July 2022 - Boost-users - lists.preview.boost.org

xpressive: How to combine vector of regex to one?
by Anton Sergunov 08 Jul '22

08 Jul '22

Hello Boost Users! I'm seeking some help from the community because can't see answer in documentation or in source code. I need to find which regex of N my string matches. I don't like to compare them one by one, to speed up the process. It's easy to implement if I have them compile time: ```cpp sregex re = (s1 = re1)|(s2 = re2)|(s3=re3); ... std::set<int> foo(const std::string& str) { std::set<int> result; smatch match; if(regex_match(str, match, re)) { for(int i = 0; i<3; ++i) if(match[i+1]) result.insert(i); } return result; } ``` But I have a vector: ```cpp std::set<int> foo(const std::string& str, const std::vector<sregex>& reVector) { sregex re; int index = 1; for(auto&& item : reVector) { re |= (mark_tag(index++) = item); // (1) } std::set<int> result; smatch match; if(regex_match(str, match, re)) { for(int i = 0; i<reVector; ++i) if(match[i+1]) result.insert(i); } } return result; } ``` There at (1) `|=` doesn't work as I expect for some reson, It didn't catch some values. If I replace it with ```cpp re = re | (mark_tag(index++) = item); ``` it just crashes. If I replace with: ```cpp auto t = re; re = t | (mark_tag(index++) = item); ``` it making captures of previous tags to be subexpresions matches. So code doesn't work as I want. Is it any way to prevent sub-expression capture isolation? As I understand it should be some intermediate type before sregex to express expression under construction. So it will not isolate matches of existing part. I'm using v1.65.1 https://github.com/boostorg/xpressive/issues/24

1 0

Embedded install paths in CMake files for Boost 1.79
by Alex 05 Jul '22

05 Jul '22

Apologies if this is the wrong list. I tried boost-build but I'm not sure if my message was verified (I don't see it in the archive). I'm trying to make a build of Boost that includes the generated CMake files. For my case, I need to install the files to a staging area before packaging them up for installation in the target environment. I've tried "b2 --stagedir <dir> stage" but the generated CMake files still include the stagedir path in them, instead of the install prefix specified during bootstrap, which triggers errors in the packaging system I need to use. I'm also not sure if it's then possible to just install the headers to the same staging location. Is there a way to install to a staging location while the CMake files have the paths to the final install location? CMake uses CMAKE_STAGING_PREFIX for this but I can't find an equivalent for b2. I guess it must be required for cross-compiling though, if you want to support CMake on the target? Regards, Alex

1 0

Excessive dynamic allocation when using boost::split(..., boost::is_any_of(", "))?
by Dominique Pellé 05 Jul '22

05 Jul '22

Hi This following program shows many allocations coming from boost::split(..., boost::is_any_of(",")): ``` $ cat split.cpp #include <string> #include <cstdio> #include <boost/algorithm/string.hpp> #include <boost/container/small_vector.hpp> int main() { std::string str = "foo,bar,foobar,quux"; std::size_t s = 0; for (int i = 0; i < 100; ++i) { boost::container::small_vector<std::string, 4> v; #ifdef USE_IS_ANY_OF boost::split(v, str, boost::is_any_of(",")); #else boost::split(v, str, [](const char c) { return c == ',';}); #endif s += v.size(); } fprintf(stderr, "%zu\n", s); } ``` When using boost::is_any_of(","), there are 7 dynamic allocations per loop iteration whereas when using the lambda predicate, there are 0 dynamic allocation per loop as shown below: ``` $ clang++ -std=c++14 -DUSE_IS_ANY_OF split.cpp $ heaptrack ./a.out ... allocations: 702 $ clang++ -std=c++14 split.cpp $ heaptrack ./a.out ... allocations: 2 ``` I suspect that there are potential optimizations in Boost here to avoid so many allocations when boost::is_any_of(",") is used. Regards Dominique

3 2