August 2010 - Boost-users - lists.preview.boost.org

[Serialization] Combination of templates and polymorphism
by Michal Gregor 27 Aug '10

27 Aug '10

I am writing serialization for a template library I created. The problem is that I cannot figure out how to serialize templates of polymorphic classes (combination of polymorphism and templates). Polymorphic classes generally need to be exported using BOOST_CLASS_EXPORT, which however takes in a complete type so this would require me to register all possible instantiations of the templates, which is not possible - I don't know beforehand what instantiations might the library user make (I would have to rely on the user of the library to do the work and there is no way the user will even know which template classes may be instantiated behind the scenes somewhere). What I would like is a mechanism that would automagically register the class upon instantiation. Any ideas? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/-Serialization--Combination-of-templates-and-polymorp… Sent from the Boost - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

1 0

How to disable warnings on gcc?
by Jean-Pierre Bergamin 27 Aug '10

27 Aug '10

Dear boost users On FreeBSD 8.1 with boost 1.43 and gcc 4.2.1 we have lots of warnings like: ... /usr/local/include/boost/type_traits/is_unsigned.hpp: In instantiation of 'boost::detail::is_ununsigned_helper<short int>': /usr/local/include/boost/type_traits/is_unsigned.hpp:73: instantiated from 'boost::detail::is_unsigned_imp<short int>' /usr/local/include/boost/type_traits/is_unsigned.hpp:123: instantiated from 'boost::is_unsigned<short int>' /usr/local/include/boost/type_traits/make_unsigned.hpp:110: instantiated from 'boost::detail::make_unsigned_imp<short int>' /usr/local/include/boost/type_traits/make_unsigned.hpp:130: instantiated from 'boost::make_unsigned<short int>' /usr/local/include/boost/lexical_cast.hpp:846: instantiated from here /usr/local/include/boost/type_traits/is_unsigned.hpp:40: warning: comparison between 'enum boost::detail::is_unsigned_values<short int>::<anonymous>' and 'enum boost::detail::is_unsigned_values<short int>::<anonymous>' ... Similar warnings about "comparison between ..." pop up in the serialization library as well. What is the easiest way to suppress these warnings? I tried using the switches "-Wno-sign-compare" and "-Wno-conversion", but the warnings don't go away. Thanks for your help James

2 4

[Serialization] Is there any documentation on make_nvp()?
by Robert Jones 27 Aug '10

27 Aug '10

If so, please point me to it. Thx - Rob.

2 2

Missing lib with Boost::Regex
by Emir D. 27 Aug '10

27 Aug '10

Hello everybody, I'm having some problems with using Boost's Regex in MS Visual Studio 2010. I've included the header file and downloaded the "bjam.exe" file, which I have run and it generated some lib and obj files. After including the newly generated files in VS2010, when I try to compile, I get the following: "fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file 'libboost_regex-vc100-mt-gd-1_43.lib' " I've inspected the bjam.exe generated files and it appears to have a lib file 'libboost_regex-vc100-mt-1_43.lib', but not 'libboost_regex-vc100-mt-gd-1_43.lib'. After doing some more googling, I have found a number of related questions, but failed to find an answer, although it seems to be a common problem. Can you please help me solve my problem? Thanks in advance, p.s. If i rename the lib file, it works, at least for now. However, it is a 'Release' version and therefore I can't using it in VS in debugging mode, meaning that I can only BatchBuild and create Release versions of my program, although I also need to create debug ones. p.s.s. My first Boost Mailing List post! p.s.s.s. I've just found out that VS10 has TR1 support, so I can TR1 Regex, which is Boost's Regex :) but I am still wondering how could of I solved the above stated problem? It's bound to happen with some other Boost library.

4 3

Boost test, segmentation fault.
by Matthijs Mohlmann 27 Aug '10

27 Aug '10

Hello all, First of all: I'm building an application and with that I use Boost test for unit testing. This helped me already to fix some obscure bugs. (I am very happy with boost test) I have the Master suite test setup in one file and the normal test suites each in one file. This worked very well. Now I have the following test suite which gives me a segmentation fault and I have no idea why: BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE(ProgramOptions) BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(ProgramOptions_Valid_Options) { // Output boost::test_tools::output_test_stream output("misc/ProgramOptions_01.output", true); // Save output buffer std::streambuf *strmbuffer; strmbuffer = std::cout.rdbuf(); // Redirect the output. std::cout.rdbuf(output.rdbuf()); // Redirect output stream so we can do some checks. printSomething(); BOOST_REQUIRE(output.match_pattern()); // Now lets process some arguments. printSomething(); BOOST_REQUIRE(output.match_pattern()); // Restore output buffer std::cout.rdbuf(strmbuffer); } BOOST_AUTO_TEST_SUITE_END() The function that gets tested: void printSomething() { std::cout << "Test output" << std::endl; } If I put the same content 'Test output' in the ProgramOptions_01.output file then everything is fine and executes ok. When putting different content in that file it goes wrong. I have also a gdb backtrace if that is interesting: (gdb) r Starting program: /home/matthijs/Projects/cppcms/trunk/cmsapp_test [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Running 10 test cases... Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0xb7f6f9e8 in vtable for boost::unit_test::progress_monitor_t () from /usr/lib/libboost_unit_test_framework.so.1.42.0 (gdb) bt full #0 0xb7f6f9e8 in vtable for boost::unit_test::progress_monitor_t () from /usr/lib/libboost_unit_test_framework.so.1.42.0 No symbol table info available. #1 0xb7e5b77f in std::ostream::flush() () from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 No symbol table info available. #2 0xb7f0a13d in boost::unit_test::output::compiler_log_formatter::log_finish(std::ostream&) () from /usr/lib/libboost_unit_test_framework.so.1.42.0 No symbol table info available. #3 0xb7f2e492 in boost::unit_test::unit_test_log_t::test_finish() () from /usr/lib/libboost_unit_test_framework.so.1.42.0 No symbol table info available. #4 0xb7f1a593 in boost::unit_test::framework::run(unsigned long, bool) () from /usr/lib/libboost_unit_test_framework.so.1.42.0 No symbol table info available. #5 0xb7f2f469 in boost::unit_test::unit_test_main(bool (*)(), int, char**) () from /usr/lib/libboost_unit_test_framework.so.1.42.0 No symbol table info available. #6 0x08062133 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbffff824) at /usr/include/boost/test/unit_test.hpp:59 No locals. Hopefully someone with some insight in boost.test can help me out here... Regards, Matthijs Möhlmann

2 2

[MPL] has_xxx always returns false!
by Eric 27 Aug '10

27 Aug '10

This code: BOOST_MPL_HAS_XXX_TRAIT_DEF(normal); template<class T, bool HasNormal> class getVertexHasNormal { public: static void getNormal(T &tv) {} }; template<class T> class getVertexHasNormal<T, true> // true case { public: static void getNormal(T &tv) { // do something } }; template<class VT> class A : public base { void doit(v) /* override */ { VT tv; getVertexHasNormal<VT, has_normal<VT>::value >::getNormal(tv); } } if I understand correctly, this code is suppose to do call a different "getNormal" method if the method "normal" exists (or not) in the template parameter class. Basically mimicking the infamous "__if_exists" macro on the Microsoft c++ compiler.... right? but, has_normal<VT> always return false (visual studio 2008) so we don't get the right expected behavior! Feel free to educate me.... thanks in advance. eric

5 6

[Serialization] Is this example legal usage of the serialization library
by Elizabeta 26 Aug '10

26 Aug '10

Hi, Is it ok to serialize/deserialize in the object I get when dereference a pointer ? void f() { B* bObj=new B(); /// save { std::ofstream ofs("C:\\hh.txt"); boost::archive::xml_oarchive oa(ofs); oa & make_nvp("bObj",*bObj); } //// Load { std::ifstream ifs("C:\\hh.txt"); boost::archive::xml_iarchive ia(ifs); ia & make_nvp("bObj",*bObj); } } My second question : Is it ok to serialize/deserialize in *this ? Thanks

3 3

[serialization] problem with custom archive type
by Kenneth Riddile 26 Aug '10

26 Aug '10

I have a custom input archive type that has worked fine when statically linked to the serialization library. I'm now must use serialization as a DLL and the code no longer compiles. This is under MSVC9 with BOOST_ALL_DYN_LINK defined. This code works fine on Linux/GCC with serialization built as a shared library...so the problem appears specific to Windows/MSVC. Here is a boiled down version of the code that exhibits the problem: // HEADER CONTENTS #include <boost/archive/xml_iarchive.hpp> class CustomArchive : public boost::archive::xml_iarchive_impl<CustomArchive> , public boost::archive::detail::shared_ptr_helper { public: CustomArchive( std::istream& is, int foo ) : boost::archive::xml_iarchive_impl<CustomArchive>( is, 0 ) , m_foo( foo ) { } int GetFoo() const { return m_foo; } template<class T> void load( T& t ) { boost::archive::xml_iarchive_impl<CustomArchive>::load( t ); } private: friend class boost::archive::xml_iarchive_impl<CustomArchive>; friend class boost::archive::basic_xml_iarchive<CustomArchive>; friend class boost::archive::load_access; int m_foo; }; // CPP CONTENTS #include <CustomArchive.hpp> #include <boost/archive/impl/basic_xml_iarchive.ipp> #include <boost/archive/impl/xml_iarchive_impl.ipp> #include <boost/archive/impl/archive_serializer_map.ipp> namespace boost { namespace archive { template class basic_xml_iarchive<CustomArchive>; template class xml_iarchive_impl<CustomArchive>; template class detail::archive_serializer_map<CustomArchive>; } } BOOST_SERIALIZATION_REGISTER_ARCHIVE( CustomArchive ) and here are the errors: 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/basic_xml_iarchive.ipp(41) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::basic_xml_iarchive<Archive>::load_start' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/basic_xml_iarchive.ipp(77) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::basic_xml_iarchive<Archive>::load_end' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/basic_xml_iarchive.ipp(83) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::basic_xml_iarchive<Archive>::load_override' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/basic_xml_iarchive.ipp(89) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::basic_xml_iarchive<Archive>::load_override' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/basic_xml_iarchive.ipp(95) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::basic_xml_iarchive<Archive>::load_override' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/basic_xml_iarchive.ipp(101) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::basic_xml_iarchive<Archive>::load_override' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/basic_xml_iarchive.ipp(108) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::basic_xml_iarchive<Archive>::basic_xml_iarchive' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/basic_xml_iarchive.ipp(111) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::basic_xml_iarchive<Archive>::~basic_xml_iarchive' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>Warning: This header is deprecated. Please use: boost/spirit/include/classic_rule.hpp 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/xml_iarchive_impl.ipp(83) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::xml_iarchive_impl<Archive>::load' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/xml_iarchive_impl.ipp(114) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::xml_iarchive_impl<Archive>::load' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/xml_iarchive_impl.ipp(127) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::xml_iarchive_impl<Archive>::load' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/xml_iarchive_impl.ipp(140) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::xml_iarchive_impl<Archive>::load' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/xml_iarchive_impl.ipp(153) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::xml_iarchive_impl<Archive>::load_override' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/xml_iarchive_impl.ipp(162) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::xml_iarchive_impl<Archive>::init' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/xml_iarchive_impl.ipp(189) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::xml_iarchive_impl<Archive>::xml_iarchive_impl' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/xml_iarchive_impl.ipp(202) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::xml_iarchive_impl<Archive>::~xml_iarchive_impl' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/archive_serializer_map.ipp(45) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::detail::archive_serializer_map<Archive>::insert' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/archive_serializer_map.ipp(57) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::detail::archive_serializer_map<Archive>::erase' : definition of dllimport function not allowed 1>C:\Boost\include\boost/archive/impl/archive_serializer_map.ipp(67) : error C2491: 'boost::archive::detail::archive_serializer_map<Archive>::find' : definition of dllimport function not allowed

2 4

[interprocess] Checking for existence Named Mutex
by Brian Davis 26 Aug '10

26 Aug '10

How do I check for the existence of a named resource in using boost interprocess without wrapping a open_only in a try catch block and waiting for the exception? Also are there calls for launching a process such as std::system that are nonblocking in Windows using the _spawnlp and friends calls?

3 5

Boost's additional test compilers - test results available?
by Jon Payne 26 Aug '10

26 Aug '10

Hi all, In the boost release notes (I was looked at 1.44) there is a section listing the "additional test compilers" - I use Borland/Codegear C++ 2010. Presumably this means the tests are run on those compilers? If so, are the results available anywhere? Thanks, Jon

1 0