November 2014 - Boost-users - lists.preview.boost.org

[interprocess] Determine size of managed_shared_memory
by Kai Benndorf 12 Oct '19

12 Oct '19

Hi all, I want to create a managed_shared_memory in exactly the size I needed. Therefore I do something like this: size = sizeof( common_managed_shared_memory ); size += sizeof( MyClassInSharedMem ); managed_shared_memory segment(create_only, "name", size ); MyClassInSharedMem allocates itself some memory by segment->allocate(). I added this also to the size, but get a boost::interprocess::bad_alloc exception on allocating this additional memory. Are there some magic bytes I forgot to add? Many thanks in advance Kai

3 2

[Range, Phoenix] What am I missing...
by Robert Jones 25 Apr '17

25 Apr '17

Hi Folks Can anyone explain the output of this program... #include <iostream> #include <boost/range/algorithm/copy.hpp> #include <boost/range/counting_range.hpp> #include <boost/range/adaptor/reversed.hpp> #include <boost/range/adaptor/transformed.hpp> #include <boost/phoenix/bind/bind_function.hpp> #include <boost/phoenix/core/argument.hpp> int f( int i ) { return i * 2; } int main( ) { using boost::adaptors::reversed; using boost::adaptors::transformed; using boost::counting_range; using boost::copy; using boost::phoenix::arg_names::_1; copy( counting_range( 1, 5 ) | reversed | transformed( f ), std::ostream_iterator<int>( std::cout, " " ) ); std::cout << std::endl; copy( counting_range( 1, 5 ) | reversed | transformed( bind( f, _1 ) ), std::ostream_iterator<int>( std::cout, " " ) ); std::cout << std::endl; } Which is... 8 6 4 2 1768406272 1768406272 1768406272 1768406272 I'm using Gcc 4.6.2 & Boost 1.53 Thx All.

3 4

[statechart] Passing parameters from event to State Local Storage
by Christophe Bourez 16 Nov '16

16 Nov '16

I need to maintain a parameter into the state local storage. This parameter is initially contained in the event that causes the transition to the target state. I give hereafter a small illustrative example. typename sc = boost::statechart; class EvTest : public sc::event<EvTest> { public: EvTest(std::size_t val) : value(val) {} std::size_t getValue() const { return this->value; } private: std::size_t value; }; class MyStateMachine; class StSource; class StTarget; class StSource : public sc::simple_state<StSource, MyStateMachine> { public: typedef sc::custom_reaction<EvTest> reactions; sc::result react(const EvTest &event) { // How to pass event.getValue() to the target state ? transit<StTarget>(); } }; class StTarget : public sc::simple_state<StTarget, MyStateMachine> { public: StTarget(std::size_t val) : val(value) {} private: std::size_t value; }; Thanks, Christophe

5 6

Some strange boost headers errors
by alfonso santimone 15 May '15

15 May '15

Hi guys, i'm a boost newbie. I've got to include boost libraries in the include path of a VisualStudio 2012 project. When i try to compile i have all these errors. Every errors is related to missing headers ( boost ones and even standard Win ones ) and to synthax errors depending on missing headers i guess. Do someone have any idea on what's wrong here? I just post here a few lines of errors, but the other ones are all of the same kind Error 1 error C2061: syntax error : identifier 'boost' C:\boost_1_57_0\boost\core\ checked_delete.hpp 24 1 csound~ Error 2 error C2059: syntax error : ';' C:\boost_1_57_0\boost\core\checked_delete.hpp 24 1 csound~ Error 3 error C2449: found '{' at file scope (missing function header?) C:\boost_1_57_0\boost\core\checked_delete.hpp 25 1 csound~ Error 4 error C2059: syntax error : '}' C:\boost_1_57_0\boost\core\checked_delete.hpp 67 1 csound~ Error 5 error C2054: expected '(' to follow 'using' C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 11.0\VC\include\cstddef 19 1 csound~ Error 6 error C2061: syntax error : identifier 'using' C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 11.0\VC\include\cstddef 19 1 csound~ Error 7 error C2061: syntax error : identifier 'boost' C:\boost_1_57_0\boost\smart_ptr\detail\sp_nullptr_t.hpp 23 1 csound~ Error 8 error C2059: syntax error : ';' C:\boost_1_57_0\boost\smart_ptr\detail\sp_nullptr_t.hpp 23 1 csound~ Error 9 error C2449: found '{' at file scope (missing function header?) C:\boost_1_57_0\boost\smart_ptr\detail\sp_nullptr_t.hpp 24 1 csound~ Error 10 error C2059: syntax error : '}' C:\boost_1_57_0\boost\smart_ptr\detail\sp_nullptr_t.hpp 41 1 csound~ Error 11 error C2054: expected '(' to follow 'using' C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 11.0\VC\include\cstdlib 19 1 csound~ Error 12 error C2061: syntax error : identifier 'using' C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 11.0\VC\include\cstdlib 19 1 csound~ Error 13 error C2061: syntax error : identifier 'abort' C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio many thanks in advance bests alfonso www.elgallorojorecords.com soundcloud.com/alfonsosantimone www.facebook.com/alfonsosantimone

5 11

Re: [Boost-users] lexical_cast between double and string slow in Visual Studio 2013
by David Roberts 07 May '15

07 May '15

> That issue is unknown. I'd really appreciate the investigation. I have done some more investigation, and there are two factors that only cause the slowness when they both occur together. > Try excluding the lexical_cast from test, I have a feeling that this is only MSVC related issue: > > #include <sstream> > #include <string> > > int main (int, char **) > { > for (double count = 0.0; count < 1000000.0; count += 1.41) > { > std::stringstream ss; > ss << count; > std::string result = std::move(ss.str()); > ss.str(std::string()); > > ss << result; > ss >> count; > } > > return 0; > } > Running your test program does not exhibit the problem. It runs in around 3 seconds on my machine when built with either Visual Studio 2010 or Visual Studio 2013. However, changing it very slightly to match more closely what lexical_cast does internally does recreate the problem: #include <sstream> #include <string> int main (int, char **) { for (double count = 0.0; count < 1000000.0; count += 1.41) { std::stringstream ss; ss.unsetf(std::ios::skipws); ss.precision(17); ss << count; std::string result = std::move(ss.str()); ss.str(std::string()); ss << result; ss >> count; } return 0; } The effect of setting the precision to 17 is that lots of 9s appear in the string representations. (The number 17 is what boost::detail::lcast_get_precision(double*) chooses.) Without the precision call the contents of the string called result start off like this: 0 1.41 2.82 4.23 5.64 7.05 8.46 9.87 11.28 12.69 With precision set to 17 they start off like this: 0 1.4099999999999999 2.8199999999999998 4.2299999999999995 5.6399999999999997 7.0499999999999998 8.4599999999999991 9.8699999999999992 11.279999999999999 12.69 This happens for both Visual Studio 2010 and Visual Studio 2013. Then the next difference is that Visual Studio 2013 spends a lot longer handling all the extra 9s. Changing the program so that the double is converted to a string using std::stringstream without a precision call and then back to double using lexical_cast takes about 3 seconds for both Visual Studio 2010 and Visual Studio 2013. It is the combination of having all the extra 9s to parse and using Visual Studio 2013 that makes the test using lexical_cast to go both ways slow. Both Visual Studio 2010 and Visual Studio 2013 do the conversion by calling std::num_get<char,std::istreambuf_iterator<char,std::char_traits<char> > >::do_get() which then calls a function called _Stodx() which is implemented in xstod.c. This function is very different for the two versions. In Visual Studio 2010 it's a relatively thin wrapper around the C function strtod(). In Visual Studio 2013 _Stodx() has got a completely new implementation that's generated by #including xxstod.h with some macros defined. The original C function strtod() is much faster than the new _Stodx() when there are lots of 9s at the end of the strings being parsed. This modification to the program: #include <sstream> #include <string> #include <stdlib.h> int main (int, char **) { for (double count = 0.0; count < 1000000.0; count += 1.41) { std::stringstream ss; ss.unsetf(std::ios::skipws); ss.precision(17); ss << count; std::string result = std::move(ss.str()); ss.str(std::string()); ss << result; char *endptr; count = strtod(ss.str().c_str(), &endptr); } return 0; } has a runtime of about 3 seconds even though it's got to cope with all the 9s. I guess only someone from Microsoft or Dinkumware could comment on why _Stodx() was reimplemented. But the other thing is that by setting precision to 17 lexical_cast is bloating the string representations of the doubles with lots of 9s in both Visual Studio 2010 and Visual Studio 2013. Setting precision to 15 instead prevents this, and makes the original test run faster even with Visual Studio 2013 (about 4 seconds rather than 10). Regards, David

5 4

[boost.geometry] buffer distance strategies
by gchlebus 09 Mar '15

09 Mar '15

Hi, I am wondering whether it would be possible to achieve anisotropic buffering (distances in neg x, pos x, neg y, pos y can have different values) of a polygon using the buffer function with custom-implemented distance strategy. What I want to achieve is presented on the figure 2-b in the following paper: http://itcnt05.itc.nl/agile_old/Conference/mallorca2002/proceedings/posters… I would be grateful to hear from you whether it is doable, and if positive, how one could implement such a custom distance strategy. Best, -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/boost-geometry-buffer-distance-strategie… Sent from the Boost - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

3 24

Statechart serialization
by mbrodeur65 04 Mar '15

04 Mar '15

Hi, I'm looking for a solution to serialize boost::statechart objects. I'm aware that this feature is on the statechart library todo list but was wondering if there are any workaround to achieve this with the latest boost release (1.34) ? thanks for your help ! mbrodeur65 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Statechart-serialization-tf4131326.html#a11749139 Sent from the Boost - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

4 4

[interprocess] Bizarro File Names (Windows)
by Aaron_Wright＠selinc.com 28 Jan '15

28 Jan '15

I have a service that is running in Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 that uses shared memory. It runs fine for a month or so, but then stops working correctly. When I check the C:\ProgramData\boost_interprocess\*\ folder, I get a bunch of weird file names, such as: 88C861CD6DE2CF01EBA2F0CC1200D001A4070000EBFFFFFF 88C861CD6DE2CF01EBA2F0CC1200D001A4070000ECFFFFFF 88C861CD6DE2CF01EBA2F0CC1200D001A4070000EDFFFFFF 88C861CD6DE2CF01EBA2F0CC1200D001A4070000EEFFFFFF 88C861CD6DE2CF01EBA2F0CC1200D001A4070000EFFFFFFF 88C861CD6DE2CF01EBA2F0CC1200D001A4070000F0FFFFFF 88C861CD6DE2CF01EBA2F0CC1200D001A4070000F1FFFFFF 88C861CD6DE2CF01EBA2F0CC1200D001A4070000F2FFFFFF 88C861CD6DE2CF014B04F3CC1200D001A40700000AFFFFFF 88C861CD6DE2CF014B04F3CC1200D001A40700000BFFFFFF 88C861CD6DE2CF014B04F3CC1200D001A40700000CFFFFFF 88C861CD6DE2CF014B04F3CC1200D001A40700000DFFFFFF ... (and so on) These are not even close to the names that are supposed to be used. They seem to increment a bit, then shift slightly, and start incrementing again. When I restart the service I get similar named files and patterns, and my services crashes because it can't grow shared memory (presumably because the file names are not correct). I have to restart the box in order to get the correct behavior. Has anyone seen this behavior before? --------------------------------------------------------- Aaron Wright

1 1

[multi state machine/ MSM] execute_queued_events
by Steve Hickman 26 Jan '15

26 Jan '15

In the MSM doc section "Enqueueing events for later processing", you state that "Calling execute_queued_events() will then process all enqueued events (in FIFO order)." You also said in a previous post that MSM is not thread safe, thus requiring an external mechanism to insure thread safety. I don't see a mechanism to execute a single event at a time, which would be preferable if I have to lock the queue while processing events. Having said that, a cursory examination of the "execute_queued_events" code makes me think it only processes one event per call. Which is correct? Is the documentation correct that it actually processes all queued events? If not, can the documentation be corrected? If so, is there a publicly usable call to process a single queued event? If there is no publicly available call for processing a single queued event, how do you recommend processing queued events in a thread safe manner that won't lock the queue for extended periods of time?

4 7

[endian] Boost.Endian library added for 1.57.0
by Beman Dawes 14 Dec '14

14 Dec '14

The library provides integer and floating point types and conversion functions for portable byte ordering regardless of processor endianness. Although the primary uses are for file or network I/O, it is also useful for unaligned integers or floats, or for 3, 5, 6, and 7 byte integers. The library's predecessors have been in use for thirty years and developed independently multiple times. The repository is https://github.com/boostorg/endian The documentation is online at https://boostorg.github.io/endian/ See https://boostorg.github.io/endian/index.html#Release-history for changes since the Formal Review. No need to report "Inspection Report" problems; those will be cleaned up before 1.57.0 ships. Please do report any other problems or concerns, since the time between now and when the 1.57.0 beta ships in effect acts a mini-review period. If anyone has access to a big-endian platform with a modern C++ compiler, please, please run the endian test suite and report the results. All testing and use in recent years has been on little-endian platforms, so big-endian platform testing is a worry. Thanks for you patience, --Beman

3 2