- Boost-users - lists.preview.boost.org

Defining tuples and variants based on mpl::sequences
by Brian Simpson 11 Jul '03

11 Jul '03

Here is the problem: A tuple or variant needs to be defined, whose types are derived from an mpl::list (or other model of MPL Sequence). How is it to be done? I have considered that I might be able to define the tuple/variant with the types and then generate the sequence from there, but that still leaves me wondering how to define another tuple/variant with a sub- or super-set of the types in the generated sequence. Consider that I am supplied with a sequence of types, and that I want to define either 1)a tuple of pointers to them, or 2)a variant based on those types as well as pointers to them. I have considered that it would be a good thing to provide sequence-based tuples/variants and still provide the current variadic template (<--is that the correct term?) versions--which could be implemented in terms of the sequence-based ones (in my uneducated opinion). But I wonder if there is another solution already available which I have not considered. TIA for your consideration, Brian

1 0

Boost.Python interface to Boost Graph Library (BGL)
by BP 11 Jul '03

11 Jul '03

I would like to use the Boost Graph Library (BGL), but I'm not much of a C++ programmer. I'd feel much more comfortable working in Python. Can I download the Boost Graph Library wrapped in Boost.Python? I'd rather not wrap myself if it already exists. Thanks. - BP __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com

3 2

templated 'handle' in pimpl code? (Slightly off topic)
by Kevin Wheatley 11 Jul '03

11 Jul '03

Hi, I wondered if there are any examples of a templated handle class within the boost code base I could look at? I'm trying to hide both the implementation of the body class and that of the template type, something like that below but my compiler is complaining about partial specialization in the declaration of the implementation class in handle.cpp I know its not strictly boost related, but I don't get any of the comp.lang.* groups. Also before anybody suggests I should be using a smart pointer for the impl variable I'd like to avoid having to introduce the boost library to the user of the two .h files. My goal was that the users would only need the *.h files and I could provide fred.o fred2.o fred3.o etc. as new options for "fred" come along. I know that using the template doesn't appear to be getting me anywhere towads my original goal (generally needing the implementation to get the templated code to work!) but I'd like to see if I could at least get the code to compile by studying anything similar as it may have some use in other areas. Thanks Kevin // -------------- fred.h class fred { public: void somefunction(); }; // -------------- handle.h template <typename T> class handle { public: handle(); ~handle(); void callsomefunctionviaimpl(); private: template <typename U> class handleimpl; handleimpl<T> *impl; }; // -------------- fred.cpp #include <iostream> using namespace std; #include "fred.h" void fred::somefunction() { cout << "fred::somefunction()" << endl; } // -------------- handle.cpp #include <iostream> using namespace std; #include "handle.h" template <class T, class U> class handle<T>::handleimpl<U> { public: void implfunctiononfred() { myfred.somefunction(); } private: static T myfred; }; template <class T> handle<T>::handle() : impl(new handle<T>::handleimpl<T>) { } template <class T> handle<T>::~handle() { delete impl; } template <class T> void handle<T>::callsomefunctionviaimpl() { cout << "handle calling" << endl; impl->implfunctiononfred(); } // ----------- Main code ---------------- #include "fred.h" #include "handle.h" int main(int argc, char** argv) { handle<fred> foo; foo.callsomefunctionviaimpl(); return 0; } -- | Kevin Wheatley | These are the opinions of | | Senior Do-er of Technical Things | nobody and are not shared | | Cinesite (Europe) Ltd | by my employers |

1 1

multi-array versus valarray
by lformaggia 11 Jul '03

11 Jul '03

Hi, I am a new user of boost and I am interest in the multi-array library. However it is not clear to me which are the advantages versus the std::valarray and std::slice classes. There are quite a few numeric functions provided by C++ that work on valarrays (the pow() for example), is there any equivalent for multi-arrays )it would be very nice to have a norm() function at least for two-dimensional arrays!) or you have to write your own. Sorry if this question may seem trivial, yet I have to choose which basic multiarray classes to implemet for my code (it is numerical code based on the finite element method) and so far my choice is between multi-array or valarray + slice. Maybe somebody of you have some experience on this matter and my help in taking an appropriate decision. Thank you Luca

1 0

Having problems with boost::signal and boost::function
by subsample 11 Jul '03

11 Jul '03

I'm having a problem (which was really hard to decipher) when connecting a function object to a signal. Thing is I default construct (no argument) a function object and connect it to the signal (using boost::ref), then at a later point in time I actually assign something to the function object (using boost::bind). But firing the signal after this causes a bad_function_call to be thrown. On the other hand; if I construct the function object with some dummy object before connecting it to the signal, and later do the assignment, the signal does its thing. If someone could enlighten me as to whats going on here, I'd be grateful .. : )

2 1

Signals library safety
by Eugene Talagrand 11 Jul '03

11 Jul '03

Hello to all, I'm looking into using the Boost.Signals. The library claims not to be thread safe. What does this mean exactly? When using Boost.Threads, can I make concurrent calls to connect as long as I wrap each call in a Mutex? If this is possible, do tackable objects also still work (if two trackable objects get destroyed in two different threads there might be a problem from what I understand) On an different note, I am trying to use Boost.Signals for network event handling. I'd like to set it up so that it uses something similar to he JavaScript event model, where every slot returns a boolean value. If that value is false, the remaining slots are not called. Would anyone have any recommendations on how to do this? Should I wrap each slot in a function that takes the return value and sets a global flag, then every subsequent slot checks the flag? It looks like combiners would not be appropriate, as it appears they are used after each slot is called (unless the InputIterator' opeator* actually calls the slot??) Thanks for any help -Eugene

2 1

stream operators and random number generators
by Witz 10 Jul '03

10 Jul '03

hi, in my code i need to be able to save the state of my program including that of he random number generators but under MSVC 7.1.3088 the following code: int main() { boost::mt19937 rng; std::cout << rng; return 0; } won't compile and gives the error: "error C2679: binary '<<' : no operator found which takes a right-hand operand of type 'boost::mt19937' (or there is no acceptable conversion)" there a workaround for this (beyond my hacky solution of adding load and save functions to the mersenne_twister class)? thanks in advance, ian whittley

1 0

BOOST_MPL_DEPENDENT_TEMPLATE_TYPEDEF
by Joaquín Mª López Muñoz 10 Jul '03

10 Jul '03

I've read on some archived post in the boost mailing list about BOOST_MPL_DEPENDENT_TEMPLATE_TYPEDEF, but seems like it is not in the 1.30 distribution anymore. Anyone knows what happened to it? I'm in need of this sort or workaround. Aleksey, are you there? :) Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo

2 1

deadlock in filesystem?
by Ken Alverson 10 Jul '03

10 Jul '03

I'm running into an odd deadlock situation, and I was wondering if it's a known issue, or if there's likely something wrong with my code, or if I've misconfigured something? First off, a stack trace: ntdll.dll!77f5b7f4() kernel32.dll!77e61bf5() scanner.exe!boost::detail::sp_counted_base::release() Line 132 + 0xf C++ scanner.exe!boost::detail::shared_count::~shared_count() Line 380 C++ scanner.exe!boost::shared_ptr<boost::filesystem::directory_iterator::dir_itr_i mp>::~shared_ptr<boost::filesystem::directory_iterator::dir_itr_imp>() + 0x2e C++ scanner.exe!boost::shared_ptr<boost::filesystem::directory_iterator::dir_itr_i mp>::reset() Line 217 C++ scanner.exe!boost::filesystem::directory_iterator::m_inc() Line 256 C++ scanner.exe!boost::filesystem::directory_iterator::operator++() Line 88 + 0x2b C++ scanner.exe!std::for_each(boost::filesystem::directory_iterator _First={...}, boost::filesystem::directory_iterator _Last={...}, scan_file _Func={...}) Line 20 + 0xa C++ I'm using boost 1.30.0 running a staticly linked debug build of the filesystem lib, on vc7. The for_each is actually the most recursed level of a recursive directory search - I'm pretty sure that code is fine; I'm very familiar with STL iteration and I'm not doing anything strange, just: std::for_each( fs::directory_iterator(dir), fs::directory_iterator(), scan_files(fileset)); where scan_files will recurse on directories and process on files. I don't touch the iterators directly other than to pass them to for_each. Now, the strange part is this program works completely fine when I simply run it from the command line. However, I am building it into a windows service, and when it runs as a service under the SYSTEM account (I haven't tried running it as a service under a different account, yet), I get deadlock. I suspected the problem might be related to funny permissions on the directory in question, but SYSTEM has full rights to the directory, so that shouldn't be the problem. Oddly, when I use the release filesystem lib it deadlocks in a different location in the search, but in the same sp_counted_base::release() function - this time in an attempt to unwind after a filesystem exception. I tried to search the mailing list for similar problems, but the search seems to be broken at the moment. I'm hoping this is an easy fix, known issue, because I'm at a loss as to how I could be causing it, especially since I'm not getting anywhere near the internals of the directory iterators. I am a fairly new user to boost, but up until now I've had no problems. Sorry if this is a jumble...I've been banging my head against this for the past few hours and my coffee is wearing off. Ken

3 11

newbie build problems with msvc-stlport toolset
by uncle_buck_598 10 Jul '03

10 Jul '03

I am attempting to build the complete boost library set with the command line: bjam -sTOOLS=msvc-stlport "-BUILD=debug release <stlport-iostream>on" Unfortunately, 5 of the release DLLs fail to link with the following error: unresolved external symbol "public: static void __cdecl _STL::_STLP_mutex_spin<0>::_M_do_lock(long volatible *)" ("_M_do_lock@?$_S_STLP_mutex_spin@$0A@@_STL@@SAXPCJ@Z) What is confusing is that the debug DLLs all build with out a hitch! I am using MSVC 6.0 SP5, STLport-4.5.3, and Windows Platform SDK - Nov2002. Any help would be greatly appreciated!! --Jamie

1 0