- Boost-users - lists.preview.boost.org

[BGL] Mapping a source Graph to a target Graph
by Ioannis Nousias 05 Oct '08

05 Oct '08

Hello BGL developers, I'm looking for an algorithm that can map a source graph to a target graph. The special requirement is that the graphs have a set of vertices which are differentiated by type(colour if you like). Thus 'red' source vertices should only map to 'red' target vertices, etc. The mapping should be 1-to-1 (a 'blue' target vertex can accept one 'blue' source vertex). I assume the target graph has enough vertices of each type(colour) to map all vertices of the source graph. The target graph represents a topology, while the source graph is the data-graph to map onto that topology. I've briefly looked at the 'layout' specific algorithms provided by BGL. I thought the 'gursoy_atun_layout'could be used, but then I realised it was not meeting the requirements. The main thing that's missing is the way to differentiate vertices by type. Also I don't understand why the 'topology' is not a BGL graph as well. To put it in other words, the layout algorithms in BGL operate on a homogeneous environment. The source vertices can freely occupy any 'point' or 'position' on the target medium. I'm looking for an algorithm that operates on a heterogeneous environment, where the target 'slots' can only accept source vertices of a given type. Is there any current BGL algorithm that fits that description, or can be easily modified to cover this case? If not, can somebody point me to an efficient mapping algorithm that I could base an implementation on. thanks in advance, Ioannis -- The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.

1 1

using boost in x64 app
by LeRetha Childress 04 Oct '08

04 Oct '08

I am using Windows Vista and Visual Studio 2005 to create my 64 bit application I used bjam to build my boost libraries with the following command bjam --toolset=msvc-8.0_64 stagedir=. --build-type=complete But when I link it to my library I get many warnings like the following 1>..\..\3rdparty\boost\boost/config/abi_prefix.hpp(19) : warning C4103: 'd:\brokaw.x64\3rdparty\boost\boost\config\abi_prefix.hpp' : alignment changed after including header, may be due to missing #pragma pack(pop) 1>..\..\3rdparty\boost\boost/archive/detail/abi_prefix.hpp(11) : warning C4103: 'd:\brokaw.x64\3rdparty\boost\boost\archive\detail\abi_prefix.hpp' : alignment changed after including header, may be due to missing #pragma pack(pop) 1>..\..\3rdparty\boost\boost/archive/basic_binary_oprimitive.hpp(52) : warning C4103: 'd:\brokaw.x64\3rdparty\boost\boost\archive\basic_binary_oprimitive.hpp' : alignment changed after including header, may be due to missing #pragma pack(pop) The library builds but with 892 of these boost warnings Then when I build the driver for the app I get 219 linker errors like the following 2>overlaylibd.lib(bsVolumeLineStrip.obj) : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol "public: void __cdecl boost::archive::detail::basic_iarchive::load_object(void *,class boost::archive::detail::basic_iserializer const &)" (?load_object@basic_iarchive@detail@archive@boost@ @QEAAXPEAXAEBVbasic_iserializer@234@@Z) 2>overlaylibd.lib(bsVolumePolygons.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol "public: void __cdecl boost::archive::detail::basic_iarchive::load_object(void *,class boost::archive::detail::basic_iserializer const &)" (?load_object@basic_iarchive@detail@archive@boost@ @QEAAXPEAXAEBVbasic_iserializer@234@@Z) referenced in function "private: void __cdecl bs::Volume::Serialize::load<class boost::archive::binary_iarchive>(class boost::archive::binary_iarchive &,unsigned int)" ( ??$load@Vbinary_iarchive@archive@boost@@@Serialize@Volume@bs@@AEAAXAEAVbinary_iarchive@archive@boost@@I@Z ) Most of them are for boost::archive , boost::serilization and boost::signal Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong or how to fix these issues Thank you LeRetha Childress

2 1

[Proto] Using custom function tag in the simplified calalble context
by Joel Falcou 04 Oct '08

04 Oct '08

I've defined some custom tag for user specific function like : struct conj_tag {}; I have made the following expression builder using make_expr : template<class X> typename proto::result_of::make_expr< conj_tag, X const &>::type conj( X const& x ) { return proto::make_expr<conj_tag>(boost::cref(x)); } And I match this function using the following grammar rule : struct my_grammar : or_< // some terminal , bp::function< bp::terminal<conj_tag>, my_grammar> > {}; Now, how should I overload operator() of a callable_context to match this special tag ? Thanks in advance -- ___________________________________________ Joel Falcou - Assistant Professor PARALL Team - LRI - Universite Paris Sud XI Tel : (+33)1 69 15 66 35

4 4

[thread] win32 mutex optimization
by Alexander Gutenev 04 Oct '08

04 Oct '08

I'd like a small change to: 1. Increase mutex::lock() performance. 2. Remove auto-link to date_time. a patch attached (For some reason yesterday posting failed, trying to post again) begin 666 mutex_optimize_lock.patch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` end

1 0

How to build only these binaries?
by Sachin Garg 04 Oct '08

04 Oct '08

I want to only build both debug and release statically linked binaries. What are the build options to build just these on windows, linux and mac? To clarify, binaries which would link directly inside my executable (the libs that won't need any dll or so). On windows I am using /MT in my projects, so the libs should also statically link to msvc runtime. When using --build-type=complete it generates 5GB of binaries, which for 32-bit and 64-bit on windows, mac and linux together ends up taking a lot more space than I can afford.

4 6

[Phoenix] Review ended September 30th
by Hartmut Kaiser 03 Oct '08

03 Oct '08

Hi all, just a (last) reminder for all of you still wanting to submit a review. The official review period is over, but since I'm going prepare the review summary this weekend only anyway - you still have a day or two. Regards Hartmut Review Manager

3 2

boost::serialization forcing linker to create a lib?
by gfsdjkgf＠Safe-mail.net 03 Oct '08

03 Oct '08

Hello folks I am using boost 1.37 off the CVS with the visual studio 2008 compiler. As soon as I instantiate an archive (of boost::serialization), the linker implicitly creates a lib and a exp file for my exe. Is that wanted behavior? Why? //text_iarchive archive(file); <- When this line is not commented, the linker creates the two files. This is the linker output: 'Creating library project_manager.lib and object project_manager.exp' Thank you

4 3

Assertion in boost::mutex
by amit khandelwal 03 Oct '08

03 Oct '08

I am getting an assertion in boost::mutex while using static mutex variables. Below is the stack trace for that. void boost::mutex::lock(): Assertion `!pthread_mutex_lock(&m)' failed. #0 0xb7f9f410 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0xb75f1085 in raise () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #2 0xb75f2a01 in abort () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #3 0xb75ea10e in __assert_fail () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #4 0x080581eb in ~mutex (this=0x80f3ab8) at boost/thread/pthread/mutex.hpp:45 #5 0x0805f202 in __tcf_7 () at TimerQueue.cpp:22 #6 0xb75f4084 in exit () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #7 0xb75dc458 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 #8 0x080546c1 in _start () Any pointers/suggestions? -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Ph : (732) 647 5679 Email: khandelwal.amit(a)gmail.com Web: http://khandelwal.amit.googlepages.com/home -------------------------------------------------------------------

2 2

[Boost-user] bjam and env var
by Jérémie Fouché 03 Oct '08

03 Oct '08

Hi everybody I'm creating python modules with boost, and I'm using bjam to compile them (because, as written in the doc, it is the easiest way to compile python module created with boost.python). Actually, my jam script is specific to my directory structure. If I want to change my directory structure, or shared my project with someone who haven't the same directory structure (which is always the case), my jam files need to be changed. My jam files are at the end of this post. I tried to use environment variables without success. If I create a BOOST_ROOT env var, I can't use it in my JamRoot file, because $(BOOST_DIR) is always empty. I also tried to create a var in my user-config.jam, but the var isn't visible in my JamRoot file. So, here are my questions : 1 - Is there a good way to do this ? 2 - I didn't find exactly what is boost-build.jam for, have you an explanation ? Thanks boost-build.jam : boost-build /_Perso/projets/lib/boost_1_36_0/tools/build/v2 ; JamRoot : wx = /_Perso/projets/lib/wxWidgets2.8 ; # Specify the path to the Boost project. If you move this project, # adjust this path to refer to the Boost root directory. use-project boost : ../../../../lib/boost_1_36_0 ; # Set up the project-wide requirements that everything uses the # boost_python library from the project whose global ID is /boost/python. project : requirements <library>/boost/python//boost_python ; # Declare the extension module. python-extension gui : gui.cpp : <include>$(wx)/include <include>$(wx)/lib/gcc_dll/mswu <define>__GNUWIN32__ <define>__WXMSW__ <define>WXUSINGDLL <define>wxUSE_UNICODE <library-file>$(wx)/lib/gcc_dll/libwxmsw28u.a ; -- Jérémie

4 7

Serialization: delayed loading of vertexes of graph/tree
by Moritz Moeller 03 Oct '08

03 Oct '08

Sorry for the n00b question, but I'm totally new to the use of sth. like boost::serialization. I always wrote all this stuff 'by hand' before. :) I have a tree (AABB tree, to be precise -- no cycles and no joins) that I have serialized (I wrote this one 'by hand', i.e. I don't use the boost graph library). This works great if I need to save and/or load the entire tree at once. But actually, when I load it, I want to be able to explicitly trigger loading of the two sub-vertexes of each vertex in the tree. I.e. my serialization code for a vertex of the tree currently looks like this: template< typename _archive > void serialze( typename _archive& ar, const unsigned version ) { ... // data ar & _data; // sub-vertexes aka children ar & _child[ 0 ]; ar & _child[ 1 ]; } Now what I imagine is that I split this into save() and load(). My save() would look exactly like the above serialize(), but my load() would also need to be split into two parts, one that is invoked automatically, when I load the object via operator >> and the other one, which I call explicitly later. template< typename _archive > void load( typename _archive& ar, const unsigned version ) { ... // data ar & _data; } template< typename _archive > void loadChildren( typename _archive& ar, const unsigned version ) // sub-vertexes aka children ar & _child[ 0 ]; ar & _child[ 1 ]; } I have no idea if this is the right approach and if so, if I can just call loadChildren() with the resp. archive? I imagine not, since I can not guarantee that the vertexes in the tree will be visited in the same order as they were during invocation of save(). Quite to the contrary, it is highly unlikely that they will ever be visited in that order. What I can guarantee though is that each cell's parent has been visited by the time I need to load it. I.e. the tree is always restored from the root up, but I can't guarantee which path along the edges the program will walk when doing so. So am I back to writing this all 'by hand' in this case or is there some mechanisms in boost::serialization that I could exploit here? Cheers, Moritz

2 1