- Boost-users - lists.preview.boost.org

problem with asio signal_set and consecutive signals
by Lutz Schneider 02 Sep '14

02 Sep '14

Hi, I have a program and would like to stop it by sending SIGINT for writing some data to a file instead of exiting immediately. However, if the user of the program sends SIGINT again then the program should quit immediately and forget about writing data to a file. For portability reason I would like to use boost::asio for this purpose. My initial (simplified) approach (see below) did not work. Is this not possible or am I missing something? handler seems to be called only once (printing out the message) and the program always stops when the loop has reached the max iteration number. void handler( const boost::system::error_code& error, int signal_number) { if (!error) { static bool first = true; if(first){ std::cout << " A signal(SIGINT) occurred." << std::endl; // do something like writing data to a file first = false; }else{ std::cout << " A signal(SIGINT) occurred, exiting...." << std::endl; exit(0); } } } int main(){ // Construct a signal set registered for process termination. boost::asio::io_service io; boost::asio::signal_set signals(io, SIGINT); // Start an asynchronous wait for one of the signals to occur. signals.async_wait(handler); io.run(); size_t i; for(i=0;i<std::numeric_limits<size_t>::max();++i){ // time stepping loop, do some computations } std::cout << i << std::endl; return 0; } Cheers, LS

2 3

Re: [Boost-users] [graph] Unique vertices using setS
by Jeremiah Willcock 02 Sep '14

02 Sep '14

On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 11:29 AM MDT Jeremiah Willcock wrote: > > >On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 10:53 PM MDT Nicholas Dahm wrote: > >>On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 7:24 PM EDT Nicholas Dahm wrote: >> >>Is there any place where I could enforce unique properties? (i.e. not add a new vertex if it's properties are the same as an existing vertex) >> >>Not that I know of. >> >>My graph is actually an implicit search tree for an A* search so there's lots of nodes which will be revisited via different paths. My current thought is to create the new vertex (which is a search tree state), then simply iterate through all existing vertices to see if any are identical in properties. However if the vertices were sorted by their properties in a set (i.e. weakly ordered), this would be much faster. >> >>Do you need to store the explored part of the search tree explicitly? You could instead use a custom graph type with your choice of vertex descriptor, then use associative_property_map to check for multiple visits to the same state. >> >>No need to store the explored part. I have exactly zero clue on how to create a custom graph type with a special vertex descriptor. At current I've gotten around it by having a "set" of vertex descriptors which use a custom "less" function which actually checks the vertex bundled properties instead of the descriptor. It's not the perfect solution but it wasn't very ugly either so it'll do. If you have a link to info on how to create custom graph types with special vertex descriptors please do let me know > >Please look at https://github.com/wpm/Boost-Implicit-Graph-Example for a simple example. You only need to do the incident edge iterator and property parts from that example, and can skip the other iterator types. There is also an A*-specific example at https://github.com/wpm/Astar-Maze-Solver, but it stores more of the data explicitly and uses existing BGL graph types. > >-- Jeremiah Willcock > There is also http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_56_0/libs/graph/example/knights-tour.cpp as an example, but you'll probably need the BGL book for its documentation. -- Jeremiah Willcock

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] [graph] Unique vertices using setS
by Jeremiah Willcock 02 Sep '14

02 Sep '14

On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 10:53 PM MDT Nicholas Dahm wrote: >>On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 7:24 PM EDT Nicholas Dahm wrote: >> >>Is there any place where I could enforce unique properties? (i.e. not add a new vertex if it's properties are the same as an existing vertex) >> >>Not that I know of. >> >>My graph is actually an implicit search tree for an A* search so there's lots of nodes which will be revisited via different paths. My current thought is to create the new vertex (which is a search tree state), then simply iterate through all existing vertices to see if any are identical in properties. However if the vertices were sorted by their properties in a set (i.e. weakly ordered), this would be much faster. >> >>Do you need to store the explored part of the search tree explicitly? You could instead use a custom graph type with your choice of vertex descriptor, then use associative_property_map to check for multiple visits to the same state. > >No need to store the explored part. I have exactly zero clue on how to create a custom graph type with a special vertex descriptor. At current I've gotten around it by having a "set" of vertex descriptors which use a custom "less" function which actually checks the vertex bundled properties instead of the descriptor. It's not the perfect solution but it wasn't very ugly either so it'll do. If you have a link to info on how to create custom graph types with special vertex descriptors please do let me know Please look at https://github.com/wpm/Boost-Implicit-Graph-Example for a simple example. You only need to do the incident edge iterator and property parts from that example, and can skip the other iterator types. There is also an A*-specific example at https://github.com/wpm/Astar-Maze-Solver, but it stores more of the data explicitly and uses existing BGL graph types. -- Jeremiah Willcock

1 0

Very interesting problem with TCP sockets
by Igor Mironchik 02 Sep '14

02 Sep '14

Hi guys, I was trying to connect Qt TCP Socket with Boost Asio TCP socket. And what I found. Qt writes simple 12 bytes message to the Boost and in most situations Boost reads garbage. Even more Boost can crash. And my question is: who is so bad guy, Boost or Qt? You can find simple implementation of the problem in the attachment. Thanks. P.S. Problem is on Windows 7, on Linux or Mac OS I have no possibility to test...

2 2

Boost MPI Collective
by Nolen, Steven Douglas 02 Sep '14

02 Sep '14

In boost/mpi/collectives/reduce.hpp The template function specialization for reduce-ing a std::vector, should probably be modified. Ffrom template<typename T, typename Op> void reduce(const communicator & comm, std::vector<T> const & in_values, std::vector<T> & out_values, Op op, int root) { out_values.resize(in_values.size()); reduce(comm, &in_values.front(), in_values.size(), &out_values.front(), op, root); } To template<typename T, typename Op> void reduce(const communicator & comm, std::vector<T> const & in_values, std::vector<T> & out_values, Op op, int root) { if( comm.rank() == root ) out_values.resize(in_values.size()); reduce(comm, &in_values.front(), in_values.size(), &out_values.front(), op, root); } This will save an extraneous allocation on the non-root nodes. -steve

2 1

[MSM] eUML compilation fails with gcc and -std=c++11
by caligano 01 Sep '14

01 Sep '14

Hi, I tried to compile some of the eUML MSM samples (e.g. http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_56_0/libs/msm/doc/HTML/examples/SimpleTimer…) using gcc 4.8 and with C+11 support enabled. However, I always get errors like the following one: error: ‘BOOST_PP_REPEAT_FROM_TO_M_1’ has not been declared I did not find anything about C++11 being not supported by Boost MSM, so I would like to know if I am doing anything wrong? Bye Manuel

3 2

[spirit,units] Linker problem on msvs platform
by Johannes Brunen 01 Sep '14

01 Sep '14

Hello, I have created two little helper functions for parsing strings with respect to unit length values: OptLengthQuantityT parse_length_quantity(...) PairOptLengthQuantityT parse_dbl_length_quantity(...) My problem is that my implementation based on the spirit and units libraries does compile fine, but fails on linking on 32Bit Debug with the following error message: Quantity.obj : fatal error LNK1179: invalid or corrupt file: duplicate COMDAT '?value@?$result_@U?$member_variable@$$A6E?AUlength_quantity_t@Quantitie s@@XZP8?$length_quantity_grammer@V?$_String_const_iterator@DU?$char_trai ts@D@std@@V?$allocator@D@2@@std@@U?$expr@Uterminal@tag@tagns_@proto@boos t@@U?$term@U?$char_code@Uspace@tag@spirit@boost@@Uiso8859_1@char_encodin g@34@@tag@spirit@boost@@@argsns_@45@$0A@@exprns_@proto@boost@@@2@AE?AU12 @XZ@detail@phoenix@boost@@@?$is_mem_fun_pointer_select@$0A@@detail@boost @@2_NB' I'm working with the msvc 2010Sp1 compiler from microsoft on windows 7. I have tried to shorten the symbol names but I could not get it to work. Does anyone has experience with this kind of errors? Is there something wrong with the implementation of the two functions? You can find the implementation in the attached files. Best, Johannes

1 0

[Boost.Log] translate 3rd party log entries
by Olaf Peter 01 Sep '14

01 Sep '14

Hello, from 3rd party lib I have to integrate the logging message - incorporating into boost.log. But I run into the problem with scopes: main.cpp: In function 'int main(int, char**)': main.cpp:55:5: error: no matching function for call to 'boost::log::v2s_mt_posix::attributes::named_scope_entry::named_scope_entry(const char [6], const char*&, int&)' main.cpp:55:5: note: candidates are: /opt/boost/boost_1_55_0/boost/log/attributes/named_scope.hpp:88:5: note: boost::log::v2s_mt_posix::attributes::named_scope_entry::named_scope_entry(const string_literal&, const string_literal&, unsigned int) /opt/boost/boost_1_55_0/boost/log/attributes/named_scope.hpp:88:5: note: no known conversion for argument 2 from 'const char*' to 'const string_literal& {aka const boost::log::v2s_mt_posix::basic_string_literal<char>&}' /opt/boost/boost_1_55_0/boost/log/attributes/named_scope.hpp:63:8: note: boost::log::v2s_mt_posix::attributes::named_scope_entry::named_scope_entry(const boost::log::v2s_mt_posix::attributes::named_scope_entry&) /opt/boost/boost_1_55_0/boost/log/attributes/named_scope.hpp:63:8: note: candidate expects 1 argument, 3 provided The problem rises on string_literal of __FILE__ entry. How can I get this working?? Thanks, Olaf

1 2

Trouble with compiling/linking the unit test library
by Christoff Kok 01 Sep '14

01 Sep '14

Hi, I am struggling to compile a simple test with the Unit test library. It seems to be a linker error when trying to link the unit_test_framework library. I have tried diffrerent options but to no avail. I have tried to link it with a visual studio library as well, but I am still receiving the same error. clang++.exe -o bin\Debug\QuickTest.exe obj\Debug\functions.o obj\Debug\functionsTest.o obj\Debug\maintest.o *C:\boost_1_55_0\stage\lib\libboost_unit_test_framework-mgw48-mt-1_55.a* obj\Debug\functionsTest.o: In function `_cxx_global_var_init2': D:\Ex Mente\Software\_CHK.Sandbox\quickCplusplusTest\QuickTest/functionsTest.cpp:4: undefined reference to `_imp___ZN5boost9unit_test9ut_detail24auto_test_unit_registrarC1EPNS0_9test_caseEm' obj\Debug\functionsTest.o: In function `ZN8Multiply11test_methodEv': D:\Ex Mente\Software\_CHK.Sandbox\quickCplusplusTest\QuickTest/functionsTest.cpp:6: *undefined reference to * `_imp___ZN5boost9unit_test15unit_test_log_t14set_checkpointENS0_13basic_cstringIKcEEjS4_' D:\Ex Mente\Software\_CHK.Sandbox\quickCplusplusTest\QuickTest/functionsTest.cpp:6: undefined reference to `_imp___ZN5boost10test_tools16predicate_resultC1Eb' D:\Ex Mente\Software\_CHK.Sandbox\quickCplusplusTest\QuickTest/functionsTest.cpp:6: *undefined reference to * `_imp___ZN5boost10test_tools9tt_detail10check_implERKNS0_16predicate_resultERKNS_9unit_test12lazy_ostreamENS5_13basic_cstringIKcEEjNS1_10tool_levelENS1_10check_typeEjz' D:\Ex Mente\Software\_CHK.Sandbox\quickCplusplusTest\QuickTest/functionsTest.cpp:6: *undefined reference to* `_imp___ZN5boost10test_tools16predicate_resultD1Ev' D:\Ex Mente\Software\_CHK.Sandbox\quickCplusplusTest\QuickTest/functionsTest.cpp:7: undefined reference to `_imp___ZN5boost10test_tools16predicate_resultD1Ev' obj\Debug\functionsTest.o: In function `_dtor__ZZN5boost9unit_test9singletonINS0_15unit_test_log_tEE8instanceEvE8the_inst': D:\Ex Mente\Software\_CHK.Sandbox\quickCplusplusTest\QuickTest/functionsTest.cpp:38: *undefined reference to* `_imp___ZN5boost9unit_test15unit_test_log_tD1Ev' obj\Debug\functionsTest.o: In function `ZN5boost9unit_test9singletonINS0_15unit_test_log_tEE8instanceEv': C:\boost_1_55_0\boost/test/utils/trivial_singleton.hpp:38: undefined reference to `_imp___ZN5boost9unit_test15unit_test_log_tC1Ev' obj\Debug\functionsTest.o: In function `ZN5boost9unit_test14make_test_caseERKNS0_9callback0INS0_9ut_detail6unusedEEENS0_13basic_cstringIKcEE': C:\boost_1_55_0\boost/test/unit_test_suite_impl.hpp:255: undefined reference to `_imp___ZN5boost9unit_test9ut_detail24normalize_test_case_nameENS0_13basic_cstringIKcEE' C:\boost_1_55_0\boost/test/unit_test_suite_impl.hpp:255: undefined reference to `_imp___ZN5boost9unit_test9test_caseC1ENS0_13basic_cstringIKcEERKNS0_9callback0INS0_9ut_detail6unusedEEE' obj\Debug\maintest.o: In function `main': C:\boost_1_55_0\boost/test/unit_test.hpp:59: undefined reference to `_imp___ZN5boost9unit_test14unit_test_mainEPFbvEiPPc' obj\Debug\maintest.o: In function `_cxx_global_var_init2': D:\Ex Mente\Software\_CHK.Sandbox\quickCplusplusTest\QuickTest/maintest.cpp:5: undefined reference to `_imp___ZN5boost9unit_test9ut_detail24auto_test_unit_registrarC1EPNS0_9test_caseEm' obj\Debug\maintest.o: In function `ZN29SimpleTestInMainTestingModule11test_methodEv': D:\Ex Mente\Software\_CHK.Sandbox\quickCplusplusTest\QuickTest/maintest.cpp:7: undefined reference to `_imp___ZN5boost9unit_test15unit_test_log_t14set_checkpointENS0_13basic_cstringIKcEEjS4_' D:\Ex Mente\Software\_CHK.Sandbox\quickCplusplusTest\QuickTest/maintest.cpp:7: undefined reference to `_imp___ZN5boost10test_tools16predicate_resultC1Eb' D:\Ex Mente\Software\_CHK.Sandbox\quickCplusplusTest\QuickTest/maintest.cpp:7: undefined reference to `_imp___ZN5boost10test_tools9tt_detail10check_implERKNS0_16predicate_resultERKNS_9unit_test12lazy_ostreamENS5_13basic_cstringIKcEEjNS1_10tool_levelENS1_10check_typeEjz' D:\Ex Mente\Software\_CHK.Sandbox\quickCplusplusTest\QuickTest/maintest.cpp:7: undefined reference to `_imp___ZN5boost10test_tools16predicate_resultD1Ev' D:\Ex Mente\Software\_CHK.Sandbox\quickCplusplusTest\QuickTest/maintest.cpp:8: undefined reference to `_imp___ZN5boost10test_tools16predicate_resultD1Ev' obj\Debug\maintest.o: In function `_dtor__ZZN5boost9unit_test9singletonINS0_15unit_test_log_tEE8instanceEvE8the_inst': D:\Ex Mente\Software\_CHK.Sandbox\quickCplusplusTest\QuickTest/maintest.cpp:38: undefined reference to `_imp___ZN5boost9unit_test15unit_test_log_tD1Ev' collect2.exe: error: ld returned 1 exit status clang++.exe: error: linker (via gcc) command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) Kind Regards, Christoff

1 0

A* search on Implicit graph (search tree)
by Nicholas Dahm 01 Sep '14

01 Sep '14

Hi All, I'm trying to run an A* search using boost's astar_search, but I'm running into issues with 'const'. I'm trying to add the examine_vertex(my_vdesc_type &v, my_graph_type &g) function, but of course boost says that I need to make it const like examine_vertex(my_vdesc_type &v, const my_graph_type &g) However since I'm searching an implicit graph, I need to call add_vertex(g) within this function. But then I of course get an error because i'm trying to do add_vertex(const my_graph_type &g) which is invalid. I've read the example astar_maze.cpp which CLAIMS to be implicit but certainly doesn't appear to be. I've also seen the pdf at http://cs.krisbeevers.com/research/astar_bgl04.pdf which says you need to basically create non-const versions of a bunch of functions. Considering that http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_56_0/libs/graph/doc/astar_search.html says that "A* is particularly useful for searching implicit graphs", I'm assuming that boost ALREADY HAS some way of actually searching implicit graphs. Any ideas? cheers Nick

1 0