March 2021 - Boost-users - lists.preview.boost.org

MSM and multithreading. Not clear what pattern to follow.
by Andrea Fiorito 08 Mar '21

08 Mar '21

Hi, I'm trying to use MSM to implement a client server component for my app. The client is broadcasting a msg, that servers in a local network will detect and respond. The client at that point will connect to one of the servers and interact following the network protocol. For the network and threading I'm using boost ASIO. I have 2 submachines that manage one the discovering part, and the other the connection and dialogue with one server part. I found that would be beneficial to run the submachines in one thread managed by an io_context, with the idea of stopping that context to cancel all the asynchronous operations. Unfortunately there are some weird behaviours with submachines, and not getting if I missed the right way of doing things or else. the description of my last stopper is here: https://github.com/boostorg/msm/issues/37 Is anyone able to point me on the right direction? Regards, Andrea

2 1

CMake's PCH support and boost.test linker error
by Olaf Peter 04 Mar '21

04 Mar '21

Hello Boost users I have here a strange problem which occurs only if I try to build with precompiled headers using CMake. I've configured the project for use with dynamically linking. The error is: /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/10/../../../../lib64/crt1.o: in function `_start': (.text+0x24): undefined reference to `main' Something obvious? Thanks in advance The project's reduce is: ---8<--- test_driver.cpp --- 8< ---- #defineBOOST_TEST_MODULE "My Test Suite" #include<boost/test/unit_test.hpp> --->8------>8------>8--- ---8<--- test_x.cpp --- 8< ---- #include<boost/test/unit_test.hpp> .... --->8------>8------>8--- ---8<--- src/CMakeLists.txt --- 8< ---- ... set_source_files_properties(src/test_xxx.cpp APPEND PROPERTIES COMPILE_DEFINITIONS "BOOST_TEST_DYN_LINK" ) .... --->8------>8------>8------>8------>8------>8--- ---8<--- pch.pp --- 8< ---- #pragma once #include<boost/test/unit_test.hpp> --->8------>8------>8---

1 2

How should a "using zlib ..." jam statement look, for Boost to link to ZLib in the form of SO filename (libz.so) instead of by -lz?
by Bob 03 Mar '21

03 Mar '21

Hello Boost mailing list, I am building a code project in my user home directory on OpenBSD, and doing this involves both a local build of Boost and also a local build of ZLib. I do the whole build using GCC. This is a relatively ordinary build use case, however GCC on OpenBSD (at least in its current version) has a peculiarity to it, which is that it adds to LD the argument "-L/usr/lib" in the leading position, and this means that LD's search for libz.so will find and use the operating system's bundled ZLib binary which is /usr/lib/libz.so ALWAYS, and NEVER use my local libz.so . Can you help me understand if Boost can be customized to link to ZLib in the following way: I can force GCC/LD to use a particular libz.so file, by specifying it by filename, e.g. "gcc ... libz.so ...", "gcc ... /my/dir/libz.so ...", instead of by the conventional "-lz". Boost's build process is hardwired to "-lz" and I ask you to help me understand if there is a way to circumvent that. ZLIB_LIBRARY_PATH will not make "-lz" hit anything else than /usr/lib/libz.so , per the compiler's default -L/usr/lib in leading position, so it will not be of help to solve my problem. To my best awareness ZLIB_INCLUDE has nothing to do with linking, so it will not be of help to solve my problem. ZLIB_NAME would only be to customize the library name would it e.g. to "-lmycustomz", or what is it for? Please clarify so I could figure if it could be of help, though ideally i keep my local ZLib having its default name "libz.so". And this brings me to the path of solving the problem that I imagine could work, but that I don't understand fully from the Boost documentation: There is the possibility to customize ZLib build settings through the JAM configuration, that is user-config.jam . The syntax used is "using zlib ...". Can you please help me understand if this route works, if so how would that "using zlib ..." statement look, such that Boost's build process will NOT build ZLib itself, and then will NOT link to it via "-lz", but will instead link to it by "$MYCUSTOMBUILDDIR/libz.so"?

1 0

Boost.Python + `RecursionError` during deallocation
by Andrew Jones 01 Mar '21

01 Mar '21

Hi, I just raised the following issue on the Python issue tracker: https://bugs.python.org/issue43351 But I'm sharing it here to widen the net ... Basically, when moving from Python 2.7.14 to Python 3.7.5, and when using Boost.Python (Boost version 1.6.9), I'm seeing a crash in finalisation due to: ``` Exception ignored in: <Boost.Python.life_support object at 0x2acf473c5d10> RecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded while calling a Python object Fatal Python error: Cannot recover from stack overflow. ``` Everything else with the Python that's running, and the Boost.Python interface, is consistent between 2.7.14 and 3.7.5 -- it is just the Python version that's changing. I should say, Python 3.7.5 does otherwise seem operable, it just falls over when running this certain code (which just walks a linked-list of ~1400 elements via Boost.Python). Has anyone seen anything like this before? Does this list feel this is more likely a Python-proper issue, or a Boost.Python issue? Cheers, Andrew

1 0

[boost::units] Best practices for implementing custom units and quantities
by Alexandru Onea 01 Mar '21

01 Mar '21

Hello community, I am working on a project which works with units such as scale intervals (cents, moria, etc.) depending on the temperament system used (24-EDO, 72-EDO, etc.). My implementation defines a namespace for each tuning system. Within the namespaces I define base units, units and a system, as well as conversion factors between the systems. The base dimension is defined in only one of the namespaces (corresponding to the tuning system which I consider "standard" which is the 1200 cents per octave system). 1. Does such an approach qualify as a good approach in general (leaving aside the musical aspects)? 2. Is it a good practice to place all these namespaces in boost::units (extend boost::units)? Or should I keep them within my own namespaces? Learning the answer to #2 is more interesting to me, even in the absence of an answer to #1. Best regards, Alexandru Onea

2 1