February 2006 - Boost-users - lists.preview.boost.org

Binding to a static member function?
by Stephen Gross 03 Feb '06

03 Feb '06

I'm trying to figure out the correct syntax for boost::bind-ing a static member function with some arguments preset. For example: ============================ struct Foo { static double go(int x, int y) { return x + y; } } typedef ... functortype; functortype f = boost::bind(&Foo::go, _1, boost::constant(3)); f(3); ============================ The actual code I have is a little different; I've simplified it as the above example. At compile time, the compiler complains that it can't find a matching call for 'f(3)'. Any ideas? I can post the complete example, obviously, if that's necessary. Is my syntax for the bind statement correct? Thanks in advance, --Steve Stephen Gross Case Western School of Medicine Cleveland, OH "By Grabthar's hammer, by the sons of Worvan, you shall be avenged." - Dr. Lazarus

2 1

installation and test...
by Alain Cormier 03 Feb '06

03 Feb '06

Hello group, I am using VS6 on Windows2000 and soon .NET2005. So we are planning to migrate to boost 1.33.1 first with VS6 and move all our application to VS8 (including boost). So, I am in the process of writing an installation / migration procedure of boost for our "3rd party manager". In summary, I want to do : 1- build boost with the right toolset 2- build regression tool 3- run regression tests of boost 4- validate regression result with boost specification from http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost.aspx 5- integrate the newly compiled boost in our application 6- correct compilation error if any change where made in the public interface 7- run our application regression test 8- submit to our version control system I am having hard time to do all this :) So : 1- I want to know your opinion about this. Does it seems like a good practice? 2- I am unable to build the regression tools with VS6. Is It normal? Am I missing something? 3- I am unable to find a boost 1.33.1 regression test. Only Head, 1.33.0 or before? 4- Does the result on my PC should be the same then the one posted on boost site? It seems like it might be different. By analysing http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/1_33_0/developer/summary.… discovered that for the same toolset we can have different results (goncalo-vc8 and RudbekAssociates have different results for vc-8_0 toolset) It is normal? Thank you for any feedback, help or comments. <http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/1_33_0/RudbekAssociates.h…> Alain

2 1

<smart_ptr> scoped_ptr with a Deleter
by Guy Peleg 03 Feb '06

03 Feb '06

Hi, How come scoped_ptr can't work with a special 'deleter' as shared_ptr? Thanks Guy __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

4 3

Decompression Problem
by Robert Vinluan 03 Feb '06

03 Feb '06

Hi All, I'm trying to decompress only a fragment of an input stream. I tried using boost::iostreams::copy() by passing in a value for the buffer_size parameter. Here's a code example of what I was trying to do: filtering_stream<input> in; in.push(gzip_decompressor()); // 'istr' is an istrstream holding the compressed data. in.push(istr); // I was hoping this would copy only the first 4 decompressed bytes!! boost::iostreams::copy(in, cout, 4); However, when I execute this, the copy() algorithm copies all decompressed data, ignoring my 'value' of 4. Perhaps I've misread the documentation? Anyway, I'm not sure if this is the correct approach to solve the problem, or even if there is a solution using boost. Any suggestions would be helpful. Thanks in advance, Rob P.S. I'm a newbie, so please let me know if this isn't the correct place to post this message.

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] [boost][serialization] How to implementserializationclasses in two DLLs
by Marc Viala 03 Feb '06

03 Feb '06

Robert wrote: > Truth is I havn't gotten to it. Sorry. Its a very tricky area. One thing > you might want to look at is the test which shows separate compilation. > This avoids having the "same" code in both the executable and the dll which > might help. > > Robert Ramey Hi Robert, Maybe you've missed my previous reply, see @ Thu, 2 Feb 2006. So I re-post it Thanks to handle my request; I've looked the source directory "test" and "examples" of boost::serialization ver#1.33.1 and I didn't find the test that you've pointed in your reply. What's the name of the test demonstrating separate compilation? Do you have tested my source code sends with my previous post? Marc Viala mailto:mviala@acticm.com <mailto:mviala@acticm.com> _____ #include <LibA/A.h> #include <LibB/B.h> #include <boost/filesystem/path.hpp> #include <boost/filesystem/fstream.hpp> #pragma comment(lib, "liba_d.lib") #pragma comment(lib, "libb_d.lib") int main(int argc, char* argv[]) { libA::A a; libA::save(&a, boost::filesystem::ofstream("a.xml")); libB::B b; libB::save(&b, boost::filesystem::ofstream("b.xml")); // -> Assert in debug mode return 0; } ---------------------- The figure hereafter describes the relationships between LibA, LibB and EXE application: ------------ ------------ | LibA | | LibB | ------------ ------------ \ / \ / Exe Application We have to face to an assert in debug mode generate by the file boost::serialization::extended_type_info.cpp, line#71. This assert happens during the instance serialization of class libB:B. Recently, there are some posts on this subject, but I would like to known how I can deal with this assert? Is it possible to avoid it by a code organisation? Is it possible to comment this assert? To have a concrete answer, I have joined my complete VC++7.1 project. Thanks in advance for your help. Development Platform WindowsXP VC++ 7.1 Boost 1.33.1

1 0

RE: [Boost-users] Björn Karlsson's Boost Book
by Bjorn.Karlsson＠readsoft.com 03 Feb '06

03 Feb '06

Hello, I just want to say thanks to all of you supporting my Boost book. > From: James Hughes [mailto:JHughes@Linx.co.uk] > Subject: RE: [Boost-users] BjÃ¶rn Karlsson's Boost Book > > I agree. I have the book and it has been very useful > (although I have not > used Boost in anger just yet as project is only just > starting). He really > needs to do another book that covers the rest of the library! James, Writing a book is a huge undertaking, and it's readers' testimonies of usefulness that make it worthwhile. Thanks. Regarding another Boost book, I do have a book on the STL algorithms to write first. After that, who knows... > > From: John Maddock [mailto:john@johnmaddock.co.uk] > > > > Absolutely, actually it's a very good book IMO (and not just > > because I proofread some of the chapters!). John, I believe that the fantastic help I received from you and other brilliant Boosters was key in striking the balance between technical detail and user-level topics. So, your proofreading definitely made the book much better. Cheers, Bjorn

1 0

boost::pp application
by Marco Correia 03 Feb '06

03 Feb '06

hi, I would like to ask if there is a way boost::preprocessor may be used to solve the following problem: The problem is to define a macro that expands to the concatenation of their arguments, without duplicates. The arguments are symbols belonging to a known alphabet. For example, one possible solution for a macro which can take 3 symbols from the alphabet (A,B,C), would be #define RemoveDuplicates(S1,S2,S3) S1 ## S2 ## S3 #define AAA A #define AAB AB #define ABA AB #define ABB AB #define BAA AB #define BAB AB #define BBA AB #define BBB B In my real problem I have an alphabet of 10 symbols, which would be solved similarly with 10^10 #defines instructions, which is too much for the c++ preprocessor. So finally, is there any way boost::preprocessor can help me on this? And also, is there any paper or other document explaining how does boost::preprocessor works inside ? thanks Marco -- Marco Correia <mvc(a)netcabo.pt>

1 0

[serialization] STATIC_ASSERTION_FAILURE on archive load
by cheesy4poofs 03 Feb '06

03 Feb '06

I've read over the compile time trap section of the docs, but I still can't get my serialization code to compile. The code to save my std::map compiles, but the code to load the map asserts on the compile. As far as I can tell, I'm not doing anything wrong (save with const ref, load with non-const ref). I will try to summarize my serialization code below: #include <boost/archive/text_oarchive.hpp> #include <boost/archive/text_iarchive.hpp> #include <boost/serialization/map.hpp> #include <boost/serialization/access.hpp> struct DLL_EXPORT Node { friend class boost::serialization::access; unsigned int handle; // handle of current object std::string name; // name of object std::string value; // optional value of object template <typename Archive> void serialize(Archive& ar, const unsigned int version) { ar & handle; ar & name; ar & value; } }; class DLL_EXPORT Manager { // manager node adds a few extra things used in management of each object struct ManagerNode : public Node { friend class boost::serialization::access; private: template <typename Archive> void serialize(Archive& ar, const unsigned int version) { // serialize base class information ar & boost::serialization::base_object <Node> (*this); } }; NodeMap * _nodes; // this method compiles fine void save(const std::string & filename) { std::ofstream outFile; outFile.open(filename.c_str(), std::ios::binary); boost::archive::text_oarchive archiveFile(outFile); const NodeMap * const n = _nodes; archiveFile << *n; } // fails on compile with STATIC_ASSERTION_FAILURE void load(const std::string & filename) { std::ifstream inFile; inFile.open(filename.c_str(), std::ios::binary); boost::archive::text_iarchive archiveFile(inFile); _nodes->clear(); archiveFile >> *_nodes; } }; This is on Windows XP using Visual Studio 7.1. The errors start like this: ..\API\inc\boost\archive\detail\iserializer.hpp(557) : error C2027: use of undefined type 'boost::STATIC_ASSERTION_FAILURE<x>' with [ x=false ] ..\API\inc\boost\archive\detail\iserializer.hpp(557) : see reference to class template instantiation 'boost::STATIC_ASSERTION_FAILURE<x>' being compiled with [ x=false ] ..\API\inc\boost\archive\basic_text_iarchive.hpp(64) : see reference to function template instantiation 'void boost::archive::load<Archive,T>(Archive &,T &)' being compiled with [ Archive=boost::archive::text_iarchive, T=const unsigned int ] ..\API\inc\boost\archive\text_iarchive.hpp(64) : see reference to function template instantiation 'void boost::archive::basic_text_iarchive<Archive>::load_override<T>(T &,int)' being compiled ** snipped for brevity ** Any help would be greatly appreciated. Scott

2 1

Compilation problems from a ublas newbie
by Pete Masterson 03 Feb '06

03 Feb '06

Hi all, I tried to compile the 2D point morph example from http://elonen.iki.fi/code/tpsdemo/2d-morph.cpp and http://elonen.iki.fi/code/tpsdemo/ludecomposition.h with the latest Boost 1.33.1 but I come across two errors. These seem to be related to the use of iterators with ublas::matrix_row and ublas::matrix_column. As a Boost newbie, the errors are not at all intuitive to me, however. I assume that the code above was generated for an older version of Boost and fails to compile now. I would be deeply grateful if you could consider taking a look at the attached the compiler output in the out.txt file. I appreciate your help very much. Regards, Peter __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com Compiling... 2d-morph.cpp .\2d-morph.cpp(93) : warning C4267: 'initializing' : conversion from 'size_t' to 'unsigned int', possible loss of data .\2d-morph.cpp(191) : warning C4267: 'initializing' : conversion from 'size_t' to 'const unsigned int', possible loss of data .\2d-morph.cpp(223) : warning C4267: 'initializing' : conversion from 'size_t' to 'const unsigned int', possible loss of data C:\Tools\Boost\include\boost-1_33_1\boost/numeric/ublas/traits.hpp(42) : warning C4267: 'argument' : conversion from 'size_t' to 'const unsigned int', possible loss of data C:\Tools\Boost\include\boost-1_33_1\boost/numeric/ublas/matrix_expression.hpp(4033) : see reference to class template instantiation 'boost::numeric::ublas::promote_traits<X,Y>' being compiled with [ X=__w64 unsigned int, Y=__w64 unsigned int ] .\2d-morph.cpp(230) : see reference to class template instantiation 'boost::numeric::ublas::matrix_matrix_binary<E1,E2,F>' being compiled with [ E1=boost::numeric::ublas::matrix_unary2<boost::numeric::ublas::matrix_range<Matrix>,boost::numeric::ublas::scalar_identity<double>>, E2=boost::numeric::ublas::matrix_range<Matrix>, F=boost::numeric::ublas::matrix_matrix_prod<double,double,double> ] C:\Tools\Boost\include\boost-1_33_1\boost/numeric/ublas/traits.hpp(42) : warning C4244: 'argument' : conversion from '__w64 int' to 'const int', possible loss of data C:\Tools\Boost\include\boost-1_33_1\boost/numeric/ublas/matrix_expression.hpp(4034) : see reference to class template instantiation 'boost::numeric::ublas::promote_traits<X,Y>' being compiled with [ X=__w64 int, Y=__w64 int ] C:\Tools\Boost\include\boost-1_33_1\boost/numeric/ublas/matrix_proxy.hpp(707) : error C2064: term does not evaluate to a function taking 0 arguments C:\Tools\Boost\include\boost-1_33_1\boost/numeric/ublas/matrix_proxy.hpp(706) : while compiling class template member function 'boost::numeric::ublas::matrix_column<M>::const_iterator::const_iterator(const std::iterator<_Category,_Ty> &)' with [ M=Matrix, _Category=boost::numeric::ublas::dense_random_access_iterator_tag, _Ty=double ] .\2d-morph.cpp(202) : see reference to class template instantiation 'boost::numeric::ublas::matrix_column<M>::const_iterator' being compiled with [ M=Matrix ] C:\Tools\Boost\include\boost-1_33_1\boost/numeric/ublas/matrix_proxy.hpp(707) : error C2039: 'it_' : is not a member of 'std::iterator<_Category,_Ty>' with [ _Category=boost::numeric::ublas::dense_random_access_iterator_tag, _Ty=double ] shapematch - 2 error(s), 5 warning(s)

1 0

Re: [Boost-users] Boost.MultiArray bounds checking
by Sohail Somani 02 Feb '06

02 Feb '06

> Ronald Garcia wrote: > > Hi Frank, > > > > There are no plans to add an at() member function. However, I have > > considered adding bounds checking to MultiArray operator[] > as a debug > > mode option. > > What consideration are you making? Some lone time ago I added that > boost::array. Can it hurt to add it? As a user of multi array, I would like to have bounds checking for [] if NDEBUG is not defined (or something similar). It helps a lot while debugging. An assertion would be best. Sohail

1 0