- Boost-announce - lists.preview.boost.org

[locale] Formal review of Boost.Locale library EXTENDED
by Chad Nelson 15 Apr '11

15 Apr '11

There have been only a handful of reviews of the proposed Boost.Locale library to date, and several people have requested more time to provide theirs, so the formal review of the Boost.Locale library has been extended. The deadline for reviews is now 11:59pm UTC on Friday, April 22nd. For those in the Western hemisphere, remember that that's earlier than it might seem -- 7:59pm in New York, 4:59 in Los Angeles. I'll accept late reviews until I complete the report on Saturday morning, but please try to get yours in earlier. You can find the "boost_locale_for_review" version here: https://sourceforge.net/projects/cppcms/files/boost_locale/ The HTML documentation can also be seen at: http://cppcms.sourceforge.net/boost_locale/html/index.html Writing a review ================ If you feel this is an interesting library, then please submit your review to the developer list (preferably), or to the review manager (me). Here are some questions you might want to answer in your review: - What is your evaluation of the design? - What is your evaluation of the implementation? - What is your evaluation of the documentation? - What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the library? - Did you try to use the library? With what compiler? Did you have any problems? - How much effort did you put into your evaluation? A glance? A quick reading? In-depth study? - Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain? And finally, every review should answer this question: - Do you think the library should be accepted as a Boost library? Be sure to say this explicitly so that your other comments don't obscure your overall opinion. -- Chad Nelson Oak Circle Software, Inc. * * *

1 0

[locale] Formal review of Boost.Locale library EXTENDED
by Chad Nelson 15 Apr '11

15 Apr '11

There have been only a handful of reviews of the proposed Boost.Locale library to date, and several people have requested more time to provide theirs, so the formal review of the Boost.Locale library has been extended. The deadline for reviews is now 11:59pm UTC on Friday, April 22nd. For those in the Western hemisphere, remember that that's earlier than it might seem -- 7:59pm in New York, 4:59 in Los Angeles. I'll accept late reviews until I complete the report on Saturday morning, but please try to get yours in earlier. Writing a review ================ If you feel this is an interesting library, then please submit your review to the developer list (preferably), or to the review manager (me). Here are some questions you might want to answer in your review: - - What is your evaluation of the design? - - What is your evaluation of the implementation? - - What is your evaluation of the documentation? - - What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the library? - - Did you try to use the library? With what compiler? Did you have any problems? - - How much effort did you put into your evaluation? A glance? A quick reading? In-depth study? - - Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain? And finally, every review should answer this question: - - Do you think the library should be accepted as a Boost library? Be sure to say this explicitly so that your other comments don't obscure your overall opinion. - -- Chad Nelson Oak Circle Software, Inc. * * *

1 0

[locale] Formal review of Boost.Local library -- need reviews!
by Chad Nelson 14 Apr '11

14 Apr '11

The final day of the Boost.Locale formal review is scheduled to be Saturday, and though there has been a lot of discussion, so far only one complete review has been submitted. If you're planning to review it, please don't delay. Writing a review ================ If you feel this is an interesting library, then please submit your review to the developer list (preferably), or to the review manager (me). Here are some questions you might want to answer in your review: - What is your evaluation of the design? - What is your evaluation of the implementation? - What is your evaluation of the documentation? - What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the library? - Did you try to use the library? With what compiler? Did you have any problems? - How much effort did you put into your evaluation? A glance? A quick reading? In-depth study? - Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain? And finally, every review should answer this question: - Do you think the library should be accepted as a Boost library? Be sure to say this explicitly so that your other comments don't obscure your overall opinion. -- Chad Nelson Oak Circle Software, Inc. * * *

1 0

[locale] Formal review of Boost.Locale library starts tomorrow
by Chad Nelson 06 Apr '11

06 Apr '11

The formal review of the Boost.Locale library by Artyom Beilis starts tomorrow, April 7th, and is scheduled to last through April 16th. *************** * Its Purpose * *************** Boost.Locale provides thorough localization features to C++ programs by way of std::locale facets. Excerpted from the introduction: C++ offers a very good base for localization via the existing C++ locale facets [...] But these are very limited and sometimes buggy by design. Support for localization varies [...], and there are frequently incompatibilities between them. On the other hand, there is a great, well debugged, high quality, widely used ICU library that gives all of the goodies. But it has a very dated API that mimics Java behavior, completely ignores the STL, and provides a useful API only for UTF-16 encoded text, ignoring other popular Unicode encodings like UTF-8 and UTF-32 and limited but still popular national character sets like Latin1. Boost.Locale provides the natural glue between the C++ locales framework, iostreams, and the powerful ICU library. Although it can use the ICU library, it supports several other processing options as well. ******************* * Where to get it * ******************* You can find the "boost_locale_for_review" version here: https://sourceforge.net/projects/cppcms/files/boost_locale/ The HTML documentation can also be seen at: http://cppcms.sourceforge.net/boost_locale/html/index.html ******************** * Writing a review * ******************** The reviews and all comments should be submitted to the developers list, and the email should have "[locale]" at the beginning of the subject line to make sure it's not missed. Please explicitly state in your review whether the library should be accepted. The general review checklist: - What is your evaluation of the design? - What is your evaluation of the implementation? - What is your evaluation of the documentation? - What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the library? - Did you try to use the library? With what compiler? Did you have any problems? - How much effort did you put into your evaluation? A glance? A quick reading? In-depth study? - Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain? -- Chad Nelson Oak Circle Software, Inc. * * *

1 0

[Review] Type Traits Extension by Frederic Bron - Review summary and decision
by Joel Falcou 26 Mar '11

26 Mar '11

Hello all, Frederic Bron's type traits extension proposal review ended up last week. In so far, we received SEVEN reviews which are all voting YES for the inclusion of Type Traits extension in Boost. So the result is that the Type Traits Extension is ACCEPTED into Boost. Suggestions include: - some clean-up in the implementation like "Renam[ing] the detail classes inside the specific namespace without using number, i.e. with a clear meaning. The use of tag, tag 2 could be renamed check_pass, check_fail or something like that." - Sensibility on cv-ref qualifiers in traits call is important. This is being addressed by Frederic. - Frederic is OK to keep the detection of void as a valid return type by using some dont_check type as default. - small comprehensive example of some of the traits like a "maybe_print function, which prints a value if the appropriate operator<< ostream overload exists, else prints "<NOT PRINTABLE>". [...] a small example like this would show a practical use of the library, and how to make use of enable_if, or some other overload method." - The main recurring suggestions found was the choice of name for the operator traits with respect to the standard naming, naming in proto and other boost libraries. This topic is still hot and alive. An alternative to the naming scheme consensus was proposed in the form of alias of commonly used operator traits. This issue is I think beyond bikeshed-color argumentation and I think it is a good point if Frederic could step up and provide a definite and rationalized answer to this point. The current status is : * the namespace options is out casue the standard didnt choose this way; * Frederic and a few other seems to favor the proto naming scheme (more or less the negate issue and the pre/post operator) * the question of a common prefix is still open * the std:: like naming seems limited as not all operators are there. Thanks to all reviewers and people participating to the discussions. Thanks to Frederic for his work.

1 0

[Boost-users] [context review] Review starts today, Mars 21st 2011
by Vicente BOTET 21 Mar '11

21 Mar '11

Hi all, The review of Oliver Kowalke Context library starts today Mars 21st 2011, and will end on Mars 30th. Boost.Context is a basic building block library that is used for more higher abstractions. It is used by Boost.Fiber, Boost.Tasklet and Boost.Task from the same author. I really hope to see your vote and your participation in the discussions on the Boost DEVELOPMENT mailing lists! WARNING !!!!!!!!!!!!! Only on the Boost DEVELOPMENT mailing lists Please use [context review] as prefix of your post to make easier the review follow up. You can download a frozen version for the review from the Vault, TinyURL: http://tinyurl.com/5r77rel or The documentation is available directly here: http://ok73.ok.funpic.de/boost/libs/context/doc/html/ --------------------------------------------------- About the library: Boost.Context provides a possibility to switch between different user-level context and is intended to be the basis for a higher abstraction like coroutine and fiber. A user-level context represents the current execution state, including all registers and CPU flags, the instruction pointer, the stack pointer. boost::context encapsulates such a user-level context and is able to store/restore its associated user-level context. This allows multiple execution paths running on a single thread using a sort of cooperative scheduling (in contrast a thread is preemptively scheduled) - the running boost::context decides explicitly when its yields to allow another boost::context to run (user-level context switching). A context can only run on a single thread at any point in time but may be migrated between thread. A context switch between threads costs usually thousands of CPU cycles on x86 compared to a user-level context switch with few hundreds of cycles. Boost.Context differes to setjmp()/longjmp() in the fact that the C99 standard does not require that longjmp() preserves the current stack frame, e. g. jumping into a function which was exited via a call to longjmp() is undefined. Boost.Context allows to select the mechanism provided by the operating system (ucontext on UNIX, Windows Fibers on Windows) or a faster implementation provided by this library (fcontext using assembler). --------------------------------------------------- Please always state in your review, whether you think the library should be accepted as a Boost library! Additionally please consider giving feedback on the following general topics: - What is your evaluation of the design? - What is your evaluation of the implementation? - What is your evaluation of the documentation? - What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the library? - Did you try to use the library? With what compiler? Did you have any problems? - How much effort did you put into your evaluation? A glance? A quick reading? In-depth study? - Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain? Have a good review, Vicente Review Manager _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users(a)lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

1 0

[Review] Type Traits Extension ending tomorrow
by Joel Falcou 17 Mar '11

17 Mar '11

Dear All, The fast track review of Frédéric Bron's extensions to the Type Traits Library is ending tomorrow. If you plan to submit a review, please do so as soon as possible. Thanks in advance to all participants of the review. =========== What is it? =========== This extension adds 37 new traits corresponding to the following 37 operators: - binary: ==, !=,<,<=,>,>=, , +, -, *, /, %, +=, -=, *=, /=, %=, , &&, ||, ,&, |, ^,<<,>>,&=, |=, ^=,<<=,>>= - prefix: ++, --, +, -, !, ~, * - postfix: ++, -- Each trait can detect if the operator can be used with particular types and if needed, if the return type is convertible to some type. =================== Getting the library =================== The latest version can be downloaded by different ways: - from the vault with unix line ending: http://www.boostpro.com/vault/index.php?action=downloadfile&filename=type_t… - from the vault with dos line ending: http://www.boostpro.com/vault/index.php?action=downloadfile&filename=type_t… - from the sandbox:http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/sandbox/type_traits/ The entry point of the documentation is type_traits/libs/type_traits/doc/html/boost_typetraits/category/value_traits/operators.html The library has been tested with: - MSVC 8, 9, 10 on Windows, - g++ 4.4.5 on Linux, - intel 10.0 and 11.1 on Linux. To test the library, the simplest is to untar the headers in your boost include directory. For this, you can download the header part of the extension: - from the vault with unix line ending: http://www.boostpro.com/vault/index.php?action=downloadfile&filename=type_t… - from the vault with dos line ending: http://www.boostpro.com/vault/index.php?action=downloadfile&filename=type_t…

1 0

[Review] Boost.Type Traits Extension by Frederic Bron
by Joel Falcou 14 Mar '11

14 Mar '11

Dear All, This is the first day of the fast track review of Frédéric Bron's extensions to the Type Traits Library.This reviews will last until March 18th, 2011 under my management. All comments and reviews are very welcome. =========== What is it? =========== This extension adds 37 new traits corresponding to the following 37 operators: - binary: ==, !=,<,<=,>,>=, , +, -, *, /, %, +=, -=, *=, /=, %=, , &&, ||, ,&, |, ^,<<,>>,&=, |=, ^=,<<=,>>= - prefix: ++, --, +, -, !, ~, * - postfix: ++, -- Each trait can detect if the operator can be used with particular types and if needed, if the return type is convertible to some type. =================== Getting the library =================== The latest version can be downloaded by different ways: - from the vault with unix line ending: http://www.boostpro.com/vault/index.php?action=downloadfile&filename=type_t… - from the vault with dos line ending: http://www.boostpro.com/vault/index.php?action=downloadfile&filename=type_t… - from the sandbox:http://svn.boost.org/svn/boost/sandbox/type_traits/ The entry point of the documentation is type_traits/libs/type_traits/doc/html/boost_typetraits/category/value_traits/operators.html The library has been tested with: - MSVC 8, 9, 10 on Windows, - g++ 4.4.5 on Linux, - intel 10.0 and 11.1 on Linux. To test the library, the simplest is to untar the headers in your boost include directory. For this, you can download the header part of the extension: - from the vault with unix line ending: http://www.boostpro.com/vault/index.php?action=downloadfile&filename=type_t… - from the vault with dos line ending: http://www.boostpro.com/vault/index.php?action=downloadfile&filename=type_t…

1 0

[1.46.1] Boost 1.46.1 Release available
by Beman Dawes 12 Mar '11

12 Mar '11

Release 1.46.1 of the Boost C++ Libraries is now available. These open-source libraries work well with the C++ Standard Library, and are usable across a broad spectrum of applications. The Boost license encourages both commercial and non-commercial use. This is a bug fix release that is otherwise the same as 1.46.0. For details, including download links, see http://www.boost.org/users/news/version_1_46_1 The release can also be downloaded directly from SourceForge. See http://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/ To install this release on your system, see http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/release/more/getting_started/index.html Thanks, --The Boost release team Beman Dawes Daniel James Eric Niebler Rene Rivera Vladimir Prus

1 0

[Review] Phoenix V3: review results
by Hartmut Kaiser 09 Mar '11

09 Mar '11

All, The review of Phoenix V3 ended on March 2nd. We've got quite some discussion, even if we hoped for more. Overall, 3 people have confirmed that the Phoenix rewrite addresses all issues raised during the original review back in 2008. Nobody raised any concerns or serious issues. So here is the result of the mini-review: Boost.Phoenix is ready to be moved to the Boost SVN trunk! All other discussions were about minor inconsistencies, which Thomas has already fixed by now. There are a couple of suggestions related to the documentation, which he agreed to address as soon as possible: 1) The Phoenix documentation should have a "What's New" section 2) Compile time is often a concern with libraries that make heavy use of expression templates. Adding a compile time test would be ideal. This should be easily invoked and results from various compilers reported within the documentation. The only thing, which needs to be decided (and which has not been discussed yet) is how the migration from Boost.Bind, Boost.Lambda, and Phoenix V2 has to be organized, ensuring minimal disruption for the users of those libraries. I see several possible ways of doing so, but would like to open up the discussion. Any suggestions and comments are welcome. With high likelihood this migration process will be implemented using forwarding headers. Therefore, this point has not to be resolved before moving the main code base to trunk. On the other hand, this migration strategy needs to be in place before merging to the release branch. -------------------- This mini-review wraps up the review process of Boost.Phoenix. Congratulations to Thomas for this version of the excellent library, which will contribute to the unification of the functional landscape in Boost. At the same time I would like to mention a couple of names which are related to the development of Phoenix since its inception, and without those Boost.Phoenix wouldn't have happened. - Joel de Guzman, who wrote the initial V1 and since then was actively involved and driving the development of Boost.Phoenix - Dan Marsden, who is the main developer (with Joel) of Phoenix V2 - Angus Leeming and Daniel Wallin who contributed to V2 - Eric Niebler, the author of Boost.Proto, who contributed to V2 and was actively driving and supporting the development of V3, he also mentored Thomas Heller's GSoC project. Regards Hartmut Review Manager --------------- http://boost-spirit.com

1 0