutext to enable locking/unlocking in MT environments. Is it an official class which I could also use in my project, or should I really bind to the boost threading library? With Kind Regards, Ovanes Markarian

2 1

[asio] reported memory leaks when using MFC
by Christian Henning 30 Oct '06

30 Oct '06

Hi there, I have been spending some hour now on trackign down memory issues that are reported from MFC. In my client program I'm calling io_service::post( ... ) quite often and is seems to me that it allocates memory that is never been deallocated afterwards. Every call of post( ... ) will result in one memory leak. The allocation takes place in the file handler_alloc_helpers.hpp in line 39. Setting a breakpoint here shows that every post(...) call allocates some memory. The deallocation which is right below in the file is never called. Is this an known issue? Regards, Christian

3 9

[Date_Time] Posix Time Zone offset question
by Jacob L. Anawalt 30 Oct '06

30 Oct '06

Hi, I've started experimenting with Boost.Date_Time's Local Time stuff. While using a posix_time_zone object the results were not what I expected. I used the POSIX.1 (IEEE Std 1003.1) timezone string suitable for use in the TZ environment variable describing my timezone for the year 2006: MST7MDT,M4.1.0,M10.5.0 Date_Time's posix_time_zone object told me that it was already the 26th but my wall clock disagrees. :) The online documentation says "A posix_time_zone is unique in that the object is created from a Posix time zone string (IEEE Std 1003.1)." and "'offset' is the offset from UTC." In the sources I've come across the offset part of a POSIX.1 timezone string is defined as "the value added to the local time to arrive at Coordinated Universal Time" with a not that "[i]f preceded by a '-', the timezone shall be east of the Prime Meridian; otherwise, it shall be west (which may be indicated by an optional preceding '+' )." * http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/basedefs/xbd_chap08.html * man pages of tzset Why do I need a negative (-) offset to make posix_time_zone work when the time zone is west of the Prime Meridian? I couldn't find anyone else raising this issue on the list or bug tracker, so maybe I'm just up in the night. Thank-you for the library. I really like some of the concepts in Date_Time Posix Time and Gregorian and have high hopes for Local Time stuff. -- Jacob

3 4

Compiling for 32 bits on x86_64
by Björn Regnström 30 Oct '06

30 Oct '06

I compiled boost on a SuSE 9.2 x86_64 machine (AMD Athlon), it built everything but compiled and linked for 64 bits. The libraries ended up in /usr/local/lib instead of lib64 though. How do I tell the build system to build 32 bit libraries (and put the 64 bit libraries in lib64)? Best regards, (and apologies if this is not the right forum...) Bjorn Regnstrom

2 1

boost filesystem
by Peng Yu 30 Oct '06

30 Oct '06

Hi, I have the following program and files .test.seg and test.seg. I try to run the main program. It seems that boost filesystem doesn't recognize file name starting with a dot. Is it a bug in boost filesystem. Or I didn't use it properly? Thanks, Peng $ ls -a . .dep main-g.exe main.o main-o.o .test.seg .. main.cc main-g.o main-o.exe Makefile test.seg $ cat main.cc #include <iostream> #include <boost/filesystem/operations.hpp> // includes boost/filesystem/path.hpp #include <boost/filesystem/fstream.hpp> int main() { if(boost::filesystem::exists("test.seg")) std::cout << "good" << std::endl; if(boost::filesystem::exists(".test.seg")) std::cout << "good1" << std::endl; } $ ./main-g.exe good terminate called after throwing an instance of 'boost::filesystem::filesystem_error' what(): boost::filesystem::path: invalid name ".test.seg" in path: ".test.seg" Aborted

2 2

[BGL] Is there an RDF implementation using BGL?
by Michel Dufresne 30 Oct '06

30 Oct '06

I'm looking for an implementation of RDF in C++ using BGL. If non exist would that be worthwhile? I'm actually interested in implementing OWL-DL over a RDF graph and use this as the domain model for business applications, e.g., applications in healthcare. Thanks, Michel

2 1

[multiindex] hashed index, modify() and traversal
by Francesco Biscani 30 Oct '06

30 Oct '06

Hello, I'm modifying the elements of a multiindex container by accessing them through an hashed index (I suppose that this is faster than accessing them through the other index, which is ordered). I would like to know if I can keep going ++ on the hashed iterator as the elements of the container get changed, without modifying the same elements more than once or reaching the end() prematurely. In other words, does the re-hash change the relative positions of the elements or are they unaltered as the elements are modified? Thanks very much, Francesco

3 4

filesystem::path noobish question
by Nick Dimiduk 30 Oct '06

30 Oct '06

As per the subject line, I have a rather noobish question about using the boost::filesystem tools, specifically the path object. The idea here is that I want to start my program by removing the "tmp" directory in the current process context if it exists to ensure a clean working environment for the remainder of the process. To the code: ... boost::filesystem::path tmp_dir ("tmp", boost::filesystem::native); // get a native handle for "./tmp" boost::filesystem::remove_all (tmp_dir); // clean out this tree in the fs ... This code acts as expected on linux. On windows, it causes a crash. The debugger shows the tmp_dir.m_path._Bx is a bad pointer, indicating to me that the constructor failed somewhere along the way. My questions are these: (1) Is there any error checking I can perform to verify that the path() constructor succeeds, such as a null pointer value or a boolean flag within the data type? (2) Is there something about my code which is linux/POSIX specific? (3) Am I missing something else entirely? I'm using boost 1.33.0 and have a mess of other functioning code which suggests that my configuration/installation is correct on both platforms. Thanks in advance! -Nick Dimiduk

4 5

[graph] incremental_components
by Chris Weed 30 Oct '06

30 Oct '06

Hi, I am trying to use incremental connected components to find the connected components of an image as I randomly add pixels to the image. I calculate the number of components after each pixel is added. This crashes part way through. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Chris #include <boost/graph/graph_utility.hpp> #include <boost/graph/adjacency_list.hpp> #include <boost/pending/disjoint_sets.hpp> #include <boost/graph/incremental_components.hpp> #include <algorithm> #include <numeric> #include <boost/multi_array.hpp> int main() { // Image size size_t width = 100; size_t height = 100; // Create vector of randomized indices std::vector<size_t> indices(width*height,1); indices[0] = 0; std::partial_sum(indices.begin(),indices.end(),indices.begin()); std::random_shuffle(indices.begin(),indices.end()); // Create image which holds which pixels were stored by their linear index boost::multi_array<size_t,2> added_pixels(boost::extents[height][width]); for(size_t i=0;i<height;++i) for(size_t j=0;j<width;++j) added_pixels[i][j] = 0; using namespace boost; typedef adjacency_list<vecS,vecS,undirectedS> Graph; typedef graph_traits<Graph>::vertex_descriptor Vertex; typedef graph_traits<Graph>::vertices_size_type size_type; Graph G(indices.size()); std::vector<size_type> rank(num_vertices(G)); std::vector<Vertex> parent(num_vertices(G)); typedef size_type* Rank; typedef Vertex* Parent; disjoint_sets<Rank,Parent> ds(&rank[0],&parent[0]); initialize_incremental_components(G,ds); incremental_components(G,ds); // Loop over indices and add pixels to image, and edges to graph std::vector<size_t>::iterator b_iter = indices.begin(); for(;b_iter!=indices.end();++b_iter) { size_t r = (*b_iter)/width; size_t c = (*b_iter)%width; size_t j = *b_iter; added_pixels[r][c] = j; if(r>0 && added_pixels[r-1][c]) { add_edge(j,added_pixels[r-1][c],G); ds.union_set(j,added_pixels[r-1][c]); } if(r<(height-1) && added_pixels[r+1][c]) { add_edge(j,added_pixels[r+1][c],G); ds.union_set(j,added_pixels[r+1][c]); } if(c>0 && added_pixels[r][c-1]) { add_edge(j,added_pixels[r][c-1],G); ds.union_set(j,added_pixels[r][c-1]); } if(c<(width-1) && added_pixels[r][c+1]) { add_edge(j,added_pixels[r][c+1],G); ds.union_set(j,added_pixels[r][c+1]); } // After each pixel is added and connected, compute the number of cc's typedef component_index<unsigned int> Components; Components comp(parent.begin(),parent.end()); std::cout << comp.size() << std::endl; } return 0; }

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] [Boost.Parameter] How to Use Named Parameters in a Class Hierarchy?
by Wu Yinghui, Freddie 30 Oct '06

30 Oct '06

> On 10/26/06, *Wu Yinghui, Freddie* <yhwu(a)volumeinteractions.com > <mailto:yhwu@volumeinteractions.com>> wrote: > > > My situation is like this: > > I have a class hierarchy briefly shown as below (assuming virtual member > function template is allowed, just to demonstrate the idea): > ===== CODE ===== <snip> > ===== CODE ===== > > To use the class hierarchy, my program loads the DLL requested by user > using LoadLibrary() (We're using Windows, but it should be similar to > Linux, I suppose), and makes use of the Derived1/Derived2 classes via a > pointer to the Base class. > > Since I have no information about the derived classes when building my > main executable (only Base class is known then), I cannot make direct > use of Derived1/Derived2 types in my main program. -- Yet, I need a way > to provide some arbitrary set of arguments to the derived classes. > > Hope my explanation clears your doubts. Do you have any suggestion or > alternative design in mind? > > > Pass your params packaged in a adobe::dictionary_t (opensource.adobe.com > <http://opensource.adobe.com>) or something like that - not sure what > the boost equivalent is. > > Tony Thanks Tony. Due to our development policy, however, I cannot easily introduce the libraries from Adobe. :( But looking at the reference for adobe::dictionary_t, however, makes me believe that I can replace it with std::map<std::string, boost::any> to certain extent. In any case, I've been trying to build something that use Boost.Parameter naturally (as named parameters to a function). I'll consider if the alternative approach can satisfy all our requirements first. Cheers, Freddie -- Wu Yinghui, Freddie Research & Development Senior Software Engineer Volume Interactions Pte Ltd 1 Kim Seng Promenade, #12-01 Great World City East Tower Singapore 237994 Tel: +65 62226962 (Ext 216) Fax: +65 62226215 Email: yhwu(a)volumeinteractions.com URL: http://www.volumeinteractions.com Important: This message is intended for the recipient(s) addressed above. It contains privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. You must not read, copy, use, or disseminate this communication in any form. Thank you.

1 0

Is it a good style about boost::format( format-string ) % arg1 % arg2 % ... % argN
by William Xue 29 Oct '06

29 Oct '06

Hi, First, I am a new user of boost. I wonder of the style of 'boost::format( format-string ) % arg1 % arg2 % ... % argN'. I think it, format(...), as a function, but it seems not function in C or C++ style. % arg1 % ... seems like a group of parameters, if so, why not use '(' and ')' to wrap them? As it works, there must be something I don't know. Please feel free to point out what I am wrong. I'm very glade to know them. Thanks! -- Sincerely yours, William

7 9

Boost.Regex hangs with large pattern
by Dave Druelinger 29 Oct '06

29 Oct '06

I'm using Boost.Regex to match a long, complicated pattern to between 30 and 50 long strings. I loop through and call regex_search until it doesn't find any more matches in the current string and then it moves on to the next string. The problem is that when it has looped through about 40 of the strings, Boost.Regex will hang on the regex_search() function, and it will just sit there processing forever. If I reduce the number of strings I match against there is no problem; 20-30 iterations works like a charm. It also seems to help if I reduce the size of the regex pattern. Frankly I have no clue what could be causing the problem, and any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks

3 2

Re: [Boost-users] [Boost.Parameter] How to Use Named Parameters in a Class Hierarchy?
by Wu Yinghui, Freddie 27 Oct '06

27 Oct '06

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 > Wu Yinghui, Freddie wrote: > > [snip] > >> >> The situation is like this: In the pseudo-code you provided, DoWork() >> function is declared in the Base class, and is overridden by Derived1 >> and Derived2, with a fixed number of arguments. My problems is that, >> my base class cannot predict the exact number of parameters that a >> derived class may have. (A derived class may have 10 parameters, >> while another may have none.) So it looks a little bit out-of-shape >> in terms of the OO programming style I'm familiar with if I'm going >> to provide overloads of DoWork() for all the possible parameters used >> by all derived classes (not to mention the undesirable dependency >> introduced). > > In order to know which parameters to send through the interface, you'll > have to know the exact subclass? Sorry, that doesn't make sense. > > What's the real problem you are trying to solve - could Boost.Variant + > static_visitor (or some other variant on the Visitor pattern) help? > > / Johan My situation is like this: I have a class hierarchy briefly shown as below (assuming virtual member function template is allowed, just to demonstrate the idea): ===== CODE ===== class Base { //... // This is the function that makes use of Boost.Parameter template <typename ArgumentPack> virtual void Configure(ArgumentPack const &arguments) = 0; }; // This class resides in Derived1.dll class Derived1 : public Base { template <typename ArgumentPack> void Configure(ArgumentPack const &arguments) { //... } }; // This class resides in Derived2.dll class Derived2 : public Base { template <typename ArgumentPack> void Configure(ArgumentPack const &arguments) { //... } }; ===== CODE ===== To use the class hierarchy, my program loads the DLL requested by user using LoadLibrary() (We're using Windows, but it should be similar to Linux, I suppose), and makes use of the Derived1/Derived2 classes via a pointer to the Base class. Since I have no information about the derived classes when building my main executable (only Base class is known then), I cannot make direct use of Derived1/Derived2 types in my main program. -- Yet, I need a way to provide some arbitrary set of arguments to the derived classes. Hope my explanation clears your doubts. Do you have any suggestion or alternative design in mind? Cheers, Freddie - -- Wu Yinghui, Freddie Research & Development Senior Software Engineer Volume Interactions Pte Ltd 1 Kim Seng Promenade, #12-01 Great World City East Tower Singapore 237994 Tel: +65 62226962 (Ext 216) Fax: +65 62226215 Email: yhwu(a)volumeinteractions.com URL: http://www.volumeinteractions.com Important: This message is intended for the recipient(s) addressed above. It contains privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. You must not read, copy, use, or disseminate this communication in any form. Thank you. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) iD8DBQFFQMFlIgDxhB4QTtMRA5JAAJ0fxjjw9IOlBOr+m2ccXD5d0Sh1EwCeKSJs /NhscTXToOeUpTgwsNBNkr8= =Kb9r -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

Re: [Boost-users] Support for VS 2005 C++/CLI
by John Dunn 27 Oct '06

27 Oct '06

Pedro Lamarão said : > > I've suffered much with this in the past. > In my experiente if you try to fool the CLR and actually > compile your DLL withouth /NOENTRY random things may happen > from time to time. I'm not using any DLLs - I'm statically linking to libboost_threads. I'm confident of this since if I define BOOST_THREAD_USE_DLL it will complain about not being able to find the DLL instead of just crashing. Interestingly enough, if I define BOOST_THREAD_USE_DLL it works perfectly fine. So the issue is with linking to the static lib, not the dynamic one. Are you aware of any issues with static libs / initialization and the CLR? That seems to be the case here. John

2 1

Re: [Boost-users] Support for VS 2005 C++/CLI
by John Dunn 27 Oct '06

27 Oct '06

> I'm out of ideas. :-) There isn't anything actively > CLI-hostile in the thread library as far as I know. You could > try stepping into the program with the debugger and see what > causes the error, but if it's the .NET loader not liking it > for some reason, this might not help. You best bet is > probably to report the problem to Microsoft somehow, since it > seems like a legitimate regression. Unfortunately the debugger doesn't help - the error isn't caught by the debugger as far as I can tell. I know I've seen problems with my code when using static objects in non-managed code. I think it might be related to the order in which initialization code is run. Anyone know of a good way to contact MS about compiler issues? I've tried in the past and it's never really been obvious that anyones even read my bug reports. I guess I'll start my posting in the MS newsgroups. Thanks- John

4 3

Regex assign raising exceptions
by Joshua Stewart 27 Oct '06

27 Oct '06

Hi everyone, I am having some issues with the boost::regex assign method. I have been following an example on the boost site for a search and replace. However I seem to be getting an Empty Expression exception when assigning my expression to my boost:regex object. boost::regex exp; const char* expression_string = "([[:space:]](|-)[[:digit:]]+)f;"; exp.assign(expression_string); Any ideas? I have tried a few different syntax option types at the end without success. Thanks Josh Ps. I posted this in comp.lang.c++ before realising that this is probably the better place to ask boost questions :-) This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual(s) named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Immersive Technologies Pty. Ltd. does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message which arise as a result of e-mail transmission.

2 2

[asio] How to reuse a socket
by george 26 Oct '06

26 Oct '06

hello, I start using asio in my project and I don't know how to reuse a socket... some code: void server(asio::io_service& io_service, short port) { tcp::acceptor a(io_service, tcp::endpoint(tcp::v4(), port)); for (;;) { tcp::socket *sock=new tcp::socket(io_service); a.accept(sock); session(sock); } } void session(tcp::socket *sock) { sock->read(...); .... sock->send("reply"); } when I send the first request everything is ok but when I try for a second one I never get a reply or an error from the server... The easy way would be to have a thread/connection model so I could block each thread waiting to a socket but I want to use a thread-pool for my server so I want to know if there is any callback parameter I could pass to my socket and when there is data availiable in the socket the asio would fire the callback function . thanks in advance, george

2 3

Using MPL to cut array?
by Arno Schödl 26 Oct '06

26 Oct '06

Hello, __FILE__ is a macro for the path to the current source file. I would like to remove the common prefix (like "c:\dev\my_program\") from it, which is in a preprocessor macro SOLUTIONDIR. Is there a metaprogramming way to do that? So the class TSuffix should be used like this: TSuffix<x, n>::value // cuts prefix of length n off char array x It would be nice if the compiler would not even store the whole path in the executable, but only the distinguishing suffix. Any ideas how to start? TIA, Arno

2 1

Re: [Boost-users] [boost.serialization] serialization crash
by Sohail Somani 26 Oct '06

26 Oct '06

> -----Original Message----- > From: boost-users-bounces(a)lists.boost.org > [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Deane Yang > Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 9:34 AM > To: boost-users(a)lists.boost.org > Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [boost.serialization] serialization crash > > RIVASSEAU Jean Noel wrote: > > I've had the same problems. The problem is with the bool > field. Code > > restoring the archive crashes if the bool stored in the > archive is not > > equal to 0 or 1. But since you did not write a constructor > in the Obj > > class, the boolean will actually be initialized with > anything( eg, read > > 14675002 for example), and will be serialized that way in > the archive > > since it seems the serialization code does not check if the bool is > > equal to 0 or 1 (only the restoration code). > > > > So, the solution is to initialize your boolean correctly > and be very > > careful whenever you use booleans. However, I think the > Serialization > > code should be fixed (remove the check for 0 or 1, it > probably does > > more bad than good. > > > > In my (very) humble opinion, it should be at least symmetric. > So either > no check for 0 or 1 in both directions or a check for 0 or 1 in both > directions. > > But it should also be consistent with other built-in types. Since it > appears that there is no check (is one even possible?) for > uninitialized > data with other built-in types, I also vote for no check. In any case, are booleans guaranteed to be 0 or 1 even if correctly initialized?

1 0

[boost::threads] can't compile threading at MSVC++ 8
by Ovanes Markarian 26 Oct '06

26 Oct '06

I have a problem, with the following error message. Unfortunately documentation does not state what can be the reason that threads are not included. I did not define the BOOST_DISABLE_THREADS macro. But still receive an error message: Compiling... main.cc c:\boost\include\boost-1_33_1\boost\config\requires_threads.hpp(29) : fatal error C1189: #error : "Threading support unavaliable: it has been explicitly disabled with BOOST_DISABLE_THREADS" My assumption is that I configured console project. These are my project preprocessor definitions: _CONSOLE;_SCL_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS; Can someone advise? With Kind Regards, Ovanes Markarian

1 1

[Boost.MultiIndex] docs unclear for ey extractors
by Markus Werle 26 Oct '06

26 Oct '06

> Hi! In http://boost.org/libs/multi_index/doc/advanced_topics.html #advanced_key_extractors I do not understand how the struct name_extractor comes to use and why I have to define it. IIUC the code snippet -------------------------------- typedef multi_index_container< employee *, indexed_by< ordered_non_unique<member<employee,std::string,&employee::name> > > > employee_set; -------------------------------- takes care of all what I need even without it - or do I have to define the struct to make this work? Markus

2 3

Re: [Boost-users] Using MPL to cut array?
by Nat Goodspeed 26 Oct '06

26 Oct '06

> -----Original Message----- > From: boost-users-bounces(a)lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users- > bounces(a)lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Arno Schödl > Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 2:45 AM > To: boost-users(a)lists.boost.org > Subject: [Boost-users] Using MPL to cut array? > > __FILE__ is a macro for the path to the current source file. I would like > to remove the common prefix (like "c:\dev\my_program\") from it, which is > in a preprocessor macro SOLUTIONDIR. Is there a metaprogramming way to do > that? > > So the class TSuffix should be used like this: > > TSuffix<x, n>::value // cuts prefix of length n off char array x [Nat] ? Is MPL needed? For a classic const char[] string literal, wouldn't (__FILE__ + n) get you what you want?

1 0

[boost.serialization] serialization crash
by Pavlo Korzhyk 26 Oct '06

26 Oct '06

The following code crashes under cygwin+boost1.33 and under mingw+boost1.33 I create text archive in a file, and then serialization crashes when restoring object from that archive. The problem seem to be with bool field, if I replace bool x; with int x; in the class Obj implementation, everything runs fine. Is this a bug in serialization code? #include <iostream> #include <sstream> #include <fstream> #include <vector> #include <map> using namespace std; #include <boost/archive/text_oarchive.hpp> #include <boost/archive/text_iarchive.hpp> #include <boost/serialization/vector.hpp> #include <boost/serialization/map.hpp> using namespace boost; using namespace boost::serialization; class Obj { friend class boost::serialization::access; template<class Archive> void serialize(Archive & ar, const unsigned int version) { ar & x; } public: bool x; }; class Item; class Cheq : public Obj{ friend class boost::serialization::access; template<class Archive> void serialize(Archive & ar, const unsigned int version) { ar & boost::serialization::base_object<Obj>(*this); ar & v; ar & id; } public: vector<Item> v; int id; Cheq(){} }; class Item{ friend class boost::serialization::access; template<class Archive> void serialize(Archive & ar, const unsigned int version) { ar & a; ar & s; } public: int a; string s; }; class Row{ friend class boost::serialization::access; template<class Archive> void serialize(Archive & ar, const unsigned int version) { ar & m1; ar & m2; } public: map<string,string> m1,m2; }; class Data{ friend class boost::serialization::access; template<class Archive> void serialize(Archive & ar, const unsigned int version) { ar & a; ar & m; ar & cheque; } public: int a; map<string,string> m; map<int,Cheq> cheque; }; BOOST_CLASS_TRACKING(Data, boost::serialization::track_never) #include "boost/serialization/export.hpp" BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT(Data); BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT(Cheq); BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT(Item); int main(int argc, char** argv) { Data d; d.cheque[0]=Cheq(); //if(argc>1 && argv[1][0]=='1') { ofstream os("datfile"); boost::archive::text_oarchive oar(os); oar << d; } //if(argc>1 && argv[1][0]=='2') { ifstream is("datfile"); boost::archive::text_iarchive iar(is); iar >> d; } cout << "without crash\n"; return 0; } -- WBR, Pavlo Korzhyk ICQ#155870780

2 1

apply_wrap.hpp(48) : fatal error C1001: INTERNAL COMPILER ERROR
by Matthew Galati 26 Oct '06

26 Oct '06

MS Visual Studio 2003 - v7.1 #include <boost/graph/graph_utility.hpp> #include <boost/graph/connected_components.hpp> #include <boost/graph/kruskal_min_spanning_tree.hpp> using namespace boost; Any ideas? c:\cygwin\home\magala\DECOMP\external\boost_1_33_1\boost\mpl\aux_\preprocessed\plain\apply_wrap.hpp(48) : fatal error C1001: INTERNAL COMPILER ERROR (compiler file 'msc1.cpp', line 2701) Please choose the Technical Support command on the Visual C++ Help menu, or open the Technical Support help file for more information Thanks, Matt

3 2

Re: [Boost-users] [Boost.Parameter] How to Use Named Parameters in a Class Hierarchy?
by Wu Yinghui, Freddie 26 Oct '06

26 Oct '06

> Wu Yinghui, Freddie wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> I'm implementing a hierarchy of classes to handle different types of >> objects. The characteristics of these objects are mostly similar (so I >> can put them into a container that knows only about the pure abstract >> base interface type), but some properties are specific to each object >> types. >> >> I plan to use Boost.Parameter for its capability of providing named >> parameter to these object types. However, I have one problem in this >> approach: Since Boost.Parameter requires that the function processing >> the ArgumentPack to be a template, I cannot make it virtual (a member >> function template cannot be virtual) in my pure abstract base >> interface. Furthermore, due to the lack of "virtual" member function, >> I cannot use >> the base class pointer to provide these named parameters to some >> subclasses. > > Depends on what you actually want to do. Perhaps you could use something > like the template pattern (pseudo-code): > > ----- > struct Parameters > : boost::parameter::parameters< ... > > {}; > > struct Base > { > BOOST_PARAMETER_MEMFUN(void, Work, 1, 4, Parameters) > { > DoWork( p[arg1], p[arg2|0], p[arg3|1] ... ); > } > > private: > virtual void DoWork(actual, args, goes, here) = 0; > }; > > class Derived : public Base > { > virtual void DoWork(actual, args, goes, here) > { > ... use args ... > } > }; > > class Derived2 : public Base > { > virtual void DoWork(actual, args, goes, here) > { > ... use args ... > } > }; > > ----- > > I've used something similar myself, hope that gives an idea on how to solve > your problem. > > // Johan Thanks for your quick reply, Johan. I actually thought of a similar solution. I guess I didn't explain my problem clear enough... Unfortunately, this solution doesn't seem to suit my need. The situation is like this: In the pseudo-code you provided, DoWork() function is declared in the Base class, and is overridden by Derived1 and Derived2, with a fixed number of arguments. My problems is that, my base class cannot predict the exact number of parameters that a derived class may have. (A derived class may have 10 parameters, while another may have none.) So it looks a little bit out-of-shape in terms of the OO programming style I'm familiar with if I'm going to provide overloads of DoWork() for all the possible parameters used by all derived classes (not to mention the undesirable dependency introduced). Thanks again for your comments! Any further thoughts? :) Cheers, Freddie -- Wu Yinghui, Freddie Research & Development Senior Software Engineer Volume Interactions Pte Ltd 1 Kim Seng Promenade, #12-01 Great World City East Tower Singapore 237994 Tel: +65 62226962 (Ext 216) Fax: +65 62226215 Email: yhwu(a)volumeinteractions.com URL: http://www.volumeinteractions.com Important: This message is intended for the recipient(s) addressed above. It contains privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. You must not read, copy, use, or disseminate this communication in any form. Thank you.

2 1

Re: [Boost-users] Deferred Function calls
by Nat Goodspeed 25 Oct '06

25 Oct '06

> -----Original Message----- > From: boost-users-bounces(a)lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users- > bounces(a)lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Matt Davies > Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 4:33 PM > To: boost-users(a)lists.boost.org > Subject: [Boost-users] Deferred Function calls > > I am implementing a signal & slots implementation with a twist. Normally > when a signal is fired the connected slots are called immediately. I will > need to defer the actual calls to be invoked later. Basically I need to > store the function reference (via pointer or functor) and the accompanying > parameter values to a 'composite' object. This composite object will be > stored on a buffer. Later another processor will pick this object of the > buffer and then invoke the actual function call. [Nat] Let me try to paraphrase the question to see if I understand. You aren't directly using Boost.Signals because when you call a signal it immediately passes control to each of its slots. Your slots have non-empty parameter signatures. The code that triggers the deferred call has matching argument values. If an immediate call were acceptable, you'd simply use a boost::signal and call it with those argument values. So... as Delfin Rojas suggested, you could use boost::bind to bind your boost::signal object with the argument values you later want passed to each connected slot. (I haven't tried this myself.) In the absence of bind placeholders (e.g. _1), bind will produce a nullary functor that you can store in a boost::function<void (void)>. When you later call that functor with no arguments, it should call each connected slot with the bound arguments. If this doesn't answer your question, please explain what we're missing.

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] Does shared_array's get() method introduceruntimeoverhead?
by Sohail Somani 25 Oct '06

25 Oct '06

> -----Original Message----- > From: boost-users-bounces(a)lists.boost.org > [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of > Sohail Somani > > I have the following two code segments. I'm wondering if > there is any > > run time overhead of the get() method. Shall I use the latter one > > instead of the former one? > > > > > > > > boost::shared_array a(new int[100]); > > for(int i = 0; i < 100; ++ i) > > a[i] = i; > > > > > > > > boost::shared_array a(new int[100]); > > int a_ptr = a.get(); > > for(int i = 0; i < 100; ++ i) > > a_ptr[i] = i; > > I'd guess not (from shared_array.hpp): > > template<class T> class shared_array > { > ... > T * get() const // never throws > { > return px; > } > ... > > Unless that doesn't get inlined of course. > [snip smart-ass comment] Argh, of course I meant to paste: T & operator[] (std::ptrdiff_t i) const // never throws { BOOST_ASSERT(px != 0); BOOST_ASSERT(i >= 0); return px[i]; }

3 2

Re: [Boost-users] Does shared_array's get()methodintroduceruntimeoverhead?
by Sohail Somani 25 Oct '06

25 Oct '06

> -----Original Message----- > From: boost-users-bounces(a)lists.boost.org > [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Peng Yu > Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 6:31 PM > To: boost-users(a)lists.boost.org > Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Does shared_array's > get()methodintroduceruntimeoverhead? > > On 10/24/06, Sohail Somani <s.somani(a)fincad.com> wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: boost-users-bounces(a)lists.boost.org > > > [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Peng Yu > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 5:33 PM > > > Does it mean that code segment 1 is as fast as segment 2, but code > > > segment 3 is the slowest? > > > > > > ///////1 > > > boost::shared_array a(new int[100]); > > > for(int i = 0; i < 100; ++ i) > > > a.get()[i] = i; > > > > > > ////////2 > > > boost::shared_array a(new int[100]); > > > int a_ptr = a.get(); > > > for(int i = 0; i < 100; ++ i) > > > a_ptr[i] = i; > > > > > > ////////3 > > > boost::shared_array a(new int[100]); > > > for(int i = 0; i < 100; ++ i) > > > a[i] = i; > > > > All I can say is profile, profile, profile! > > > > PS: Profile. > > PPS: I'd guesstimate with a proper C++ compiler + optimizer, you > > wouldn't notice much of a difference between 1 and 3. > > Could you recommend a profiler on linux x86? I recall using something called callgrind. There is a gui called kcachegrind. I hope that should give you enough search keywords. Its been a while since I profiled on linux. You also always have the gcc option -pg which I've used quite often.

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] Does shared_array's get() methodintroduceruntimeoverhead?
by Sohail Somani 25 Oct '06

25 Oct '06

> -----Original Message----- > From: boost-users-bounces(a)lists.boost.org > [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Peng Yu > Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 5:33 PM > Does it mean that code segment 1 is as fast as segment 2, but code > segment 3 is the slowest? > > ///////1 > boost::shared_array a(new int[100]); > for(int i = 0; i < 100; ++ i) > a.get()[i] = i; > > ////////2 > boost::shared_array a(new int[100]); > int a_ptr = a.get(); > for(int i = 0; i < 100; ++ i) > a_ptr[i] = i; > > ////////3 > boost::shared_array a(new int[100]); > for(int i = 0; i < 100; ++ i) > a[i] = i; All I can say is profile, profile, profile! PS: Profile. PPS: I'd guesstimate with a proper C++ compiler + optimizer, you wouldn't notice much of a difference between 1 and 3.

2 1

Re: [Boost-users] Does shared_array's get() method introduce runtimeoverhead?
by Sohail Somani 24 Oct '06

24 Oct '06

> -----Original Message----- > From: boost-users-bounces(a)lists.boost.org > [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Peng Yu > Subject: [Boost-users] Does shared_array's get() method > introduce runtimeoverhead? > > Hi, > > I have the following two code segments. I'm wondering if there is any > run time overhead of the get() method. Shall I use the latter one > instead of the former one? > > > > boost::shared_array a(new int[100]); > for(int i = 0; i < 100; ++ i) > a[i] = i; > > > > boost::shared_array a(new int[100]); > int a_ptr = a.get(); > for(int i = 0; i < 100; ++ i) > a_ptr[i] = i; I'd guess not (from shared_array.hpp): template<class T> class shared_array { ... T * get() const // never throws { return px; } ... Unless that doesn't get inlined of course. PS: Use the source :)

1 0

GIL Review
by Christian Henning 24 Oct '06

24 Oct '06

Hi Here's my GIL review: > Please always explicitly state in your review, whether you think the > library should be accepted into Boost. I vote to accept GIL into boost. > - What is your evaluation of the design? I like the design and the use of modern C++ paradigms. The design seems to well thought through and taken the whole discourse so far it also seems to hold against heavy criticism. I don't think I'm the position or having the skills to criticize the design. I'm a boost user and happy to have found that place. > - What is your evaluation of the implementation? Seems fine to me. Although I'm a bit anal when code lines that are longer than 80 characters. But that is more minor. I'm not sure the extensions are on review as well. If so, using plain old C code for reading and writing to files, feels outdated. > - What is your evaluation of the documentation? This my biggest problem so far. I like a lot of documentation. My favorite is the one from ASIO. And in this way GIL is loosing. I do understand that documentation is hard but I think it should be treated as source code. For example, I was trying to figure out how to implement indexed images using GIL. Since, it's not there yet it should be easy to add. If I would have known through the documentation the image views have struct add_deref then I might have been able to figure out how to do it. Also I think the documentation should not just enumerate but also explain plus examples. As I said I'm a user and so I don't need to understand all the details on how and why. > - What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the library? There are millions of things the lib can do and hopefully will. Image processing is just the start! I'm think of 3D, loading Quake models and so on ... . Would be cool if researchers can use GIL to test new algorithms quickly in an efficient way. > - Did you try to use the library? With what compiler? Did you have > any problems? Yes, I'm using it and have send the creators extensions to read and write bmp files. An early version. Sorry, Lubomir, haven't had a single chance to work on it. I also played around with adding SDL to GIL. Using SDL would make it easy to display a window with the actual image. I'm using VC2003 on Windows XP SP2. > - How much effort did you put into your evaluation? A glance? A quick > reading? In-depth study? I know about GIL for quite a while now. I have tried some things and was usually successful in implementing. But I haven't done an in-depth study. > - Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain? I would be the last to call myself an expert in image processing. I know basics and eager to learn more. The library will certainly help me. Regards, Christian

2 1

Does shared_array's get() method introduce runtime overhead?
by Peng Yu 24 Oct '06

24 Oct '06

Hi, I have the following two code segments. I'm wondering if there is any run time overhead of the get() method. Shall I use the latter one instead of the former one? boost::shared_array a(new int[100]); for(int i = 0; i < 100; ++ i) a[i] = i; boost::shared_array a(new int[100]); int a_ptr = a.get(); for(int i = 0; i < 100; ++ i) a_ptr[i] = i; Thanks, Peng

1 0

Deferred Function calls
by Matt Davies 24 Oct '06

24 Oct '06

I am implementing a signal & slots implementation with a twist. Normally when a signal is fired the connected slots are called immediately. I will need to defer the actual calls to be invoked later. Basically I need to store the function reference (via pointer or functor) and the accompanying parameter values to a 'composite' object. This composite object will be stored on a buffer. Later another processor will pick this object of the buffer and then invoke the actual function call. I am not sure how to do this, or if it can be done. I've been looking at functors and binding functionality in Boost but I am not sure if I can store a functor with parameter values in a generic container only to invoke it at a later time. The motivation is that I want a signal & slots solution where slots are executed on different processors in a multi-processor environment. Any ideas would be very welcome. Thanks, Matt Davies Software Engineer Action Pants Inc.

2 1

Re: [Boost-users] Deferred Function calls
by Sohail Somani 24 Oct '06

24 Oct '06

> -----Original Message----- > From: boost-users-bounces(a)lists.boost.org > [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Matt Davies > > I am implementing a signal & slots implementation with a > twist. Normally > when a signal is fired the connected slots are called > immediately. I will > need to defer the actual calls to be invoked later. > Basically I need to > store the function reference (via pointer or functor) and the > accompanying > parameter values to a 'composite' object. This composite > object will be > stored on a buffer. Later another processor will pick this > object of the > buffer and then invoke the actual function call. > > I am not sure how to do this, or if it can be done. I've > been looking at > functors and binding functionality in Boost but I am not sure > if I can store > a functor with parameter values in a generic container only > to invoke it at > a later time. The motivation is that I want a signal & slots > solution where > slots are executed on different processors in a > multi-processor environment. I think you're on the right track. Basically, you want the interface to be `void fn()' Binding should help you: deferred_fn_t fn=boost::bind(the_function,1,2,3); And have a vector of deferred_fn_t's? HTH! Sohail

1 0

[asio][serialization] read_until end of archive, which delimiter
by Christian Rössel 24 Oct '06

24 Oct '06

Dear all, I want to receive a boost::archive::text_iarchive using the boost::asio::read_until () function. boost::asio::streambuf response; boost::asio::read_until(socket, response, boost::regex("\r\n")); std::istream responseStream(&response); boost::archive::text_iarchive responseArchive (responseStream); responseArchive >> retVal; The data is sent using code linke this: boost::asio::streambuf response; std::ostream commandStream (&response); boost::archive::text_oarchive responseArchive (commandStream); const ReturnValue retVal (42); responseArchive << retVal; boost::asio::write(socket, response); If I use boost::regex("\r\n") or a character that does not occur in the sent archive, read_until throws an eof exception. If I use a delimiter that is contained in the archive, read_until succeeds and the streambuf does contain the entire archive, not only up to the delimiter. What is the correct way to read the entire archive without throwing an exception? Thanks and regards, Christian

3 5

[serialization] Serialization of derived classes
by Christian Henning 24 Oct '06

24 Oct '06

Hi there, I'm having problems when serializing derived classes from a non-polymorphic base class. I have read the section "Pointers to Objects of Derived Classes". But for some reasons I cannot make these tricks to work in my application. I have created a small sample application that shows my problem: class base { public: base() : _type( 0 ) {} base( unsigned int type) : _type( type ) {} unsigned int type() { return _type; } private: friend boost::serialization::access; template< class ARCHIVE > void serialize( ARCHIVE& ar, const unsigned int version ) { ar & _type; } private: unsigned int _type; }; class derived1 : public base { public: derived1() : base( 1 ), _value( 2.1 ) {} private: friend boost::serialization::access; template< class ARCHIVE > void serialize( ARCHIVE& ar, const unsigned int version ) { ar & boost::serialization::base_object<base>( *this ); ar & _value; } private: double _value; }; class derived2 : public base { public: derived2() : base( 2 ), _value( 8 ) {} private: friend boost::serialization::access; template< class ARCHIVE > void serialize( ARCHIVE& ar, const unsigned int version ) { ar & boost::serialization::base_object<base>( *this ); ar & _value; } private: short _value; }; BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT( derived1 ); BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT( derived2 ); int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[]) { std::string data; { std::ostringstream archive_stream; boost::archive::binary_oarchive archive( archive_stream ); derived2 d; archive & d; data = archive_stream.str(); } { // deserialize std::string archive_data( &data[0], data.size() ); std::istringstream archive_stream( archive_data ); boost::archive::binary_iarchive archive( archive_stream ); // I don't know what derived class was serialized. base* b; archive & b; if( b->type() == 1 ) { derived1* d1 = static_cast<derived1*>( b ); } else { derived2* d2 = static_cast<derived2*>( b ); } } return 0; } Any help is more than welcome. Thanks ahead, Christian

4 12

undefined ref to basic_regex
by Nathan Fain 24 Oct '06

24 Oct '06

i cannot tell why i am having trouble with basic_regex. I followed the installation instructions and had no error on install. g++ -o example -g -O2 -Wall -W -Wno-unused -fno-strict-aliasing example.cc-lboost_regex /tmp/ccFmlTDD.o(.text+0x3c): In function `main': /usr/local/include/boost/regex/v4/basic_regex.hpp:253: undefined reference to `boost::basic_regex<char, boost::regex_traits<char, boost::cpp_regex_traits<char> > >::do_assign(char const*, char const*, unsigned)' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status example.cc: #include <boost/regex.hpp> using namespace boost; int main () { regex expr("foo"); return 0; } i compiled and installed boost as follows: ./tools/build/jam_src/bin.linuxx86/bjam -sHAVE_ICU=1 -sICU_PATH=/usr/local/share/icu/3.6 -sTOOLS=gcc -sPYTHON_ROOT=/usr -sPYTHON_VERSION=2.4 --prefix=/usr/local --exec-prefix=/usr/local --libdir=/usr/local/lib --includedir=/usr/local/include install thanks for any help -- cyphunk://cypherpoet.com

2 3

[bind]
by Sebastian Weber 24 Oct '06

24 Oct '06

Hello there! I'm about to explore the power of boost::bind, but I am still a beginner. Maybe the question is rather stupid, but the following code does not compile and I do not understand why: typedef std::vector<std::size_t> data_t; data_t dataVec; ... populate dataVec ... std::size_t shiftIndex = 3; boost::function<std::size_t& (std::size_t)> shiftedData = boost::bind(&data_t::at, &dataVec, _1 - shiftIndex); The error message is something like /home/sweber/graphpkg/libs/boost/boost/function/function_template.hpp:119: error: invalid initialization of reference of type 'size_t&' from expression of type 'const unsigned int' My system is a debian sarge with a g++-3.3 and boost 1.33.1. What I'm trying to do is to shift the index of the data-vector such that index 3 would address the first element. Thanks for any help. Greetings, Sebastian Weber

3 3

OOPSLA Birds of Feather - Tuesday 5:30 PM - Room E147
by Jeff Garland 23 Oct '06

23 Oct '06

For folks in Portland that want to get together and talk about Boost, please stop by tomorrow evening. This will be an open session to discuss anything you'd like to about Boost, ask questions about the Portland committee meeting, Google SoC, or any other vaguely related Boost topic. See ya there! Jeff

1 0

Implementation of Exponential Distribution
by Nelis Franken 23 Oct '06

23 Oct '06

Hi, I've been looking into statistical distributions, and while comparing Wikipedia's mathematical formulation and Boost's implementation of the Exponential Distribution, I have found two points of interest. Before continuing, I just need to add that I'm not a statistician or a mathematician, so any errors either mathematical or in interpretation below are my own. The Wikipedia reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponential_distribution The Boost implementation (line 54 of exponential_distribution.hpp) -result_type(1) / _lambda * log(result_type(1)-eng()); Where the eng() call generates a uniform random number. The first, less critical point: If eng() is uniform, then so is (1 - eng()), which allows for the simplification of the statement passed to log() from: log(result_type(1)-eng()) to log(eng()) The second, more critical point: The implementation does not seem to be the correct inverse of the original function. Boost's implementation (with above modification) is: -result_type(1) / _lambda * log(eng()); But should actually be: -log(eng()) / _lamda; Could someone perhaps clarify the above? Again, apologies if my interpretations were wrong. Kind regards, Nelis Franken

5 5

Re: [Boost-users] [bind]
by Sohail Somani 23 Oct '06

23 Oct '06

> -----Original Message----- > From: boost-users-bounces(a)lists.boost.org > [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of > Stuart Dootson > Boos.Bind will only do the binding bit - what you're wanting to do > (apply an expression to the parameter at call-time) can be > accomplished with Boost.Lambda - which has its own bind facility (with > pretty much exactly the same syntax as Boost.Bind) that you'll need to > use instead of Boost.Bind. Do you know if there are any plans to unify boost bind and lambda bind? I have heard about it...

1 0

[boost::shared_ptr] performance killer
by Ovanes Markarian 23 Oct '06

23 Oct '06

Hello, we have some application, where boost::shared_ptr is extensively used. After profiling with gprof I got that the shared_ptr destructor is very expensive. I used following g++ compiler flags to compile: -Wall -ftemplate-depth-50 -fexceptions -fexpensive-optimizations -O3 Are there may be some MACRO-defs, which can enable/disable some additional optimizations? With Kind Regards, Ovanes Markarian

5 15

[mpl::map] question for Dave ;)
by Ovanes Markarian 23 Oct '06

23 Oct '06

Dave, sorry to address you directly. I assume you were absent last week, so nobody answered my posts. :( Can you take a look at them? I have a problem resizing mpl::map to 150 elements. http://lists.boost.org/boost-users/2006/10/22961.php http://lists.boost.org/boost-users/2006/10/22988.php With Kind Regards, Ovanes Markarian

1 0

[Numeric.Interval_Lib] typecasting behaviour
by tirath 23 Oct '06

23 Oct '06

Hi all, Background... I'm using the interval arithmetic library to evaluate the accuracy of different algorithms for my application (i.e. I'm using the library "offline"; once a winner is chosen, the interval arithmetic will be removed). One possibility that I am pursuing is using mixed precision arithmetic; i.e. do some parts in double precision, some parts in single precision - this is to explore the possibility of eventually utilising non-conventional processing hardware such as GPUs, which tend to have only single precision arithmetic hardware. The query... Before I started using the library, I had this assumption: let A be a float with an exact representation (i.e. width=0). If we cast A to a double, the resulting double will have a non-zero width - specifically the width will be equal to the extra precision afforded to doubles vs floats. Unless I've messed something up, I find that the library does not actually behave this way, and to be frank, I think it ought to! :-) Here's the simple testcase: typedef interval<float> I1; typedef interval<double> I2; I1 y = 1.0; I2 yy = (I1)y; cout << yy.upper() - yy.lower(); I expected yy.upper()-yy.lower() to be non-zero, but it was zero. I had a look at the policies but couldn't spot anything obviously relevant to this situation. Any thoughts on this behaviour per se, or any ideas on a neat and elegant way to implement my desired behaviour? FWIW, my system is PowerPC G4 with powerpc-apple-darwin8-g++-4.0.0 (GCC) 4.0.0 20041026 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 4061). -tirath

3 6

creating lambda expressions incrementally
by Arnaldur Gylfason 23 Oct '06

23 Oct '06

Hi, I´m writing a simple expression parser in boost::spirit that can parse a string like "_1 + _2" or "log(_1)" and return a function object that does just that. I used boost::lamda for that and return it as boost::function object. Now I want to parse compositions like "sqrt(_1*_1 + _2*_2)" or "(_1 + _2)*_2" etc. It is easy to parse this of course but I have to create the corresponding function incrementally (in a loop or recursively) and that means I have to keep incremental lambdas until the whole expression has been created. I can not store them as boost::function since they do not work with lambda operator overloading (apart from the fact that it would be too costly). I need a lambda type for these intermediate lambda objects. I guess the auto type specifier would solve this but when will that be available I wonder? The typeof seems to provide a solution though. I was just trying it and it seems to work! Am I on the right track or am I overlooking something? If anyone knows a better solution please tell me! cheers Arnaldur Gylfason

4 8

[BGL] Correct way to retrieve properties
by Leandro Melo 23 Oct '06

23 Oct '06

Hi, I'd like to make about whether this is the correct way to retrieve a vertex (or edge) property from graph. In this case, the vertex is property is my_v_prop and the edge property is my_e_prop. //... typedef adjacency_list<vecS, vecS, directedS, my_v_prop, my_e_prop> Graph; //.... std::pair<VI, VI> vi = vertices(g); //VI are vertices iterators. for (; !(vi.first == vi.second); ++vi.first) { vertex_descriptor v = *vi.first; //Now, I want to retrieve the property of v. my_v_prop data = g[v]; } Is it the the best/fastest/easiest way to retrieve the property? Thanks. -- Leandro Terra C. Melo

2 1

time_duration compile warning
by Leon Mergen 22 Oct '06

22 Oct '06

Hello, I'm using GCC 4.0.2 20050808 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.0.1-4ubuntu9), and the time_duration class was generating the following warning for me: /usr/local/include/boost/boost/date_time/time_duration.hpp:58: warning: control may reach end of non-void function I've heard that I wasn't the first person with this problem, and well, since I like my code to compile clean (treat warnings as errors), this was preventing me to do so. Apparently GCC had some troubles with seeing that the static tick_type to_tick_count () function defined at time_resolution_traits.hpp was always returning something. Simply moving the code inside the else {} block to the end of the function made GCC confident that the function was indeed always returning something. Looks more like a GCC bug, but here's the patch: root@solatis1:/usr/local/include/boost/boost/date_time# diff time_resolution_traits.hpp time_resolution_traits.hpp~ 123,125c123,127 < return (((fractional_seconds_type(hours)*3600) < + (fractional_seconds_type(minutes)*60) < + seconds)*res_adjust()) + fs; --- > else{ > return (((fractional_seconds_type(hours)*3600) > + (fractional_seconds_type(minutes)*60) > + seconds)*res_adjust()) + fs; > } root@solatis1:/usr/local/include/boost/boost/date_time# This is for boost 1.33.1 Regards, Leon Mergen http://www.solatis.com

2 2

shmem - Allocating enough space. open and allocate.
by Andrea Carbone 22 Oct '06

22 Oct '06

Hello dear boost users, I am trying to use the shmem library for the first time. The domain of the application is centered on the passing of image frames from process that acquires the images to the client process via a local shared memory segment. In short, nothing really complicated. A synchronized writer/reader process. I started from looking at processA/processB example in the example directory. I am using boost 1.33.1 and shmem 0.93 (the latest available from boost vault). If I open the segment with the exact number of bytes needed: > const int memsize = 320*240; > //Create shared memory > if(!segment.open_or_create(shMemName, memsize)){ > std::cout << "error creating shared memory\n"; > return -1; > }; Then I cannot use: > unsigned char* uchar_ptr = (unsigned char*)segment.allocate(num_elements); with num_elements equal to the memsize. I see that there is need for an extra memory space to pass as second argument to the open() function... (for example 320*240+1024) ... How can I know in advance how many bytes are necessary to allocate the space actually needed? For instance, what is the difference between the size in open(..) and allocate(..)? In this case I just need a raw_memory segment .... In more complex cases? Is there some rule of thumb? Andrea Carbone

3 6

[iterators] Do I need and how to use a custom difference type
by Markus Bernhardt 20 Oct '06

20 Oct '06

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have a custom vector-like template class for scalar types which compresses the contents similar to the infamous vector<bool> template. If for example all stored values are in the range from 0 to 1023 then only 10 bits will be used to store each value. If you insert the value 1024 to the sequence the bitcount will be increased to 11 and the whole sequence get rewritten. Now I want to use boost::iterator to create a "random access traversal iterator". I think I have to provide a custom Difference parameter, because std::ptrdiff_t will not work (right?). I have simply no idea how to do that. Any comments are welcome. Thank you, Markus -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFNLIUdnooMonJSYkRAi3dAJ91CwtdgBRdjDnt0gFKxvh0Hq7WVwCfUST/ kpFy9EA5MGZvU1cF7RKnjZw= =c53t -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 1

Re: [Boost-users] Support for VS 2005 C++/CLI
by John Dunn 20 Oct '06

20 Oct '06

From: Peter Dimov > > Well... the download page for the beta SP > > https://connect.microsoft.com/visualstudio > > has a Feedback link > > http://connect.microsoft.com/feedback/default.aspx?SiteID=210 > > Since the SP is a beta, they probably pay attention to > feedback from beta testers. :-) I've posted feedback regarding the issue. If anyone is feeling bored feel free to vote for my issue ( #230171 ) - perhaps they use the voting to determine priority in some fashion. https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?Feedba ckID=230171

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] Support for VS 2005 C++/CLI offtopic: why C++/C LI?
by John Dunn 20 Oct '06

20 Oct '06

> From: Andre Krause > > just a beginners question, not want to start any flames: > why are you using C++/CLI mode, if you are using portable > libraries like boost anyway? why not build a native C++ > application? what are pro's and con's? i must admit that i > never got my head up into .net stuff, because i thought: "no > way, i completely will loose cross platform." but now with > mono, thats not true that much anymore. i heard that bytecode > might be even faster than native code, because these bytecode > JIT compilers can "magically" optimise speed at runtime!! ( > see http://psyco.sourceforge.net/, > http://www.kano.net/javabench/ , > http://www.idiom.com/~zilla/Computer/javaCbenchmark.html ) > Valid question. I'm using C++/CLI because I want to use the new Windows Presentation Foundation ( WPF ) libries which only have a managed API. So my choices are C++/CLI, C#, VB or XAML. Using these libraries are the only way to get 'next-gen' hardware accelerated GUI applications as far as I know. Compared to the Win32 API, WPF is a huge win - it's saved me months since I didn't have to write my own windowing framework. If our application was Windows only I'd probably not be using boost but we also have a bunch of shared portable code that needs to run on Windows, x86 Linux and PPC Linux, so I need to figure out how to integrate boost properly into a C++/CLI application.

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] Support for VS 2005 C++/CLI
by Nat Goodspeed 20 Oct '06

20 Oct '06

> -----Original Message----- > From: boost-users-bounces(a)lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users- > bounces(a)lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of John Dunn > Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 3:23 PM > To: 'boost-users(a)lists.boost.org' > Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Support for VS 2005 C++/CLI (Peter Dimov) > > Peter Dimov wrote : > > Did you rebuild the Boost.Thread library with the new SP? You probably > > still have a dependency on the old VC runtime in it if you didn't, > > whereas the application now depends on the new runtime. > > Yes, I did rebuild boost after installing the new SP. [Nat] I've just run into a very strange behavior when loading DLLs in VS 2005, and I wonder whether your problem might be related. Our app dynamically loads certain DLLs. I coded a static object in the DLL whose constructor performs some initialization. The app loads the DLL and the OS returns control to the requesting app. Surprise! Control hasn't yet reached the static object's constructor! I'm floored by this behavior, which seems to me to violate one of the fundamental promises of the C++ language. It appears that because this particular DLL contains both unmanaged (native) and managed (CLR) code, somehow the compiler decided that it would be okay to defer initializing this static native class object until CLR initialization -- which only happens the first time control passes into any managed code in the DLL! Before that time, we've already called lots of native code in the DLL with this object sitting there uninitialized. One is tempted to invoke some managed code from DllMain() to force CLR initialization as soon as the DLL is loaded -- except that it's flatly forbidden. The MS runtime throws an exception with a stderr message to the effect that you may NOT invoke managed code during DllMain(). (I don't know the technical reason for that restriction. Probably that's why Microsoft implemented this highly dubious "lazy initialization" strategy in the first place.) So far I've thought of no better workaround than to introduce a function with a canonical name (e.g. "initManaged()") in each such DLL. Our routine that dynamically loads a DLL will test for the existence of such a function, and if found, will call it. But I haven't yet implemented this workaround. The chilling fact is that it's possible to begin actively using a newly-loaded VS 2005 DLL containing unconstructed static objects. Will such a system run any given third-party library? Flip a coin. I have no idea whether this has any bearing on your problem -- but to me, it seems to call into question the robustness of the whole VS 2005 C++ implementation.

1 0

[Summer of Code] An overview of Boost participation in GSoC 2006
by Joaquín Mª López Muñoz 20 Oct '06

20 Oct '06

Hello, A report of our experience in GSoC 2006 has been uploaded at http://boost.org/more/boost_soc_06_overview.html The report includes an analysis of the areas of improvement we found and a list of action proposals aimed at doing it better next year. I hope you find it an instructive and entertaining read. Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo

2 1

Support for VS 2005 C++/CLI
by John Dunn 20 Oct '06

20 Oct '06

I'm curious if boost currently ( or plans to ) support C++/CLI. For the past couple of months I've been using boost in a managed C++ application without any issues ( but with quite a few scary warnings ). I've recently installed the beta VS2005 SP and now my applicaiton crashes with the following error if I link with the boost::thread library. The application failed to initialize properly (0xc000007b). Click on OK to terminate the application. Is this something that should work? I seem to remeber when I initially downloaded boost some mention of it not supporting C++/CLI but I couldn't find that reference again. Since it worked pre service pack should I complain to MS? Is my best bet putting all my boost code inside of a DLL? Here's a simple program which will crash if compiled with /clr. Note that no managed C++ objects are used/created and I haven't instantiated a thread object either. #include <iostream> #include <boost/thread/thread.hpp> #include <boost/thread/xtime.hpp> static void thread_func() { int count = 5; while( count ) { std::cout << "thread func..." << std::endl; boost::xtime xt; boost::xtime_get( &xt, boost::TIME_UTC ); xt.sec += 1; boost::thread::sleep( xt ); count--; } } int main( int argc, const char* * argv ) { std::cout << "running" << std::endl; return 1; } Any pointers would be appreciated. Thanks- John Dunn QSC Audio Products, Inc.

4 3

Re: [Boost-users] Memory problem using shared_ptr w/ STL-containers, gcc
by Wu Yinghui, Freddie 20 Oct '06

20 Oct '06

> And thus spake "Baranowski, Daniel" <dbaranowski(a)LSIJAX.COM> > Thu, 19 Oct 2006 14:25:46 -0400: > >> You'll see that the objects are or are not getting destroyed (they are >> on my comp). I played around with this in VC 8 and the memory usage >> didn't go up like yours. Here's how it looks on my system: > > Well, I have to apologise in one respect, the memory definitely gets > re-used, which is a relief. What remains is the impossibly-large memory > footprint of >10kb per object, which I have to investigate further. At the > moment it is such that a list of a little over 5000 (small) POD objects > eats well over 100MB of memory, and that just can't be right... however I > will check if this is really caused by the shared_ptr... > > Anyway, thank you all for your suggestions and your time. You have been a > great help. > > Regards, > Robert Hi, As what Andrew has already mentioned, using shared_ptr for simple POD is way too heavy in terms of memory overhead. I'd suggest you try two alternatives and see which one fits you more: 1) Store the POD directly in your container. AFAIK, copying 2 integers in and out of the container is not heavy at all in most cases. So that might help remove the trouble of using shared_ptr all together. 2) If you insist on storing pointer to the POD in the container, why not take a look at Boost.Pointer_Container library? The library provides the whole range of containers for pointer types. Better still, memory management on destruction is automatic in the pointer containers. Hope this helps... Cheers, Freddie -- Wu Yinghui, Freddie Research & Development Senior Software Engineer Volume Interactions Pte Ltd 1 Kim Seng Promenade, #12-01 Great World City East Tower Singapore 237994 Tel: +65 62226962 (Ext 216) Fax: +65 62226215 Email: yhwu(a)volumeinteractions.com URL: http://www.volumeinteractions.com Important: This message is intended for the recipient(s) addressed above. It contains privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. You must not read, copy, use, or disseminate this communication in any form. Thank you.

2 1

Memory problem using shared_ptr w/ STL-containers, gcc
by Robert Fendt 20 Oct '06

20 Oct '06

Hi, I have a somewhat peculiar problem concerning the shared_ptr template. I use an STL container to hold several shared_ptr values. When the container is destroyed, all the destructors are called correctly, but the memory is not freed. Furthermore, shared_ptr usage introduces a 100x memory overhead (or more) in my case. Compiler system is GCC. Consider the following short example: #include <iostream> #include <string> #include <deque> #include <boost/shared_ptr.hpp> class A { public: int a; int b; }; int main() { std::string tmp; std::cout << "Enter something to continue" << std::endl; std::cin >> tmp; { std::deque<boost::shared_ptr<A> > list; for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { boost::shared_ptr<A> ptr(new A()); list.push_back(ptr); } std::cout << "Enter something to continue" << std::endl; std::cin >> tmp; } std::cout << "Enter something to continue" << std::endl; std::cin >> tmp; } Between the first and the second stop, the program size in memory grows by about 150k... and that's for 10 objects which are <20 bytes large, individually. And to top it off, it leaks memory. Between stops two and three the memory *should* be freed since the scope is left. I can include a destructor doing debug output in the class which shows that the objects are indeed destroyed. But the memory stays allocated. I suspect this is a GCC problem, but I have actually no clue... I tested it on a recent Debian "Unstable" and an Ubuntu "Breezy". GCC versions varying from 3.2 to 4.1. Or do I use the template in a wrong way? Suggestions would be very welcome... and if this is a known bug in GCC, a feasible work-around would be great. Thanks in advance, Robert

4 5

depth_first_search compilation problem
by Saptarshi Ghosh 19 Oct '06

19 Oct '06

Dear all, I am facing a problem with boost::depth_first_search. I couldn't compile the example http://boost.org/libs/graph/example/dfs-example.cpp after changing line no 42: typedef adjacency_list < listS, vecS, directedS > graph_t; to: typedef adjacency_list < listS, listS, directedS > graph_t; I need to use < listS, listS, directedS > because of performance issue. I have used gcc 3.2.2 and gcc 4.1.0 without any success. Any suggestion how to solve the problem ? regards, Saptarshi __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

2 1

Re: [Boost-users] Support for VS 2005 C++/CLI
by John Dunn 19 Oct '06

19 Oct '06

Peter Dimov wrote : > Does it fail with both the static and the dynamic VC runtime? I don't think you can use the static runtime with CLI. When I try, I get the following error - cl: Command line error D8016 : '/MTd' and '/clr' command-line options are incompatible Both the release and debug versions fail in the same manner.

3 2

Re: [Boost-users] Support for VS 2005 C++/CLI (Peter Dimov)
by John Dunn 19 Oct '06

19 Oct '06

Peter Dimov wrote : > Did you rebuild the Boost.Thread library with the new SP? You probably > still have a dependency on the old VC runtime in it if you didn't, > whereas the application now depends on the new runtime. Yes, I did rebuild boost after installing the new SP. I couldn't figure out how to get bjam to clean boost so I just deleted the boost_src/bin directory and re-installed. The .lib files all have new datestamps so I believe they were rebuilt correctly.

2 1

Re: [Boost-users] Boost-users Digest, Vol 1062, Issue 2
by james.jones＠firstinvestors.com 19 Oct '06

19 Oct '06

From: Arnaldur Gylfason <arnaldur.gylfason(a)decode.is> > Let's say I have to parse "(_1 + _2)*_1" and "(_1/_2)*_1". I only get > these command strings at runtime so I don't know the expressions at > compile time. I don't think there's any hope of making it work this way. Ultimately you really need to use run-time expression structures if you're building expressions at run-time. This is not hard to do, however. My advice would be to use boost::variant. - James Jones Administrative Data Mgmt. Webmaster 375 Raritan Center Pkwy, Suite A Data Architect Edison, NJ 08837

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] enable_shared_from_this & inheritance
by Nat Goodspeed 19 Oct '06

19 Oct '06

> -----Original Message----- > From: boost-users-bounces(a)lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users- > bounces(a)lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Peter Dimov > Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 12:39 PM > To: boost-users(a)lists.boost.org > Subject: Re: [Boost-users] enable_shared_from_this & inheritance > > Peter Dimov wrote: > > > I have no idea why this compiles. It shouldn't, B has two > > enable_shared_from_this<> bases, and the constructor will only > > initialize one of them. Only one of FooA and FooB works (FooA in this > > case). I'll investigate. > > The code compiles on g++ and como, but neither FooA nor FooB works. Looks > like an MSVC (and Borland) bug. It would be nice if I could find a way to > make it fail at compile time instead of not working, though... [Nat] <silly question> Could the ref count be put into a virtual base class so that only one instance would appear in a given leaf class, regardless of how many enable_shared_from_this<> bases it has? </silly question>

2 1

enable_shared_from_this & inheritance
by Alex Ott 19 Oct '06

19 Oct '06

Hello all I have one problem with enable_shared_from_this - i have one Base class, that inherit from enable_shared_from_this<Base>. But i also need to do shared_from_this from classes inherited from Base class. Without explicit inheritance from enable_shared_from_this for Derived code fail, but when i do enable_shared_from_this<Derived>, my code fail with "error: reference to 'shared_from_this' is ambiguous" How i can resolve this issue? -- With best wishes, Alex Ott http://alexott.blogspot.com/ http://content-filtering.blogspot.com/ http://xtalk.msk.su/~ott/

4 7

[Boost.Serialization] How to make CString behave like a primitive in xml archive?
by Markus Werle 19 Oct '06

19 Oct '06

Hi! I cannot figure out how to make some class behave like a primitive and let boost::serialization rely on ostream/istream operators for xml input. This makes sense to me for e.g. String representations other than std::string. It seems it does not suffice to define the iostream operators. As an example here is my try to get things right for an MFC/ATL CString: std::istream & operator>>(std::istream &is, CString & S) { std::string s; is >> s; S = s.c_str(); return is; } #ifndef BOOST_NO_STD_WSTREAMBUF std::wistream & operator>>(std::wistream &is, CString & S) { std::wstring s; is >> s; S = s.c_str(); return is; } #endif BOOST_CLASS_IMPLEMENTATION(CString, boost::serialization::primitive_type) Output works fine due to automatic conversion of CString to char* but input fails. Debugging shows the end tag is "eaten" and appended to the value. This means that in struct C { CString SomeString; }; template<class Archive> inline void serialize(Archive & ar, C & c, const unsigned int version) { using boost::serialization::make_nvp; ar & make_nvp("SomeTag", c.SomeString); }; C c; c.SomeString = Test; reading the archive yields SomeString == "Test</SomeTag>" and an exception ("stream error") is thrown by basic_xml_archive. Any hint how to get things fixed here? This would be nice in cases a string represenation is already defined. Or should I work around this with binary_object? And how? regards, Markus

2 5

[graph] Doc für custom properties
by Jens Müller 19 Oct '06

19 Oct '06

http://boost.sourceforge.net/libs/graph/doc/using_adjacency_list.html#sec:a… says: "Creating your own property types and properties is easy; just define a tag class for your new property. The property tag class will need to define num with a unique integer ID, and kind which should be either edge_property_tag, vertex_property_tag, or graph_property_tag." But the sample tag class below don't define num. Has this become obsolete? The book (on page 52) only mentions an enum, where the value (without _t) is set to "a unique #", then BOOST_INSTALL_PROPERTY is called, the example on the above page doesn't state a value here as well.

1 0

Can't build Python library on Solaris
by chris botos 19 Oct '06

19 Oct '06

Hi, I sent this once, but I'm not sure that it made it. Please accept my apology if it is a repeat. I'm new to this list and to Boost. I'm interested in using Boost to wrap C++ objects in Python. The environment is Solaris 10, x86. I did the following: Downloaded boost_1_33_1.tar and extracted it to /opt/boost. >setenv PYTHON_ROOT /usr/local > cd to /opt/boost/boost_1_33_1/libs/python/build > bjam I get lots of error messages, repeated throughout the compile. They are generally grouped around the same line: '->' cannot appear in a constant-expression '&' cannot appear in a constant-expression template argument 1 is invalid value is not a member of '<declaration errors>' ...failed gcc-C++-action ... If I "bjam" from /opt/boost/boost_1_33_1, I get the same errors when it gets to the python library. I would most appreciate any help with this! Regards, Chris Botos

1 0

[function][lambda] Create a boost function to a bind functor
by Chris Weed 19 Oct '06

19 Oct '06

Hi, I would like to create a boost::function to a lambda::bind functor such as float fx(float a, float b) { return a+b; } int main() { boost::function<float(float)> f = boost::lambda::bind(fx,_2,2); std::cout << f(3) << std::endl; return 0; } I would expect this to bind 2 to the "b" argument of fx, and print "5". Instead with msvc-8.0 I get a bunch or compile errors. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Chris

3 5

[mpl::map] compilation error when using custom length
by Ovanes Markarian 19 Oct '06

19 Oct '06

As previously described in my former posting (http://lists.boost.org/boost-users/2006/10/22961.php) I am trying to instantiate a mpl::map with 150 types. Defining macros as stated in the documentation did not help. After taking a look in to the boost/mpl/map.hpp include file I assume that previously described error resides because compiler tries to include some pre-generated files: ----------------map.hpp excerpt----------------- #if !defined(BOOST_MPL_PREPROCESSING_MODE) # include <boost/mpl/limits/map.hpp> # include <boost/mpl/aux_/na.hpp> # include <boost/mpl/aux_/config/preprocessor.hpp> # include <boost/preprocessor/inc.hpp> # include <boost/preprocessor/cat.hpp> # include <boost/preprocessor/stringize.hpp> #if !defined(BOOST_NEEDS_TOKEN_PASTING_OP_FOR_TOKENS_JUXTAPOSING) # define AUX778076_MAP_HEADER \ BOOST_PP_CAT(map, BOOST_MPL_LIMIT_MAP_SIZE).hpp \ /**/ #else # define AUX778076_MAP_HEADER \ BOOST_PP_CAT(map, BOOST_MPL_LIMIT_MAP_SIZE)##.hpp \ /**/ #endif # include BOOST_PP_STRINGIZE(boost/mpl/map/AUX778076_MAP_HEADER) # undef AUX778076_MAP_HEADER #endif #include <boost/mpl/aux_/config/use_preprocessed.hpp> #if !defined(BOOST_MPL_CFG_NO_PREPROCESSED_HEADERS) \ && !defined(BOOST_MPL_PREPROCESSING_MODE) # define BOOST_MPL_PREPROCESSED_HEADER map.hpp # include <boost/mpl/aux_/include_preprocessed.hpp> #else # include <boost/mpl/limits/map.hpp> # define AUX778076_SEQUENCE_NAME map # define AUX778076_SEQUENCE_LIMIT BOOST_MPL_LIMIT_MAP_SIZE # include <boost/mpl/aux_/sequence_wrapper.hpp> #endif // BOOST_MPL_CFG_NO_PREPROCESSED_HEADERS #endif // BOOST_MPL_MAP_HPP_INCLUDED -------------end of map.hpp excerpt------------- As described in the documentation this file can not generate anything in a preprocessor mode until the macro BOOST_MPL_PREPROCESSING_MODE was defined. After the definition of this macro I got new errors. This errors were referring to some unknown types but the fact of preprossor execution was obvious at this time. The new errors are: c:\boost\include\boost-1_33_1\boost\mpl\aux_\sequence_wrapper.hpp(246) : error C2065: 'na' : undeclared identifier c:\boost\include\boost-1_33_1\boost\mpl\aux_\sequence_wrapper.hpp(254) : error C2913: explicit specialization; 'boost::mpl::map' is not a specialization of a class template c:\boost\include\boost-1_33_1\boost\mpl\aux_\sequence_wrapper.hpp(254) : error C2976: 'boost::mpl::map' : too few template arguments c:\boost\include\boost-1_33_1\boost\mpl\aux_\sequence_wrapper.hpp(254) : see declaration of 'boost::mpl::map' To be honest I do not know what would be the right solution, but the documentation insisted way does not work. Attached is my cpp file containing the defintions. I try to compile it using Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition. Should I run some generator scripts to create map60.hpp ... map150.hpp? Or is there any other solution? Would really appreciate any help! With Kind Regards, Ovanes Markarian

1 0

[boost-users][serialization] unused variable in boost/archive/detail/[oserialize.hpp | iserialize.hpp]
by david callu 19 Oct '06

19 Oct '06

Hi all I have a warning message when i compile my application. /usr/include/boost/archive/detail/oserializer.hpp:118: attention : unused parameter 'flags' /usr/include/boost/archive/detail/iserializer.hpp:126: attention : unused parameter 'flags' This is not really important but it's not really serious to have warning in the compilation. I see in Boost CVS that the "flags" variable is not yet commented. Why didn't do it? David Callu

1 0

[asio] Win32 exception harmless?
by Christian Henning 18 Oct '06

18 Oct '06

Hi there, when I call acceptor::listen() in my application I get the following exception: First-chance exception at 0x7c812a5b in Server.exe: 0x000006D9: There are no more endpoints available from the endpoint mapper. The client can connect. The server does not fail or terminate. Everything seems fine. So, can I ignore that exception? Thanks, Christian

2 1

[asio] some general user questions
by Christian Henning 18 Oct '06

18 Oct '06

Hi there, I have been using ASIO for some weeks, now. I really like the lib and have made good progress. Even though the learning curve was quite steep for me. I have never really programmed networking code. So please excuse my most likely dumb questions. The reason why I ask is to get to know the lib better and try to avoid adding code on my side for stuff I can simply poll from the lib. 1. [server side] Are errors the only way to get notice when a client disconnects. 2. [server side] How can I poll if a server is connected to a client. 3. I have been asking questions regarding asio for some time now and never gotten any answer. Is the boost user list the right forum? For example yesterday I posted a message for a memory leaks reported by MFC and nobody replied, so far. 4. [server side] When running io_service::run() on a separate thread, is io_service::interrupt() the only way to let ioservice return from run(). Basically what do I need to do to gracefully quite my server app when there are still clients connected. Same questions goes for the client apps. 5. [client side] When I quite the client app (MFC) I get a lot of these error message: "The I/O operation has been aborted because of either a thread exit or an application request". I seems for every message I send to the server I got one of this error. I use io_service::post() to initiate a send operation. I can provide sample applications that produce my problems. I'm using VC7.1 SP2. Thanks ahead, Christian

2 1

threadpool library
by Philipp Henkel 18 Oct '06

18 Oct '06

Hi, I'm the author of a boost based thread pool lib (http://threadpool.sf.net) mentioned before in the "boost::thread queries" thread and I would like to give you some insight in the lib's future. As there's strong request for further features I plan to extend the pool step by step. Scott Meyers inspired me with policy based design at one of this C++ workshop and therefore I'm going to provide more policies for the pool. 1. Task scheduling policies Lifo, fifo, and priority based policies are already implemented. However, there's some work to be done to support bounded / blocking queues. 2. Pool resizing policies (Not implemented) These policies control the number of threads in the pool: Fixed pool, growing pool, bounded pool, dynamic shrinking, ... 3. Future creation policy (Not implemented) - General support for futures - Implementation independence: support for arbitrary future implementations (e.g. the future lib in boost vault) - I plan to provide a simple future implementation modelled on Peter Dimov's proposal http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2006/n2096.html 4. General design I think, the Java framework (J2SE5 as java.util.concurrent) is well designed. I plan to provide similar functionality (futures, dynamic pools, etc) without relying on the interface concept (using templates and boost::function/bind instead). I have not yet read the document "Multithreading API for C++0X" ( http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2006/n2094.html) Anyway, the threadpool lib should focus on providing a flexible, extensible, light-weight pool which can be used easily in high level concepts (like the Channel lib, fully featured futures, etc.). Any ideas and comments are welcome. Best regards, Philipp

2 2

[BGL] fails to compile on Suse
by Pranab K. Nag 18 Oct '06

18 Oct '06

Hello, I have been trying to get bgl-python (cvs v315) working on suse10.0. Compilation gives a severe error: boost_1_33_1/boost/graph/graph_traits.hpp:49: error: ‘null_vertex’ is not a member of ‘boost::filtered_graph<const boost::graph::python::basic_graph<boost::undirectedS> ..... This is on suse10.0. Everything else seems to compile without much complaining. I can get it to to compile on an experimental fedora core machine but I need the suse machine for development and testing. Let me know if there is a solution to this. I tried searching the archives but seems like I am the only one with this problem. -PK

2 1

Multiple definitions on SuSE 10.1/GCC 4.1.0
by Michael Klemm 18 Oct '06

18 Oct '06

Hey there! We have trouble compiling our project with Boost 1.33 (as of SuSE 10.1). We tried to compile our project, which uses the serialization capabilities of Boost to serialize C++ objects into MPI messages. On IA32, everything works fine with Boost 1.34-rc1 (Debian, kernel 2.6.15.7). However, on my AMD machine with SuSE 10.1 and Boost 1.33, we get linker errors related to multiple definitions of templates: > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/Component.o:/proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/Component.cpp:24: multiple definition of `boost::archive::det > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/AddOperator.cpp:128: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/DelayOperator.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<co > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/DelayOperator.cpp:25: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<Component>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/AddOperator.cpp:128: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/DelayOperator.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<co > /usr/include/boost/archive/detail/oserializer.hpp:148: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<Polynom>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/usr/include/boost/archive/detail/oserializer.hpp:148: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/DelayOperator.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<co > /usr/include/c++/4.1.0/bits/stl_tree.h:1262: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<MapPolynom>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/usr/include/c++/4.1.0/bits/stl_tree.h:1262: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/Iterator.o:/usr/include/boost/serialization/export.hpp:194: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail: > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/AddOperator.cpp:128: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/MapPolynom.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<const > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/MapPolynom.cpp:202: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<Component>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/AddOperator.cpp:128: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/MapPolynom.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<const > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/MapPolynom.cpp:204: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<Polynom>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/usr/include/boost/archive/detail/oserializer.hpp:148: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/MapPolynom.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<const > /usr/include/c++/4.1.0/bits/stl_tree.h:1262: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<MapPolynom>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/usr/include/c++/4.1.0/bits/stl_tree.h:1262: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/MapPolynomIterator.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pa > /usr/include/boost/serialization/export.hpp:194: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<Component>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/AddOperator.cpp:128: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/MapPolynomIterator.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pa > /usr/include/boost/archive/detail/oserializer.hpp:148: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<Polynom>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/usr/include/boost/archive/detail/oserializer.hpp:148: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/MapPolynomIterator.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pa The full log of errors is at the end of this message. The command used for linking is: /opt/mpich/ch-p4//bin/mpiCC -shared /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/Component.o /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/DelayOperator.o /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/Iterator.o /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/MapPolynom.o /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/MapPolynomIterator.o /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/MulOperator.o /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/Operator.o /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/PolyNormalizator.o /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/Polynom.o /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/ShiftOperator.o /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/XExtractor.o /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/NTLAdaptor.o /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/polycommon.o /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/RandomNumberPool.o -o /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI//lib/libpoly.so Replacing mpiCC with g++ does not help either (and on IA32 this command works well). I also tried to use a self-compiled version of Boost on the AMD (Boost 1.34-rc1) but it showed the same compiler errors. I don't think it's a problem with our program, as in IA32 everything works as expected. Any hints? Thanks in advance! Best regards -michael Full log or error messages: > proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/Component.o:/proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/Component.cpp:24: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<Component>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/AddOperator.cpp:128: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/DelayOperator.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<const int, Component*> > > >': > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/DelayOperator.cpp:25: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<Component>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/AddOperator.cpp:128: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/DelayOperator.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<const int, Component*> > > >': > /usr/include/boost/archive/detail/oserializer.hpp:148: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<Polynom>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/usr/include/boost/archive/detail/oserializer.hpp:148: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/DelayOperator.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<const int, Component*> > > >': > /usr/include/c++/4.1.0/bits/stl_tree.h:1262: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<MapPolynom>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/usr/include/c++/4.1.0/bits/stl_tree.h:1262: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/Iterator.o:/usr/include/boost/serialization/export.hpp:194: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<Component>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/AddOperator.cpp:128: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/MapPolynom.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<const int, Component*> > > >': > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/MapPolynom.cpp:202: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<Component>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/AddOperator.cpp:128: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/MapPolynom.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<const int, Component*> > > >': > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/MapPolynom.cpp:204: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<Polynom>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/usr/include/boost/archive/detail/oserializer.hpp:148: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/MapPolynom.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<const int, Component*> > > >': > /usr/include/c++/4.1.0/bits/stl_tree.h:1262: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<MapPolynom>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/usr/include/c++/4.1.0/bits/stl_tree.h:1262: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/MapPolynomIterator.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<const int, Component*> > > >': > /usr/include/boost/serialization/export.hpp:194: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<Component>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/AddOperator.cpp:128: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/MapPolynomIterator.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<const int, Component*> > > >': > /usr/include/boost/archive/detail/oserializer.hpp:148: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<Polynom>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/usr/include/boost/archive/detail/oserializer.hpp:148: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/MapPolynomIterator.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<const int, Component*> > > >': > /usr/include/c++/4.1.0/bits/stl_tree.h:1262: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<MapPolynom>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/usr/include/c++/4.1.0/bits/stl_tree.h:1262: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/MulOperator.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<const int, Component*> > > >': > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/MulOperator.cpp:255: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<Component>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/AddOperator.cpp:128: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/MulOperator.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<const int, Component*> > > >': > /usr/include/boost/archive/detail/oserializer.hpp:148: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<Polynom>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/usr/include/boost/archive/detail/oserializer.hpp:148: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/MulOperator.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<const int, Component*> > > >': > /usr/include/c++/4.1.0/bits/stl_tree.h:1262: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<MapPolynom>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/usr/include/c++/4.1.0/bits/stl_tree.h:1262: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/Operator.o:/proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/Operator.cpp:14: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<Component>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/AddOperator.cpp:128: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/Operator.o:/proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/Operator.cpp:14: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<Polynom>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/usr/include/boost/archive/detail/oserializer.hpp:148: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/PolyNormalizator.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<const int, Component*> > > >': > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/PolyNormalizator.cpp:22: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<Component>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/AddOperator.cpp:128: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/PolyNormalizator.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<const int, Component*> > > >': > /usr/include/boost/archive/detail/oserializer.hpp:148: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<Polynom>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/usr/include/boost/archive/detail/oserializer.hpp:148: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/PolyNormalizator.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<const int, Component*> > > >': > /usr/include/c++/4.1.0/bits/stl_tree.h:1262: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<MapPolynom>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/usr/include/c++/4.1.0/bits/stl_tree.h:1262: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/Polynom.o:/proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/include/Polynom.h:177: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<Component>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/AddOperator.cpp:128: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/Polynom.o:/proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/include/Polynom.h:177: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<Polynom>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/usr/include/boost/archive/detail/oserializer.hpp:148: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/ShiftOperator.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<const int, Component*> > > >': > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/ShiftOperator.cpp:28: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<Component>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/AddOperator.cpp:128: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/ShiftOperator.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<const int, Component*> > > >': > /usr/include/boost/archive/detail/oserializer.hpp:148: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<Polynom>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/usr/include/boost/archive/detail/oserializer.hpp:148: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/ShiftOperator.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<const int, Component*> > > >': > /usr/include/c++/4.1.0/bits/stl_tree.h:1262: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<MapPolynom>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/usr/include/c++/4.1.0/bits/stl_tree.h:1262: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/XExtractor.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<const int, Component*> > > >': > /usr/include/boost/serialization/export.hpp:194: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<Component>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/AddOperator.cpp:128: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/XExtractor.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<const int, Component*> > > >': > /usr/include/boost/archive/detail/oserializer.hpp:148: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<Polynom>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/usr/include/boost/archive/detail/oserializer.hpp:148: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/XExtractor.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<const int, Component*> > > >': > /usr/include/c++/4.1.0/bits/stl_tree.h:1262: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<MapPolynom>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/usr/include/c++/4.1.0/bits/stl_tree.h:1262: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/NTLAdaptor.o: In function `NTLAdaptor': > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/NTLAdaptor.cpp:5: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<Component>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/AddOperator.cpp:128: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/NTLAdaptor.o: In function `NTLAdaptor': > /usr/include/boost/archive/detail/oserializer.hpp:148: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<Polynom>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/usr/include/boost/archive/detail/oserializer.hpp:148: first defined here > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/NTLAdaptor.o: In function `destroy<std::map<int, Component*, std::less<int>, std::allocator<std::pair<const int, Component*> > > >': > /usr/include/c++/4.1.0/bits/stl_tree.h:1262: multiple definition of `boost::archive::detail::guid_initializer<MapPolynom>::instance' > /proj.stand/klemm/evolFIR-MPI/src/share/AddOperator.o:/usr/include/c++/4.1.0/bits/stl_tree.h:1262: first defined here > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

1 0